MMR gene patterns evaluation provides novel insights for personalized immunotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinama.

BACKGROUND: The association involving mismatch repair (MMR) genes, molecular subtype and specific immune cell group in tumor microenvironment has been focused by more recent studies. Its prognosis value in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains elusive. METHODS: The correlation between the MMR gene patterns and the immune landscape were comprehensively evaluated. The MMRScore was calculated using principal component analysis (PCA) after grouping using R/mclust package. The prognostic significance of the MMRScore was evaluated by Kaplan-merrier analysis. Then a cohort of 103 Chinese LUAD patients was collected for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prognosis evaluation and validation using MMRScore. RESULTS: Four MMRclusters (mc1, 2, 3, 4)-characterized by differences in extent of aneuploidy, expression of immunomodulatory (IM) genes, mRNA expression, lncRNA expression and prognosis were identified. We established MMRscore to quantify the MMR pattern of individual LUAD patients. As is shown in further analyses, the MMRscore was a potential independent prognostic factor of LUAD. Finally, the prognostic value of the MMRscore and its association with tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of LUAD were verified in Chinese LUAD cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the correlation between MMR gene pattern, the CNV and tumor immune landscape in LUAD. A MMRcluster mc2 with high MMRscore, high TMB and high CNV subtype was identified with poor prognosis and infiltrating immunocyte. The comprehensive evaluation of MMR patterns in individual LUAD patients enhances the understanding of TIME and gives a new insight toward improved immune treatment strategies for LUAD patients compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Driver-Gene-Negative Advanced NSCLC.

Outcome improvement in patients with driver-gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been significantly enhanced through targeting the immune system, specifically the PD-L1/PD-1 axis. Nevertheless, only a subset of patients with advanced NSCLC may derive benefits from immuno-monotherapy or immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. Hence, in order to identify patients who will gain the maximum advantage from immunotherapy, it is crucial to investigate predictive biomarkers. This review provides a summary of the currently identified biomarkers associated with the extent of benefit from immuno-monotherapy or immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. These biomarkers can be categorized into three groups: tumor-related, tumor-microenvironment-related, and host-factor-related.Tumor-related factors include PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden and specific genetic mutations, while tumor-microenvironment-related factors include extracellular vesicles and T-cell receptors, and host-related factors include systemic inflammation, circulating fatty acid profile, and the microbiome.

Pyrotinib combined with apatinib for targeting metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with HER2 alterations: a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study (PATHER2).

BACKGROUND: Although targeted agents have been gradually applied in the treatment of HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, patients' therapeutic demands are far from being met. PATHER2 was the first phase 2 trial to explore the efficacy and safety of the HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pyrotinib plus the antiangiogenic agent apatinib in previously treated HER2-altered metastatic NSCLC patients. METHODS: HER2-mutated or HER2-amplified metastatic NSCLC patients who had failed at least first-line chemotherapy or HER2-targeted TKIs received oral pyrotinib 400 mg plus apatinib 250 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Between March 2019 and December 2020, 33 patients were enrolled; 13 (39.4%) presented brain metastases, and 16 (48.5%) had received at least two lines of prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted TKIs. As of September 20, 2021, the median follow-up duration was 11.3 (range, 3.5-26.0) months. The investigator-assessed ORR was 51.5% (17/33; 95% CI, 33.5 to 69.2%), and the disease control rate was 93.9% (31/33; 95% CI, 79.8 to 99.3%). The median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 6.0 (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.6) months, 6.9 (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.5) months, and 14.8 (95% CI, 10.4 to 23.8) months, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea (3.0%) and hypertension (9.1%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Pyrotinib plus apatinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in HER2-mutated or HER2-amplified metastatic NSCLC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900021684 .

Optimized dose selective HDAC inhibitor tucidinostat overcomes anti-PD-L1 antibody resistance in experimental solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have influenced the treatment paradigm for multiple solid tumors, increasing evidence suggests that primary and adaptive resistance may limit the long-term efficacy of ICIs. New therapeutic strategies with other drug combinations are hence warranted to enhance the antitumor efficacy of ICIs. As a novel tumor suppressor, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor tucidinostat has been successfully confirmed to act against hematological malignancies. However, the underlying mechanisms of action for tucidinostat and whether it can manipulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors remain unclear. METHODS: Three murine tumor models (4T1, LLC, and CT26) were developed to define the significant role of different doses of tucidinostat in TME. The immunotherapeutic effect of tucidinostat combined with anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 antibody (aPD-L1) was demonstrated. Furthermore, the effect of tucidinostat on phenotypic characteristics of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from lung cancer patients was investigated. RESULTS: With an optimized dose, tucidinostat could alter TME and promote the migration and infiltration of CD8+ T cells into tumors, partially by increasing the activity of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) via NF-κB signaling. Moreover, tucidinostat significantly promoted M1 polarization of macrophages and increased the in vivo antitumor efficacy of aPD-L1. Tucidinostat also enhanced the expression of the costimulatory molecules on human monocytes, suggesting a novel and improved antigen-presenting function. CONCLUSIONS: A combination regimen of tucidinostat and aPD-L1 may work synergistically to reduce tumor burden in patients with cancer by enhancing the immune function and provided a promising treatment strategy to overcome ICI treatment resistance.

Biomarker subset analysis of a phase IIIb, open-label study of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive patients with EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer.

Aim: To explore the relationship between mutations in cfDNA and response to afatinib. Patients & methods: In total, 64 patients from one Chinese site with locally advanced/metastatic EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer, who received afatinib 40 mg once daily, were included. Results: Overall, 33 (82.5%) patients became EGFRm- by visit 3; median progression-free survival was longer in these patients vs those who did not (11.0 vs 5.5 months). Progression-free survival was shorter in 42 (45.2%) patients with non-EGFR co-mutations at baseline vs those without (8.1 vs 12.5 months). Neither difference was significant. Conclusion: Afatinib provided clinical benefit for patients with EGFRm+ non-small-cell lung cancer across all subgroups. EGFRm status assessment in plasma cfDNA is a useful method of monitoring treatment.

We conducted a study in 64 Chinese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer to investigate the relationship between cancer mutations detected in the blood and the response to treatment with afatinib, which is known to be effective against EGFR mutations. Technology is now available to detect these mutations in the blood, as an alternative to obtaining and testing lung tissue samples. All 64 patients had EGFR mutations (and some patients had additional types of mutations) when afatinib was started (visit 1 in the study). By visit 3, most patients (82.5%) no longer had EGFR mutations detected in their blood, and these patients responded better to afatinib than those who still had EGFR mutations in their blood. Patients with additional types of mutations generally did not respond as well as those who had only EGFR mutations. Although results showed clinical benefit with afatinib using assessment of mutation status in the blood, statistical significance could not be shown due to the small size of the study. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01953913 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Treatment-related adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous ongoing trials are testing anti-PD-1-based or anti-PD-L1-based cancer treatment combinations. Understanding the toxicity profiles of treatment-related adverse events is essential. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the incidences and profiles of treatment-related adverse events across different combination therapies. METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing different chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy combinations with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. We searched Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published in English between Jan 1, 2000, and May 21, 2020, investigating globally approved PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. Only prospective trials reporting overall incidence or tabulated data of treatment-related adverse events were included. Trials investigating sequential therapies, comprising three or more classes of therapies, and enrolling less than ten patients were excluded. The primary outcomes were overall incidences and profiles for all-grade and grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events by random-effect models. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with I2 statistics. The summary measures for main outcomes are incidences (95% CI). The 95% CI were calculated together with the incidence through a random-effects model with a logit transformation. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020189617). FINDINGS: We identified 2540 records, of which 161 studies (17 197 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events in the chemotherapy combination was 97·7% (95% CI 96·4-98·5; I2=75%) for all-grade adverse events and 68·3% (60·7-75·0; I2=93%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events; in the targeted therapy combination was 94·5% (90·7-96·8; I2=86%) for all-grade adverse events and 47·3% (37·3-57·5; I2=93%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events; in the immunotherapy combination was 86·8% (80·9-91·1; I2=94%) for all-grade adverse events and 35·9% (29·5-42·9; I2=92%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events; and in the radiotherapy combination was 89·4% (69·0-96·9; I2=74%) for all-grade adverse events and 12·4% (4·4-30·6; I2=73%) for grade 3 or higher adverse events. For these four combination therapies, the most common all-grade adverse events were anaemia (45.4% [95% CI 32·4-59·1]), fatigue (34·3% [27·5-41·9]), fatigue (26·4% [19·2-35·2]), and dysphagia (30·0% [18·7-44·5]), respectively, and the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (19·6% [13·5-27·7]), hypertension (9·3% [5·7-14·9]), lipase increased (7·2% [5·2-9·9]), and lymphopenia (10·3% [4·5-21·8]). All included randomised controlled trials had a low risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: Our study provides comprehensive data on treatment-related adverse events of different PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. Our results provide an essential reference of toxicity profiles of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies for clinicians in routine practice of cancer care. FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Programme, National Natural Science Foundation of China key program, National Natural Science Foundation of China general program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine, Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund.

Identification and validation of tissue or ctDNA PTPRD phosphatase domain deleterious mutations as prognostic and predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-squamous NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: With the revolutionary progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) achieved in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), identifying patients benefiting from ICIs becomes critical and urgent. The associations of genomic alterations in protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type (PTPRs) and ICIs responses are unknown. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) of 73 advanced NSCLC tumors sampled before anti-PD-(L)1 therapy was carried out with corresponding clinical data collected as a discovery cohort to find the associations of PTPR mutations and ICI responses. Three validation cohorts consolidated by 7 public cohorts of 1920 NSCLC patients with WES or target sequencing data of tumor tissue-derived DNA or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and relevant clinical data were applied as validation cohorts. The lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cohort (n=586) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used for analyzing the potential anti-tumor immunologic mechanisms. RESULTS: With the highest mutation frequency among all PTPRs, PTPRD mutations in non-squamous NSCLC (ns-NSCLC) were linked to longer progression-free survivals (PFS, 324 vs 63 days, hazard ratio (HR)=0.36, p= 0.0152) and higher objective response rate (ORR, p=0.0099). In validation cohort 1 (n=377), ns-NSCLC patients with tissue PTPRD mutations had favorable PFS (9.10 vs 4.33 months, HR=0.62, p=0.0184) and ORR (p=0.013). In validation cohort 2 (n=406), ns-NSCLC patients with tissue PTPRD mutations had favorable overall survivals (OS, over 40 vs 11.94 months, HR=0.57, p=0.011). In validation cohort 3 (n=1137), ns-NSCLC patients with ctDNA PTPRD mutations had longer PFS (6.97 vs 2.73 months, HR=0.63, p=0.028) and higher ORR (p=0.047). Moreover, it was deleterious mutations in phosphatase domains (phosphatase-mut), rather than other mutations (other-mut), that were responsible of PTPRD's prediction efficiency. In addition, in validation cohort 3, ctDNA phosphatase-mut also functioned as a predictive biomarker helping identify patients benefiting more from ICIs than chemotherapy (interaction P for PFS=0.0506, for OS=0.04). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis revealed that phosphatase-mut was independent on PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden (TMB) to predict. In silico analysis based on TCGA LUAD cohort discovered enhanced anti-tumor immunity in phosphatase-mut patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tissue or ctDNA PTPRD phosphatase domain deleterious mutations might function as a both prognostic and predictive biomarker predicting clinical outcomes of ICIs in ns-NSCLC patients, independent on TMB or PD-L1 expression.

Dynamics of peripheral T cell clones during PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

Understanding of the functional states and clonal dynamics of T cells after immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is valuable for improving these therapeutic strategies. Here we performed Smart-seq2 single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis on 3,110 peripheral T cells of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients before and after the initiation of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. We identified individual peripheral T cell clones based on the full-length T cell receptor (TCR) sequences and monitored their dynamics during immunotherapy. We found a higher cytotoxic activity in the tumor-related CD4+ T cell clones than in the CD8+ T cell clones. Based on a large tumor-related CD4+ T cell clone, we observed a dramatically decreased abundance after progression, as well as a reduction in the percentage of PD-1+ T cells. We also detected 25 genes, such as CXCR4, DUSP2 and ZFP36, that were noticeably upregulated or downregulated following progression. In addition, the pseudotime trajectory of CD8+ T cell clones corresponded to the treatment time points, showing a decreased activity in the "cytokine and cytokine receptor interaction" pathway. These analyses provided an insight into the dynamics of peripheral T cell clones during PD-1 blockade in NSCLC.

A novel tumor mutational burden estimation model as a predictive and prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has both prognostic value in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and predictive value for immunotherapy response. However, TMB evaluation by whole-exome sequencing (WES) is expensive and time-consuming, hampering its application in clinical practice. In our study, we aimed to construct a mutational burden estimation model, with a small set of genes, that could precisely estimate WES-TMB and, at the same time, has prognostic and predictive value for NSCLC patients. METHODS: TMB estimation model was trained based on genomic data from 1056 NSCLC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Validation was performed using three independent cohorts, including Rizvi cohort and our own Asian cohorts, including 89 early-stage and n late-stage Asian NSCLC patients, respectively. TCGA data were obtained on September 3, 2018. The two Asian cohort studies were performed from September 1, 2018, to March 5, 2019. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the performance of estimated TMB with WES-TMB. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to evaluate the association of estimated TMB with disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and response to anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. RESULTS: The estimation model, consisted of only 23 genes, correlated well with WES-TMB both in the training set of TCGA cohort and validation set of Rizvi cohort and our own Asian cohort. Estimated TMB by the 23-gene panel was significantly associated with DFS and OS in patients with early-stage NSCLC and could serve as a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: The 23-gene panel, instead of WES or the currently used panel-based methods, could be used to assess the WES-TMB with a high relevance. This customized targeted sequencing panel could be easily applied into clinical practice to predict the immunotherapy response and prognosis of NSCLC.

Complete response induced by anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy with toripalimab in a patient with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma who failed rapidly after concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A case report.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Several immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now available for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, not all patients benefit from ICI therapy, and the choice of ICIs is limited. CASE SUMMARY: A 54-year-old man with locally advanced NSCLC achieved partial response after definitive chemoradiotherapy. When he opted for consolidation therapy, metastatic lesions were found. Surprisingly, after immunotherapy with toripalimab, he quickly achieved complete response. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: As a PD-1 inhibitor, toripalimab may be an effective option for subsequent therapy of patients with locally advanced NSCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and nuclear factor-κB play important roles in regulating programmed cell death ligand 1 expression by epidermal growth factor receptor mutants in non-small-cell lung cancer cells.

Some driver gene mutations, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), have been reported to be involved in expression regulation of the immunosuppressive checkpoint protein programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), but the underlying mechanism remains obscure. We investigated the potential role and precise mechanism of EGFR mutants in PD-L1 expression regulation in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Examination of pivotal EGFR signaling effectors in 8 NSCLC cell lines indicated apparent associations between PD-L1 overexpression and phosphorylation of AKT and ERK, especially with increased protein levels of phospho-IκBα (p-IκBα) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). Flow cytometry results showed stronger membrane co-expression of EGFR and PD-L1 in NSCLC cells with EGFR mutants compared with cells carrying WT EGFR. Additionally, ectopic expression or depletion of EGFR mutants and treatment with EGFR pathway inhibitors targeting MEK/ERK, PI3K/AKT, mTOR/S6, IκBα, and HIF-1α indicated strong accordance among protein levels of PD-L1, p-IκBα, and HIF-1α in NSCLC cells. Further treatment with pathway inhibitors significantly inhibited xenograft tumor growth and p-IκBα, HIF-1α, and PD-L1 expression of NSCLC cells carrying EGFR mutant in nude mice. Moreover, immunohistochemical analysis revealed obviously increased protein levels of p-IκBα, HIF-1α, and PD-L1 in NSCLC tissues with EGFR mutants compared with tissues carrying WT EGFR. Non-small-cell lung cancer tissues with either p-IκBα or HIF-1α positive staining were more likely to possess elevated PD-L1 expression compared with tissues scored negative for both p-IκBα and HIF-1α. Our findings showed important roles of phosphorylation activation of AKT and ERK and potential interplay and cooperation between NF-κB and HIF-1α in PD-L1 expression regulation by EGFR mutants in NSCLC.

Apatinib, a novel VEGFR inhibitor plus docetaxel in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR: a phase I trial.

Background This phase I trial was primarily conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of apatinib combined with docetaxel in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR who have failed to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of apatinib plus docetaxel. Methods This was a single-center, open-label, dose-escalating phase I trial. The study used a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design with the primary aim of determining the MTD. Twelve patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled, the primary endpoint was safety. Two doses of apatinib, 250 mg/day (level 1) and 500 mg/day (level 2), were evaluated in combination with 60 mg/m2 doxetacel every 3 weeks. Six patients have been treated at levels 1 and 2, respectively. Optimal dose of apatinib was determined by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results Six patients have been treated at levels 1 and 2. At level 1, one of six patients experienced grade 3 acneiform rash as DLTs. At level 2, two patients experienced grade 3 hypertension and one experienced grade 3 nasal bleeding. MTD and recommended dose for phase II study was 250 mg/day. Most frequent adverse events of any grade were bilirubin elevation, hypertension, alanine aminotransferase elevation, transglutaminase elevation, hand foot syndrome and fatigue. The median progression-free survival was 2.76 month. Moreover, three patients had developed progressive disease and the mean duration of response was 2.79 months. Conclusion Apatinib plus docetaxel was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. This combination therapy may represent a potent therapeutic option for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with wild-type EGFR.

First-line pemetrexed-platinum doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world propensity score-matched study in China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of first-line bevacizumab (Bev)-containing pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy in a real-world Chinese cohort with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 415 eligible patients with NS-NSCLC who received first-line pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy at National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College between February 2010 and September 2017 were reviewed retrospectively: 309 Bev(-) and 106 Bev(+) cases. Bev was administered at 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks in the Bev(+) group. To reduce the risk of a selection bias, a propensity score-matching (PSM) was conducted and 105 pairs of Bev(-) and Bev(+) cases were identified. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 15.8 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged significantly in the Bev(+) group than in the Bev(-) group in overall (9.8vs. 7.8 months, P=0.006) and PSM pairs (9.8 vs. 6.6 months, P<0.001). Moreover, patients receiving maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus Bev had longer PFS than those interrupted after induction chemotherapy, or those receiving mono-maintenance with pemetrexed (12.3vs. 4.8 vs. 8.6 months; P<0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed Bev to be one of the favorable prognostic factors for PFS, along with the predictor of maintenance therapy. CONCLUSIONS: First-line induction and maintenance therapy with Bev (7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks) combined with pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy was efficacious and superior to non-Bev chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced NS-NSCLC.

LncRNA cancer susceptibility candidate 15 accelerates the breast cancer cells progression via miR-153-3p/KLF5 positive feedback loop.

Emerging literature have illustrated the vital regulatory roles of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) on the breast cancer tumorigenesis. Although series of researches have been proceeded on the pathogenesis, there are still much of unsolved mysteries worth investigating. This study uncovered that CASC15 expression level was aberrantly high-expressed in breast cancer tissue specimens and cells. Functionally, the loss-of-functional experiments showed that knockdown of CASC15 suppressed the malignant behaviors of breast cancer cells, such as proliferation, invasion and tumor growth in vitro and vivo. Mechanically, we confirmed that CASC15 functioned as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) of miR-153-3p, besides, miR-153-3p targeted the 3'-UTR of KLF5 mRNA utilizing the bioinformatics online tools, luciferase reporter assay and RNA immunoprecipitation. Interestingly, we confirmed that the transcription factor KLF5 binds with the promoter region of CASC15 and activates the transcription. In conclusion, we validated the positive feedback loop of KLF5/CASC15/miR-153-3p/KLF5 in the acceleration of breast cancer malignant behaviors and tumorigenesis, suggesting the important biologic roles of CASC15 on the breast cancer tumorigenesis.

Activation of the BMP-BMPR pathway conferred resistance to EGFR-TKIs in lung squamous cell carcinoma patients with EGFR mutations.

The empirical criteria for defining a clinical subtype of lung cancer are gradually transiting from histopathology to genetic variations in driver genes. Targeting these driver mutations, such as sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, has dramatically improved the prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical benefit of molecularly targeted therapy on NSCLC appears to be different between lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas (SqCCs). We report here that the resistance of lung SqCC harboring EGFR mutations to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) was due to the activation of BMP-BMPR-Smad1/5-p70S6K. The combined treatment of these tumor cells with EGFR-TKI, together with inhibitors specific to BMPR or downstream mTOR, effectively reversed the resistance to EGFR-TKI. Moreover, blocking the whole PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway with the PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor BEZ235 also showed efficacy in treating this subtype of lung SqCC. This study details the empirical basis for a feasible clinical solution for squamous cell carcinomas with EGFR mutations.

Clinical efficacy of bevacizumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of bevacizumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 186 patients with advanced NSCLC who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from October 2013 to June 2016 were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 93 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with GP chemotherapy, while patients in observation group were treated with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab combined with GP chemotherapy. Treatment was administered for 3 courses, every 3 weeks. After treatment, clinical efficacy, tumor markers levels (CEA and CYFRA21-1), serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels and adverse reactions were compared between two groups. RESULTS: After treatment, the total effective rate and disease control rate in the control group were 40.86% and 70.97%, respectively, while the total effective rate and disease control rate in the observation group were 70.97% and 90.32% respectively, (p<0.05). After treatment, the levels of CEA, CYFRA21-1 and serum VEGF in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (p<0.05), and decreases were more significant in the observation group than in the control group (p<0.05). The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 52.69% (49 cases), 36.56% (34 cases) and 25.81% (24 cases) for the observation group, and 43.01% (40 cases), 27.96% (26 cases) and 15.05 % (14 cases) for the control group. Overall survival rate in the observation group was significantly higher than the one in the control group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of bevacizumab plus GP chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC can improve serum tumor markers and clinical efficacy, thus prolonging the long-term survival of patients. It is worthy of clinical application.

Reproducible copy number variation patterns among single circulating tumor cells of lung cancer patients.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enter peripheral blood from primary tumors and seed metastases. The genome sequencing of CTCs could offer noninvasive prognosis or even diagnosis, but has been hampered by low single-cell genome coverage of scarce CTCs. Here, we report the use of the recently developed multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles for whole-genome amplification of single CTCs from lung cancer patients. We observed characteristic cancer-associated single-nucleotide variations and insertions/deletions in exomes of CTCs. These mutations provided information needed for individualized therapy, such as drug resistance and phenotypic transition, but were heterogeneous from cell to cell. In contrast, every CTC from an individual patient, regardless of the cancer subtypes, exhibited reproducible copy number variation (CNV) patterns, similar to those of the metastatic tumor of the same patient. Interestingly, different patients with the same lung cancer adenocarcinoma (ADC) shared similar CNV patterns in their CTCs. Even more interestingly, patients of small-cell lung cancer have CNV patterns distinctly different from those of ADC patients. Our finding suggests that CNVs at certain genomic loci are selected for the metastasis of cancer. The reproducibility of cancer-specific CNVs offers potential for CTC-based cancer diagnostics.

A phase I study of nimotuzumab plus docetaxel in chemotherapy-refractory/resistant patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To determine the safety and therapeutic efficacy of nimotuzumab (h-R3) combined with docetaxel in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have failed to respond to prior first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, dose-escalating phase I trial, patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing stage IV NSCLC were treated with nimotuzumab plus docetaxel according to a dose escalation schedule. The safety and efficacy of the combination treatment were observed and analyzed. RESULTS: There were 12 patients with EGFR-expressing stage IV NSCLC enrolled. The dose of nimotuzumab was escalated from 200 to 600 mg/week. The longest administration of study drug was 40 weeks at the 600 mg/week dose level. Grade III-IV toxicities included neutropenia and fatigue, and other toxicities included rash. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred with Grade 3 fatigue at the 200 mg dose level of nimotuzumab and Grade 4 neutropenia with pneumonia at the 600 mg dose level of nimotuzumab. No objective responses were observed, and stable disease was observed in eight patients (66.7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months in all patients, 1.3 months in patients with the EGFR mutation, and 4.4 months in those with wild type EGFR (EGFR WT). The median survival time (MST) was 21.1 months in all patients, 21.1 months in patients with EGFR mutation, and 26.4 months in patients with EGFR WT. CONCLUSIONS: Nimotuzumab and docetaxel combination therapy was found to be well tolerated and efficacious. Further study of nimotuzumab is warranted in advanced NSCLC patients.

[Prognostic factors and response of chemotherapy including amrubicin in small cell lung cancer patients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the response, toxicity and prognostic factors of amrubicin in the therapy of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Thirty-one SCLC patients treated with amrubicin in Beijing Cancer Hospital from Dec.2008 to Apr.2013, including 21 males and 10 females, aged from 32 to 75 years, were enrolled in this study. Amrubicin was injected intravenously with 40 mg/m² d1-3, Q21 d or combined with cisplatin 60 mg/m² d1, Q 21 d. The first line chemotherapy regimens included amrubicin plus cisplatin in 11 cases, etopside plus platin in 18 cases and other drugs in 2 cases. The second and more line chemotherapy treatments included amrubicin in 20 cases, topotican in 14 cases and others in 28 cases. SPSS 16.0 statistical analysis software was used to analyze the clinical characteristics and survivals. RESULTS: The median progression free survival (PFS) of patients receiving amrubicin plus cisplatin and single amrubicin were 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.2 to 8.8 ) and 4.1 months (95% CI:1.2 to 7.0) respectively (P= 0.090). There were 16 refractory patients whose disease progressed within 3 months after first line chemotherapy and 15 sensitive patients who had tumor progression after more than 3 months; the median survival time (MST) were 14.2 months (95% CI 11.1-17.3) and 21.3 months (95% CI 15.7-26.9) respectively (P= 0.018). Patients treated with amrubicin plus cisplatin as first line therapy had a prolonged median PFS compared with etopside plus platin, which were 7.5 months (95% CI:6.2-8.8) vs. 4.6 months (95% CI:1.7-7.5) (P= 0.055). Patients received amrubicin, topotican or other drugs as second or more line therapy had median PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI: 1.2-7.0), 1.4 months (95% CI: 0.8-2.0) and 1.6 months (95% CI:1.2-1.9) respectively (P= 0.013), while the median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 2.0-9.2), 1.4 months (95% CI: 0.6-2.2) and 1.4 months (95% CI: 0.8-2.0) (P= 0.005 and 0.003) in refractory patients. CONCLUSIONS: Amrubicin as second or more line treatment was shown to be an effective and safe drug for SCLC patients with a significant survival benefit compared with other drugs, especially in refractory patients. It suggested that amrubicin might be one of the preferred therapies for refractory SCLC.

Real-world outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy and selective RET inhibitors in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion is a target for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, and RET inhibitors are approved for advanced NSCLC. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in RET fusion-positive NSCLC remains controversial. This retrospective study analyzed the efficacy of ICIs and RET inhibitors in Chinese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Methods: Data from patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC harboring RET fusion from Jan 2017 to Sep 2021 were analyzed. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of ICIs and RET inhibitors treatments were collected. Results: Seventy-five patients with RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC were identified. The median age of patients was 57 years, half of the patients were female (50.3%), and most were non-smokers or light smokers (72%). Of the cancer types diagnosed in study patients, the KIF5B-RET fusion subtype accounted for 73.3% (55/75), twelve patients (16%) had CCDC6-RET fusion, and three (4%) had NCOA4-RET fusion. Sixteen patients were treated with ICIs. In previously untreated patients, we observed an objective response rate (ORR) of 71.4% and median progression free survival (PFS) of 7.5 months in seven assessable patients. Of four patients with PD-L1 overexpression (>50%) one received pembrolizumab and the other three patients received pemetrexed, carboplatin, and pembrolizumab or camrelizumab. In these patients, the ORR was 75% and disease control rate was 100%. Fifteen patients received selective RET inhibitors (pralsetinib and selpercatinib), resulting in an ORR of 53.3% (8/15) and median PFS of 10.0 months (95% CI 5.2-14.9). Conclusions: ICIs for PD-L overexpression and treatment naive patients offer comparable benefits for RET fusion-positive NSCLC, warranting further investigation.