Effect of combined naltrexone and bupropion therapy on the brain's reactivity to food cues.

OBJECTIVE: The significant weight loss observed with combination naltrexone-sustained release (SR) 32 mg and bupropion SR 360 mg (NB32) therapy is thought to be due, in part, to bupropion stimulation of hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons, and naltrexone blockade of opioid receptor-mediated POMC autoinhibition, but the neurobiological mechanisms are not fully understood. We assessed changes in brain reactivity to food cues before and after NB32 treatment. METHODS: Forty women (31.1±8.1 years; body mass index: 32.5±3.9) received 4 weeks of NB32 or placebo, and were instructed to maintain their dietary and exercise habits. Functional magnetic resonance imaging responses (analyzed using SPM2 and clusters (>100 pixels)) to a 5-min food video (preparation of the subject's favorite food) and a 5-min neutral video (manipulation of neutral objects) under conditions of mild food deprivation (∼14 h) were assessed before and after treatment. RESULTS: The food cues video induced positive brain activation in visual and prefrontal cortices, insula and subcortical brain regions. The group-by-treatment interaction on regional brain activation was significant and showed that whereas NB32 attenuated the activation in the hypothalamus in response to food cues (P<0.01), it enhanced activation in regions involved in inhibitory control (anterior cingulate), internal awareness (superior frontal, insula, superior parietal) and memory (hippocampal) regions (whole-brain analysis; P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Blunting the hypothalamic reactivity to food cues while enhancing the activation of regions involved with self-control and internal awareness by NB32 might underlie its therapeutic benefits in obesity.

Combination therapy with naltrexone and bupropion for obesity reduces total and visceral adiposity.

The effects of combination naltrexone/bupropion therapy on body composition and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) mass were examined in a subset (n = 107) of obese subjects from a Phase 2 trial that compared the efficacy and safety of placebo, naltrexone monotherapy, bupropion monotherapy or one of three naltrexone/bupropion dose combinations for 24 weeks. Body composition data were obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography. Eighty subjects completed the substudy. Naltrexone/bupropion resulted in weight loss and a greater reduction in body fat (-14.0 ± 1.3%) than placebo (-4.0 ± 2.0%), naltrexone monotherapy (-3.2 ± 2.5%) and bupropion monotherapy (-4.1 ± 2.9%; all p < 0.01). Reduction in VAT mass was also greater with naltrexone/bupropion (-15.0 ± 1.8%) than placebo (-4.6 ± 2.7%), naltrexone monotherapy (-0.1 ± 3.5%) and bupropion monotherapy (-2.3 ± 4.2%; all p < 0.01). Reductions in body fat and VAT mass with naltrexone/bupropion were proportional with weight loss. Weight loss with naltrexone/bupropion was not associated with a greater relative reduction in lean mass than placebo or the monotherapies.

Twelve-month outcome in bipolar patients with and without personality disorders.

BACKGROUND: We studied the 12-month course of illness after hospitalization for patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of bipolar disorder, manic or mixed episode, to identify the impact of a co-occurring personality disorder on measures of outcome. METHOD: Fifty-nine patients with bipolar disorder hospitalized for the treatment of a manic or mixed episode were recruited. Diagnostic, symptomatic, and functional evaluations were obtained at the index hospitalization. Personality disorders were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, personality disorders version (SCID-II). Patients were then reevaluated at 2, 6, and 12 months after discharge to assess syndromic, symptomatic, and functional recovery. Factors associated with outcome were identified using multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Survival analyses showed that in the 12-month follow-up period, subjects with bipolar disorder and co-occurring personality disorder were significantly less likely to achieve recovery. Logistic regression analyses indicated that both a diagnosis of personality disorder and noncompliance with treatment were significantly associated with lack of syndromic recovery. CONCLUSION: Co-occurring personality disorders in patients with bipolar disorder are associated with poor outcome after hospitalization for mania.

Affective state dependence of the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire.

The authors administered the Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) on two occasions separated by more than 1 month to 30 patients with psychotic disorders to examine hypothesized relationships between affective symptomatology and the TPQ dimension Harm Avoidance. As predicted, changes in Harm Avoidance scores demonstrated a robust correlation with changes in depression ratings and a less robust association with changes in mania ratings. The TPQ dimensions Novelty Seeking and Reward Dependence demonstrated minimal associations with symptom measures. This study supports the hypothesis that Harm Avoidance scores are strongly associated with depression.

Personality disorders in first- and multiple-episode mania.

We compared rates of DSM-III-R personality disorders in 33 first-episode and 26 multiple-episode bipolar patients. Patients were evaluated with the patient and personality disorders versions of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Significantly more multiple-episode patients (65%) met DSM-III-R criteria for a personality disorder than did first-episode patients (33%). Race was also associated with a diagnosis of a personality disorder. Personality disorders may be associated with multiple affective episodes in bipolar patients.

Prevalence and description of psychotic features in bipolar mania.

Psychotic symptoms are common in both the manic and depressive phases of bipolar disorder. More than half of patients with bipolar disorder will experience psychotic symptoms in their lifetime. Grandiose delusions are the most common type of psychotic symptom, but any kind of psychotic symptom, including thought disorder, hallucinations, mood-incongruent psychotic symptoms, and catatonia can present as part of a manic episode. Psychotic symptoms suggest poor prognosis when they occur in the absence of affective symptoms. However, psychotic symptoms can mask affective symptoms and make the distinction between manic-depressive illness and other psychiatric disorders difficult, especially in minorities. Careful assessment of prior psychiatric history, family history, and treatment response can aid in the differentiation of affective disorders with psychotic features from psychotic disorders.

A pilot study of rapid lithium administration in the treatment of acute mania.

OBJECTIVES: The use of rapid lithium dosage administration, a strategy that could lead to rapid improvement in mania, has been largely unexamined. In this open-label, pilot, acute-treatment study, we sought to determine the safety and tolerability of lithium administered at 20 mg/ kg/day. A secondary aim was to provide preliminary data regarding the efficacy of this strategy in ameliorating manic, depressive, and psychotic symptoms. METHODS: Fifteen patients hospitalized with DSM-IV bipolar disorder, manic or mixed, and who provided written informed consent, received lithium 20 mg/kg/day for up to 10 days. Patients were evaluated for adverse effects daily. Lithium levels were obtained on days 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10 or at study termination. Electrocardiograms (EKGs) were performed at baseline and on days 1-5, 7, and 10 or at study termination. Symptomatic improvement was assessed daily using the Young Mania Rating Scale, 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). RESULTS: Five of the 15 patients completed the 10-day study period. Two patients dropped out due to adverse events. Seven patients did not complete the inpatient trial because of improvement sufficient to allow hospital discharge. All patients achieved serum lithium concentrations > or =0.6 mEq/L after 1 day of treatment; the mean + SD concentration on day 5 was 1.1 (+/- 0.1) mEq/L on day 5. There were significant reductions from baseline to endpoint on all rating scales, except the SAPS bizarre behavior subscale. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data suggest that lithium 20 mg/kg/day was well tolerated and that this strategy may produce rapid improvement in affective and psychotic symptoms. These impressions require confirmation in double-blind, randomized trials.