Mortality among people admitted to Australian intensive care units for reasons other than COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in-hospital mortality among people admitted to Australian intensive care units (ICUs) with conditions other than coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: National, multicentre, retrospective cohort study; analysis of data in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation (ANZICS CORE) Adult Patient Database. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Adults (16 years or older) without COVID-19 admitted to Australian ICUs, 1 January 2016 - 30 June 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause in-hospital mortality, unadjusted and relative to the January 2016 value, adjusted for illness severity (Australian and New Zealand Risk of Death [ANZROD] and hospital type), with ICU as a random effect. Points of change in mortality trends (breakpoints) were identified by segmental regression analysis. RESULTS: Data for 950 489 eligible admissions to 186 ICUs were available. In-hospital mortality declined steadily from January 2016 to March 2021 by 0.3% per month (P < 0.001; March 2021 v January 2016: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.80), but rose by 1.4% per month during March 2021 - June 2022 (P < 0.001; June 2022 v January 2016: aOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.90-1.17). The rise in mortality continued after the number of COVID-19-related ICU admissions had declined; mortality increased in jurisdictions with lower as well as in those with higher numbers of COVID-19-related ICU admissions. CONCLUSION: The rise in in-hospital mortality among people admitted to Australian ICUs with conditions other than COVID-19 from March 2021 reversed the improvement of the preceding five years. Changes to health service delivery during the pandemic and their consequences should be investigated further.

A comparison of characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU with asthma in Australia and New Zealand and United states.

Objective: To compare the characteristics, use of invasive ventilation and outcomes of patients admitted with critical asthma syndrome (CAS) to ICUs in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), and a large cohort of ICUs in the United States (US). Methods: We examined two large databases of ICU for patients admitted with CAS in 2014 and 2015. We obtained, analyzed, and compared information on demographic and physiological characteristics, use of invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinical outcome and derived predictive models. Results: Overall, 2202 and 762 patients were admitted with a primary diagnosis of CAS in the ANZ and US databases respectively (0.73% vs. 0.46% of all ICU admissions, P < 0.001). A similar percentage of patients received invasive mechanical ventilation in the first 24 h (24.7% vs. 24.4%, P = 0.87) but ANZ patients had lower respiratory rates and higher PaCO2 levels. Overall mortality was low (1.23 for ANZ and 1.71 for USA; P = 0.36) and even among invasively ventilated patients (2.4% for ANZ vs. 1.1% for USA; P = 0.38). However, ANZ patients also had longer length of stay in ICU (43 vs. 37 h, P = 0.001) and hospital (105 vs. 78 h, P = 0.003). Conclusions: Patients admitted to ANZ and USA ICU with CAS are broadly similar and have a low and similar rate of invasive ventilation and mortality. However, ANZ patients made up a greater proportion of ICU patients and had longer ICU and hospital stays. These findings provide a modern invasive ventilation and mortality rates benchmark for future studies of CAS.

Clinical Informatics needs to be a competency for Intensive care training.

Clinical informatics is a cornerstone in the delivery of safe and quality critical care in Australia and New Zealand. Recent advances in the field of clinical informatics, including new technologies that digitise healthcare data, improved methods of capturing and storing these data, as well as innovative analytic methods using machine learning and artificial intelligence, present exciting new opportunities to leverage data for improving the delivery of critical care and patient outcomes. However, ICU training in Australian and New Zealand does not adequately address capability gaps in this area, potentially leaving future intensivists without the necessary skills to provide leadership in the application of informatics within ICUs. This highlights the need to examine how competency in clinical informatics can be incorporated into ICU training, potentially through a range of activities such as curriculum redesign, the formal project, and workshops or datathons. Further work to identify relevant informatics competencies and methods to develop and assess these competencies within ICU training is needed.

Bilateral facial nerve palsies due to leptomeningeal progression of lung adenocarcinoma and response to osimertinib.

A 39-year-old female Chinese non-smoker was diagnosed with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma with cerebral metastases and commenced erlotinib. After 5 weeks, she presented with a 3-day history of severe bilateral facial weakness (House-Brackmann grade V/VI) and hypogeusia consistent with bilateral facial nerve palsies. MRI demonstrated new, symmetrical contrast-enhancing foci at the expected location of the facial nerves, consistent with leptomeningeal progression. Erlotinib was ceased and osimertinib was commenced. Facial nerve motor and sensory function began to improve within 1 week and by 2 weeks had returned to near normal. Review at 2 and 6 months demonstrated normal facial nerve function and progressive resolution of the facial nerve lesions on MRI. While rare, leptomeningeal malignancy may present as simultaneous bilateral facial nerve palsies. Osimertinib has superior central nervous system penetration and in this case was associated with rapid and sustained clinical and radiographical resolution of the facial nerve lesions.

The risk of postoperative deterioration of non-cardiac surgery patients with ICU referral status who are admitted to the regular ward: a retrospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Higher-risk surgical patients may not be admitted to the intensive care unit due to stable immediate post-operative status on review. The outcomes of this cohort are not well described. Our aim was to examine the subsequent inpatient course of intensive care unit -referred but not admitted surgical patients. METHODS: All patients aged ≥18 years who were referred but not admitted for post-operative management in a tertiary metropolitan intensive care unit following non-cardiac surgery between 1/7/2017 and 30/6/2018 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective observational cohort study. Primary outcome was Medical Emergency Team activation. Secondary outcomes included unplanned intensive care unit admission; length of stay; and 30-day mortality. Risk of serious complications and predicted length of stay were calculated using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program scoring tool. RESULTS: Fifteen of 60 patients (25%) had a MET-call following surgery, eight (13%) patients required unplanned intensive care unit admission, with median (IQR) time to Medical Emergency Team call 9 (6-13) hours. No patients died within 30-days. There was no significant difference between mean National Surgical Quality Improvement Program predicted and actual length of stay; after adjustment, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program predicted risk of serious complications was associated with unplanned intensive care unit admission (OR [95% CI] = 1.08 [1.00-1.16], p = 0.04), although not Medical Emergency Team calls. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative deterioration occurs frequently, and early, in a cohort of high-risk surgical patients initially assessed as being safe for ward care. Changes to current triage models for post-operative intensive care unit admission may reduce the impact of complications in this high-risk group.

ISARIC-4C Mortality Score overestimates risk of death due to COVID-19 in Australian ICU patients: a validation cohort study.

Objective: To assess the performance of the UK International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (4C) Mortality Score for predicting mortality in Australian patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Design: Multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. Setting: 78 Australian ICUs participating in the SPRINT-SARI (Short Period Incidence Study of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection) Australia study of COVID-19. Participants: Patients aged 16 years or older admitted to participating Australian ICUs with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 between 27 February and 10 October 2020. Main outcome measures: ISARIC-4C Mortality Score, calculated at the time of ICU admission. The primary outcome was observed versus predicted in-hospital mortality (by 4C Mortality and APACHE II). Results: 461 patients admitted to a participating ICU were included. 149 (32%) had complete data to calculate a 4C Mortality Score without imputation. Overall, 61/461 patients (13.2%) died, 16.9% lower than the comparable ISARIC-4C cohort in the United Kingdom. In patients with complete data, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) 4C Mortality Score was 10.0 (IQR, 8.0-13.0) and the observed mortality was 16.1% (24/149) versus 22.9% median predicted risk of death. The 4C Mortality Score discriminatory performance measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.90), similar to its performance in the original ISARIC-4C UK cohort (0.77) and not superior to APACHE II (AUROC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.87). Conclusions: When calculated at the time of ICU admission, the 4C Mortality Score consistently overestimated the risk of death for Australian ICU patients with COVID-19. The 4C Mortality Score may need to be individually recalibrated for use outside the UK and in different hospital settings.

Smoking cessation therapy in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units: a multicentre point prevalence study.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain an accurate estimate of smoking prevalence and smoking cessation support practices, including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional, observational study using data obtained from adult ICUs participating in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group Point Prevalence Program in 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and intensity of current smoking, baseline characteristics of smokers in comparison with non-smokers and frequency of NRT use while admitted to the ICU. RESULTS: Smoking data were present for 551 of 671 adult ICU patients from 47 ICUs on 2 study days in 2016. Of these 551 patients, 112 were current smokers (20.3%; 95% CI, 17.0-23.9%). No significant differences in severity of illness or mortality were observed between smokers and non-smokers. NRT was prescribed to 30/112 smokers (26.8%), and in 28 of those 30 patients (93%) it was administered via nicotine patch alone. Routine prescribing of NRT was practised in 28/47 ICUs (60%), and 24/47 ICUs (51%) had formal protocols or guidelines in place related to supporting smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of smoking in Australian and New Zealand ICUs patients is high. Over half of participating ICUs reported the routine prescription of NRT despite uncertainty regarding the practice. Further research evaluating the safety and efficacy of NRT is required.

Intensive care implications of epidemic thunderstorm asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the environmental precipitants, treatment and outcome of critically ill patients affected by the largest and most lethal reported epidemic of thunderstorm asthma. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective multicentre observational study. Meteorological, airborne particulate and pollen data, and a case series of 35 patients admitted to 15 intensive care units (ICUs) due to the thunderstorm asthma event of 21-22 November 2016, in Victoria, Australia, were analysed and compared with 1062 total ICU-admitted Australian patients with asthma in 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics and outcomes of total ICU versus patients with thunderstorm asthma, the association between airborne particulate counts and storm arrival, and ICU resource utilisation. RESULTS: All 35 patients had an asthma diagnosis; 13 (37%) had a cardiac or respiratory arrest, five (14%) died. Compared with total Australian ICU-admitted patients with asthma in 2016, patients with thunderstorm asthma had a higher mortality (15% v 1.3%, P < 0.001), were more likely to be male (63% v 34%, P < 0.001), to be mechanically ventilated, and had shorter ICU length of stay in survivors (median, 31.8 hours [interquartile range (IQR), 14.8-43.6 hours] v 40.7 hours [IQR, 22.3-75.1 hours]; P = 0.025). Patients with cardiac arrest were more likely to be born in Asian or subcontinental countries (5/10 [50%] v 4/25 [16%]; relative risk, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.05-9.31). A temporal link was demonstrated between airborne particulate counts and arrival of the storm. The event used 15% of the public ICU beds in the region. CONCLUSION: Arrival of a triggering storm is associated with an increase in respirable airborne particles. Affected critically ill patients are young, have a high mortality, a short duration of bronchospasm, and a prior diagnosis of asthma is common.

The Melbourne epidemic thunderstorm asthma event 2016: an investigation of environmental triggers, effect on health services, and patient risk factors.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary collaboration investigated the world's largest, most catastrophic epidemic thunderstorm asthma event that took place in Melbourne, Australia, on Nov 21, 2016, to inform mechanisms and preventive strategies. METHODS: Meteorological and airborne pollen data, satellite-derived vegetation index, ambulance callouts, emergency department presentations, and data on hospital admissions for Nov 21, 2016, as well as leading up to and following the event were collected between Nov 21, 2016, and March 31, 2017, and analysed. We contacted patients who presented during the epidemic thunderstorm asthma event at eight metropolitan health services (each including up to three hospitals) via telephone questionnaire to determine patient characteristics, and investigated outcomes of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. FINDINGS: Grass pollen concentrations on Nov 21, 2016, were extremely high (>100 grains/m3). At 1800 AEDT, a gust front crossed Melbourne, plunging temperatures 10°C, raising humidity above 70%, and concentrating particulate matter. Within 30 h, there were 3365 (672%) excess respiratory-related presentations to emergency departments, and 476 (992%) excess asthma-related admissions to hospital, especially individuals of Indian or Sri Lankan birth (10% vs 1%, p<0·0001) and south-east Asian birth (8% vs 1%, p<0·0001) compared with previous 3 years. Questionnaire data from 1435 (64%) of 2248 emergency department presentations showed a mean age of 32·0 years (SD 18·6), 56% of whom were male. Only 28% had current doctor-diagnosed asthma. 39% of the presentations were of Asian or Indian ethnicity (25% of the Melbourne population were of this ethnicity according to the 2016 census, relative risk [RR] 1·93, 95% CI 1·74-2·15, p <0·0001). Of ten individuals who died, six were Asian or Indian (RR 4·54, 95% CI 1·28-16·09; p=0·01). 35 individuals were admitted to an intensive care unit, all had asthma, 12 took inhaled preventers, and five died. INTERPRETATION: Convergent environmental factors triggered a thunderstorm asthma epidemic of unprecedented magnitude, tempo, and geographical range and severity on Nov 21, 2016, creating a new benchmark for emergency and health service escalation. Asian or Indian ethnicity and current doctor-diagnosed asthma portended life-threatening exacerbations such as those requiring admission to an ICU. Overall, the findings provide important public health lessons applicable to future event forecasting, health care response coordination, protection of at-risk populations, and medical management of epidemic thunderstorm asthma. FUNDING: None.

A "Code ICU" expedited review of critically ill patients is associated with reduced emergency department length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of a system of expedited review of critically ill patients in the Emergency Department (ED) on ED length of stay (LOS) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital comparing two 12-month periods before and after implementation of a 'Code ICU' system of expedited review of critically ill patients in the ED. All adult ED to ICU admissions were included. Separate analyses were performed for patients intubated prior to ICU admission. RESULTS: 622 and 629 patients were included in each time period. During the intervention period more patients had ED LOS<240min in both the total [199 (32.0%) vs. 243 (38.6%), P=0.014; adjusted OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.14-2.25] and intubated cohorts [145 (51.2%) vs. 172 (61.9%), P=0.011; adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.16-2.36]. 'Code ICU' intubated patients had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS compared to non-'Code ICU' intubated patients. CONCLUSIONS: A system of rapid review of critically ill patients in the ED was associated with reduced ED LOS and improved ICU outcomes.