Clinically important pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with antibacterial agents.

Antimicrobial agents are widely used, and drug interactions are challenging due to increased risk of adverse effects or reduced efficacy. Among the interactions, the most important are those affecting metabolism, although those involving drug transporters are becoming increasingly known. To make clinical decisions, it is key to know the intensity of the interaction, as well as its duration and time-dependent recovery after discontinuation of the causative agents. It is not only important to be aware of all patient treatments, but also of supplements and natural medications that may also interact. Although they can have serious consequences, most interactions can be adequately managed with a good understanding of them. Especially in patients with polipharmacy it is compulsory to check them with an electronic clinical decision support database. This article aims to conduct a narrative review focusing on the major clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions that can be seen in patients receiving treatment for bacterial infections.

Drug-related problems in patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Drug-related problems (DRP) are events or circumstances in which drug therapy does or could interfere with desired health outcomes. In December 2019, a new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, appeared. Little knowledge about this type of infection resulted in the administration of various drugs with limited use in other pathologies. Evidence about DRP in patients with COVID-19 is lacking. Objective: The aim of the present study is to describe identified cases of DRP and those drugs involved in the first wave of patients with COVID-19, and evaluate associated risk factors. Material and methods: Observational, retrospective study performed in a tertiary university hospital between 14th March 2020 and 31 May 2020 (corresponding to the first COVID-19 wave). We recruited patients admitted during the study period. Exclusion criteria included age < 18 years; admission to critically ill units; and care received either in the emergency room, at-home hospitalization or a healthcare center. Results: A total of 817 patients were included. The mean age was 62.5 years (SD 16.4) (range 18-97), and 453 (55.4%) were male. A total of 516 DRP were detected. Among the patients, 271 (33.2%) presented at least one DRP. The mean DRP per patient with an identified case was 1.9. The prevailing DRPs among those observed were: incorrect dosage (over or underdosage) in 145 patients (28.2%); wrong drug combination in 131 (25.5%); prescriptions not in adherence to the then COVID-19 treatment protocol in 73 (14.1%); prescription errors due to the wrong use of the computerized physician order entry in 47 (9.2%); and incorrect dosage due to renal function in 36 (7%). The logistic regression analysis showed that patients who received only prescriptions of antibacterials for systemic use (J01 ATC group) faced a higher likelihood of experiencing a DRP (OR 2.408 (1.071-5.411), p = 0.033). Conclusion: We identified several factors associated with an increased risk of DRPs, similar to those reported in other pre-pandemic studies, including a prolonged length of stay, higher number of prescribed drugs and antimicrobial administration. The relevance of pharmacists and tools like pharmacy warning systems can help prevent, identify and resolve DRP efficiently.

Linezolid vs glycopeptides in the treatment of glycopeptide-susceptible Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia: A propensity score matched comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia is increasing. Vancomycin remains the first-line treatment in areas with a high prevalence of glycopeptide-susceptible isolates, but data comparing its clinical outcomes with other treatments are lacking. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides for the treatment of glycopeptide-susceptible E. faecium bloodstream infection (GSEF-BSI). METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted from January 2006 to May 2018 at the Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain, and compared the clinical outcomes and safety of linezolid and glycopeptides in adult patients with GSEF-BSI. The main outcomes included clinical cure at the end of therapy, 30-day mortality, microbiological eradication and attributable length of stay (LOS). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce potential confounders among groups. RESULTS: In total, 105 patients with GSEF-BSI were included (linezolid, n=38; glycopeptides, n=67). After propensity score matched analysis, 56 (53.3%) patients, 28 in each cohort, entered the final analysis. No differences were observed in any of the main clinical outcomes among patients treated with linezolid or glycopeptides: clinical cure [16/28 (57.1%) vs 13/28 (46.4%), P=0.593], 30-day mortality [8/28 (28.6%) vs 12/28 (42.9%), P=0.403], microbiological eradication [22/28 (78.6%) vs 20/28 (71.4%), P=0.758] and median attributable LOS (18.0 vs 17.0 days, P=0.924). Adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid and glycopeptides showed similar clinical effectiveness and safety in the treatment of GSEF-BSI. Linezolid could be an alternative to glycopeptides in the treatment of GSEF-BSI.

Frequency and severity of potential drug interactions in a cohort of HIV-infected patients Identified through a Multidisciplinary team.

OBJECTIVES: Interactions between antiretroviral treatment (ART) and comedications are a concern in HIV-infected patients. This study aimed to determine the frequency and severity of potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs) with ART in our setting. METHODS: Observational study by a multidisciplinary team in 1259 consecutive HIV patients (March 2015-September 2016). Data on demographics, toxic habits, comorbidities, and current ART were collected. A structured questionnaire recorded concomitant medications (including occasional and over-the-counter drugs). PDDIs were classified into four categories: (1) no interactions, (2) mild (clinically non-significant), (3) moderate (requiring close monitoring or drug modification/dose adjustment), and (4) severe (contraindicated). STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: chi-square test, logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 881 (70%) patients took comedication, and 563 (44.7%) had ≥ PDDI. Forty-one comedicated patients (4.6%) had severe and 522 (59.2%) moderate PDDIs. Moderate PDDIs mainly involved cardiovascular (53.8%) and central nervous system (40.2%) drugs. Independent risk factors for PDDIs were ART containing a boosted protease inhibitor (odds ratio [OR]=9.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.15-16.11; p = 0.0001) and/or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI) (OR = 4.34, 95%CI 2.49-7.55; p = 0.0001), HCV co-infection (OR = 3.26, 95%CI 2.15-4.93; p = 0.0001), and use of two or more comedications (OR = 3.36, 95%CI 2.27-4.97; p = 0.0001). Adherence and effectiveness of ART were similar in patients with and without PDDIs. The team made 133 recommendations related to comedications (drug change or dose adjustment) or ART (drug switch or change in administration schedule). CONCLUSIONS: Systematic evaluation detected a significant percentage of PDDIs requiring an intervention in HIV patients on ART. Monitoring and advice about drug-drug interactions should be part of routine practice.

Urinary micafungin levels are sufficient to treat urinary tract infections caused by Candida spp.

Six cases of patients diagnosed with urinary tract infection (UTI) successfully treated with micafungin are reported. Four were infected with fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. and two (with hepatic injury) were infected with fluconazole-sensitive Candida spp. Traditionally, echinocandins have not been considered for the treatment of UTIs. However, despite its low urinary excretion rate, therapeutic drug monitoring of micafungin urinary levels could be helpful in order to achieve optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices for treating UTIs caused by Candida spp. resistant to fluconazole.