Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(4): 132-138, 2022 Jan 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085223

RESUMEN

Previous reports of COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death rates by vaccination status† indicate that vaccine protection against infection, as well as serious COVID-19 illness for some groups, declined with the emergence of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and waning of vaccine-induced immunity (1-4). During August-November 2021, CDC recommended§ additional primary COVID-19 vaccine doses among immunocompromised persons and booster doses among persons aged ≥18 years (5). The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant emerged in the United States during December 2021 (6) and by December 25 accounted for 72% of sequenced lineages (7). To assess the impact of full vaccination with additional and booster doses (booster doses),¶ case and death rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated among unvaccinated and fully vaccinated adults by receipt of booster doses during pre-Delta (April-May 2021), Delta emergence (June 2021), Delta predominance (July-November 2021), and Omicron emergence (December 2021) periods in the United States. During 2021, averaged weekly, age-standardized case IRRs among unvaccinated persons compared with fully vaccinated persons decreased from 13.9 pre-Delta to 8.7 as Delta emerged, and to 5.1 during the period of Delta predominance. During October-November, unvaccinated persons had 13.9 and 53.2 times the risks for infection and COVID-19-associated death, respectively, compared with fully vaccinated persons who received booster doses, and 4.0 and 12.7 times the risks compared with fully vaccinated persons without booster doses. When the Omicron variant emerged during December 2021, case IRRs decreased to 4.9 for fully vaccinated persons with booster doses and 2.8 for those without booster doses, relative to October-November 2021. The highest impact of booster doses against infection and death compared with full vaccination without booster doses was recorded among persons aged 50-64 and ≥65 years. Eligible persons should stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Inmunización Secundaria , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Adulto , Anciano , Humanos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(38): 1032-8, 2016 Sep 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27684886

RESUMEN

During the first 6 months of 2016, large outbreaks of Zika virus disease caused by local mosquito-borne transmission occurred in Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories, but local mosquito-borne transmission was not identified in the continental United States (1,2). As of July 22, 2016, the Florida Department of Health had identified 321 Zika virus disease cases among Florida residents and visitors, all occurring in either travelers from other countries or territories with ongoing Zika virus transmission or sexual contacts of recent travelers.* During standard case investigation of persons with compatible illness and laboratory evidence of recent Zika virus infection (i.e., a specimen positive by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction [rRT-PCR], or positive Zika immunoglobulin M [IgM] with supporting dengue serology [negative for dengue IgM antibodies and positive for dengue IgG antibodies], or confirmation of Zika virus neutralizing antibodies by plaque reduction neutralization testing [PRNT]) (3), four persons were identified in Broward and Miami-Dade counties whose infections were attributed to likely local mosquito-borne transmission. Two of these persons worked within 120 meters (131 yards) of each other but had no other epidemiologic connections, suggesting the possibility of a local community-based outbreak. Further epidemiologic and laboratory investigations of the worksites and surrounding neighborhood identified a total of 29 persons with laboratory evidence of recent Zika virus infection and likely exposure during late June to early August, most within an approximate 6-block area. In response to limited impact on the population of Aedes aegypti mosquito vectors from initial ground-based mosquito control efforts, aerial ultralow volume spraying with the organophosphate insecticide naled was applied over a 10 square-mile area beginning in early August and alternated with aerial larviciding with Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies israelensis (Bti), a group biologic control agent, in a central 2 square-mile area. No additional cases were identified after implementation of this mosquito control strategy. No increases in emergency department (ED) patient visits associated with aerial spraying were reported, including visits for asthma, reactive airway disease, wheezing, shortness of breath, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. Local and state health departments serving communities where Ae. aegypti, the primary vector of Zika virus, is found should continue to actively monitor for local transmission of the virus.(†).


Asunto(s)
Culicidae/virología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Insectos Vectores/virología , Infección por el Virus Zika/diagnóstico , Infección por el Virus Zika/transmisión , Virus Zika/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto , Animales , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Control de Mosquitos/métodos , Control de Mosquitos/organización & administración , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/prevención & control
3.
J Environ Health ; 73(2): 8-11, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20873527

RESUMEN

Challenges exist in comparing foodborne disease outbreaks (FBDOs) across states due to important differences in reporting practices and investigations. Variables such as FBDO size, population size, number of tourists, and suspected etiology are important to consider when interpreting FBDO data. Analysis of eFORS data can be valuable in improving state FBDO investigations. From 2000 to 2005, Florida reported a greater proportion of FBDOs, with two cases per outbreak, than the U.S. as a whole (40.4% in Florida vs. 17.2% in the U.S.). Reporting a higher rate of small FBDOs provided more opportunities for public health interventions but contributed to a lower agent confirmation rate (17.0% in Florida vs. 42.2% in the U.S.). While the Electronic Foodborne Outbreak Reporting System's (eFORS) database brought great improvements in national FBDO surveillance, as with any complex surveillance system, considerable knowledge and specialized expertise is required to properly analyze and interpret the data, especially because there is a large variation in state reports to eFORS.


Asunto(s)
Notificación de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/epidemiología , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/prevención & control , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Acceso a la Información , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Sistemas de Administración de Bases de Datos , Florida/epidemiología , Educación en Salud , Humanos , Internet , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
J Environ Health ; 71(3): 18-22; quiz 49-50, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18990929

RESUMEN

An outbreak of giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis was identified in central Florida in September 2006. Environmental and epidemiological investigations indicated the likely source was a neighborhood interactive water fountain in a large upscale urban neighborhood. Forty-nine cases meeting the case definition were identified, of which 38 were giardiasis, nine were cryptosporidiosis, and two were co-infections. The median age of those affected was four years old, and 32 (65.3%) cases were male. This outbreak and other similar occurrences highlight the need to design and implement more stringent disinfection practices and filtration requirements for treated interactive water venues. Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts are small and chlorine-resistant, and they may require supplemental disinfection methods, such as ultraviolet light irradiation, ozonation, or chlorine dioxide. Individuals who use these types of venues also need to change their behavior to prevent disease transmission. This is the first documentation of a giardiasis outbreak associated with exposure to an interactive water fountain in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Criptosporidiosis/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Giardiasis/epidemiología , Microbiología del Agua , Preescolar , Criptosporidiosis/fisiopatología , Educación Continua , Femenino , Florida/epidemiología , Giardiasis/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Población Urbana , Purificación del Agua
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA