Treatment Efficacy Score-continuous residual cancer burden-based metric to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy between randomized trial arms in breast cancer trials.

BACKGROUND: Difference in pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not capture the impact of treatment on downstaging of residual cancer in the experimental arm. We developed a method to compare the entire distribution of residual cancer burden (RCB) values between clinical trial arms to better quantify the differences in cytotoxic efficacy of treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Treatment Efficacy Score (TES) reflects the area between the weighted cumulative distribution functions of RCB values from two trial arms. TES is based on a modified Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with added weight function to capture the importance of high RCB values and uses the area under the difference between two distribution functions as a statistical metric. The higher the TES the greater the shift to lower RCB values in the experimental arm. We developed TES from the durvalumab + olaparib arm (n = 72) and corresponding controls (n = 282) of the I-SPY2 trial. The 11 other experimental arms and control cohorts (n = 947) were used as validation sets to assess the performance of TES. We compared TES to Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests to identify trial arms with higher cytotoxic efficacy and assessed associations with trial arm level survival differences. Significance was assessed with a permutation test. RESULTS: In the validation set, TES identified arms with a higher pCR rate but was more accurate to identify regimens as less effective if treatment did not reduce the frequency of high RCB values, even if the pCR rate improved. The correlation between TES and survival was higher than the correlation between the pCR rate difference and survival. CONCLUSIONS: TES quantifies the difference between the entire distribution of pathologic responses observed in trial arms and could serve as a better early surrogate to predict trial arm level survival differences than pCR rate difference alone.

Intensive combined modality therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Conventional-dose chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer has resulted in high response rates but rarely in a cure. The addition of thoracic radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) has improved survival for patients having limited disease, resulting in a median survival of 14-18 months. Previous trials evaluating high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation have demonstrated enhanced complete response rates without documenting overall survival benefit. PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase II trial was to determine the disease-free and overall survival, toxic effects, and relapse patterns in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer who were in partial or complete response to first-line conventional-dose chemotherapy and then received intensive systemic combined modality therapy. METHODS: Adults with stage III small-cell lung cancer who had achieved at least a partial response to conventional-dose induction chemotherapy were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine combined with autologous bone marrow transplantation. Cumulative doses of the three drugs were 5625, 165, and 480 mg/m2, respectively. After recovery, patients received thoracic radiotherapy (50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions over 5-6 weeks) and cranial radiotherapy (30 Gy in 15 fractions during 3 weeks). RESULTS: Of 19 patients in the study, six had achieved complete response, eight had a greater than 90% reduction in tumor size, and five had a 50%-90% reduction in tumor size. After high-dose therapy, 15 of the 19 were in complete response. Overall, median time to treatment failure after high-dose therapy was 12 months. Overall survival was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 42%-89%) at 1 year and 53% (95% CI = 22%-77%) at 2 years. Of the 14 patients in or near complete response before high-dose therapy, 10 remain disease free with no further chemotherapy a median of 15 (4-69+) months after therapy. Actuarial 2-year disease-free survival is 57% (95% CI = 20%-82%). One patient died of Candida sepsis. Morbidity was low, and most patients returned to full-time work. With the exception of herpes zoster, there were no complications more than 3 months after high-dose therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the patients in this study are experiencing prolonged and unmaintained disease-free survival. Our findings suggest that patients in or near complete response before high-dose therapy have the most favorable prognosis. IMPLICATIONS: A randomized comparison between this approach and conventional-dose therapy is planned to define the utility of dose intensification with autologous bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who are in or near complete response.

Keratin subtypes of small cell lung cancer.

The molecular forms of keratin in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines and tumors were examined with antikeratin monoclonal antibodies. Immunostaining of SCLC by antikeratin antibody and examination by fluorescence microscopy indicates population heterogeneity in keratin content. Intensity of immunostaining is often weak. However, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting reproducibly demonstrate the presence of keratin and allow analysis of the keratin subtypes. The finding of keratin subtypes closely associated with the development of keratinizing epithelium (the 68 kDa basic keratin) in SCLC was unexpected in a tumor that is regarded as poorly differentiated. The cytoskeletal composition of SCLC suggests the presence of a heterogeneous population with a significant proportion of cells expressing highly differentiated epithelial properties.

Evaluation of monoclonal antibody DF3 conjugated with ricin as a specific immunotoxin for in vitro purging of human bone marrow.

DF3 is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody (MAb) generated against a Mr 350,000-400,000 glycoprotein expressed by approximately 80% of human breast cancers. We have coupled MAb DF3 to ricin. Purification of the immunotoxin (DF3-IT) was obtained by affinity and size exclusion chromatography. DF3 antigen-positive breast cancer cell lines (ZR-75-1, BT-20, and MCF-7) and DF3 antigen-negative lung cancer cell lines (A549 and CALU6) were tested for cytotoxicity with metabolic labeling and clonogenic assays. The cells were exposed for 3 h to different concentrations of DF3-IT, MAb DF3, ricin, and a combination of unconjugated MAb DF3 and ricin. In the presence of 100 mM lactose, DF3-IT specifically inhibited protein synthesis of lines expressing DF3 antigen on their cell surface. Moreover, clonogenic survival experiments demonstrated that DF3-IT at a concentration of 1 x 10(-9) M specifically kills 2.6-2.8 log of ZR-75-1 and BT-20 cells and 1.6 log of MCF-7 cells. At the same concentration, nonspecific toxicity of DF3-IT resulted in a 30% reduction of bone marrow granulocyte and macrophage colony formation. In bone marrow-purging experiments, tumor cells were mixed with an excess of bone marrow cells and treated with DF3-IT or ricin. Tumor cell clonogenic survival assays demonstrated that the presence of bone marrow cells had no detectable effect on activity or specificity of the DF3-IT. These results thus indicate that MAb DF3 is an effective vehicle to specifically deliver toxins to cancer cells which express DF3 antigen on their surface and that DF3-IT may be useful for in vitro purging of bone marrow.

Multimodality treatment of stage IIIA non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a critical review of the literature and strategies for future research.

PURPOSE AND DESIGN: Stage IIIA non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is composed of regionally advanced yet potentially resectable disease. Many trials have evaluated a variety of therapeutic strategies. Most have been single-arm phase II trials, although a number of comparative phase III trials have also been performed. This review critically evaluates the existing literature on the treatment of stage IIIA NSCLC, particularly the various multimodality approaches that have been used. RESULTS: A review of the existing literature does not establish the optimal treatment of stage IIIA NSCLC. Although radiation therapy alone remains the most commonly administered therapy for apparently unresectable disease, the status of radiation as a "standard" therapy can be seriously challenged based on existing data. Similarly, although a number of studies have established that surgical resection is clearly feasible in selected patients with stage IIIA disease, the efficacy of surgery also remains to be definitively established. Many studies have explored neoadjuvant chemotherapy, either in conjunction with radiation or surgery, with results that are best described as conflicting and controversial. CONCLUSIONS: Without question, randomized phase III trials are required at this time to define what is to be considered optimal treatment. An attempt is made to define the most important questions that should be addressed in future phase III trials. Additionally, a number of study designs are suggested to best answer the therapeutic questions posed.

High-dose ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection: a phase I study.

Phase II trials of ifosfamide have been performed with standard doses of 5 to 8 g/m2/course. In this phase I study, 29 patients were treated with a 4-day continuous infusion ifosfamide to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the nonhematologic dose-limiting toxicity. Autologous bone marrow support was to have been used for the subsequent dose level if granulocytes were more than 500/microL for more than 14 days in two of two to five patients at a given dose level. Doses were escalated from 8 to 18 g/m2 ifosfamide. Mesna was given at an equivalent dose by continuous infusion for 5 days. At the 18 g/m2 dose level, dose-limiting renal insufficiency and a median of 11 days (range, 8 to 18 days) of granulocytopenia (less than 500/microL) were observed. Thus, autologous bone marrow reinfusion ws not used. The duration of myelosuppression, the frequency and severity of mucositis, and renal tubular acidosis were all dose-dependent. Mild to moderate CNS toxicity also appeared to be related to dose; however, severe CNS toxicity (transient confusion, hallucinations, and somnolence) was observed sporadically at both low- and high-dose levels. Transient hematuria (greater than 50 red blood cells [RBCs]/high power field) occurred once but did not affect treatment. There were nine responses (two complete) in 27 heavily pretreated assessable patients including seven responses in 20 patients with advanced refractory sarcoma. Ifosfamide with mesna uroprotection can undergo considerable dose escalation over the usual prescribed doses before nonhematologic dose-limiting toxicity is encountered. Ifosfamide has broad cytotoxicity against solid tumors and may prove to be an important addition to high-dose combination chemotherapy regimens.

A phase I study of high-dose ifosfamide and escalating doses of carboplatin with autologous bone marrow support.

The dose-limiting toxicity in two separate phase I trials of the high-dose single agents ifosfamide and carboplatin was renal insufficiency at 18 g/m2 and hepatic and ototoxicity at 2,400 mg/m2, respectively. In this phase I study, 16 adults were treated with ifosfamide at 75% of the single-agent maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) (12 g/m2) and escalating doses of carboplatin (400 to 1,600 mg/m2) to determine the nonhematologic dose-limiting toxicity and the maximum-tolerated dose of the combination. Both drugs as well as mesna for uroprotection were given by continuous infusion over 4 days with an additional day of mesna (total dose per course, 15 g/m2). Autologous bone marrow support was stipulated for subsequent dose levels once granulocytes remained less than 500/microL for more than 14 days in two of three to five patients entered at a given dose level. Autologous bone marrow support was used at doses above the 400 mg/m2 carboplatin dose level. At the maximum-tolerated dose level of 1,600 mg/m2 of carboplatin, renal toxicity precluded further dose escalation. Of the five patients entered at this dose level, reversible creatinine elevation greater than 2 mg/dL (median peak, 2.6 mg/dL) was observed in three patients, and irreversible renal failure occurred in an additional patient (peak creatinine, 6.9 mg/dL. Transient gross hematuria appeared more common with the combination than with ifosfamide alone. Two patients developed severe somnolence and confusion associated with a rising creatinine. There were two complete (CRs) and four partial responses (PRs) in 14 heavily pretreated assessable patients (including four partial or complete responses in eight assessable patients with advanced refractory sarcoma, and one CR in two patients with germ cell carcinoma). Carboplatin and ifosfamide appear to have overlapping renal toxicity. Nevertheless, carboplatin and ifosfamide can be combined at 80% and 75% of the single-agent maximum-tolerated doses, respectively, with acceptable nonhematologic toxicity. Ifosfamide and carboplatin are an attractive core combination for further studies in the treatment of sarcoma, germ cell, ovarian, and lung carcinomas.

Dose escalation of the hypoxic cell sensitizer etanidazole combined with ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support.

Multiple mechanisms of drug resistance contribute to treatment failure. Although high-dose therapy attempts to overwhelm these defenses pharmacologically, this approach is only successful in a fraction of treated patients. Many drug resistance mechanisms are shared between malignant and normal cells, but the expression of various drug resistance mechanisms associated with hypoxia is largely confined to tumor tissue. Thus, reversal of this mechanism is likely to provide a therapeutic advantage to the host. This study was designed to define the dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of etanidazole when it is given concurrently with high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE), with hematopoietic stem cell support. The maximum tolerated doses of high-dose ICE were administered concurrently with dose escalations of etanidazole, a hypoxic cell sensitizer. All agents were given by 96-h continuous i.v. infusion beginning on day -7. Mesna uroprotection was provided. Autologous marrow and cytokine mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells were reinfused on day 0. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered following reinfusion until the granulocytes recovered to > 1000/microliter. Fifty-five adults with advanced malignancies were enrolled in cohorts of five to nine patients. Four dose levels of etanidazole between 3 and 5.5 g/m2/day (12, 16, 20, and 22 g/m2 total doses) and two doses of carboplatin (1600 and 1800 mg/m2 total doses) were evaluated. Seven patients died of organ toxicity (13%); two each from veno-occlusive disease of liver and sepsis; and one each from sudden death, renal failure, and refractory thrombocytopenic hemorrhage. Five deaths occurred at the top dose level. One additional patient suffered a witnessed cardiorespiratory arrest from ventricular fibrillation and was resuscitated. Dose-dependent and largely reversible peripheral neuropathy was observed consisting of two syndromes: severe cramping myalgic/neuralgic pain, predominantly in stocking glove distribution, occurring between day -3 and day 0, and a sensory peripheral neuropathy with similar distribution peaking around day +60. The maximal achievable dose of etanidazole (16 g/m2 dose level) resulted in a mean serum level of 38 micrograms/ml (25-55 micrograms/ml). Etanidazole significantly enhanced host toxicity of high-dose ICE. Effective modulatory doses of etanidazole could not be given with acceptable toxicity using this schedule.

The clinical management of soft tissue sarcomas.

Sarcomas are a relatively rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors of principally mesenchymal origin. The histologic grade and size (and possibly compartmental localization) are the main factors predicting local and distant biologic aggressiveness. Tumor localization and surgical margins are significant prognostic factors that relate to the adequacy of local-regional therapy. A general consensus management usually consists of an incisional biopsy for diagnosis and grade, staging of the primary tumor and lungs, and function-preserving surgery with margins free of tumor either followed by or preceded by tumor bed high-dose radiotherapy. Each of these concepts remains under active investigation. The role of adjuvant therapy is not yet established despite tantalizing biologic effects documented in their trials. Ifosfamide in addition to doxorubicin does appear to have major activity; however, further laboratory investigation of resistance and metastases mechanisms and new drug evaluations are necessary for further advance.

High-dose therapy for adult soft tissue sarcoma: dose response and survival.

The role for high-dose therapy in the treatment of sarcomas is controversial and limited. Numerous trials in soft tissue sarcomas have suggested dose-response relationships for doxorubicin (and epirubicin) and ifosfamide. Low doses of these agents are associated with lower response rates than aggressive doses that do not require cellular support. There is little evidence that doses high enough to require hematopoietic stem cell support achieve higher response rates. Complete responses remain rare, and no survival advantage has been documented. New drugs are needed urgently, particularly those with dose-response relationships and those achieving complete responses. In their absence, transplant therapy does not yet play a role in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas, although further phase II trials could be performed to assess consolidation therapy for complete responders, patients requiring neoadjuvant therapy, and those with resectable oligometastatic disease. High-dose therapy has been evaluated more extensively in patients with pediatric histologies like Ewing's sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Many more agents suited to transplant regimens have substantial activity against these histologies. Results from certain trials demonstrate improved, long-term, relapse-free survival compared with historical controls, whereas others suggest that selection biases may account for such "improvements." Development of new agents is needed. Carefully designed randomized trials to evaluate the role of high-dose therapy with cellular support should be strongly encouraged in these histologies.

Salvage therapy for soft tissue sarcomas.

The clinical management of sarcomas, tumors of the connective tissue, is complicated by their relative rarity and pathologic heterogeneity. Adequate first-line treatment is essential to diminish the need for salvage therapy, and includes diagnostic incisional biopsy, appropriate staging of disease extent locally and systemically, and, at resection, careful assessment of surgical margins and tumor grade and size. In patients with resectable limb-sparing disease, local control is most frequently achieved with surgery and preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy. In patients with isolated pulmonary recurrence, pulmonary metastatectomy is clearly indicated. For soft tissue sarcomas, chemotherapy is palliative. Only two drugs, doxorubicin (and its analogue, epirubicin) and ifosfamide, have demonstrated more than 20% activity in soft tissue sarcomas. The two leading combination regimens currently are cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/dacarbazine (CyADIC) and mesna/doxorubicin/ifosfamide with or without dacarbazine (MAI +/- D), which, when used aggressively, achieve response rates of 40% to 57%. In metastatic disease, however, there appears to be no survival advantage to using combination chemotherapy over single agents used in sequence. Biologic agents, including tumor necrosis factor and gamma interferon, have not been effective as single agents, but antiangiogenic therapy with alpha interferon may have synergy when combined with chemotherapy. Clearly, new chemotherapeutic agents and agents to overcome drug resistance mechanisms are needed to bolster the efficacy of therapy for patients with sarcomas.

High-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support: safety and future directions.

Agents with broad cytotoxic activity, steep linear log dose-response relationships, relative non-cross-resistance, and nonoverlapping nonhematologic toxicities can be combined to create new high-dose combination regimens. We have previously reported phase I dose-escalation studies of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and the combination of the two. Etoposide has reported synergism with these alkylators and produces mucositis as its dose-limiting toxicity. The current study was designed to define the maximum tolerated doses of high-dose combination ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE), with stem cell support for amelioration of hematologic toxicity. Forty-eight adults with advanced malignancy received ICE chemotherapy by 96-hour continuous infusion. Initially, etoposide was added to fixed-dose ifosfamide and carboplatin, then the maximum tolerated dose of etoposide was fixed while doses of the alkylators were individually escalated. Autologous marrow, with or without peripheral blood progenitor cells, was reinfused 3 days after completing chemotherapy. The maximum tolerated doses of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide were identified as 16 g/m2, 1.8 g/m2, and 1.2 g/m2, respectively. Mortality was 4%. Patients who had prior cisplatin exposure were at increased risk for renal toxicity. If serum creatinine levels (monitored twice daily) rose sharply during chemotherapy, ifosfamide and carboplatin were immediately stopped. Severe multiorgan toxicity developed in the few patients who experienced early renal toxicity. Early stopping enhanced the safety of this regimen. Interpatient differences in chemotherapy drug metabolism or reduced renal clearance may predispose individuals to severe toxicity by increasing overall drug exposure. It was concluded that the ICE regimen is well tolerated and warrants further exploration as treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer, ovarian and germ cell carcinomas, and lymphomas in phase II trials.

A phase I study of ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer.

A phase I study was conducted to define the maximally tolerated dose and toxicity profile of the ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) (ICE-T) regimen in advanced lung cancer. This chemotherapy program uses paclitaxel given as a 24-hour continuous infusion in conjunction with full-dose ICE chemotherapy with growth factor support. The dosage of paclitaxel was escalated from 75 to 225 mg/m2. Thirty-four patients have been accrued to date onto this study. Because hematologic dose-limiting toxicity was defined in terms of neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia exceeding 7 days' duration, no patient demonstrated what was defined by the protocol as dose-limiting toxicity. Nonetheless, substantial hematologic toxicity was observed. Overall, 26% had fever and neutropenia, 56% had grade 4 neutropenia, and 26% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In all cases, hematologic toxicity was short term and reversible. While grade 3 and 4 myelosuppression was frequently observed, it was not dose related (in terms of paclitaxel dosage). Nonhematologic toxicity also was not dose related and, with only a few exceptions, was not clinically significant. Among 27 patients evaluable for response, 41% achieved an objective response, including 15% with a complete response. All of five patients with small cell lung cancer responded (including two with a complete response). Among 22 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 27% achieved an objective response (also including two with a complete response). The results of this study suggest that with growth factor support, it is possible to safely administer full-dose, single-agent paclitaxel in conjunction with full-dose ICE chemotherapy. We will soon be initiating a phase II study of the ICE-T regimen using paclitaxel at 225 mg/m2 as a 24-hour continuous infusion in advanced lung cancer. We will also conduct a phase I study of ICE-T, with paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour continuous infusion.

Ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide/paclitaxel in advanced lung cancer: update and preliminary survival analysis.

The primary objective of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), given as a 24-hour infusion, in conjunction with ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide (ICE) chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. Paclitaxel was escalated from 75 to 225 mg/m2 in 25-mg/m2 increments. All patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 5 microg/kg/d from day 4 until the neutrophil count was > or = 10,000/microL. The study population consisted of 41 patients with a median age of 60 years and a median follow-up of 20.7 months. Stage distribution included 5% stage IIIA, 46% stage IIIB, and 49% stage IV. Histology consisted of 61% adenocarcinoma, 12% squamous cell carcinoma, 10% large cell carcinoma, 15% small cell carcinoma, and 2% mixed. The predominant toxicity was hematologic; 63% of patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia and 49% developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Fever and neutropenia occurred in 34% of patients. Hematologic toxicity was, in all cases, short-term and reversible and was not dose related. With few exceptions, nonhematologic toxicity was not clinically important. Among 39 patients evaluable for response, 36% achieved a remission (8% complete, 28% partial, 41% had stable disease, and 23% experienced disease progression). Among 33 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the response rate was 27% (one complete response, eight partial responses, 15 had stable disease, and nine had progressive disease). Among six patients with small cell carcinoma, the response rate was 83% (two complete responses, three partial responses, and one had stable disease). The median survival of all 41 patients was 13.6 months. Survival was almost identical between stage IIIA and stage IV subsets. We conclude that it is possible to safely administer full-dose single-agent paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in conjunction with full-dose ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. While response rates observed were not particularly notable, median survival is considerably longer than that usually achieved with combination chemotherapy in advanced lung cancer.

Gallium imaging in metastatic and recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma.

Fifty-six patients with metastatic or recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma were evaluated by 67Ga-citrate imaging. Prior to entry on the therapy protocol, 52/56 (93%) patients had true-positive 67Ga studies. Two of four patients with liposarcoma, one of twelve with leiomyosarcoma and one with an epithelioid sarcoma had false-negative studies; 89/105 disease sites (85%) were 67Ga positive, including 100% of pleural lesions, 94% in bone, 88% in the abdomen, 85% in soft tissue, 78% in lung parenchyma and 56% of liver metastases. There was significant association between 67Ga avidity and tumor grade with the exception of mesothelioma. No relationship was seen between 67Ga avidity and tumor cell type, disease site or lesion size. Following therapy, 67Ga correctly identified 11/12 sites of active disease in 8/9 patients. Mean pre- and post-therapy 67Ga avidity scores did not differ significantly. Gallium-67 appears to have an important role in the evaluation of patients presenting with either primary or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

Dose-intensive therapy for small cell lung cancer.

Enhancement of dose and dose intensity increases tumor response and may enhance long-term progression-free survival in patients with small cell lung cancer. Several strategies are identified to intensify therapy safely: a traditional induction/intensification mode, in which high-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell support is used to treat patients responding to conventional-dose therapy; and multicycle dose-intensive approaches, in which higher-dose therapy is administered over multiple cycles at initiation of therapy. This paper reviews some of the recently completed and activated trials (particularly those developed at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) exploring these concepts.

Small cell lung cancer: state-of-the-art therapy in 1996.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) occurs almost exclusively in smokers and represents 15 to 25% of all lung cancer histologic findings. It is distinguished from non-small cell lung cancer by its rapid tumor doubling time, high growth fraction, and early development of widespread metastases. Since patients with SCLC usually present with disseminated disease, treatment strategies have focused on systemic therapy. Single-agent and combination chemotherapy, as well as combined-modality therapy, have produced high response rates (80 to 100% for limited disease; 60 to 80% for extensive disease), but these tend to be short-lived (median duration, 6 to 8 months). Survival beyond 5 years occurs in only 3 to 8% of all patients with SCLC. At least 15 to 20 different chemotherapeutic agents have shown major activity against SCLC in both the untreated and relapsed settings, including etoposide, teniposide, cisplatin, carboplatin, ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and doxorubicin. This paper reviews state-of-the-art treatment strategies being employed in the treatment of SCLC, including those incorporating high-dose intensive therapy, salvage therapy, new agents, thoracic radiotherapy, prophylactic cranial radiotherapy, surgical resection, and biologic response modifiers.

High-dose combined alkylating agent therapy with autologous stem cell support and chest radiotherapy for limited small-cell lung cancer.

Although initially responsive to chemotherapy, patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) almost invariably suffer relapse. Recurrent SCLC responds poorly to treatment. Previous trials using high-dose chemotherapy with bone marrow support have commonly used single agents or combined alkylating agents without chest radiotherapy. Among patients with limited disease receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy, locoregional relapse remained the predominant site of first failure. Recent phase II trials using intensive locoregional therapy (aggressive concurrent chemoradiotherapy) have resulted in promising survival. Our trial used combined alkylating agents with autologous marrow support and chest radiotherapy in patients with limited disease in response to conventional-dose induction chemotherapy. Of 19 patients treated, the actuarial survival was 56% with a median follow-up of 18 months following high-dose therapy. Patients who achieved complete or near-complete response prior to high-dose therapy enjoyed the best prognosis. Continued evaluation of intensive systemic and local therapy for SCLC is indicated.

Multimodality therapy of patients with stage IIIA, N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on resectability and downstaging.

To assess the effect of neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy on resectability, stage of disease at resection, and patterns of recurrence and survival in patients with IIIA, N2 non-small-cell lung cancer, we examined the first 60 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by attempted resection in our institution. Of 67 patients identified, 7 patients were ineligible because of comorbidities, 3 patients refused chemotherapy, and 1 consented but died before treatment. Fifty-six received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Complications of chemotherapy were minor, with no deaths. Fifty-four patients had thoracotomy; 75% (n = 42) had complete resection and 25% (n = 14) had unresectable lesions. One postoperative death occurred (2%). Pathologic review of specimens and nodal groups revealed that 41% (n = 23) were downstaged, 39% (n = 22) remained stage IIIA, and 19% (n = 11) progressed. Squamous histologic type was predictive of resectability, 18 of 20 patients having resectable squamous cell tumors (p < 0.05). Actuarial survivals at 1 and 2 years were 74% and 52%, respectively. In patients with resectable tumors survivals at 1 and 2 years were 85% and 67%, respectively. For those with unresectable lesions, survivals were 43% and 14%. Relapse-free survivals at 1 and 2 years for patients with resectable lesions were 70% and 42%, respectively. Relapses were local in 25% (n = 4), at a distant site only in 50% (n = 8), combined local and distant in 25% (n = 4). Distant relapse occurred in the central nervous system only in 7 of 8 patients (88%). Complete resectability was highly predictive of improved survival (p < 0.0002). Weight loss did not affect resectability but was associated with decreased survival (p < 0.003). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears to improve resectability and to pathologically downstage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer from stage IIIA. Multiinstitutional randomized trials are needed to further demonstrate the efficacy of this approach.

Neoadjuvant therapy for surgically staged IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant therapy in patients with Stage IIIA NSCLC is associated with a 50-70% resection rate and a 3-5 year survival of 20-32%, but few trials have required meticulous staging of the mediastinum to ensure homogeneity of the study population. Continuous infusion cisplatin 25 mg/m2/day 1-5, 5-fluorouracil 800 mg/m2/day 2-5, and high-dose leukovorin 500 mg/m2/day 1-5 (PFL) given every 4 weeks achieved a 41% response rate in metastatic NSCLC (Lynch TJ, Kalish LA, Kass F, Strauss G, Elias A, Skarin A, Shulman L, Sugarbaker D, Frei E. Continuous infusion cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leukovorin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 1994; 73: 1171-1176). The regimen was therefore evaluated in 34 patients with pathologic Stage IIIA N2 disease between 3/91 and 10/92. METHODS: Staging consisted of chest, liver, brain computerized tomography and bone scan, bronchoscopy and surgical mediastinal node mapping. Patients received PFL for 3 cycles, followed by thoracotomy and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) to 54-60 Gy. RESULTS: Median age was 57 (42-68) years. Demographic factors included: male 56%; adenocarcinoma 59%, squamous cell carcinoma 24%; Stage T3N2 26%, T2N2 56%, and T1N2 18%. No treatment related deaths occurred. Radiographically defined response to PFL was 65% (6% complete). Thoracotomy was performed in 28 patients (82%) (6 had no attempt due to disease progression). Complete resection was achieved in 21 (75%) and seven were unresectable. Pathologic complete response was observed in five patients (15%) and an additional unresectable patient had fibrosis-only documented at thoracotomy for an overall clinicopathologic response rate of 76% (18% pathologic CR). Another ten patients had residual primary with or without hilar disease with resolution of previously documented mediastinal involvement. Six (18%) patients remain alive and disease-free with a median follow-up of 46 (33-50) months, four of whom had achieved pathologic complete response at time of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term event-free survival was associated with complete surgical resection which in turn was associated with clinical response to chemotherapy. There was a possible trend associating pathologic downstaging (absent residual disease in mediastinal nodes), particularly pathologic complete response observed in patients with non-bulky mediastinal disease, with improved event-free survival. Pathologic downstaging might therefore be a useful surrogate endpoint in trials evaluating the preoperative activity of new chemotherapy regimens. While radiographic response generally correlated with findings at surgery, response as determined by histologic examination of resected tissue was generally more extensive and may more accurately reflect the systemic impact of the chemotherapy regimen.