A Phase 1B, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, multiple-dose escalation study of NSI-189 phosphate, a neurogenic compound, in depressed patients.

We wanted to examine tolerability and efficacy of NSI-189, a benzylpiperizine-aminiopyridine neurogenic compound for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). This was a Phase 1B, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled, multiple-dose study with three cohorts. The first cohort received 40 mg q.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2), the second cohort 40 mg b.i.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2), and the third cohort 40 mg t.i.d. (n=6) or placebo (n=2). Twenty-four patients with MDD were recruited, with the diagnosis and severity confirmed through remote interviews. Eligible patients received NSI-189 or placebo for 28 days in an inpatient setting with assessments for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. Outpatient follow-up visits were conducted until day 84 (±3). NSI-189 was relatively well tolerated at all doses, with no serious adverse effects. NSI-189 area under the curve increased in a dose-related and nearly proportional manner across the three cohorts, with a half-life of 17.4-20.5 h. The exploratory efficacy measurements, including Symptoms Of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I), and The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cognitive and Physical Functioning Questionnaire (CPFQ) showed a promising reduction in depressive and cognitive symptoms across all measures for NSI-189, with significant improvement in the SDQ and CPFQ, and a medium to large effect size for all measures. These improvements persisted during the follow-up phase. In summary, NSI-189 shows potential as a treatment for MDD in an early phase study. The main limitation of this preliminary study was the small sample size of each cohort.

Validation of a suite of ERP and QEEG biomarkers in a pre-competitive, industry-led study in subjects with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Complexity and lack of standardization have mostly limited the use of event-related potentials (ERPs) and quantitative EEG (QEEG) biomarkers in drug development to small early phase trials. We present results from a clinical study on healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with schizophrenia (SZ) that assessed test-retest, group differences, variance, and correlation with functional assessments for ERP and QEEG measures collected at clinical and commercial trial sites with standardized instrumentation and methods, and analyzed through an automated data analysis pipeline. METHODS: 81 HV and 80 SZ were tested at one of four study sites. Subjects were administered two ERP/EEG testing sessions on separate visits. Sessions included a mismatch negativity paradigm, a 40 Hz auditory steady-state response paradigm, an eyes-closed resting state EEG, and an active auditory oddball paradigm. SZ subjects were also tested on the Brief Assessment of Cognition (BAC), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT). RESULTS: Standardized ERP/EEG instrumentation and methods ensured few test failures. The automated data analysis pipeline allowed for near real-time analysis with no human intervention. Test-retest reliability was fair-to-excellent for most of the outcome measures. SZ subjects showed significant deficits in ERP and QEEG measures consistent with published academic literature. A subset of ERP and QEEG measures correlated with functional assessments administered to the SZ subjects. CONCLUSIONS: With standardized instrumentation and methods, complex ERP/EEG testing sessions can be reliably performed at clinical and commercial trial sites to produce high-quality data in near real-time.

Low penetration of oseltamivir and its carboxylate into cerebrospinal fluid in healthy Japanese and Caucasian volunteers.

Oseltamivir is a potent, well-tolerated antiviral for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza. Although no relationship with treatment could be demonstrated, recent reports of abnormal behavior in young individuals with influenza who were receiving oseltamivir have generated renewed interest in the central nervous system (CNS) tolerability of oseltamivir. This single-center, open-label study explored the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir and oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of healthy adult volunteers over a 24-hour interval to determine the CNS penetration of both these compounds. Four Japanese and four Caucasian males were enrolled in the study. Oseltamivir and OC concentrations in CSF were low (mean of observed maximum concentrations [C(max)], 2.4 ng/ml [oseltamivir] and 19.0 ng/ml [OC]) versus those in plasma (mean C(max), 115 ng/ml [oseltamivir] and 544 ng/ml [OC]), with corresponding C(max) CSF/plasma ratios of 2.1% (oseltamivir) and 3.5% (OC). Overall exposure to oseltamivir and OC in CSF was also comparatively low versus that in plasma (mean area under the concentration-time curve CSF/plasma ratio, 2.4% [oseltamivir] and 2.9% [OC]). No gross differences in the pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir or OC were observed between the Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Oseltamivir was well tolerated. This demonstrates that the CNS penetration of oseltamivir and OC is low in Japanese and Caucasian adults. Emerging data support the idea that oseltamivir and OC have limited potential to induce or exacerbate CNS adverse events in individuals with influenza. A disease- rather than drug-related effect appears likely.

Multiple-dose plasma pharmacokinetic and safety study of LY450108 and LY451395 (AMPA receptor potentiators) and their concentration in cerebrospinal fluid in healthy human subjects.

The objective of this study was to measure the steady-state cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration of LY450108 and LY451395 (positive modulators of AMPA receptors) in healthy subjects after the administration of 1 mg and 5 mg. Secondary objectives included the evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics, and steady-state ratio of plasma:CSF concentrations of LY450108 and LY451395 after multiple dosing. This study was an open-label, multiple oral dose study evaluating 1 mg and 5 mg LY450108 and 1 mg and 5 mg LY451395 in 12 (3 subjects per dosing group) healthy subjects, aged 18 to 49 years. Twelve healthy male subjects completed the study. LY450108 and LY451395 were quantifiable in CSF after 1-mg and 5-mg multiple-dose administrations with plasma:CSF ratio of 82:1 and 44:1, respectively. LY450108 and LY451395 1 mg and 5 mg were measured in the CSF. Single and multiple oral doses of LY450108 and LY451395 were determined to be safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects.

An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials. Part II. Detection of a drug-drug interaction.

The use of observational data, collected during the routine clinical care of patients, has been advocated as a means to obtain clinically relevant information regarding the pharmacokinetic parameters of drugs. However, the validity of this approach and its proper role in new drug development is unclear. This study was performed to evaluate the ability of three approaches to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters: the traditional approach, mixed-effect modeling, and a simple pharmacokinetic screen. The evaluation was performed with data collected during a multicenter, open-label study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of imipramine and alprazolam in combination. The traditional pharmacokinetic study demonstrated a 20% decrease in the clearance of imipramine in the presence of 4 mg/day alprazolam. Mixed-effect modeling extends these findings by suggesting that the interaction is dependent on the simultaneous concentration of alprazolam, a finding that was not possible under the study design typically used for traditional pharmacokinetic studies. Although the simple screen suggests the presence of the drug-drug interaction, limited information regarding pharmacokinetic parameters is available and those parameters that can be estimated are biased.

Treatment of tardive dyskinesia and mania with RBC lithium determinations.

The authors report the usefulness of RBC lithium determinations in managing the treatment of tardive dyskinesia. They present a case report in which manic manifestations and tardive dyskinesia symptoms paralleled the rise and fall of RBC lithium and plasma lithium levels were constant during the period of symptom improvement. They conclude that RBC lithium levels appeared to reflect toxicity, control of mania, and symptom suppression of tardive dyskinesia better than plasma lithium levels alone.

Very high dose loxapine in refractory schizophrenic patients.

The authors report on three chronic, treatment-refractory schizophrenic patients who dramatically improved when placed on very high doses of loxapine (300-500 mg/day). Numbness transiently appeared in two patients at very high doses of loxapine; it may be a frequently occurring but unreported side effect. The relative lack of serious side effects to very high dose loxapine suggests that this may be a useful intervention in carefully selected refractory patients. The authors recommend that controlled studies be done to elucidate the benefit to risk ratio.

Antidepressant drug interactions and the cytochrome P450 system. The role of cytochrome P450 2D6.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and venlafaxine display the following rank order of in vitro potency against the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzyme CYP2D6 as measured by their inhibition sparteine and/or dextromethorphan metabolism: paroxetine > fluoxetine identical to norfluoxetine > or = sertraline > or = fluvoxamine > venlafaxine. On this basis, paroxetine would appear to have the greatest and fluvoxamine and venlafaxine the least potential for drug interactions with CYP2D6-dependent drugs. In vivo, inhibitory potency is affected by the plasma concentration of the free (unbound) drug, a potentially important consideration since many CYP2D6-metabolised drugs exhibit nonlinear (saturable) kinetics, and by the presence of metabolites, which might accumulate and interact with the CYP system. Under steady-state conditions, paroxetine and fluoxetine are approximately clinically equipotent inhibitors of CYP2D6 in vivo (as determined through their effects on desipramine metabolism); sertraline, in contrast, shows lower steady-state plasma concentrations than fluoxetine and, hence, a less pronounced inhibition of CYP2D6. Of the drugs that are metabolised by CYP2D6, secondary amine tricyclic antidepressants, antipsychotics (e.g. phenothiazines, and risperidone), codeine, some antiarrhythmics (e.g. flecainide) and beta-blockers form the focus of clinical attention with regard to their potential interactions with the SSRIs. Coadministration of desipramine and fluoxetine (20 mg/day) at steady-state produced an approximately 4-fold elevation in peak plasma desipramine concentrations, while the long half-life of the active metabolite norfluoxetine was responsible for a significant and long lasting (approximately 3 weeks) elevation of plasma desipramine concentrations after discontinuation of fluoxetine. Similarly, coadministration of desipramine with paroxetine produced an approximately 3-fold increase in plasma desipramine concentration. In contrast, coadministration of desipramine and sertraline (50 mg/day) for 4 weeks resulted in a considerably more modest (approximately 30%) elevation in plasma desipramine concentrations. Coadministration of fluoxetine (60 mg/day, as a loading dose) [equivalent to serum concentrations obtained with 20 mg/day at steady-state] with imipramine or desipramine resulted in approximately 3- to 4-fold increases in plasma area under the curve (AUC) values for both imipramine and desipramine (illustrating a significant drug interaction potential at multiple isoenzymes). Consistent with its minimal in vitro effect on CYP2D6, fluvoxamine shows minimal in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction with desipramine, but does interact with imipramine (approximately 3- to 4-fold increase in AUC) through inhibition of CYP3A3/4, CYP1A2, and CYP2C19. Thus, the extent of the in vivo interaction between the SSRIs and tricyclic antidepressants mirrors to a large extent their in vitro inhibitory potencies against CYP2D6 and other isoenzyme systems, especially if one takes into account pharmacokinetic factors.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the depot antipsychotics.

The clinical pharmacokinetics of the 4 depot antipsychotics for which plasma level studies are available (i.e. fluphenazine enanthate and decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, clopenthixol decanoate and flupenthixol decanoate) are reviewed. The proper study of these agents has been handicapped until recently by the necessity of accurately measuring subnanomolar concentrations in plasma. Their kinetic properties, the relationship of plasma concentrations to clinical effects, and conversion from oral to injectable therapy are discussed. The depot antipsychotics are synthesised by esterification of the active drug to a long chain fatty acid and the resultant compound is then dissolved in a vegetable oil. The absorption rate constant is slower than the elimination rate constant and therefore, the depot antipsychotics exhibit 'flip-flop' kinetics where the time to steady-state is a function of the absorption rate, and the concentration at steady-state is a function of the elimination rate. Fluphenazine is available as both an enanthate and decanoate ester (both dissolved in sesame oil), although the decanoate is more commonly used clinically. The enanthate produces peak plasma concentrations on days 2 to 3 and declines with an apparent elimination half-life (i.e. the half-time of the apparent first-order decline of plasma concentrations) of 3.5 to 4 days after a single injection. The decanoate produces an early high peak which occurs during the first day and then declines with an apparent half-life ranging from 6.8 to 9.6 days following a single injection. After multiple injections of fluphenazine decanoate, however, the mean apparent half-life increases to 14.3 days, and the time to reach steady-state is 4 to 6 weeks. Withdrawal studies with fluphenazine decanoate suggest that relapsing patients have a more rapid plasma concentration decline than non-relapsing patients, and that the plasma concentrations do not decline smoothly but may exhibit 'lumps' due to residual release from previous injection sites or multicompartment redistribution. Cigarette smoking has been found to be associated with a 2.33-fold increase in the clearance of fluphenazine decanoate. In 3 different studies, fluphenazine has been proposed to have a therapeutic range from less than 0.15 to 0.5 ng/ml with an upper therapeutic range of 4.0 ng/ml. Plasma concentrations following the decanoate injection are generally lower than, but clinically equivalent to, those attained with the oral form of the drug. Haloperidol decanoate plasma concentrations peak on the seventh day following injection although, in some patients, this peak may occur on the first day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions: update for new antipsychotics.

Advances in our understanding of schizophrenia have led to a new generation of antipsychotic agents. These medications not only demonstrate reduced extrapyramidal symptoms but also possess pharmacologic profiles that can be especially advantageous in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The pharmacokinetics of many of the newer agents are compared and contrasted with typical neuroleptics. Changes in the pharmacokinetics and dosage of the newer agents are also reviewed. A particular emphasis is placed on the metabolism of the newer agents and their potential for drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions. Clozapine, the archetypal atypical agent, has a complex pharmacokinetic profile with extremely large interpatient variability and many well-documented drug-drug interactions. Thus, clozapine presents special challenges in dose optimization and requires vigilant clinical monitoring for cardiovascular, neurologic, and hematologic adverse effects. Olanzapine demonstrates a very low potential for drug-drug interactions; it requires extremely high inhibitory concentrations at cytrochrome P450 (CYP) systems, typically 30-fold above the usual concentrations observed at steady-state oral high-dose therapy. The metabolic pathways of olanzapine include N-glucuronidation, reducing its overall sensitivity to drugs that might induce or inhibit its own metabolism via CYP or flavin-containing monooxygenase (FMO) systems. Plasma olanzapine concentrations at steady state typically demonstrate only a fourfold to fivefold variability among patients at a standard dose of medications. Sertindole and risperidone demonstrate polymorphic metabolism characteristics mirroring the CYP 2D6 phenotype. The inhibitory potentials of sertindole at CYP 2D6 and CYP 3A are modest and not likely to be of clinical significance. However, in those patients taking CYP 2D6 inhibitors or in those who are genotypic poor metabolizers, concentrations achieved by sertindole and its metabolites might result in moderate inhibition of CYP 3A.

Pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic considerations in choosing an antipsychotic.

Recent advances in our understanding of schizophrenia along with neuroscience insights into antipsychotic medication mechanisms of action have led to a renaissance in new drug development, including an expanded therapeutic spectrum encompassing more of the symptoms encountered in schizophrenia. Atypical antipsychotics, or new generation therapies, also demonstrate greater selectivity for therapeutic actions than for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Our modern armamentarium of drugs spans a wide range of pharmacologies, and it is more accurate to envision shades of gray rather than a black-and-white description for typical versus atypical properties of medications. As our paradigms for antipsychotic efficacy have shifted, a reexploration of the "older" neuroleptics is warranted to determine if they possess pharmacologic attributes that might have been overlooked during the era of high-dose neuroleptic therapy. Loxapine appears to be in the center of this spectrum, somewhere between haloperidol and risperidone. Dosing implications for drugs with a more even serotonin-2A (5-HT2A) receptor and dopamine-2 (D2) receptor blocking effect are discussed. Loxapine might have a window of partial atypicality at doses < or = 50 mg/day. These lower doses might have potential as both monotherapy in responsive patients with persistent psychotic disorders and as an adjunctive treatment in partially responding patients on concurrent atypical antipsychotic treatments. The pharmacologic properties of loxapine within its usable dosage range are quite complex and are the net sum of the parent's plus metabolites' contributions (demethylation and hydroxylation by cytochrome P450 enzymes). These pharmacologic effects include alpha-adrenergic blockade, inhibition of the noradrenergic transporter protein (reuptake inhibition), and antimuscarinic effects. Drug interactions and cigarette smoking might alter the parent-to-metabolite concentration ratios, affecting the relative atypicality of this antipsychotic therapy. Moreover, with the intramuscular formulation, which does not undergo first-pass metabolism, the parent compound of loxapine, i.e., not its metabolites, is predominantly detected in the plasma of patients, reducing the likelihood for EPS during emergency interventions in patients with positive symptoms. Further study is warranted to determine loxapine's place in our treatment of schizophrenia.

A pharmacoeconomic model of outpatient antipsychotic therapy in "revolving door" schizophrenic patients.

BACKGROUND: The discrepancy between supply and demand in health care today requires that psychiatrists and other providers of patient care expand their traditional role from one of patient advocate to one of allocator of care. In this new role, the care provider must consider not only the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic regimen, but also its impact on society in terms of quality of life and cost-effectiveness. METHOD: A variety of pharmacoeconomic analysis methodologies have been used to assess the economic and quality of life consequences of alternate treatment strategies. A clinical decision analysis model that takes into account compliance rates and associated rehospitalization was used to compare the direct treatment costs associated with alternate outpatient neuroleptic strategies for "revolving door" schizophrenic patients. The antipsychotic treatment options considered were traditional oral neuroleptics (e.g., haloperidol), depot neuroleptics (e.g., haloperidol decanoate), and "atypical" oral agents (e.g., risperidone). RESULTS: The results of this decision analysis model (based on a set of reasonable outcome probabilities and costs) suggest that, under five sets of cost and outcome assumptions, switching to the depot route in a patient with a history of relapse and rehospitalization may reduce total direct treatment costs by approximately $650 to $2600/year compared with an atypical agent and approximately $460 to $1150/year compared with a traditional oral neuroleptic. Under a sixth set of assumptions-namely, a compliance rate with atypical oral drug (80%) equal to that with the depot agent and an average wholesale price of the atypical drug 25% lower than current wholesale price-the atypical oral drug treatment option would be approximately $700 less than treatment with a depot agent, and $1860 less than treatment with a traditional neuroleptic. CONCLUSION: The decision analysis model presented here indicates that, under a variety of assumptions, switching a revolving door patient to a depot medication for outpatient maintenance therapy could result in lower total direct treatment costs over the first year. This finding was consistent, although to varying degrees, under differing probability and cost assumptions. The proposed model can be used in other clinical circumstances, such as treatment-refractory patients or those with severe negative symptoms, as well as with other associated outcome probabilities and costs. Application of this model in different clinical scenarios associated with different outcome probabilities and treatment costs, however, may well provide different results.

Serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor drug interactions and the cytochrome P450 system.

The article focuses on the effects of the serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on specific drug metabolizing isoenzymes: CYP2D6, CYP3A3/4, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. Both in vitro and in vivo data regarding the inhibition potential of the SSRIs at each of these isoenzyme systems are reviewed. In general, the magnitude of the in vivo interactions between the SSRIs and substrates for these isoenzyme systems mirrors to a large extent their in vitro inhibitory potencies. However, in vitro work is limited owing to pharmacokinetic considerations, the effect of metabolites on the isoenzymes, and the likelihood that several isoenzymes are co-responsible for the metabolism of a substrate.

Bioavailability of psychotropic drugs: historical perspective and pharmacokinetic overview.

The evolution of the federal government's role in the regulation and evaluation of generic psychotropic medications is described. To place many of the methodologic bioequivalence issues for antipsychotic agents into perspective, the pharmacokinetics of these drugs are reviewed. Appropriate methodologies for studying the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of psychotropic drugs are in early developmental stages. Many of the issues relating to bioequivalence of generic products will not be resolved until a better understanding of these factors is developed.

Branded versus generic clozapine: bioavailability comparison and interchangeability issues.

Clozapine has been the treatment of choice for patients with refractory schizophrenia. Generic clozapine has recently become available, because of a waiver of the usual criteria for establishing bioequivalence. However, there are biopharmaceutical, bioavailability, and clinical concerns related to the generic formulation raised by both clinicians and academic researchers. We conducted a prospective, randomized, crossover study to evaluate steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of generic clozapine (Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals) versus Clozaril (Novartis Pharmaceuticals) in schizophrenic patients. A preliminary report of the pertinent bioavailability results is presented here. Despite comparable mean plasma concentration-time curves, significant differences were found in the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of the 2 formulations in almost 40% of patients. Such intraindividual differences raise the issue of average bioequivalence versus individual bioequivalence and the implication for interchangeability of different clozapine formulations. The decision to switch a patient from branded to generic clozapine should be made on an individual basis with special emphasis on clinical outcome, and patients should be monitored closely during the transition.

Future of depot neuroleptic therapy: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approaches.

The future of depot neuroleptic therapy is discussed in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic research opportunities. Analytic methods for neuroleptic assays, including chromatographic, radioreceptor, nuclear magnetic resonance, and radioimmunoassay techniques, are briefly reviewed. Elucidation of depot neuroleptic multicompartment kinetics utilizing nonlinear mixed-effects modeling and the usefulness of these data in interpreting plasma levels are discussed. The clinical significance of plasma monitoring of depot fluphenazine, including the development of dosage conversion guidelines, is presented. The relationships between haloperidol and its metabolite reduced haloperidol (RH) are discussed in terms of dosage form and response. Clinical advantages resulting from the availability of more depot neuroleptics are discussed.

Clinical outcome and adverse effect profile associated with concurrent administration of alprazolam and imipramine.

Clinical outcome and adverse effects associated with concurrent alprazolam and imipramine administration were studied in 29 patients with major depressive disorder who completed a 6-week trial in which they served as their own controls. Alprazolam was added on Day 8 in gradually escalating, then gradually tapering dosages while imipramine dosages remained unchanged. Significant decreases were observed in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety at all later evaluation days with Day 8 as baseline. The mean total Symptom and Side Effects score decreased significantly from Day 8 to Day 22 when alprazolam doses were 1 mg q.i.d. For most side effects, total number of reports remained constant or decreased from Day 1 to later evaluation days. Standing diastolic blood pressures were significantly lower on Day 22 than on Day 1. No significant relationship was found between any rating scale score and plasma concentration data.

Effects of smoking on haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma concentrations and haloperidol clearance.

Plasma concentrations of haloperidol and its reduced metabolite (reduced haloperidol) were investigated in cigarette smokers (N = 23) and nonsmokers (N = 27). Steady-state plasma concentrations were obtained 12 h post bedtime dose. Haloperidol and reduced haloperidol concentrations were determined by RIA. Reduced haloperidol was separated by selective succinylation and liquid chromatography. Patients were clinically assessed with the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGIS). Smokers had significantly lower haloperidol and reduced haloperidol plasma concentrations than nonsmokers (P less than 0.01, P less than 0.05). Clearance of haloperidol was significantly greater in smokers compared to nonsmokers (P = 0.0052). CGIS assessments did not show significant differences between smokers and nonsmokers. Plasma concentrations should be carefully monitored when patients either start or stop smoking.