Role of genetic variation in docetaxel-induced neutropenia and pharmacokinetics.

Docetaxel is used for treatment of several solid malignancies. In this study, we aimed for predicting docetaxel clearance and docetaxel-induced neutropenia by developing several genetic models. Therefore, pharmacokinetic data and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) of 213 docetaxel-treated cancer patients were collected. Next, patients were genotyped for 1936 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 225 genes using the drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters platform and thereafter split into two cohorts. The combination of SNPs that best predicted severe neutropenia or low clearance was selected in one cohort and validated in the other. Patients with severe neutropenia had lower docetaxel clearance than patients with ANCs in the normal range (P=0.01). Severe neutropenia was predicted with 70% sensitivity. True low clearance (1 s.d.

Histological and Molecular Subclassification of Pancreatic and Nonpancreatic Periampullary Cancers: Implications for (Neo) Adjuvant Systemic Treatment.

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been confirmed in randomized controlled trials. For nonpancreatic periampullary cancers (NPPC) originating from the distal bile duct, duodenum, ampulla, or papilla of Vater, the role of adjuvant therapy remains largely unclear. This review describes methods for distinguishing PDAC from NPPC by means of readily available and recently developed molecular diagnostic methods. The difficulties of reliably determining the exact origin of these cancers pathologically also is discussed. The review also considers the possibility of unintentional inclusion of NPPC in the most important adjuvant trials on PDAC and the subsequent implications for interpretation of the results. The authors conclude that correct determination of the origin of periampullary cancers is essential for clinical management and should therefore be systematically incorporated into clinical practice and future studies.

Pazopanib exposure decreases as a result of an ifosfamide-dependent drug-drug interaction: results of a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathway plays a pivotal role in solid malignancies and is probably involved in chemotherapy resistance. Pazopanib, inhibitor of, among other receptors, VEGFR1-3, has activity as single agent and is attractive to enhance anti-tumour activity of chemotherapy. We conducted a dose-finding and pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamics study of pazopanib combined with two different schedules of ifosfamide. METHODS: In a 3+3+3 design, patients with advanced solid tumours received escalating doses of oral pazopanib combined with ifosfamide either given 3 days continuously or given 3-h bolus infusion daily for 3 days (9 g m(-2) per cycle, every 3 weeks). Pharmacokinetic data of ifosfamide and pazopanib were obtained. Plasma levels of placental-derived growth factor (PlGF), vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), soluble VEGFR2 (sVEGFR2) and circulating endothelial cells were monitored as biomarkers. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. Pazopanib with continuous ifosfamide infusion appeared to be safe up to 1000 mg per day, while combination with bolus infusion ifosfamide turned out to be too toxic based on a variety of adverse events. Ifosfamide-dependent decline in pazopanib exposure was observed. Increases in PlGF and VEGF-A with concurrent decline in sVEGFR2 levels, consistent with pazopanib-mediated VEGFR2 inhibition, were observed after addition of ifosfamide. CONCLUSION: Continuous as opposed to bolus infusion ifosfamide can safely be combined with pazopanib. Ifosfamide co-administration results in lower exposure to pazopanib, not hindering biological effects of pazopanib. Recommended dose of pazopanib for further studies combined with 3 days continuous ifosfamide (9 g m(-2) per cycle, every 3 weeks) is 800 mg daily.

A phase I pharmacokinetic study of the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin (AVE8062) and docetaxel in advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: The vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin shows synergy with docetaxel in vivo. Recommended phase II doses were determined in a dose escalation study in advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Ombrabulin (30-min infusion, day 1) followed by docetaxel (1-h infusion, day 2) every 3 weeks was explored. Ombrabulin was escalated from 11.5 to 42 mg m(-2) with 75 mg m(-2) docetaxel, then from 30 to 35 mg m(-2) with 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel. Recommended phase II dose cohorts were expanded. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were treated. Recommended phase II doses were 35 mg m(-2) ombrabulin with 75 mg m(-2) docetaxel (35/75 mg m(-2); 13 patients) and 30 mg m(-2) ombrabulin with 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel (30/100 mg m(-2); 16 patients). Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 fatigue (two patients; 42/75, 35/100), grade 3 neutropaenic infection (25/75), grade 3 headache (42/75), grade 4 febrile neutropaenia (30/100), and grade 3 thrombosis (35/100). Toxicities were consistent with each agent; mild nausea/vomiting, asthaenia/fatigue, alopecia, and anaemia were common, as were neutropaenia and leukopaenia. Diarrhoea, nail disorders and neurological symptoms were frequent at 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel. Pharmacokinetic analyses did not show any relevant drug interactions. Ten patients had partial responses (seven at 30 mg m(-2) ombrabulin), eight lasting >3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential administration of ombrabulin with 75 or 100 mg m(-2) docetaxel every 3 weeks is feasible.

Isatuximab plus atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The anti-CD38 antibody isatuximab is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, but there are no data on its efficacy in solid tumors. This phase I/II study (NCT03637764) assessed the safety and activity of isatuximab plus atezolizumab (Isa + Atezo), an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with immunotherapy-naive solid tumors: epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), glioblastoma (GBM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase I assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of isatuximab 10 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) every week for 3 weeks followed by once every 3 weeks + atezolizumab 1200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks. Phase II used a Simon's two-stage design to assess the overall response rate or progression-free survival rate at 6 months (GBM cohort). Interim analysis was carried out at 6 months following first dose of the last enrolled patient in each cohort. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers were tested for CD38, PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). RESULTS: Overall, 107 patients were treated (EOC, n = 18; GBM, n = 33; HCC, n = 27; SCCHN, n = 29). In phase I, Isa + Atezo showed an acceptable safety profile, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and RP2D was confirmed. Most patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), with ≤48.5% being grade ≥3. The most frequent TEAE was infusion reactions. The study did not continue to stage 2 based on prespecified targets. Tumor-infiltrating CD38+ immune cells were reduced and almost cleared after treatment. Isa + Atezo did not significantly modulate Tregs or PD-L1 expression in the TME. CONCLUSIONS: Isa + Atezo had acceptable safety and tolerability. Clinical pharmacodynamic evaluation revealed efficient target engagement of isatuximab via treatment-mediated reduction of CD38+ immune cells in the TME. Based on clinical data, CD38 inhibition does not improve responsiveness to PD-L1 blockade in these patients.

A phase II study of stereotactic radiotherapy after FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC-1 trial): Long-term outcome.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term outcome of a multicenter phase II study with FOLFIRINOX followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (LAPC-1 trial) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histological confirmation of LAPC inoperable at diagnosis were enrolled. Induction therapy with 8 cycles of FOLFIRINOX was administered. If no disease progression was found after chemotherapy, patients received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) at a total dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. RESULTS: In LAPC-1 trial, 50 patients were included, but due to disease progression in 11 patients under chemotherapy, 39 patients received stereotactic SBRT after FOLFIRINOX treatment. In whole population, the 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS) were 62% and 10%, respectively. Median follow-up was 13 months. The SBRT group had median OS of 18 months (95% CI 13.2-21.5) versus 5 months (95% CI 4.1-6.7) in non-SBRT group (p<0.001). After chemoradiotherapy, seven patients underwent surgery achieving a radical resection. Patients who underwent surgery had a 3-years OS of 43% compared to 6.5% in the unresected group (p=0.03). Four patients developed grade ≥ 3 adverse events during SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival has been found in patients with LAPC underwent FOLFIRINOX followed by SBRT. This approach increased the probability of a radical surgery. The resected patients achieved a significant better survival compared to unresected group.

A Phase Ib dose-escalation study to evaluate safety and tolerability of the addition of the aminopeptidase inhibitor tosedostat (CHR-2797) to paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: This Phase Ib dose-escalating study investigated safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical antitumour activity of tosedostat (CHR-2797), an orally bioavailable aminopeptidase inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel. METHODS: A total of 22 patients received paclitaxel (135-175 mg m(-2)) intravenously, administered once every three weeks for up to six cycles, with oral tosedostat (90-240 mg) daily. RESULTS: One DLT (grade 3 dyspnoea) was observed in one patient with tosedostat 180 mg combined with paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2). A high number of paclitaxel infusion reactions was noted during the second administration (59%) and this prompted interruption of tosedostat dosing for 5 days around every second and subsequent paclitaxel infusion. No formal MTD was determined because of the high frequency of paclitaxel infusion reactions that may have been influenced by tosedostat. Most frequently observed drug-related adverse events were alopecia, fatigue (95% each), peripheral sensory neuropathy (59%), paclitaxel hypersensitivity (59%) and rash (55%). One patient died because of eosinophilic myocarditis, possibly related to study medication. There was no PK interaction between tosedostat and paclitaxel. In all, 3 patients had a partial response and 12 patients had stable disease lasting >3 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of tosedostat with paclitaxel was well tolerated except for the high incidence of paclitaxel-related infusion reactions.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor JNJ-26483327 in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: JNJ-26483327 is an oral, potent, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, inhibiting kinases of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-1, -2 and -4, rearranged during transfection (RET) receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 and Src family (Lyn, Fyn, Yes) at low nanomolar concentrations. This phase I, accelerated titration study assessed maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of JNJ-26483327. METHODS: Nineteen patients with advanced cancers received JNJ-26483327 continuous twice daily (BID) in escalating dose cohorts ranging from 100 to 2100 mg. Pharmacodynamic effects were assessed in paired skin biopsies and blood. RESULTS: JNJ-26483327 was well tolerated in doses up to 1500 mg BID, with target-inhibition-related toxicity such as diarrhoea and skin rash, and other common reported toxicities being nausea, vomiting, anorexia and fatigue. At 2100 mg, two episodes of dose-limiting toxicity were observed, consisting of grade 3 anorexia and a combination of grade 3 anorexia and fatigue, respectively. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional up to 1500 mg in which plasma levels were obtained showing anti-tumour activity in xenograft mouse models. Pharmacodynamic analysis did not show a substantial effect on expression of Ki-67, p27(kip1), phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphorylated Akt and EGFR, and serum levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-C and VEGF-D remained unchanged. Stable disease was noted in six patients (32%). CONCLUSION: JNJ-26483327 is well tolerated and shows a predictable pharmacokinetic profile; the recommended dose for further studies is 1500 mg BID.

[As series of success stories; the pitfall of preoperative chemotherapy in unresectable carcinoma of the colon]. / Stuk voor stuk succesverhalen.

This comment is a reflection on the case studies of three patients with T4 cancer of the colon with bladder invasion. All three patients were successfully treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery. Although we want to underline this result, we must also emphasise that some patients will not benefit from this treatment. Future research should clarify the short- and long-term effects of preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery. Until then, it is important that patients are aware of the actual intention of the treatment plan, and that there is a chance that the intended targets will not be met.

The spliceosome as target for anticancer treatment.

The spliceosome is a ribonucleoprotein complex involved in RNA splicing, that is, the removal of non-coding introns from precursor messenger RNA. (Alternative) Splicing events may play an essential role in tumourigenesis. The recent discovery that the spliceosome is a target for novel compounds with anticancer activity opens up new therapeutic avenues.

Systemic treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma; 'A small step for man...'.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. In localised disease, orthotopic liver transplantation, surgical resection or local ablations are the mainstay of treatment. In unresectable or metastatic HCC, systemic therapy has unfortunately yielded disappointing results and therefore until recently was generally considered to be ineffective. Most patients with HCC have an underlying liver disease and many drugs may exacerbate the underlying liver disease. Recently, two randomised phase II trials with sorafenib in patients with advanced or metastatic HCC have shown a significant increase in progression free and overall survival of approximately two months, which is an absolute novum for this disease. Sorafenib is therefore now considered a viable treatment option in patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC, a good performance status and Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis. Despite this very promising result, of major concern is the treatment-related toxicity as observed in these and other trials by sorafenib treatment. However, the important first significant survival benefit by systemic treatment has generated hope for the development of new treatment strategies which will be more efficacious, have favourable toxicity profiles and will further extend survival of this still highly lethal disease.

Evaluation of a face-to-face psychosocial screening intervention for cancer patients: acceptance and effects on quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a psychosocial screening intervention that offers cancer patients counselling. The assumption underlying the intervention was that barriers are often present that hamper patients' awareness of and active request for psychosocial care. An active yet unobtrusive approach was hypothesized to improve accessibility to psychosocial services. METHODS: In a sequential cohort design, patients newly admitted to the oncology department of an academic hospital were assigned to a usual care group (n=50) or a screening group (n=79). A retrospective, medical records group (n=89) was also included. At baseline and 4 weeks following discharge, the usual care and screening groups completed mental health and quality of life questionnaires. RESULTS: Half the screening group actually wanted and received counselling. At follow-up, the screening group reported significantly less pain, better mental health and better physical and role functioning than the usual care group. CONCLUSION: The face-to-face screening intervention appears an effective means of identifying patients interested in obtaining formal psychosocial counselling, and may result in improvements in physical and mental health outcomes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This screening intervention may be particularly useful for hospitals that prefer a personal approach to psychosocial screening, but do not have sufficient resources to interview every new patient.

Tivozanib: a new treatment option for renal cell carcinoma.

Tivozanib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets all vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), causing inhibition of angiogenesis. It has recently been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of adult patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and for adult patients who are VEGFR and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway inhibitor-naive, following disease progression after one prior treatment with cytokine therapy for advanced RCC. This review will focus on mechanisms of action, early drug development and results of published and ongoing clinical trials of tivozanib.

Phase I study of the thrombospondin-1-mimetic angiogenesis inhibitor ABT-510 with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: a safe combination.

We performed a phase I study with the thrombospondin-1-mimetic angiogenesis inhibitor ABT-510 combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) to determine safety profile and assess pharmacokinetic interactions. Patients with advanced solid malignancies received LV 20 mg/m(2) followed by 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) both administered intravenously in 15 min daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. ABT-510 was administered subcutaneously twice daily continuously from day 2 onwards. Blood and urine samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were collected at days 1, 5 and 22. Twelve patients received a total of 45 cycles of 5-FU/LV combined with ABT-510. ABT-510 dose levels studied were 50 and 100 mg. The combination was well tolerated, with a toxicity profile comparable to that of 5-FU/LV alone. At the dose levels studied no significant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. These data indicate that ABT-510 administered twice daily subcutaneously can be safely combined with 5-FU/LV administered daily for 5 days, every 4 weeks.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 given twice daily to patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 was performed to determine the safety profile, maximum-tolerated dose, and recommended dose for phase II studies. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCH 66336 was given orally bid without interruption to patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors. Routine antiemetics were not prescribed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled onto the study. Dose levels studied were 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 300 mg bid. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 and 15. At 400 mg bid, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of grade 4 vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and the combination of grade 3 anorexia and diarrhea with reversible grade 3 plasma creatinine elevation. After dose reduction, at 300 mg bid, the DLTs consisted of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 neurocortical toxicity, and the combination of grade 3 fatigue with grade 2 nausea and diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 200 mg bid, which was found feasible for prolonged periods of time. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a greater than dose-proportional increase in drug exposure and peak plasma concentrations, with increased parameters at day 15 compared with day 1, indicating some accumulation on multiple dosing. Plasma half-life ranged from 4 to 11 hours and seemed to increase with increasing doses. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained at days 7 through 14. A large volume of distribution at steady-state indicated extensive distribution outside the plasma compartment. CONCLUSION: SCH 66336 can be administered safely using a continuous oral bid dosing regimen. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this regimen is 200 mg bid.

Effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral MMI270B (CGS 27023A), a novel matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor.

MMI270B is a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPI) with in vitro and in vivo activity. To exert optimal target inhibition, MMPI must be given chronically, and therefore, oral bioavailability is important. We analyzed the effect of food intake on AUC0-8 h, Cmax, and Tmax. Seventeen patients were entered into the study. Doses of MMI270B were 150, 400, and 600 mg. The first day, patients ingested the drug in a fasted state and were not allowed to eat for 2 h. The second day, patients ingested the drug 30 min after a light breakfast. Mean AUC0-8 h was not significantly influenced by food intake. Plasma concentrations were well above the IC50 of several MMPs at all doses tested. Mean Cmax was significantly decreased after food intake. Mean Tmax was significantly delayed after food intake. Food intake did not result in a significant change in exposure to MMI270B (AUC0-8 h) but did result in a significant, although not clinically relevant, decrease in peak plasma levels and time to reach peak plasma levels. No specific guidelines concerning the ingestion of MMI270B in either a fed or a fasted state are recommended.

Phase I and pharmacological study of weekly administration of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM 486A (CGP 48 664) in patients with solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group.

A single-agent dose-escalating Phase I and pharmacological study of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM 486A was performed. A dosing regimen of four weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks off therapy was studied. Fifty patients were entered into the study. Dose levels studied were 1.25, 2.5, 5, 8, 16, 32, 48, 70, 110, 170, 270, and 325 mg/m2/week. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done on day 1, and trough samples were taken weekly during the first treatment cycle. Pharmacodynamic sampling was done on days 1 and 22. At 325 mg/m2/week, dose-limiting toxicity was seen (one patient each with grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 neurotoxicity, and grade 3 hypotension with syncope and T-wave inversions on electrocardiogram). The recommended dose for further testing was set at 270 mg/m2/week. Infusion time was increased from 10 to 180 min due to facial paresthesias and flushing and somnolence. Drug exposure increased linearly with dose. Mean +/- SD t1,2 at 70-325 mg/m2 doses was 61.4+/-26.2 h, with a large volume of distribution at steady state. In peripheral blood leukocytes, a clear relationship between dose and inhibitory effect on S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase or changes in intracellular polyamine pools was not recorded. SAM 486A can be administered safely using a dosing regimen of four weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks off therapy. The recommended dose for Phase II studies using this regimen is 270 mg/m2/week.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the oral matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, MMI270 (CGS27023A), in patients with advanced solid cancer.

This Phase I study of MMI270, an p.o. administered matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, assessed toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and tumor response data and investigated markers of biological activity to recommend a dose for Phase II studies. MMI270 was administered continuously at seven dose levels (50 mg once daily to 600 mg three times/day). Patients were evaluated for toxicity and tumor response, and blood and urine samples were taken for pharmacokinetics, bone resorption markers, direct targets of the inhibitor [matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), MMP-8, and MMP-9], indirect targets [tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), TIMP-2, basic fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, and cathepsins B and H] and for a tumor necrosis factor-alpha cytokine release assay. Ninety-two patients were entered. There was no myelotoxicity. Eighteen patients developed a widespread maculopapular rash, which increased in frequency and severity at doses > or = 300 mg bid. Thirty nine patients developed musculoskeletal side effects, which were related to duration of treatment, not to dose level. Pharmacokinetics were linear, and MMI270 was rapidly absorbed and eliminated with minimal accumulation on chronic dosing. Sustained plasma concentrations in excess of 4 x mean IC(50) for the target enzymes were observed at dose levels > or = 150 mg bid. There were no tumor regressions; however, 19 patients had stable disease for > or = 90 days. There was a dose-response increase of MMP-2 and TIMP-1 with MMI270. Transient effects on the bone resorption markers were detected. MMI270 was generally well tolerated, with adequate plasma levels for target enzyme inhibition. The two main toxicities were rash, resulting in a maximum tolerated dose of 300 mg bid and musculoskeletal side effects. Biological marker data indicate drug effects. The rise in TIMP-1 suggests that a reflex rise in inhibitors could modify the effects of MMI270. The recommended Phase II dose is 300 mg bid.

Impact of pazopanib on docetaxel exposure: results of a phase I combination study with two different docetaxel schedules.

PURPOSE: There are several reasons why combining an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial and the platelet-derived growth factor receptor with a taxane might induce synergistic antitumor activity. This phase I study aimed to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of pazopanib with two different schedules of docetaxel. METHODS: In a 3 + 3 + 3 design, patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating doses of oral pazopanib combined with docetaxel given either every 3 weeks (D3w) or weekly at days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days (D1w). Pharmacokinetic data of docetaxel and pazopanib were obtained through extensive sampling and WinNonlin modeling. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were enrolled to six dose levels. Both schedules of docetaxel could be combined with 400 mg/day pazopanib. The MTD of D3w docetaxel was 50 mg/m(2), while for D1w MTD, it was 20 mg/m(2). In the D3w schedule, the administration of pazopanib led to a 33% lower docetaxel clearance (mean 31.5 vs 21.1 L/h/m(2); P = 0.019) and >50% increase in AUC(0-∞) (mean 1,602 vs 2,414 ng*h/mL; P = 0.029) compared with docetaxel single-agent data. Data for the D1w schedule were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment schedules of docetaxel combined with pazopanib are feasible but at doses for both drugs that are considerably lower than the recommended single-agent doses. This is largely due to a clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interaction with pazopanib, substantially increasing docetaxel exposure. This interaction is most likely due to CYP3A4 and OATP1B1 inhibition.

Farnesyl transferase inhibitors: current developments and future perspectives.

Ras oncogenes play an important role in carcinogenesis and are frequently found in various human tumour types. Cellular activity of Ras oncoprotein, regulated through the enzyme farnesyl transferase, is crucial in the process of ras -dependent carcinogenesis, and therefore, specific inhibition of this enzyme is an attractive goal in anticancer treatment. Specific inhibitors of farnesyl transferase have been developed in recent years, many of them showing in vitro and in vivo growth inhibitory or cytostatic activity. Recently, results of the first clinical studies with various farnesyl transferase inhibitors have been presented. In the design of phase I and II studies, either single-agent or combination studies, new endpoints have to be defined in order to properly assess feasibility, antitumour activity and clinical valuability.