Analysis and reporting of pediatric growth and development assessment from clinical trials: overview and challenges.

Pediatric drug development has many unique challenges, one of which is the evaluation of growth and development changes in children that are expected and are not due to the study intervention. Children grow and mature at different pace. The potential impact of the drug could vary with the developmental age of the participants receiving the treatment. For example, sexual maturation is a critical consideration in children of age 10 and above, but not in younger age groups. How the investigational drug impacts children is ultimately a risk-benefit consideration. In this paper, practical considerations and recommendations are provided on how to assess growth and development based on data collected from clinical trials in pediatric patients. The endpoints and measures related to growth, sexual maturation and neurocognitive development are discussed. Basic analysis approaches are recommended.

Integrated analysis of long-term growth and bone development in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND: We conducted an integrated analysis of clinical data to describe long-term effects of bevacizumab on growth and bone development in pediatric and adolescent patients with solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Clinical data were pooled from five phase I/II trials of bevacizumab versus chemotherapy: BERNIE, HERBY, and AVF4117s enrolled newly diagnosed patients, AVF3842s and AVF2771s enrolled patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and bone-age data were pooled by treatment group. Growth charts were used to track and monitor growth in relation to a reference population of healthy children. Bone age was measured based on X-ray of the left hand and wrist. Analyses were exploratory/descriptive. RESULTS: Overall, 268 patients received bevacizumab ± chemotherapy and 135 received chemotherapy alone. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced. Median duration of long-term follow-up was 41.8 months (range, 2.4-75.1) with bevacizumab and 22.9 months (range, 2.8-69.2) with chemotherapy alone. Patients had age-appropriate baseline height and weight. Mean height and weight percentiles decreased over time in both treatment groups, but remained within the normal range (height: mean standard deviation score [SDS] range -2 to +3; weight: mean SDS range -2 to +1). Similar trends were seen in BMI. A tendency for reduced growth velocity relative to the reference population was observed at 6 months and 1 year in both groups, but there was no additional decrease for patients receiving bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab did not appear to have additional negative effects on growth or development of pediatric and adolescent patients with solid tumors.

Is there sufficient evidence to consider the use of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibition in children?

Manifestations of the metabolic syndrome [obesity, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, blood glucose derangements including prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)] in juvenile populations are becoming increasingly prevalent throughout the world and are at the point of being a global public health concern. Derangements in cortisol regeneration seem to be involved in the pathophysiology. Treatment with selective 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1 (11ß-HSD1) inhibitors could be a therapeutic strategy in paediatric patients with manifestations of the metabolic syndrome. Based on preclinical and clinical data regarding development of the 11ß-HSD1 enzyme, it appears that maturation occurs within the first year of life. Different changes in biomarkers for assessing the efficacy and safety of 11ß-HSD1 inhibitors are to be expected in paediatric patients compared to adults, reflecting differences in metabolism. The effect of 11ß-HSD1 treatment in children on bone differentiation and development as well as adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), circulating and local cortisol tissue concentrations, androgens and respective stress response is not yet known. Based on current literature, the concept of inhibition of 11ß-HSD1 is considered a potentially effective mean to regulate local cortisol levels in the paediatric population, and 11ß-HSD1 inhibitors may provide a valuable target and treatment option for the metabolic syndrome in paediatric patients. However, the uncertainty over effects on the developing skeleton combined with mild increases in adrenal androgen levels raises potential concerns regarding growth as well as onset of puberty as to their future use in children. Future clinical studies are needed to thoroughly assess the risks and benefits of this new class of drugs in the paediatric population.

The Impact of Radiation Therapy in Children and Adolescents With Metastatic Rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: There is limited evidence to define the role of radiation therapy in children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (mRMS). In the international BERNIE study, children with mRMS or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab, with radiation therapy to all disease sites recommended after chemotherapy cycle 6. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of radiation therapy on survival in the mRMS cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were grouped according to the radiation therapy they received: radical, partial, or none. Radical irradiation was defined as radiation therapy delivered to all disease sites, unless a site was completely surgically resected. Partial irradiation was defined as radiation therapy to ≥1, but not all, disease sites. Landmark analysis excluded patients with an event before day 221. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were modeled using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 102 patients with mRMS, 97 were included in the analysis for OS and 85 for EFS. Overall, 27 patients received radical irradiation, 46 partial irradiation, and 24 no irradiation. EFS was not significantly different among patient groups after adjustment for prognostic factors (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.520; P = .054 for any vs no irradiation). Radiation therapy was associated with improved OS compared with no radiation therapy (adjusted HR = 0.249; P = .00025), with OS being greater for radical versus partial irradiation (HR = 0.245; P = .039). The 3-year OS rate was 84%, 54%, and 23% for patients receiving radical, partial, and no irradiation, respectively. Radical treatment (surgery, irradiation, or both) of the primary site improved EFS and OS compared with no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate variability in the application of radiation therapy for mRMS and support the routine use of radical treatment to the primary site. Radical irradiation to metastatic sites may further improve OS. The burden of such treatment should be balanced against prognosis; further studies are needed.

Risdiplam treatment has not led to retinal toxicity in patients with spinal muscular atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of ophthalmologic safety with focus on retinal safety in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treated with risdiplam (EVRYSDI®), a survival of motor neuron 2 splicing modifier associated with retinal toxicity in monkeys. Risdiplam was approved recently for the treatment of patients with SMA, aged ≥ 2 months in the United States, and is currently under Health Authority review in the EU. METHODS: Subjects included patients with SMA aged 2 months-60 years enrolled in the FIREFISH, SUNFISH, and JEWELFISH clinical trials for risdiplam. Ophthalmologic assessments, including functional assessments (age-appropriate visual acuity and visual field) and imaging (spectral domain optical coherence tomography [SD-OCT], fundus photography, and fundus autofluorescence [FAF]), were conducted at baseline and every 2-6 months depending on study and assessment. SD-OCT, FAF, fundus photography, and threshold perimetry were evaluated by an independent, masked reading center. Adverse events (AEs) were reported throughout the study. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients receiving risdiplam were assessed. Comprehensive, high-quality, ophthalmologic monitoring assessing retinal structure and visual function showed no retinal structural or functional changes. In the youngest patients, SD-OCT findings of normal retinal maturation were observed. AEs involving eye disorders were not suggestive of risdiplam-induced toxicity and resolved with ongoing treatment. INTERPRETATION: Extensive ophthalmologic monitoring conducted in studies in patients with SMA confirmed that risdiplam does not induce ophthalmologic toxicity in pediatric or adult patients with SMA at the therapeutic dose. These results suggest that safety ophthalmologic monitoring is not needed in patients receiving risdiplam, as also reflected in the United States Prescribing Information for risdiplam.

Phase I Trial of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Anti-angiopoietin 2 Bispecific Antibody RG7716 for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: RG7716 is a novel bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and another key angiogenic factor, angiopoietin 2. A phase I study of intravitreal RG7716 was conducted to evaluate single-dose and multiple-dose safety in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Open-label, single and multiple ascending-dose study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four patients diagnosed with neovascular AMD with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 to 20/400 (Snellen equivalent) and refractory subfoveal choroidal neovascularization defined as leakage on fluorescein angiography or fluid on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography despite 3 or more intravitreal anti-VEGF treatments in the preceding 6 months. METHODS: Single intravitreal doses of 0.5 mg, 1.5 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg RG7716 were administered in stepwise dose-escalation groups, each with 3 patients. In the multiple-dose phase, 6 patients were enrolled and received 3 treatments each of 3 mg and 6 mg RG7716. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety and tolerability, changes in baseline BCVA, and central subfield thickness (CST). RESULTS: There were no dose-limiting toxicities in either the single-dose or multiple-dose group. Treatment-emergent ocular adverse events were mild. There was a single withdrawal and 1 serious adverse event, both deemed to be unrelated to the study drug by principal investigators. In the combined single-dose groups and in the 6-mg multiple-dose group, BCVA increased from baseline to 28 days after the last dose administration by a median of 7 letters (range, 0-18 letters; n = 11) and 7.5 letters (range, 3-18 letters; n = 6), respectively. The corresponding median reduction from baseline in CST were 42 µm (range, -101 to 10 µm; n = 11) and -117 µm (range, -252 to -7 µm; n = 6), respectively. After multiple 3-mg RG7716 doses, no changes were observed in either BCVA (median, -0.5 letters; range, -9 to 8 letters; n = 6) or CST (median, -9 µm; range, -188 to -1 µm; n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: RG7716 was well tolerated and exhibited an overall favorable safety profile, with evidence of improvements in BCVA and anatomic parameters. These data support further evaluation of RG7716 in phase II trials.

Open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase II study of the EpSSG and the ITCC evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in childhood and adolescent patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (the BERNIE study).

PURPOSE: We evaluated the role of bevacizumab as part of the multi-modality treatment of children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) or non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years were randomised to receive induction chemotherapy (four cycles of IVADo + five cycles of IVA, ±bevacizumab), surgery and/or radiotherapy, followed by maintenance chemotherapy (12 cycles of low-dose cyclophosphamide + vinorelbine, ±bevacizumab). The primary objective was event-free survival (EFS) evaluated by an independent radiological review committee. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four patients were randomised to receive chemotherapy alone (n = 80) or with bevacizumab (n = 74). At the data cut-off for the primary efficacy analysis, median EFS was 14.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.8-35.9) with chemotherapy and 20.6 months (95% CI: 15.2-24.9) with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.61-1.41; P = 0.72). The HR for EFS in patients with RMS (n = 103) was 1.24 (95% CI: 0.73-2.09) versus 0.64 (95% CI: 0.32-1.26) for those with NRSTS (n = 49). Objective response rate was 36.0% (95% CI: 25.2-47.9) with chemotherapy and 54.0% (95% CI: 40.9-66.6) with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (difference of 18.0%; 95% CI: 0.6-35.3). There were no treatment-related deaths and no increased incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities with bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy appeared tolerable in children and adolescents with metastatic RMS/NRSTS, but the primary end-point of EFS did not show statistically significant improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00643565.

Inhibition of 11ß-HSD1 with RO5093151 for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is increasing worldwide and an effective and safe pharmacological treatment is needed. We investigated whether inhibition of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11ß-HSD1, also known as HSD11B1) by RO5093151 could safely and effectively decrease liver-fat content in patients with this disorder. METHODS: We did this phase 1b trial at four centres in Germany and Austria. Participants with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (defined as (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopy liver-fat content >5·56%), insulin resistance (homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR] of at least 2·0 mmol/L·mU/L), BMI greater than 27 kg/m(2), and aged 35-65 years were randomly assigned by interactive voice response system in a 1:1 ratio, stratified for triglyceride concentration (<1·7 mmol/L or ≥1·7 mmol/L), to oral RO5093151 (200 mg twice daily) or matching placebo for 12 weeks. The main exclusion criteria were other liver diseases, aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase concentrations of more than two and a half times the upper limit of normal, history of diabetes or bariatric surgery, and use of weight lowering drugs. Participants and investigators were masked to assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint was change in liver-fat content from baseline to week 12. Efficacy analysis was by modified intention to treat, including all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had a baseline and follow-up measurement of liver-fat content. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01277094. FINDINGS: We did this trial between Jan 13, 2011, and March 28, 2012. 41 patients were randomly assigned to RO5093151 and 41 to placebo. 35 patients in the RO5093151 group and 39 in the placebo group were included in the efficacy analysis. Mean liver-fat content decreased in the RO5093151 group (from 16·75% [SD 8·67] to 14·28% [8·89]), but not in the placebo group (from 18·53% [10·00] to 18·46% [10·78], p=0·02 for between group difference). 26 participants (65%) in the RO5093151 group had adverse events, compared with 21 (53%) in the placebo group. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (12 patients [30%] in the RO5093151 group vs seven [18%] in the placebo group), and infections and infestations (eight [20%] vs nine [23%]). Nervous system disorders occurred in significantly more patients in the RO5093151 group than in the placebo group (nine [23%] vs two [5%]; p=0·02); all other differences in adverse events were non-significant. One participant (3%) in the placebo group and three participants (8%) in the RO5093151 group had serious adverse events. All serious adverse events were deemed unrelated to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: Inhibition of 11ß-HSD1 by RO5093151 was effective and safe in reducing liver-fat content, suggesting that targeting of 11ß-HSD1 might be a promising approach for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Integration of pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics in drug development: implications for regulatory and medical decision making in pediatric diseases.

This article aims to provide an overview of the current situation regarding pharmacogenetic and pharmacogenomic (PG) studies in pediatrics, with a special focus on the role of PG data in the regulatory decision-making process. Despite the gap in pharmacogenetic research due to the lack of translational studies in adults and children, several technologies exist in drug development and biomarkers validation, which could supply valuable information concerning labeling and dosing recommendations. If performed under strict good clinical practice quality criteria, such findings could be included in the submission package of new chemical entities and used as additional information for prescribers, supporting further evaluation and understanding of the efficacy and safety profile of new medicines. Even though regulatory authorities may be aware of the potential role of PG in medical practice and guidances are available about the integration of PG in drug development, most data obtained from PG studies are not used by prescribers. The challenge is to better understand whether PG markers can be used to assess potential differences in drug response during the clinical program, so PG data can be integrated into the regulatory decision-making process, enabling the introduction of labeling information that promotes optimal dosing in the pediatric population.