Extracellular vesicles from human liver stem cells inhibit renal cancer stem cell-derived tumor growth in vitro and in vivo.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered as responsible for initiation, maintenance and recurrence of solid tumors, thus representing the key for tumor eradication. The antitumor activity of extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from different stem cell sources has been investigated with conflicting results. In our study, we evaluated, both in vitro and in vivo, the effect of EVs derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and from a population of human liver stem cells (HLSCs) of mesenchymal origin on renal CSCs. In vitro, both EV sources displayed pro-apoptotic, anti-proliferative and anti-invasive effects on renal CSCs, but not on differentiated tumor cells. Pre-treatment of renal CSCs with EVs, before subcutaneous injection in SCID mice, delayed tumor onset. We subsequently investigated the in vivo effect of MSC- and HLSC-EVs systemic administration on progression of CSC-generated renal tumors. Tumor bio-distribution analysis identified intravenous treatment as best route of administration. HLSC-EVs, but not MSC-EVs, significantly impaired subcutaneous tumor growth by reducing tumor vascularization and inducing tumor cell apoptosis. Moreover, intravenous treatment with HLSC-EVs improved metastasis-free survival. In EV treated tumor explants, we observed both the transfer and the induction of miR-145 and of miR-200 family members. In transfected CSCs, the same miRNAs affected cell growth, invasion and survival. In conclusion, our results showed a specific antitumor effect of HLSC-EVs on CSC-derived renal tumors in vivo, possibly ascribed to the transfer and induction of specific antitumor miRNAs. Our study provides further evidence for a possible clinical application of stem cell-EVs in tumor treatment.

Extracellular vesicles from human liver stem cells inhibit tumor angiogenesis.

Human liver stem-like cells (HLSC) and derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) were previously shown to exhibit anti-tumor activity. In our study, we investigated whether HLSC-derived EVs (HLSC-EVs) were able to inhibit tumor angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo, in comparison with EVs derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC-EVs). The results obtained indicated that HLSC-EVs, but not MSC-EVs, inhibited the angiogenic properties of tumor-derived endothelial cells (TEC) both in vitro and in vivo in a model of subcutaneous implantation in Matrigel. Treatment of TEC with HLSC-EVs led to the down-regulation of pro-angiogenic genes. Since HLSC-EVs carry a specific set of microRNAs (miRNAs) that could target these genes, we investigated their potential role by transfecting TEC with HLSC-EV specific miRNAs. We observed that four miRNAs, namely miR-15a, miR-181b, miR-320c and miR-874, significantly inhibited the angiogenic properties of TEC in vitro, and decreased the expression of some predicted target genes (ITGB3, FGF1, EPHB4 and PLAU). In parallel, TEC treated with HLSC-EVs significantly enhanced expression of miR-15a, miR-181b, miR-320c and miR-874 associated with the down-regulation of FGF1 and PLAU. In summary, HLSC-EVs possess an anti-tumorigenic effect, based on their ability to inhibit tumor angiogenesis.

Alternative Strategies to Inhibit Tumor Vascularization.

Endothelial cells present in tumors show different origin, phenotype, and genotype with respect to the normal counterpart. Various mechanisms of intra-tumor vasculogenesis sustain the complexity of tumor vasculature, which can be further modified by signals deriving from the tumor microenvironment. As a result, resistance to anti-VEGF therapy and activation of compensatory pathways remain a challenge in the treatment of cancer patients, revealing the need to explore alternative strategies to the classical anti-angiogenic drugs. In this review, we will describe some alternative strategies to inhibit tumor vascularization, including targeting of antigens and signaling pathways overexpressed by tumor endothelial cells, the development of endothelial vaccinations, and the use of extracellular vesicles. In addition, anti-angiogenic drugs with normalizing effects on tumor vessels will be discussed. Finally, we will present the concept of endothelial demesenchymalization as an alternative approach to restore normal endothelial cell phenotype.

PDGF enhances the protective effect of adipose stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in a model of acute hindlimb ischemia.

We previously have shown that platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) modulates the biological activity of extracellular vesicles released by adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASC-EVs). ASC-EVs may interact with blood and vessel cells by transferring proteins and nucleic acids and regulate their functions. In this study, we investigated immunomodulatory activity and protection from acute hindlimb ischemia of EVs released by PDGF-stimulated ASC (PDGF-EVs). PDGF treatment of ASC changed protein and RNA composition of released EVs by enhancing the expression of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory factors. In vitro, control EVs (cEVs) derived from non-stimulated ASC increased the secretion of both the IL-1b, IL-17, IFNγ, TNFα pro-inflammatory factors and the IL-10 anti-inflammatory factor, and enhanced the in vitro peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) adhesion on endothelium. In contrast, PDGF-EVs enhanced IL-10 secretion and induced TGF-ß1 secretion by PBMC. Moreover, PDGF-EVs stimulated the formation of T regulatory cells. In vivo, PDGF-EVs protected muscle tissue from acute ischemia, reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells and increased T regulatory cell infiltration in respect to cEVs. Our results suggest that PDGF-EVs are enriched in anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory factors and induced in PBMC an enhanced production of IL-10 and TGF-ß1 resulting in protection of muscle from acute ischemia in vivo.