JAK2/mTOR Inhibition Fails to Prevent Acute GVHD Despite Reduced Th1/Th17 cells: Final Phase II Trial Results.

Our phase I graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention trial of JAK2 inhibitor, pacritinib, (recommended phase II dose: 100mg po BID day 0 to +70) plus sirolimus and tacrolimus (PAC/SIR/TAC) demonstrated the regimen was safe and free of pan-JAK myelosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). PAC inhibits IL-6 receptor activity and pathogenic Th1/Th17 differentiation in preclinical models and the phase I trial. Herein we report on our completed phase II trial of PAC/SIR/TAC after 8/8-HLA matched alloHCT. This single-arm phase II trial (NCT02891603) was powered to determine if PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells at day +21 (primary endpoint: %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells ≤ 35%) and estimated grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100. The impact of PAC/SIR/TAC on T cell subsets, CD28 (pS6 and pH3ser10), and IL-2 receptor (pSTAT5) signal transduction was also evaluated. Eligible patients (n=28) received alloHCT for hematologic malignancies or myeloproliferative neoplasms. Reduced or myeloablative intensity conditioning was permitted. PAC/SIR/TAC met the primary endpoint, reducing %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells to 9.62% at day +21. Th1/Th17 cells were decreased at day +21, increasing the ratio of Tregs to Th1 and Th17 cells with PAC/SIR/TAC at RP2D PAC compared to dose level 1 PAC. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100 with PAC/SIR/TAC was similar to historic SIR/TAC values (46 v 43%). While PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed pSTAT3 and Th1/Th17 cells, the regimen did not improve acute GVHD prevention.

Whole-genome sequencing reveals complex genomic features underlying anti-CD19 CAR T-cell treatment failures in lymphoma.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-19) T cells are groundbreaking immunotherapies approved for use against large B-cell lymphomas. Although host inflammatory and tumor microenvironmental markers associate with efficacy and resistance, the tumor-intrinsic alterations underlying these phenomena remain undefined. CD19 mutations associate with resistance but are uncommon, and most patients with relapsed disease retain expression of the wild-type receptor, implicating other genomic mechanisms. We therefore leveraged the comprehensive resolution of whole-genome sequencing to assess 51 tumor samples from 49 patients with CAR-19-treated large B-cell lymphoma. We found that the pretreatment presence of complex structural variants, APOBEC mutational signatures, and genomic damage from reactive oxygen species predict CAR-19 resistance. In addition, the recurrent 3p21.31 chromosomal deletion containing the RHOA tumor suppressor was strongly enriched in patients for whom CAR T-cell therapy failed. Pretreatment reduced expression or monoallelic loss of CD19 did not affect responses, suggesting CAR-19 therapy success and resistance are related to multiple mechanisms. Our study showed that tumor-intrinsic genomic alterations are key among the complex interplay of factors that underlie CAR-19 efficacy and resistance for large B-cell lymphomas.

The role of allogeneic transplant for adult Ph+ ALL in CR1 with complete molecular remission: a retrospective analysis.

Historically, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been associated with poor outcomes, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended in first complete remission (CR1). However, in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era, rapid attainment of a complete molecular remission (CMR) is associated with excellent outcomes without allo-HCT, suggesting transplant may not be required for these patients. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively identified adult patients with Ph+ ALL treated with induction therapy, including TKIs, and attained CMR within 90 days of diagnosis at 5 transplant centers in the United States. We compared outcomes of those who did and did not receive allo-HCT in first remission. We identified 230 patients (allo-HCT: 98; non-HCT: 132). The allo-HCT cohort was younger with better performance status. On multivariable analysis (MVA), allo-HCT was not associated with improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.05; 95% CI, 0.63-1.73) or relapse-free survival (aHR: 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.37) compared with non-HCT treatment. Allo-HCT was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of relapse (aHR: 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17-0.62) but higher non-relapse mortality (aHR: 2.59; 95% CI, 1.37-4.89). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed results of MVA. Comparison of reduced-intensity HCT to non-HCT showed no statistically significant difference in any of the above endpoints. In conclusion, adult patients with Ph+ ALL who achieved CMR within 90 days of starting treatment did not derive a survival benefit from allo-HCT in CR1 in this retrospective study.

Tumor interferon signaling and suppressive myeloid cells are associated with CAR T-cell failure in large B-cell lymphoma.

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). This study evaluated whether immune dysregulation, present before CAR T-cell therapy, was associated with treatment failure. Tumor expression of interferon (IFN) signaling, high blood levels of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs), and high blood interleukin-6 and ferritin levels were each associated with a lack of durable response. Similar to other cancers, we found that in LBCL tumors, IFN signaling is associated with the expression of multiple checkpoint ligands, including programmed cell death-ligand 1, and these were higher in patients who lacked durable responses to CAR-T therapy. Moreover, tumor IFN signaling and blood M-MDSCs associated with decreased axi-cel expansion. Finally, patients with high tumor burden had higher immune dysregulation with increased serum inflammatory markers and tumor IFN signaling. These data support that immune dysregulation in LBCL promotes axi-cel resistance via multiple mechanistic programs: insufficient axi-cel expansion associated with both circulating M-MDSC and tumor IFN signaling, which also gives rise to expression of immune checkpoint ligands.

Immune reconstitution and associated infections following axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma.

CD19 CAR T-cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) for relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) may lead to durable remissions, however, prolonged cytopenias and infections may occur. In this single center retrospective study of 85 patients, we characterized immune reconstitution and infections for patients remaining in remission after axi-cel for LBCL. Prolonged cytopenias (those occurring at or after day 30 following infusion) were common with >= grade 3 neutropenia seen in 21/70 (30-0%) patients at day 30 and persisting in 3/31 (9-7%) patients at 1 year. B cells were undetectable in 30/34 (88-2%) patients at day 30, but were detected in 11/19 (57-9%) at 1 year. Median IgG levels reached a nadir at day 180. By contrast, CD4 T cells decreased from baseline and were persistently low with a median CD4 count of 155 cells/µl at 1 year after axi-cel (n=19, range 33 - 269). In total, 23/85 (27-1%) patients received IVIG after axi-cel, and 34/85 (40-0%) received G-CSF. Infections in the first 30 days occurred in 31/85 (36-5%) patients, of which 11/85 (12-9%) required intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization ("severe") and were associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, tocilizumab use, corticosteroid use, and bridging therapy on univariate analyses. After day 30, 7 severe infections occurred, with no late deaths due to infection. Prolonged cytopenias are common following axi-cel therapy for LBCL and typically recover with time. Most patients experience profound and prolonged CD4 T cell immunosuppression without severe infection.

Outcomes in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma after intensive frontline treatment failure.

BACKGROUND: Salvage immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard-of-care second-line treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first-line R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Outcomes after receipt of second-line immunochemotherapy in patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas who relapse or are refractory to intensive first-line immunochemotherapy regimens (etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab [R-EPOCH], rituximab, hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine [R-HyperCVAD], rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate alternating with ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytarabine [R-CODOX-M/IVAC]) remain unknown. METHODS: Outcomes of patients with non-Burkitt, aggressive B-cell lymphomas and relapsed/refractory disease after first-line treatment with intensive immunochemotherapy regimens who received platinum-based second-line immunochemotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. Analyses were performed to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of receipt of second-line immunochemotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 195 patients from 19 academic centers were included in the study. The overall response rate to second-line immunochemotherapy was 44%, with a median PFS of 3 months and a median OS of 8 months. Patients with early treatment failure (primary refractory or relapse <12 months from completion of first-line therapy) experienced inferior median PFS (2.8 vs 23 months; P < .001) and OS (6 months vs not reached; P < .001) compared with patients with late treatment failure. Although the 17% of patients with early failure who achieved a complete response to second-line immunochemotherapy experienced prolonged survival, this outcome could not be predicted by clinicopathologic features at the start of second-line immunochemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early treatment failure after intensive first-line immunochemotherapy experience poor outcomes after receiving standard second-line immunochemotherapy. The use of standard-of-care or experimental therapies currently available in the third-line setting and beyond should be investigated in the second-line setting for these patients.

Poor outcomes for double-hit lymphoma patients treated with curative-intent second-line immunochemotherapy following failure of intensive front-line immunochemotherapy.

While patients with double-hit lymphoma (DHL) are now frequently treated with intensive front-line immunochemotherapy, outcomes for those who fail these regimens and subsequently receive curative-intent second-line immunochemotherapy are unknown. We identified 55 such patients who achieved an overall/complete response rate of 29%/11%, median progression-free/overall survival (PFS/OS) of 2/5·1 months and one-year PFS/OS of 10/19% following the start of second-line therapy. These outcomes may serve as a standard against which future second-line treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory DHL can be measured and justify investigation of non-cytotoxic therapies in the second-line setting for these patients.

Presence of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations may predict clinical response to hypomethylating agents in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Mutations in IDH1 and IDH2 occur in 15-20% of AML cases, resulting in the production of 2-hydroxyglutarate, which promotes aberrant hypermethylation of DNA in leukemic cells. Although these mutations have been shown to have prognostic implications for patients with AML, optimal treatment strategies have yet to be defined. We retrospectively identified forty-two patients with AML treated with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTIs) decitabine (n = 36) or azacitidine (n = 6) and performed analysis of stored samples for the presence of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. Of the forty-two samples analyzed, seven (16.7%) had IDH mutations. Thirteen patients (31%) achieved remission [(complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi)/partial response (PR)] after treatment with a DNMTI, five of seven (71.4%) with IDH mutations and eight of thirty-five (22.9%) without IDH mutations (P = 0.01). When adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, bone marrow blast percentage and cytogenetic, the odds of achieving response after administration of a DNMTI among patients with an IDH mutation was 14.2 when compared to patients without an IDH mutation (95%CI: 1.3-150.4). IDH1 and IDH2 mutations may predict a favorable response to DNMTI in patients with AML.

Sirolimus Is an Acceptable Alternative to Tacrolimus for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis after Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for allogeneic haploidentical donor (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) results in comparable outcomes to matched unrelated donor HCT. A phase II study from the Moffitt Cancer Center substituting sirolimus (Siro) for Tac in this prophylactic regimen reported comparable rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD). Many centers have substituted Siro for Tac in this setting based on a preferable side effect profile, although comparative data are limited. In this study, we retrospectively compared outcomes in haplo-HCT with PTCy/Siro/MMF versus haplo-HCT with PTCy/Tac/MMF. The study cohort included all consecutive patients receiving haploidentical donor T cell-replete peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) HCT for hematologic malignancies at Moffitt Cancer Center or the City of Hope National Medical Center between 2014 and 2019. A total of 423 patients were included, of whom 84 (20%) received PTCy/Siro/MMF and 339 (80%) received PTCy/Tac/MMF. The median age for the entire cohort was 54 years (range, 18 to 78 years), and the median follow-up was 30 months. The Siro group had a higher proportion of patients age ≥60 years (58% versus 34%; P < .01), and the groups also differed in diagnosis type, conditioning regimen, and cytomegalovirus serostatus. There were no significant differences in the rates of grade II-IV aGVHD (45% versus 47%; P = .6) at day +100 or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (47% versus 54%; P = .79) at 2 years post-HCT. In multivariate analysis, neutrophil engraftment at day +30 was significantly better in the Tac group (odds ratio, .30; 95% confidence interval, .1 to .83; P = .02), with a median time to engraftment of 17 days versus 18 days in the Siro group, but platelet engraftment was similar in the 2 groups. Otherwise, in multivariate analysis, GVHD prophylaxis type had no significant influence on aGVHD or cGVHD, nonrelapse mortality, relapse, GVHD-free relapse-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival after PBSC haplo-HCT. These findings suggest that Siro is a comparable alternative to Tac in combination with PTCy/MMF for GVHD prophylaxis, with overall similar clinical outcomes despite delayed engraftment after peripheral blood stem cell haplo-HCT. Although Tac remains the standard of care, Siro may be substituted based on the side effect profile of these medications, with consideration of patient medical comorbidities at HCT.

Hypomethylating Agents and Venetoclax for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Relapsed After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Hypomethylating agent + venetoclax is an effective frontline combination for acute myeloid leukemia, but its efficacy and safety in post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) relapse remain underexplored. Outcomes have been poor for this population, with no standard treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 72 Ven-naïve patients who received hypomethylating agents + venetoclax at relapse following alloHCT and aimed to evaluate the rates of complete remission with or without hematologic recovery (CR/CRi) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, CR/CRi duration, and overall survival. We leveraged our larger sample to analyze the impact of cytogenetic/molecular features on the odds of CR/CRi. RESULTS: CR/CRi was achieved among 32 of 67 (48%) patients, and MRD negativity was recorded among 10 of 12. NPM1 and IDH 1 or 2 mutations increased the odds of CR/CRi, as did increasing time from alloHCT to relapse. Fourteen patients subsequently received donor lymphocyte infusions or a second alloHCT. Responses lasted a median of 17.8 months (95% CI, 7.2 months to not reached), and responders had a greater median overall survival of 19.7 months (95% CI, 7.6-51.5 months) compared to 2.9 months among nonresponders (95% CI, 1.8-4.4 months; log-rank P < .01). Treatment was well tolerated, but prolonged cytopenias were common and most patients required reduction in the number of venetoclax days per cycle. CONCLUSION: These data support the efficacy of this combination in the alloHCT relapse setting where we report responses among nearly half of patients, with possibly greater benefit for NPM1 and IDH 1/2-mutated cases. These responses can be durable and profound as evidenced by conversion to MRD negativity.

Baseline Serum Inflammatory Proteins Predict Poor CAR T Outcomes in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

A subset of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have poor clinical outcomes. We report serum proteins associated with severe immune-mediated toxicities and inferior clinical responses in 146 patients with DLBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel. We develop a simple stratification based on pre-lymphodepletion C reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin to classify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. We observe that patients in the high-risk category were more likely to develop grade ≥3 toxicities and had inferior overall and progression-free survival. We sought to validate our findings with two independent international cohorts demonstrating that patients classified as low-risk have excellent efficacy and safety outcomes. Based on routine and readily available laboratory tests that can be obtained prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy, this simple risk stratification can inform patient selection for CAR T-cell therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: CAR T-cell therapy has changed the treatment paradigm for patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies. Despite encouraging efficacy, a subset of patients have poor clinical outcomes. We show that a simple clinically applicable model using pre-lymphodepletion CRP and ferritin can identify patients at high risk of poor outcomes. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 80.

Belumosudil Impacts Immunosuppression Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Belumosudil (BEL) is a novel Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor approved for the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in patients who have failed 2 or more prior lines of systemic therapy. Although the pharmacokinetic effects of BEL on other immunosuppressive (IS) agents have not been clinically evaluated, in vitro data indicate that BEL may have possible interactions with drugs with a narrow therapeutic index used to treat cGVHD, such as tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine, through cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and p-glycoprotein interactions. Further evaluation of these potential interactions is warranted to optimize the safety and effectiveness of these medications when combined with BEL. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of BEL on sirolimus and tacrolimus levels when used concurrently by assessing changes in IS levels after the addition of BEL. This retrospective single-center study of patients who started BEL while on tacrolimus and/or sirolimus between February 1, 2019, to February 1, 2023, included patients who had IS levels measured at baseline prior to starting BEL and at least 1 subsequent IS measurement to assess changes over time. The primary endpoint was the concentration-dose (C/D) ratio analyzed before and after the addition of BEL. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of IS levels outside of the therapeutic range (subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic) and mean dosage changes over time. Thirty-seven patients met our eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. Patients taking sirolimus (n = 30) or tacrolimus (n = 16) concurrently with BEL had a statistically significant increase in the C/D ratio (sirolimus recipients, 160% [P < .001]; tacrolimus recipients, 113% [P = .013]) between the pre-BEL and final post-BEL assessments. The C/D ratios for both tacrolimus and sirolimus recipients continued to increase at several time points after initiation of BEL, indicating that multiple drug dosage adjustments may be required. After BEL initiation, 19% of tacrolimus levels and 57% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic. Despite dosage adjustments, 27% of tacrolimus levels were supratherapeutic at both the second and third assessments after starting BEL, and 28% and 30% of sirolimus levels were supratherapeutic at these 2 time points, respectively. All 12 of the patients who discontinued BEL during the study period (100%) showed a return to their baseline C/D ratio, confirming that the C/D ratio change can be attributed to BEL. The impact of BEL on IS levels is clinically significant, warranting dosage adjustments of concurrent medications. A significant number of patients taking sirolimus with BEL had levels >15 ng/mL during the study period, indicating a potential risk for toxicity if this interaction is unmonitored. We recommend empiric dose reductions of 25% for tacrolimus and 25% to 50% for sirolimus when adding BEL, as well as close monitoring of IS levels during the initial weeks of BEL therapy. Future studies are warranted to better describe the impact of BEL on patients taking CYP3A inhibitors.

Feasibility and Toxicity of Full-Body Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Technique for High-Dose Total Body Irradiation.

Introduction: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is often part of myeloablative conditioning in acute leukemia. Modern volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based plans employ arcs to the inferior-most portion of the body that can be simulated in a head-first position and use 2D planning for the inferior body which can result in heterogeneous doses. Here, we describe our institution's unique protocol for delivering high-dose TBI entirely with VMAT and retrospectively compare dosimetric outcomes with helical tomotherapy (HT) plans. Additionally, we describe our method of oropharyngeal mucosal sparing that was implemented after fatal mucositis occurred in two patients. Methods: Thirty-one patients were simulated and treated in head-first (HFS) and feet-first (FFS) orientations. Patients were treated with VMAT (n = 26) or HT (n = 5). In VMAT plans, to synchronize doses between the orientations, images were deformably registered and the HFS dose was transferred to the FFS plan and used as a background dose when optimizing plans. Six to eight isocenters with two arcs per isocenter were generated. HT was delivered with an established technique. Patients were treated to 13.2 Gy over eight twice daily fractions. Dosimetric outcomes and toxicities were retrospectively compared. Results: Prescription dose and organ at risk (OAR) constraints were met for all patients. Lower lung doses were achieved with VMAT relative to HT plans (7.4 vs 7.7 Gy, P = .009). Statistically significant improvement in mucositis was not achieved after adopting a mucosal-sparing technique, however lower doses to the oropharyngeal mucosal were achieved (6.9 vs 14.1 Gy, P = .009), and no further mucositis-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This full-body VMAT method of TBI achieves dose goals, eliminates risk of heterogenous doses within the femur, and demonstrates that selective OAR sparing with the purpose of reducing TBI-related morbidity and mortality is possible at any institution with a VMAT-capable linear accelerator.

Cardiac and inflammatory biomarker differences in adverse cardiac events after chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell therapy: an exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T- Cell (CAR-T) immunotherapy has been a breakthrough treatment for various hematological malignancies. However, cardiotoxicities such as new-onset heart failure, arrhythmia, acute coronary syndrome and cardiovascular death occur in 10-15% of patients treated with CAR-T. This study aims to investigate the changes in cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers in CAR-T therapy to determine the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines. METHODS: In this observational study, ninety consecutive patients treated with CAR-T underwent baseline cardiac investigation with electrocardiogram (ECG), transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), troponin-I, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Follow-up ECG, troponin-I and BNP were obtained five days post- CAR-T. In a subset of patients (N = 53), serum inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-15, interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and angiopoietin 1 & 2 were tested serially, including baseline and daily during hospitalization. Adverse cardiac events were defined as new-onset cardiomyopathy/heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, arrhythmia and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Eleven patients (12%) had adverse cardiac events (one with new-onset cardiomyopathy and ten with new-onset atrial fibrillation). Adverse cardiac events appear to have occurred among patients with advanced age (77 vs. 66 years; p = 0.002), higher baseline creatinine (0.9 vs. 0.7 mg/dL; 0.007) and higher left atrial volume index (23.9 vs. 16.9mL/m2; p = 0.042). Day 5 BNP levels (125 vs. 63pg/mL; p = 0.019), but not troponin-I, were higher in patients with adverse cardiac events, compared to those without. The maximum levels of IL-6 (3855.0 vs. 254.0 pg/mL; p = 0.021), IFN-γ (474.0 vs. 48.8pg/mL; p = 0.006) and IL-15 (70.2 vs. 39.2pg/mL; p = 0.026) were also higher in the adverse cardiac events group. However, cardiac and inflammatory biomarker levels were not associated with cardiac events. Patients who developed cardiac events did not exhibit worse survival compared to patients without cardiac events (Log-rank p = 0.200). CONCLUSION: Adverse cardiac events, predominantly atrial fibrillation, occur commonly after CAR-T (12%). The changes in serial inflammatory cytokine after CAR-T in the setting of adverse cardiac events suggests pro-inflammation as a pathophysiology and require further investigation for their role in adverse cardiac events. TWEET BRIEF HANDLE: CAR-T related Cardiotoxicity has elevated cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers. #CARTCell #CardioOnc #CardioImmunology.

Severe hematotoxicity after CD19 CAR-T therapy is associated with suppressive immune dysregulation and limited CAR-T expansion.

Prolonged cytopenias after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy are a significant clinical problem and the underlying pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Here, we investigated how (CAR) T cell expansion dynamics and serum proteomics affect neutrophil recovery phenotypes after CD19-directed CAR T cell therapy. Survival favored patients with "intermittent" neutrophil recovery (e.g., recurrent neutrophil dips) compared to either "quick" or "aplastic" recovery. While intermittent patients displayed increased CAR T cell expansion, aplastic patients exhibited an unfavorable relationship between expansion and tumor burden. Proteomics of patient serum collected at baseline and in the first month after CAR-T therapy revealed higher markers of endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory cytokines, macrophage activation, and T cell suppression in the aplastic phenotype group. Prolonged neutrophil aplasia thus occurs in patients with systemic immune dysregulation at baseline with subsequently impaired CAR-T expansion and myeloid-related inflammatory changes. The association between neutrophil recovery and survival outcomes highlights critical interactions between host hematopoiesis and the immune state stimulated by CAR-T infusion.

Cardiac events after standard of care idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) is a type of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Currently, the incidence of cardiac events associated with ide-cel remains unclear. This was a retrospective single-center observational study of patients treated with ide-cel for RRMM. We included all consecutive patients who received standard-of-care ide-cel treatment at least 1-month follow-up. Baseline clinical risk factors, safety profile, and responses were examined based on the development of a cardiac event. A total of 78 patients were treated with ide-cel, and 11 patients (14.1%) developed cardiac events: heart failure (5.1%), atrial fibrillation (10.3%), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (3.8%), and cardiovascular death (1.3%). Only 11 of the 78 patients had repeat echocardiogram. Baseline risk factors associated with the development of cardiac events included being female sex and having poor performance status, λ light-chain disease, and advanced Revised International Staging System stage. Baseline cardiac characteristics were not associated with cardiac events. During index hospitalization after CAR-T, higher-grade (≥grade 2) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune cell-associated neurologic syndrome were associated with cardiac events. In multivariable analyses, the hazard ratio for the association of the presence of cardiac events with overall survival (OS) was 2.66 and progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.98. Ide-cel CAR-T for RRMM was associated with similar cardiac events as other types of CAR-T. Worse baseline performance status and higher-grade CRS and neurotoxicity were associated with cardiac events after BCMA-directed CAR-T-cell therapy. Our results suggest that the presence of cardiac events may confer worse PFS or OS; although because of the small sample size, the power to detect an association was limited.

Outcomes Following Intolerance to Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Although tacrolimus and sirolimus (TAC/SIR) is an accepted graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimen following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), toxicity from this regimen can lead to premature discontinuation of immunosuppression. There are limited studies reporting outcomes and subsequent treatment of patients with TAC/SIR intolerance. This study was conducted to assess the outcomes of patients with TAC/SIR intolerance and guide their subsequent management. We retrospectively analyzed transplantation outcomes of consecutive adult patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who underwent allogeneic HCT with TAC/SIR as GVHD prophylaxis between 2009 and 2018. TAC/SIR intolerance was defined as discontinuation of either TAC or SIR due to toxicity before post-transplantation day +100. A total of 777 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median duration of follow-up was 22 months (range, 0.2 to 125 months). Intolerance occurred in 13% (n = 104) of the patients at a median of 30 days (range, 5 to 90 days). The most common causes of intolerance were acute kidney injury (n = 53; 51%), thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 31; 28%), and veno-occlusive disease (n = 23; 22%). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at 100 days was 50% (95% CI, 39% to 64%) in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients and 25% (95% CI, 22% to 29%) in patients tolerant to this regimen (P < .0001). In multivariate analyses, the incidence of grade II-IV 4 acute GVHD was significantly higher in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.40; 95% CI, 1.59 to 3.61; P < .0001). Similarly, in multivariate analyses, the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients had a higher incidence of chronic GVHD (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.12; P = .03). The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 47% (95% CI, 38% to 59%) in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients and 12% (95% CI, 10% to 15%) in those tolerant to the regimen (P < .0001). The 2-year relapse-free survival was 35% (95% CI, 25% to 44%) in the TAC/SIR-intolerant patients and 60% (95% CI, 57% to 65%) in the TAC/SIR-tolerant patients (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.61 to 3.28; P < .0001). Intolerance stratified by early (≤30 days) versus late (31 to 100 days) significantly affected the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 75% (early; 95% CI, 59% to 94%) versus 33% (late; 95% CI, 21% to 50%) (P = .001), as well as the cumulative incidence of NRM at 61% (early; 95% CI, 48% to 77%) versus 35% (late; 95% CI, 24% to 51%) (P = .006). Most patients who developed TAC/SIR intolerance were switched to an alternative 2-drug regimen (71 of 104; 68%), most commonly mycophenolate mofetil in addition to continuing TAC or SIR (68 of 71; 96%). Overall, TAC/SIR intolerance was associated with poorer outcomes. Early intolerance contributed to a higher risk of acute GVHD, increased NRM, and inferior survival. Patients with early intolerance were often switched to an alternative agent, and patients with late intolerance tended to be continued on single-drug therapy without substitution. The use of single-drug versus 2-drug regimens after intolerance did not appear to affect outcomes. Management strategies to mitigate the risks of intolerance are warranted.

Outcomes of CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Patients with Reduced Renal Function Including Dialysis.

Patients with renal impairment (RI) are typically excluded from trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. We evaluated the outcomes of patients with RI receiving standard of care (SOC) CAR T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) after 2 or more prior lines of therapy, renal and survival outcomes were compared based on RI and fludarabine dose reduction (DR) status. RI was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as determined by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation using day -5 creatinine (Cr) values. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was identified and graded using standard Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Renal recovery was considered to occur if Cr was within .2 mg/mL of baseline by day +30. Fludarabine was considered DR if given at <90% of the recommended Food and Drug Administration label dose. Among 166 patients treated with CAR T cell therapy were 17 patients (10.2%) with baseline RI and 149 (89.8%) without RI. After CAR T cell infusion, the incidence of any grade AKI was not significantly different between patients with baseline RI and those without RI (42% versus 21%; P = .08). Similarly, severe grade 2/3 AKI was seen in 1 of 17 patients (5.8%) with baseline RI and in 11 of 149 patients (7.3%) without RI (P = 1). Decreased renal perfusion (28 of 39; 72%) was the most common cause of AKI, with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) contributing to 17 of 39 AKIs (44%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients with RI and those without RI or between those who received standard-dose fludarabine and those who received reduced-dose fludarabine. In contrast, patients with AKI had worse clinical outcomes than those without AKI (multivariable PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.7; OS: HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.4). Notably, peak inflammatory cytokine levels were higher in patients who experienced AKI. Finally, we describe 2 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis who received lymphodepletion and CAR T cell therapy. Baseline renal function did not affect renal or efficacy outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in DLBCL. On the other hand, patients with AKI went on to experience worse clinical outcomes. AKI was commonly related to CRS and high peak inflammatory cytokine levels. CAR T cell therapy is feasible in patients with ESRD and requires careful planning of lymphodepletion.