RESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the coronally advanced flap (CAF) with the modified microsurgical tunnel technique (MMTT) for treatment of Miller class I and II recessions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients with 71 gingival recessions were recruited and randomly assigned to either CAF or to MMTT. In both groups, a connective tissue graft was applied. Clinical evaluations were performed after 3, 6, and 12 months. Impressions were taken and digitally scanned three-dimensionally to evaluate the quantitative soft tissue changes in the operative region. Patient satisfaction was measured with the root coverage aesthetic score (RES). RESULTS: After a period of 12 months, significant differences were not found between the two groups. Root coverage was 98.3% for CAF and 97.2% for MMTT. The evaluation of the aesthetic outcome using RES showed good results in both groups. The RES score was in accordance with subjective patient satisfaction. There was no significant difference in the amount of volumetric changes. CONCLUSIONS: CAF and MMTT with the additional use of a graft are equally successful in covering gingival recessions of Miller class I and II, with high aesthetic results. All patients indicated their willingness for further periodontal surgery.