Transverse Myelitis Following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study in the World Health Organization's Database.

BACKGROUND: Transverse myelitis (TM) has recently been associated by health authorities with Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen/Johnson & Johnson), one of the 5 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) labeled severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines. It is unknown whether a similar association exists for the other FDA or EMA labeled SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (BNT162b2 [Pfizer/BioNTech], mRNA-1273 [Moderna], ChAdOx1nCov-19 [Oxford-AstraZeneca], and NVX-CoV2373 [Novavax]). This study aimed to evaluate the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccine class and TM. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional, pharmacovigilance cohort study examined individual case safety reports from VigiBase, the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database. We first conducted a disproportionality analysis with the information component (IC) using the reports of TM that occurred within 28 days following exposure to the FDA or EMA labeled SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, from December 1, 2020 (first adverse event related to a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine) to March 27, 2022. Second, we analyzed the clinical features of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-associated TM cases reported in VigiBase. RESULTS: TM was significantly associated both with the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-based (n = 364; IC025  = 0.62) and vector-based (n = 136; IC025  = 0.52) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that are authorized by the FDA or the EMA. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this observational, cross-sectional pharmacovigilance study showed that mRNA-based and vector-based FDA/EMA labeled SARS-CoV-2 vaccines can be associated with TM. However, because TM remains a rare event, with a previously reported rate of 0.28 cases per 1 million vaccine doses, the risk-benefit ratio in favor of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 virus remains unchallenged. Rather, this study suggests that clinicians should consider the diagnosis of TM in patients presenting with early signs of spinal cord dysfunction after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:1080-1089.

Association between road traffic accidents and drugs belonging to the antiseizure medications class: A pharmacovigilance analysis in VigiBase.

AIMS: Due to their central mechanism of action, antiseizure medications (ASMs) could lead to adverse effects likely to impair driving skills. Their extended use to neuropsychiatric disorders makes it a class of drugs to monitor for their road traffic accidental (RTA) potential. We aimed to assess the reporting association between ASMs and RTAs using the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase). METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis to compute adjusted reporting odds ratios to evaluate the strength of reporting association between ASMs and RTAs. A univariate analysis using the reporting odds-ratio was used to assess drug-drug interactions between ASMs and RTAs. RESULTS: There were 1 341 509 reports associated with at least 1 ASM in VigiBase of whom 2.91‰ were RTAs reports. Eight ASMs were associated with higher reporting of RTAs compared to others (ranging from 1.35 [95% confidence interval 1.11-1.64] for lamotrigine to 4.36 [95% confidence interval 3.56-5.32] for cannabis). Eight significant drug-drug interactions were found between ASMs and the onset of RTA, mainly involving CYP450 induction. CONCLUSION: A significant safety signal between RTAs and some ASMs was identified. Association of several ASMs might further increase the occurrence of RTA. ASMs prescription in patients with identified risk factors of RTA should be considered with caution. Study number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04480996.

Rhabdomyolysis with Co-Administration of Statins and Antiplatelet Therapies-Analysis of the WHO Pharmacovigilance Database.

PURPOSE: While statins and antiplatelet therapies are largely prescribed together worldwide, limited information is available on the safety of their association regarding rhabdomyolysis occurrence. We aimed to assess the reporting of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with a combination of statin and antiplatelet therapy, compared to statin alone. METHODS: We used the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) to compare the rhabdomyolysis reporting between statin (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin) plus antiplatelet therapy (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) groups versus statin alone groups, for each statin and antiplatelet therapy. Study setting was restricted to patients aged 45 or older, including reports up until 1st September, 2021. We computed reporting Odds-Ratio (ROR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) to quantify the disproportionality between groups, adjusted on age and sex. RESULTS: Among the 11,431,708 reports of adverse reactions, we extracted 9,489 cases of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with statins, of whom 2,464 (26%) were also treated with antiplatelet therapy. The reporting of rhabdomyolysis was increased when ticagrelor was associated with atorvastatin (ROR 1.30 [1.02-1.65]) or rosuvastatin (ROR 1.90 [1.42-2.54]) compared to the respective statin alone but did not change when aspirin, clopidogrel or prasugrel were considered. CONCLUSION: Rhabdomyolysis reporting was increased when ticagrelor -but not other antiplatelet agents- was notified with the most prescribed statins in practice. This finding needs to be considered by physicians especially in high-risk patients.

Neonatal Hypotonia Following in Utero Exposure to Antidepressant Drugs.

Associations between fetal exposure to antidepressants and neonatal hypotonia were studied using VigiBase and the French PharmacoVigilance Database. We identified significant associations between neonatal hypotonia and clomipramine, venlafaxine, and imipramine. Reports from the French database implicated prolonged fetal exposure. Neonatal hypotonia may be associated with in utero exposure to antidepressants.

General medicine and notification of adverse reactions: contributions of health insurance representatives / Cabinets de médecine générale et notification des effets indésirables médicamenteux : expertise d'un délégué de l'Assurance maladie

INTRODUCTION: In order to reduce the under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in general practice, the Caen Normandie regional pharmacovigilance center (CRPV) has implemented a training program for the French health insurance representatives (DAM) of the Manche department in order to raise awareness among general practitioners (GPs) to ADR reporting. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: During quarterly visits of DAM to GPs, the mode of operation and the value of pharmacovigilance reporting was presented. This pilot study presents the impact of these DAM visits to GPs in term of ADRs reporting quantification. RESULTS: Assessment of this first year showed a doubling of ADR reporting by GPs of the Manche department in 2019 compared to 2017 and 2018. This phenomenon was not found in the two control departments (departments of Calvados and Orne) where the information had not been issued. These ADRs first concerned drugs of the renin-angiotensin system, then psychotropic drugs and anti-infectives. These were cutaneous, then neurological and gastrointestinal ADRs, preferentially affecting women. CONCLUSIONS: This experimentation should continue on a larger scale. The longer-term evaluation of this tool also requires evaluating its relevance.

Introduction: Pour réduire la sous-notification des effets indésirables médicamenteux (EIM) en médecine générale, le centre régional de pharmacovigilance (CRPV) Caen Normandie a mis en place une formation pour les délégués de la Caisse primaire d'assurance maladie de la Manche (CPAM 50) afin de sensibiliser les médecins généralistes (MG) à la déclaration des EIM. Ainsi, lors de la visite trimestrielle des délégués de la CPAM 50 aux MG, il était présenté le mode de fonctionnement et l'intérêt des déclarations de pharmacovigilance. But de l'étude: Cette étude pilote présente l'influence de ces visites post-formation des délégués de la CPAM 50 sur le nombre d'EIM déclarés. Résultats: Le bilan de cette première année de visites montre le doublement des EIM déclarés par les MG du département de la Manche en 2019 par rapport aux années 2017 et 2018. Ce phénomène n'a pas été retrouvé dans les deux départements témoins (départements du Calvados et de l'Orne), où l'information n'avait pas été délivrée. Ces EIM concernaient d'abord les médicaments du système rénine-angiotensine, puis les psychotropes et les anti-infectieux. Il s'agissait d'EIM cutanés puis neurologiques et gastro-intestinaux touchant préférentiellement les femmes. Conclusions: Cette expérimentation devra se poursuivre à plus large échelle. L'évaluation à plus long terme de ce dispositif permettra aussi d'en évaluer la pertinence.

Haematologic malignancies associated with clozapine v. all other antipsychotic agents: a pharmacovigilance study in VigiBase®.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is mainly used in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and may lead to potentially severe haematologic adverse events, such as agranulocytosis. Whether clozapine might be associated with haematologic malignancies is unknown. We aimed to assess the association between haematologic malignancies and clozapine using Vigibase®, the WHO pharmacovigilance database. METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis to compute reporting odds-ratio adjusted for age, sex and concurrent reporting of antineoplastic/immunomodulating agents (aROR) for clozapine and structurally related drugs (loxapine, olanzapine and quetiapine) compared with other antipsychotic drugs. Cases were malignant lymphoma and leukaemia reports. Non-cases were all other reports including at least one antipsychotic report. RESULTS: Of the 140 226 clozapine-associated reports, 493 were malignant lymphoma cases, and 275 were leukaemia cases. Clozapine was significantly associated with malignant lymphoma (aROR 9.14, 95% CI 7.75-10.77) and leukaemia (aROR 3.54, 95% CI 2.97-4.22). Patients suffering from those haematologic malignancies were significantly younger in the clozapine treatment group than patients treated with other medicines (p < 0.001). The median time to onset (available for 212 cases) was 5.1 years (IQR 2.2-9.9) for malignant lymphoma and 2.5 years (IQR 0.6-7.4) for leukaemia. The aROR by quartile of dose of clozapine in patients with haematologic malignancies suggested a dose-dependent association. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine was significantly associated with a pharmacovigilance signal of haematologic malignancies. The risk-benefit balance of clozapine should be carefully assessed in patients with risk factors of haematologic malignancies. Clozapine should be used at the lowest effective posology.

Disproportionality analysis in VigiBase as a drug repositioning method for the discovery of potentially useful drugs in Alzheimer's disease.

Drug repositioning aims to propose new indications for marketed drugs. Although several methods exist, the utility of pharmacovigilance databases for this purpose is unclear. We conducted a disproportionality analysis in the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database VigiBase to identify potential anticholinesterase drug candidates for repositioning in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Disproportionality analysis is a validated method for detecting significant associations between drugs and adverse events (AEs) in pharmacovigilance databases. We applied this approach in VigiBase to establish the safety profile displayed by the anticholinesterase drugs used in AD and searched the database for drugs with similar safety profiles. The detected drugs with potential activity against acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterases (BuChEs) were then evaluated to confirm their anticholinesterase potential. RESULTS: We identified 22 drugs with safety profiles similar to AD medicines. Among these drugs, 4 (clozapine, aripiprazole, sertraline and S-duloxetine) showed a human BuChE inhibition rate of over 70% at 10-5  M. Their human BuChE half maximal inhibitory concentration values were compatible with clinical anticholinesterase action in humans at their normal doses. The most active human BuChE inhibitor in our study was S-duloxetine, with a half maximal inhibitory concentration of 1.2 µM. Combined with its ability to inhibit serotonin (5-HT) reuptake, the use of this drug could represent a novel multitarget directed ligand therapeutic strategy for AD. CONCLUSION: We identified 4 drugs with repositioning potential in AD using drug safety profiles derived from a pharmacovigilance database. This method could be useful for future drug repositioning efforts.

Could N-acetylcysteine improve the safety of clozapine?

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic indicated in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia which remains underused due to safety issues. Mechanisms behind these adverse effects are complex and not fully understood. They may involve immune-related mechanisms, direct toxic effects and oxidative stress. Clozapine-induced oxidative stress might indeed notably be involved in the onset of neutropenia, agranulocytosis, myocarditis, sialorrhea, and metabolic alterations. Therefore, the association of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an easily accessible, low-cost and well tolerated antioxidant drug could be of interest in clozapine-treated patients to improve clozapine safety. Furthermore, according to recent studies NAC could help to improve schizophrenia symptoms. We believe that the use of NAC in the context of clozapine prescribing merits further study, as it could improve clozapine safety which may lead to a wider use and ultimately improve the healthcare of thousands of patients. NAC could also secondarily show positive knock-on effects for the patients by improving clinical symptoms of schizophrenia in synergy with clozapine, and by reducing substance abuse and thus by improving the patient's overall condition. However, given the rarity of clozapine-induced severe adverse effects, only a large volume of data (e.g., National adverse events monitoring) could assess the benefits of NAC on clozapine safety.

Cushing's syndrome due to interaction between ritonavir or cobicistat and corticosteroids: a case-control study in the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the frequent interaction between antiretroviral-boosting agents and corticosteroids causing Cushing's syndrome (CS) in the French Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study describing CS recorded in the FPVD between 1996 and 2018. Case was defined as CS occurring in people living with HIV (PLWH) and control was defined as CS in uninfected individuals. Drug-drug interaction (DDI) was defined as an interaction between corticosteroids and CYP3A4 inhibitors. Data concerning the DDI, corticosteroids involved, route of administration and seriousness of the CS were described. RESULTS: Among the 139 instances of CS identified, 34/35 cases (97%) had DDIs (31 with ritonavir and 3 with cobicistat) and 7/104 controls (7%) had DDIs (6 with itraconazole and 1 with verapamil). The main corticosteroid involved was inhaled fluticasone (28/35, 80%) among the cases and oral prednisone (38/104, 37%) among the controls. More CS cases (30/35, 86%) than CS controls (62/104, 60%) were serious (OR = 4.0, 95% CI = 1.4-14.4; P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Antiretroviral-boosting agents were responsible for one out of four iatrogenic CS cases in a French national database. Prescribers should be aware of the risk of potentially serious DDIs between antiretroviral-boosting agents and corticosteroids, including single-tablet regimens containing cobicistat.

[Completeness of pharmacovigilance reporting in general medicine in France.] / Informativité des déclarations de pharmacovigilance en médecine générale en France.

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous reporting remains one of the cornerstones of post-marketing drug safety surveillance. One of its main limitations is a lack of completeness.The main aim of this study was to assess the completeness of pharmacovigilance reports sent by general practitioners (GPs) to regional pharmacovigilance centers (RPC) reported in the French pharmacovigilance database (FPVD). Secondary aim was to identify factors associated with complete reports. METHOD: All adverse drugs reactions (ADRs) sent by GPs in France in 2015 were analyzed. According to information provided in ADR reports (ADR, date of occurrence, clinical description, drugs suspected, etc.), completeness was analyzed from “mandatory” criteria (age, gender, ADR and suspected drug(s)) and “non-mandatory” criteria (medical history, concomitant drugs, symptoms evolution and complementary exams) and classified as “well-documented”, “slightly-documented” or “poorly-documented”. RESULTS: In 2015, the FPVD contained 3,020 ADR reports realized by GPs. Only 16.4% of these reports were classified as “well-documented”, in accordance with study criteria. The most poorly documented items were concomitant drugs (41.4%) and complementary exams (37.4%). An association between a “well-documented” ADR report and its “seriousness” (OR = 3,02 [95% CI 2,44; 3,23], P < 10–3) and elderly compared to adults (OR = 1,76 [95% CI 1,42; 2,18], P < 10–3) or children (OR = 4,59 [95% CI 2,51; 8,39], P < 10–3). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that only one out of six ADR reports was “well-documented”. It appears to be important to promote pharmacovigilance to improve completeness of ADR reports.

[Evaluation of a new pharmacovigilance tool: Simplified online reporting for general practitioners]. / Évaluation d'un nouvel outil en pharmacovigilance : la déclaration simplifiée en ligne pour les médecins généralistes.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions remains the cornerstone of postmarketing drug safety surveillance (pharmacovigilance). However, the marked underreporting of adverse drug reactions constitutes a major limitation. The main objective of this study was to assess the use of this simplified reporting by general practitioners (GPs) in Western Normandy based on the number of ADRs reported and to assess its impact on the quality of these reports. METHOD: Simplified online pharmacovigilance reporting was proposed in June 2015 by the Caen Normandie regional pharmacovigilance center (CRPV) in conjunction with the Normandy Union régionale des médecins libéraux (URML Normandie) for GPs. This new tool is based on items to be completed by the GP. They were selected by members of CRPV in an attempt to combine good quality reporting and maximum simplicity. RESULTS: Between June 2014 and June 2016, 220 reports were made by 67 GPs. One year after introduction of this new tool, the monthly number of reports was multiplied by 4.8 and the number of reporting GPs was multiplied by two. The quality of reporting remained unchanged over the same period (p = 0.1). Simplified reporting allowed a decreased number of inaccurate reports (33% versus 36%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Simplified online reporting is effective quantitatively (increased number of reports) but also qualitatively (quality unchanged). We must now try to develop this tool in other French regions and reassess it over time.

[Fibrates and risk of venous thromboembolism: Case/no-case study in French pharmacovigilance database]. / Fibrates et risques thrombo-emboliques veineux : étude cas/non-cas dans la base nationale de pharmacovigilance.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have investigated the occurrence of venous thromboembolic events (phlebitis and pulmonary embolism) [VTE] and fibrates. Fibrates could be associated with VTE although published data are contradictory. The objective of this study is to confirm the link between VTE and fibrates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective disproportionality analysis (case/non-case method) from observations recorded consecutively in the French pharmacovigilance database between 1985 and 2016. Cases were defined as embolic and thrombotic events, thrombophlebitis; Non-cases were other adverse events reported over the same period. We measured the disproportionality of exposure to each fibrate among cases and no-cases. The analysis was validated with a positive control (drospirenone) and a negative control (paracetamol). RESULTS: We compared 19,436 cases (including 161 mentioning fibrates) to 563,310 non-cases (including 3228 fibrates). Reports of VTE were significantly associated with fenofibrate (ROR=1.83; 95% CI=[1.53; 2.2]) but not with other fibrates: bézafibrate (ROR=0.44; 95% CI=[0.2; 0.99]), ciprofibrate (ROR=1.15; 95% CI=[0.76; 1.73]) and gemfibrozil (ROR=0.91; 95% CI=[0.45; 1.84]). CONCLUSION: With this study, we confirm the link between VTE and fenofibrate. It is therefore advisable to remain cautious when prescribing fenofibrate, in particular in case of past history of VTE and to declare systematically any venous thromboembolic adverse events observed with these drugs.

[Reporting of harms in clinical trials: Vigilant support to the investigator. A guideline of REVISE' Group]. / Sécurité des essais cliniques : accompagnement de l'investigateur par le vigilant pour la publication des données de sécurité. Une ligne directrice du groupe REVISE.

Since August 9, 2004, the 2001 European Directive for clinical trials is applied to the French law. Since the 2006 implementing decree amending public health law on biomedical researches, safety data are managed by sponsor vigilant. Competent authorities collect sponsor's data, implement the vigilance system (Article L. 1123-12 of French Health Code) and supervise drastically safety data in clinical research from clinical trial authorization to final report. However, although available to competent authorities, final reports are not addressed to scientific community, who has only access to scientific publications for clinical trials safety data. Final report is under sponsor's responsibility (Article R. 1123-60 of French Health Code), but scientific publication is written by the study coordinating investigator. Therefore, at the end of the clinical trial, two actors will interpret safety data from the same database but with different scientific objectives. The lack of reporting of harms in scientific communications impacts the information. The REVISE group (safety officers of French institutional sponsors) suggests help to investigators in the safety data writing for their trial scientific publication. The group published a guideline, based on the international recommendations for publications of safety data in randomized clinical trials and expanded its scope to all clinical trials.

[Not Available]. / Nouvel effet indésirable fréquent des inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons chez le sujet âgé : l'hyponatrémie modérée.

Hyponatremia is a rare side effect described in the product characteristics of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Hyponatremia in the elderly (>65years) was assessed in patients with exposure to PPIs for at least one year compared to controls not exposed to PPIs counterparts. Included 145 patients, twenty-four patients (16.6%) had moderate hyponatremia ([120-134] mEq/L). Forty-eight patients (33.1%) were treated with PPIs. In the end, 31.3% [18.7%-46.3%] of the treated population for more than a year by PPI suffered moderate hyponatremia against only 9.3% [14.3%-16.9%] in the rest of the population, giving an odds ratio of 4.4 ([1.8-11.1], p=0.001). The relationship between hyponatremia dose was not significant (R(2)=0.05, p=0.74). By our study, we show that the risk of moderate hyponatremia is increased by chronic use of PPI in the elderly population. We also specify a notion of prevalence between 18.7% and 46.3%.

[New frequent adverse reaction of PPI in older adults: mild hyponatremia]. / Nouvel effet indésirable fréquent des inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons chez le sujet âgé : l'hyponatrémie modérée.

Hyponatremia is a rare side effect described in the product characteristics of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Hyponatremia in the elderly (>65 years) was assessed in patients with exposure to PPIs for at least one year compared to controls not exposed to PPIs counterparts. Included 145 patients, twenty-four patients (16.6%) had moderate hyponatremia ([120-134] mEq/L). Forty-eight patients (33.1%) were treated with PPIs. In the end, 31.3% [18.7%-46.3%] of the treated population for more than a year by PPI suffered moderate hyponatremia against only 9.3% [14.3%-16.9%] in the rest of the population, giving an odds ratio of 4.4 ([1.8-11.1], p=0.001). The relationship between hyponatremia dose was not significant (R2=0.05, p=0.74). By our study, we show that the risk of moderate hyponatremia is increased by chronic use of PPI in the elderly population. We also specify a notion of prevalence between 18.7% and 46.3%.