Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 1067, 2021 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627239

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the development of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology, the ophthalmic AI-related recognition issues are prominent, but there is a lack of research into people's familiarity with and their attitudes toward ophthalmic AI. This survey aims to assess medical workers' and other professional technicians' familiarity with, attitudes toward, and concerns about AI in ophthalmology. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study design study. An electronic questionnaire was designed through the app Questionnaire Star, and was sent to respondents through WeChat, China's version of Facebook or WhatsApp. The participation was voluntary and anonymous. The questionnaire consisted of four parts, namely the respondents' background, their basic understanding of AI, their attitudes toward AI, and their concerns about AI. A total of 562 respondents were counted, with 562 valid questionnaires returned. The results of the questionnaires are displayed in an Excel 2003 form. RESULTS: There were 291 medical workers and 271 other professional technicians completed the questionnaire. About 1/3 of the respondents understood AI and ophthalmic AI. The percentages of people who understood ophthalmic AI among medical workers and other professional technicians were about 42.6 % and 15.6 %, respectively. About 66.0 % of the respondents thought that AI in ophthalmology would partly replace doctors, about 59.07 % having a relatively high acceptance level of ophthalmic AI. Meanwhile, among those with AI in ophthalmology application experiences (30.6 %), above 70 % of respondents held a full acceptance attitude toward AI in ophthalmology. The respondents expressed medical ethics concerns about AI in ophthalmology. And among the respondents who understood AI in ophthalmology, almost all the people said that there was a need to increase the study of medical ethics issues in the ophthalmic AI field. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results revealed that the medical workers had a higher understanding level of AI in ophthalmology than other professional technicians, making it necessary to popularize ophthalmic AI education among other professional technicians. Most of the respondents did not have any experience in ophthalmic AI but generally had a relatively high acceptance level of AI in ophthalmology, and there was a need to strengthen research into medical ethics issues.


Asunto(s)
Oftalmología , Inteligencia Artificial , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Int J Ophthalmol ; 16(9): 1395-1405, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37724288

RESUMEN

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most common retinal vascular diseases and one of the main causes of blindness worldwide. Early detection and treatment can effectively delay vision decline and even blindness in patients with DR. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) models constructed by machine learning and deep learning (DL) algorithms have been widely used in ophthalmology research, especially in diagnosing and treating ophthalmic diseases, particularly DR. Regarding DR, AI has mainly been used in its diagnosis, grading, and lesion recognition and segmentation, and good research and application results have been achieved. This study summarizes the research progress in AI models based on machine learning and DL algorithms for DR diagnosis and discusses some limitations and challenges in AI research.

3.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 138: 111444, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33662679

RESUMEN

A large number of microbial communities exist in normal human intestinal tracts, which maintain a relatively stable dynamic balance under certain conditions. Gut microbiota are closely connected with human health and the occurrence of tumors. The colonization of certain intestinal bacteria on specific sites, gut microbiota disturbance and intestinal immune disorders can induce the occurrence of tumors. Meanwhile, gut microbiota can also play a role in tumor therapy by participating in immune regulation, influencing the efficacy of anti-tumor drugs, targeted therapy of engineered probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation. This article reviews the role of gut microbiota in the occurrence, development, diagnosis and treatment of tumors. A better understanding of how gut microbiota affect tumors will help us find more therapies to treat the disease.


Asunto(s)
Carcinogénesis/metabolismo , Disbiosis/metabolismo , Disbiosis/terapia , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Animales , Carcinogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/efectos de los fármacos , Transformación Celular Neoplásica/metabolismo , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Diabetes Ther ; 10(5): 1811-1822, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31290125

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In April 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the world's first artificial intelligence (AI) medical device for detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR), the IDx-DR. However, there is a lack of evaluation systems for DR intelligent diagnostic technology. METHODS: Five hundred color fundus photographs of diabetic patients were selected. DR severity varied from grade 0 to 4, with 100 photographs for each grade. Following that, these were diagnosed by both ophthalmologists and the intelligent technology, the results of which were compared by applying the evaluation system. The system includes primary, intermediate, and advanced evaluations, of which the intermediate evaluation incorporated two methods. Main evaluation indicators were sensitivity, specificity, and kappa value. RESULTS: The AI technology diagnosed 93 photographs with no DR, 107 with mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR), 107 with moderate NPDR, 108 with severe NPDR, and 85 with proliferative DR (PDR). The sensitivity, specificity, and kappa value of the AI diagnoses in the primary evaluation were 98.8%, 88.0%, and 0.89, respectively. According to method 1 of the intermediate evaluation, the sensitivity of AI diagnosis was 98.0%, specificity 97.0%, and the kappa value 0.95. In method 2 of the intermediate evaluation, the sensitivity of AI diagnosis was 95.5%, the specificity 99.3%, and kappa value 0.95. In the advanced evaluation, the kappa value of the intelligent diagnosis was 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: This article proposes an evaluation system for color fundus photograph-based intelligent diagnostic technology of DR and demonstrates an application of this system in a clinical setting. The results from this evaluation system serve as the basis for the selection of scenarios in which DR intelligent diagnostic technology can be applied.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA