Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 107(3): 319-28, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21841049

RESUMEN

We have conducted a meta-analysis of the clinical effects of morphine and hydromorphone to compare their benefit in analgesia. Embase and Medline were searched with an end-date of June 2009 for randomized, controlled trials or observational studies that addressed comparative analgesic and side-effects or particular side-effects. Two researchers independently identified included studies and extracted the data. Estimates of opioid effects were combined by using a random-effects model. Meta-analysis of eight studies suggested that hydromorphone (494 patients) provides slightly better (P=0.012) clinical analgesia than morphine (510 patients). The effect-size was small (Cohen's d=0.266) and disappeared when one study was removed, although the advantage of hydromorphone was more evident in studies of better quality (Jadad's rating). Side-effects were similar, for example, nausea (P=0.383, nine studies, 456 patients receiving hydromorphone and 460 morphine); vomiting (P=0.306, six studies, 246 patients receiving hydromorphone and 239 morphine); or itching (P=0.249, eight studies, 405 patients receiving hydromorphone, 410 morphine). This suggests some advantage of hydromorphone over morphine for analgesia. Additional potential clinical pharmacological advantages with regard to side-effects, such as safety in renal failure or during acute analgesia titration, are based on limited evidence and require substantiation by further studies.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Hidromorfona/uso terapéutico , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hidromorfona/efectos adversos , Morfina/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 87(2): 204-11, 2010 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19907420

RESUMEN

Ventilatory depression is a significant risk associated with the use of opioids. We assessed whether opioid-induced ventilatory depression can be selectively antagonized by an ampakine without reduction of analgesia. In 16 healthy men, after a single oral dose of 1,500 mg of the ampakine CX717, a target concentration of 100 ng/ml alfentanil decreased the respiratory frequency by only 2.9 +/- 33.4% as compared with 25.6 +/- 27.9% during placebo coadministration (P < 0.01).Blood oxygenation and the ventilatory response to hypercapnic challenge also showed significantly smaller decreases with CX717 than with placebo. In contrast, CX717 did not affect alfentanil-induced analgesia in either electrical or heat-based experimental models of pain. Both ventilatory depression and analgesia were reversed with 1.6 mg of naloxone. These results support the use of ampakines as selective antidotes in humans to counter opioid-induced ventilatory depression without affecting opioid-mediated analgesia.


Asunto(s)
Alfentanilo/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Isoxazoles/farmacología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Adulto , Alfentanilo/farmacología , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Hipercapnia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Naloxona/farmacología , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/farmacología , Oxígeno/sangre , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA