RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Depression and anxiety are prevalent in older adults with cancer but are often undertreated. Older adults are also at increased risk of chemotherapy toxicity (CT). This study evaluated the impact of depression and anxiety symptoms on severe CT risk in older adults with cancer. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial (2:1) evaluating geriatric assessment-driven intervention (GAIN) versus standard of care (SOC) to reduce grade 3+ CT in older adults with cancer. Mental health was assessed via the Mental Health Inventory 13. CT was graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: A total of 605 patients enrolled (402 GAIN; 203 SOC). Overall, 35% were depressed and 47% were anxious. Patients with depression had increased CT in the SOC arm (70.7% vs. 54.3%; p = .02) but not in the GAIN arm (54.3% vs. 48.5%; p = .27). CT was more likely in SOC patients with depression (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; 95% CI, 1.10-3.72). This association persisted after adjusting for Cancer and Aging Research Group toxicity score (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.07-3.65) and for demographic, disease, and treatment factors (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.03-3.85). Depression and CT were not associated in the GAIN arm (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.84-1.91). Anxiety and CT were not associated in either arm. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated depression symptoms are associated with increased risk of severe CT in older adults with cancer, which was mitigated with GAIN. This suggests that treating depression symptoms may lower toxicity risk. Future studies are needed to confirm and investigate the impact of depression-specific interventions on outcomes.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Older adults with cancer facing competing treatments must prioritize between various outcomes. This study assessed health outcome prioritization among older adults with cancer starting chemotherapy. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized trial addressing vulnerabilities in older adults with cancer. Patients completed three validated outcome prioritization tools: 1) Health Outcomes Tool: prioritizes outcomes (survival, independence, symptoms) using a visual analog scale; 2) Now vs. Later Tool: rates the importance of quality of life at three times-today versus 1 or 5 years in the future; and 3) Attitude Scale: rates agreement with outcome-related statements. The authors measured the proportion of patients prioritizing various outcomes and evaluated their characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 219 patients (median [range] age 71 [65-88], 68% with metastatic disease) were included. On the Health Outcomes Tool, 60.7% prioritized survival over other outcomes. Having localized disease was associated with choosing survival as top priority. On the Now vs. Later Tool, 50% gave equal importance to current versus future quality of life. On the Attitude Scale, 53.4% disagreed with the statement "the most important thing to me is living as long as I can, no matter what my quality of life is"; and 82.2% agreed with the statement "it is more important to me to maintain my thinking ability than to live as long as possible". CONCLUSION: Although survival was the top priority for most participants, some older individuals with cancer prioritize other outcomes, such as cognition and function. Clinicians should elicit patient-defined priorities and include them in decision-making.