Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BMC Fam Pract ; 21(1): 14, 2020 01 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31980021

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to assess impact of disease and treatment on quality of life and symptoms; however, their use in primary care is fragmented. We aimed to understand how PROMs are currently being used in primary care, the barriers and facilitators of this use and if appropriate how it might be optimised. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews among general practitioners (GPs) in England. GPs' opinions were explored using an electronic, self-completed questionnaire disseminated to 100 GPs via an online doctors' community and semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 GPs. RESULTS: Most GPs surveyed (77/100; 77%) reported using one or more PROM, primarily to aid clinical management (n = 66) or as screening/diagnostic tools (n = 62). Qualitative interviews highlighted challenges in identifying and selecting PROMs; however, some GPs valued PROMs for shared decision making and to direct patient discussions. The interviews identified key barriers to PROM use including: time constraints; insufficient knowledge; lack of integration into clinical systems; and PROMs being mandated without consultation or explanation. Evidence of the benefit of PROMs is required to promote uptake and use of PROMs in primary care. CONCLUSION: Implementation of PROMs in primary care requires integration with clinical systems, a bottom-up approach to PROM selection and system design involving meaningful consultation with patients and primary care clinicians and training/support for use.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Médicos Generales , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Transversales , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ; 171: 139-143, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35610131

RESUMEN

Shared decision making has been on the policy agenda in the UK for at least twelve years, but it lacked a comprehensive approach to delivery. That has changed over the past five years, and we can now see significant progress across all aspects of a comprehensive approach, including leadership at policy, professional and patient levels; infrastructure developments, including the provision of training, tools and campaigns; and practice improvements, such as demonstrations, measurement and coordination. All these initiatives were necessary, but the last, central coordination, would appear to be key to success.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Participación del Paciente , Toma de Decisiones , Alemania , Humanos , Reino Unido
4.
Br J Gen Pract ; 73(730): 222, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37105733
7.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 9(4): 733-5, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19640867

RESUMEN

We describe the case of a 17-year-old hairdresser who presented with haemoptysis and trichoptysis due to benign intrapulmonary teratoma and her surgical management. The clinical and radiological features of this rare tumour are reviewed and the symptom of trichoptysis discussed.


Asunto(s)
Cabello/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Teratoma/complicaciones , Adolescente , Peluquería , Biopsia , Femenino , Hemoptisis/etiología , Hemoptisis/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Teratoma/patología , Teratoma/cirugía , Toracotomía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA