Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(4): e1173-e1178, 2022 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34570077

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to measure overall trends and to identify leading causes for pediatric emergency department (ED) visits among children aged 0 to 4 years. METHODS: We conducted an 11-year population-based open cohort study using health administrative data from 2008 to 2018 in Ontario, Canada. All ED visits were extracted from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, along with the most responsible cause of each visit. Annual ED visit rates were calculated per 100 children in each year. Overall and disease-specific rates for all children were calculated and then stratified by sex and age groups. Relative percentage change in rates between 2008 and 2018 were calculated and compared using standardized differences (SDIFs). Statistical significance of time trends was tested using Poisson regression. RESULTS: This study included an average of 911,566 children from 2008 to 2018. All-cause ED visit rates increased by 28.2% from 2008 to 2018 (43.24-55.42 per 100, SDIF >0.1). Respiratory diseases were consistently the top cause of ED visits, and contributed to 1 in 3 ED visits in 2018. These respiratory conditions include asthma, asthma-related diseases (bronchiolitis, bronchitis, influenza, and pneumonia), and other respiratory diseases. Respiratory ED visit rates increased by 32.8% from 2008 to 2018 (11.51-15.28 per 100, SDIF <0.1), driven by a 46.4% (14.58-21.35 per 100, SDIF >0.1) increase among children younger than 1 year. There was a 78.0% increase in ED visits for bronchiolitis in infants (1.45-2.58 per 100, SDIF <0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory diseases like bronchiolitis among infants were the consistent leading cause for ED visits. All-cause ED visit rates among young children increased by 28.17% from 2008 to 2018.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Atención Ambulatoria , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Ontario/epidemiología
2.
Environ Res ; 194: 110645, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359457

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on COVID-19 transmission is crucial in preventing more cases. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation and ozone (O3) have reported antimicrobial properties but few studies have examined associations with community infectivity of COVID-19. Research suggests UV light can be preventative while the effect of O3 is contested. We sought to determine the relationship between UV, O3, and COVID-19 incidence in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: In our time series analyses, we calculated daily incidence rates and reproductive number (Rt) from 34,975 cases between January and June 2020 across 34 Ontario Public Health Units. We used generalised linear models, adjusting for potential confounders, to calculate point estimates (PE) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for UV and O3. Analyses were further stratified by age groups and outbreaks at institutions versus community. RESULTS: We found that 1-week averaged UV was significantly associated with a 13% decrease (95% CI: 0.80-0.96) in overall COVID-19 Rt, per unit increase. A negative association with UV was also significant among community outbreaks (PE: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81-0.96) but not institutional outbreaks (PE: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.85-1.03). A positive association of O3 with COVID-19 incidence is strongly suggested among institutional outbreak cases (PE: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.13). CONCLUSION: Our study found evidence to support the hypothesis that higher UV reduced transmission of COVID-19 and some evidence that ground-level O3 positively influenced COVID-19 transmission. Setting of infection should be strongly considered as a factor in future research. UV and O3 may explain some of COVID-19's seasonal behaviour.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Ozono , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Ontario/epidemiología , Ozono/análisis , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Environ Res ; 199: 111302, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34019894

RESUMEN

Owing to their greater outdoor activity and ongoing lung development, children are particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5). However, the effects of PM2.5 components are poorly understood. This study aimed to use a longitudinal birth cohort of children with physician-diagnosed incident asthma to investigate the effect of PM2.5 components at birth on morbidity measured by health services utilization. Of 1277 Toronto Child Health Evaluation Questionnaire (T-CHEQ) participants, the study population included 362 children diagnosed with asthma who were followed for a mean of 13 years from birth until March 31, 2016, or loss-to-follow-up. Concentrations of PM2.5 and its components were assigned based on participants' postal codes at birth. Study outcomes included counts of asthma, asthma-related, and all-cause health services use. Poisson regression in single-, two-, and multi-pollutant models was used to estimate rate ratios (RR) per interquartile range (IQR) increase of exposures. Covariates were included in all models to further adjust for potential confounding. The adjusted RR for sulfate (SO4) and all-cause hospitalizations was statistically significant with RR = 2.23 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-3.96) in a multi-pollutant model with nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3). In multi-pollutant models with oxidants, the adjusted RRs for SO4 of all-cause hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits were also statistically significant with RR = 2.31 (95% CI: 1.32-4.03) and RR = 1.39 (95% CI: 1.02-1.90), respectively. While unadjusted single-pollutant RRs for asthma-specific and asthma-related health services use with the SO4 component of PM2.5 were above one, none were statistically significant. This study found significant associations with exposure to SO4 in PM2.5 and all-cause acute care, chiefly for hospitalizations, in children with asthma.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Asma , Ozono , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/toxicidad , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Asma/inducido químicamente , Asma/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/análisis , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/toxicidad , Ontario/epidemiología , Ozono/análisis , Material Particulado/análisis , Material Particulado/toxicidad
4.
Eur Respir J ; 55(2)2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31806712

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: There is growing evidence that air pollution may contribute to the development of childhood asthma and other allergic diseases. In this follow-up of the Toronto Child Health Evaluation Questionnaire (T-CHEQ) study, we examined associations between early life exposures to air pollution and incidence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema from birth through adolescence. METHODS: 1286 T-CHEQ participants were followed from birth until outcome (March 31, 2016) or loss to follow-up, with a mean of 17 years of follow-up. Concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3) and particulate matter with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 µm (PM2.5) from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2012 were assigned to participants based on their postal codes at birth using ground observations, chemical/meteorological models, remote sensing and land-use regression models. Study outcomes included incidence of physician-diagnosed asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios per interquartile range of exposures and outcomes, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Hazard ratios of 1.17 (95% CI 1.05-1.31) for asthma and 1.07 (95% CI 0.99-1.15) for eczema were observed for total oxidants (O3 and NO2) at birth. No significant increase in risk was found for PM2.5. CONCLUSIONS: Exposures to oxidant air pollutants (O3 and NO2) but not PM2.5 were associated with an increased risk of incident asthma and eczema in children. This suggests that improving air quality may contribute to the prevention of asthma and other allergic disease in childhood and adolescence.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos , Contaminación del Aire , Asma , Eccema , Rinitis Alérgica , Adolescente , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/efectos adversos , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Contaminación del Aire/efectos adversos , Contaminación del Aire/análisis , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/etiología , Niño , Eccema/epidemiología , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/análisis , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/análisis , Material Particulado/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/análisis , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología
5.
ERJ Open Res ; 7(1)2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33748257

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Antibiotics are among the most common medications dispensed to children and youths. The objective of this study was to characterise and compare antibiotic use patterns between children and youths with and without asthma. METHODS: We conducted a population-based nested case-control study using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada, in 2018. All Ontario residents aged 5-24 years with asthma were included as cases. Cases were matched to controls with a 1:1 ratio based on age (within 0.5 year), sex and location of residence. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to obtain an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for having filled at least one antibiotic prescription, adjusted for socioeconomic status, rurality, and presence of common infections, allergic conditions and complex chronic conditions. RESULTS: The study population included 1 174 424 Ontario children and youths aged 5-24 years. 31% of individuals with asthma and 23% of individuals without asthma filled at least one antibiotic prescription. The odds of having filled at least one antibiotic prescription were 34% higher among individuals with asthma compared to those without asthma (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.32-1.35). In the stratified analysis, the odds ratios were highest in the youngest group of children studied, aged 5-9 years (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.41-1.48), and in females (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.34-1.38). CONCLUSION: Asthma is significantly associated with increased antibiotic use in children and youths. This association is the strongest in younger children and in females.

6.
Sci Total Environ ; 750: 141484, 2021 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32829260

RESUMEN

The SARS-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus identified as the cause of COVID-19 and, as the pandemic evolves, many have made parallels to previous epidemics such as SARS-CoV (the cause of an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS]) in 2003. Many have speculated that, like SARS, the activity of SARS-CoV-2 will subside when the climate becomes warmer. We sought to determine the relationship between ambient temperature and COVID-19 incidence in Canada. We analyzed over 77,700 COVID-19 cases from four Canadian provinces (Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec) from January to May 2020. After adjusting for precipitation, wind gust speed, and province in multiple linear regression models, we found a positive, but not statistically significant, association between cumulative incidence and ambient temperature (14.2 per 100,000 people; 95%CI: -0.60-29.0). We also did not find a statistically significant association between total cases or effective reproductive number of COVID-19 and ambient temperature. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that higher temperatures will reduce transmission of COVID-19 and warns the public not to lose vigilance and to continue practicing safety measures such as hand washing, social distancing, and use of facial masks despite the warming climates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Alberta , Betacoronavirus , Colombia Británica/epidemiología , COVID-19 , Humanos , Incidencia , Ontario , Quebec , SARS-CoV-2 , Temperatura
7.
BMJ Open ; 11(8): e048137, 2021 08 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34353798

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study will add to existing literature by examining the impact of smoke-free legislation in outdoor areas among children with asthma. We aimed to examine the effect of the 2015 Smoke-Free Ontario Act (SFOA) amendment, which prohibited smoking on patios, playgrounds and sports fields, on health services use (HSU) rates in children with asthma. METHODS: We conducted a population-based open cohort study using health administrative data from the province of Ontario, Canada. Each year, all Ontario residents aged 0-18 years with physician diagnosed asthma were included in the study. Annual rates of HSU (emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalisations and physician office visits) for asthma and asthma-related conditions (eg, bronchitis, allergic rhinitis, influenza and pneumonia) were calculated. Interrupted time-series analysis, accounting for seasonality, was used to estimate changes in HSU following the 2015 SFOA. RESULTS: The study population ranged from 618 957 individuals in 2010 to 498 812 in 2018. An estimated average increase in ED visits for asthma in infants aged 0-1 years of 0.42 per 100 individuals (95% CI: 0.09 to 0.75) and a 57% relative increase corresponding to the 2015 SFOA was observed. A significant decrease in ED visits for asthma-related conditions of 0.19 per 100 individuals (95% CI: -0.37 to -0.01) and a 22% relative decrease corresponding to the 2015 SFOA was observed. CONCLUSION: Based on the observed positive effect of restricting smoking on patios, playgrounds and sports fields on respiratory morbidity in children with asthma, other jurisdictions globally should consider implementing similar smoke-free policies.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/terapia , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Ontario/epidemiología
8.
ERJ Open Res ; 5(4)2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31803772

RESUMEN

Sex differences are well documented in chronic disease populations with cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Although recent research has suggested that asthma is more severe in older women compared to men, the extent of this difference remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to compare rates of asthma-specific health services use (HSU) and medication use, between older women and men with asthma. This population-based cohort study included 209 054 individuals aged ≥66 years with asthma from health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. The primary exposure was sex. Outcomes included asthma-specific HSU (spirometry, emergency department (ED), hospitalisation, physician office and specialist visits) and medication use (asthma controller and reliever prescriptions). Negative binomial regression models adjusted for age, socioeconomic status and comorbidities were used to ascertain outcomes by sex from 2010 to 2016. Compared to men, women had lower rates of spirometry (adjusted relative rate (ARR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.89) and specialist visits for asthma (ARR 0.93, 95% CI 0.90-0.96), but higher rates of asthma-specific ED (ARR 1.43, 95% CI 1.33-1.53) and physician office visits (ARR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05). Women also had lower asthma controller (ARR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) but higher asthma reliever (ARR 1.03, 95% CI 1.02-1.05) prescription fill rates, compared to men. These findings may indicate poorer disease control, greater asthma severity and poorer access to specialist asthma care in women.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA