[Adults with intellectual disability : actual concepts and clinical challenges]. / Le handicap intellectuel chez l'adulte : concepts actuels et défis dans l'approche clinique.

The condition of the adult with intellectual disability (AWID) includes the largely autonomous, integrated person but also the one in need of constant support, with grossly altered communication abilities, frequently affected by somatic and mental comorbidities and non-adapted behaviors. Their prevalence is about 1 % of the adult population. They should benefit from particular attention of health care professionals, including in mental health. However, their access to health care is often limited and their quality of life and life expectancy are diminished. Recent advances in the field of ID include modified diagnostic criteria, as well as individualized care in a multidisciplinary approach in partnership with relatives and professionals from the community/service providers. These approaches allow to better address special needs of AWID.

La condition de l'adulte porteur d'un diagnostic de handicap intellectuel (ADHI) va de la personne largement autonome et intégrée dans la communauté à celle nécessitant une surveillance constante, avec des difficultés de communication, des comorbidités somatiques et mentales et des comportements non adaptés. Leur prévalence est d'environ 1 % de la population adulte. Elles devraient bénéficier d'une attention particulière de la part des professionnels de la santé, y compris mentale. Cependant, l'accès aux soins et leur qualité sont souvent limités. L'espérance et la qualité de vie des ADHI sont diminuées. Des évolutions dans le domaine du handicap intellectuel concernent le diagnostic et les approches de soins individualisés et intégrés en partenariat avec les proches et le réseau. Elles permettent de mieux répondre aux spécificités de l'ADHI.

Fluoxetine blocks Nav1.5 channels via a mechanism similar to that of class 1 antiarrhythmics.

The voltage-gated Nav1.5 channel is essential for the propagation of action potentials in the heart. Malfunctions of this channel are known to cause hereditary diseases. It is a prime target for class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs and a number of antidepressants. Our study investigated the Nav1.5 blocking properties of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Nav1.5 channels were expressed in HEK-293 cells, and Na(+) currents were recorded using the patch-clamp technique. Dose-response curves of racemic fluoxetine (IC50 = 39 µM) and its optical isomers had a similar IC50 [40 and 47 µM for the (+) and (-) isomers, respectively]. Norfluoxetine, a fluoxetine metabolite, had a higher affinity than fluoxetine, with an IC50 of 29 µM. Fluoxetine inhibited currents in a frequency-dependent manner, shifted steady-state inactivation to more hyperpolarized potentials, and slowed the recovery of Nav1.5 from inactivation. Mutating a phenylalanine (F1760) and a tyrosine (Y1767) in the S6 segment of domain (D) IV (DIVS6) significantly reduced the affinity of fluoxetine and its frequency-dependent inhibition. We used a noninactivating Nav1.5 mutant to show that fluoxetine displays open-channel block behavior. The molecular model of fluoxetine in Nav1.5 was in agreement with mutational experiments in which F1760 and Y1767 were found to be the key residues in binding fluoxetine. We concluded that fluoxetine blocks Nav1.5 by binding to the class 1 antiarrhythmic site. The blocking of cardiac Na(+) channels should be taken into consideration when prescribing fluoxetine alone or in association with other drugs that may be cardiotoxic or for patients with conduction disorders.

Sudden death of cardiac origin and psychotropic drugs.

Mortality rate is high in psychiatric patients versus general population. An important cause of this increased mortality is sudden cardiac death (SCD) as a major side-effect of psychotropic drugs. These SCDs generally result from arrhythmias occurring when the posology is high and may attain a toxic threshold but also at dosages within therapeutic range, in the presence of risk factors. There are three kinds of risk factors: physiological (e.g., low cardiac rate of sportsmen), physiopathological (e.g., hepatic insufficiency, hypothyroidism) and "therapeutic" (due to interactions between psychotropic drugs and other medicines). Association of pharmacological agents may increase the likelihood of SCDs either by (i) a pharmacokinetic mechanism (e.g., increased torsadogenic potential of a psychotropic drug when its destruction and/or elimination are compromised) or (ii) a pharmacodynamical mechanism (e.g., mutual potentiation of proarrhythmic properties of two drugs). In addition, some psychotropic drugs may induce sudden death in cases of pre-existing congenital cardiopathies such as (i) congenital long QT syndrome, predisposing to torsade de pointes that eventually cause syncope and sudden death. (ii) A Brugada syndrome, that may directly cause ventricular fibrillation due to reduced sodium current through Nav1.5 channels. Moreover, psychotropic drugs may be a direct cause of cardiac lesions also leading to SCD. This is the case, for example, of phenothiazines responsible for ischemic coronaropathies and of clozapine that is involved in the occurrence of myocarditis. The aims of this work are to delineate: (i) the risk of SCD related to the use of psychotropic drugs; (ii) mechanisms involved in the occurrence of such SCD; (iii) preventive actions of psychotropic drugs side effects, on the basis of the knowledge of patient-specific risk factors, documented from clinical history, ionic balance, and ECG investigation by the psychiatrist.

Hidden cardiac lesions and psychotropic drugs as a possible cause of sudden death in psychiatric patients: a report of 14 cases and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the hypothesis that psychotropic drugs, especially neuroleptics, lithium, and antidepressants, are implicated as a cause of unexpected sudden death in psychiatric patients because of their cardiotoxicity, especially when hidden cardiac lesions are present. METHOD: We performed a full pathological examination of 14 psychiatric patients who unexpectedly and suddenly died between 1980 and 1999. RESULTS: Neuroleptics were involved in 13 instances, antidepressants in 9, and anxiolytics in 5. Psychotropic drugs were combined in all but a single patient. In all 14 patients, toxicological analyses discarded drug overdose as cause of death. At postmortem examination, the brain and abdominal organs were normal. In 13 patients, the following lesions were found in the heart and lungs: dilated cardiomyopathy (6 patients), left ventricular hypertrophy (2 patients, 1 of which was associated with mitral prolapse and anomalies of His bundle), arrhythmogenic cardiopathy of the right ventricle (1 patient), pericarditis (1 patient), mitral prolapse (1 patient), muscular bridge on the anterior interventricular artery (1 patient), and Mendelsons syndrome (1 patient). In 1 case, no changes were seen. Most of the drugs that were taken immediately prior to death can induce arrhythmias either by prolonging the QT interval, potentially resulting in torsades de pointes, or by widening QRS complexes, possibly leading to reentry and ventricular fibrillation. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the arrhythmogenic effects of psychotropic drugs can be exacer bated when preexisting hidden cardiac lesions are present and can result in sudden death. Patients should be systematically evaluated for cardiac lesions prior to starting any treatment with psychotropic drugs; the minimal effective dosage should be used.