A phase 1/1b, open-label, dose-escalation study of PD-1 inhibitor, cetrelimab alone and in combination with FGFR inhibitor, erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the leading approaches in tumor immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to establish recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of intravenous cetrelimab, a checkpoint inhibitor, alone and with oral erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. This open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation phase 1/1b study enrolled adults with advanced solid tumors who were ineligible for standard therapy. Study was conducted in two parts: phase 1a assessed cetrelimab at three dosing levels (80 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], 240 mg Q2W, and 480 mg Q4W); phase 1b assessed cetrelimab+erdafitinib at two dosing levels (240 mg Q2W + 6 mg once daily [QD] and 240 mg Q2W + 8 mg QD). Primary endpoint was frequency and severity of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cetrelimab ± erdafitinib. In total 22 patients (phase 1a, n = 9; phase 1b, n = 13) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 8.64 months in phase 1a and 2.33 months in phase 1b. In phase 1a, DLTs weren't reported while in phase 1b, 1 patient who received 240 mg cetrelimab + 6 mg erdafitinib reported Stevens-Johnson syndrome (grade 3, immune-related). Overall, 88.9% patients in phase 1a (grade ≥ 3: 44.4%) and 100.0% in phase 1b (grade ≥ 3: 53.8%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs); 33.3% in phase 1a and 38.5% in phase 1b reported serious TEAEs, of which 11.1% patients in phase 1a and 15.4% in phase 1b had TEAEs which led to treatment discontinuation. Cetrelimab alone and in combination with erdafitinib showed manageable safety in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. RP2Ds were determined as 480 mg cetrelimab Q4W for monotherapy, and cetrelimab 240 mg Q2W + erdafitinib 8 mg QD for combination therapy.

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: CARTITUDE-1 (phase 2) Japanese cohort.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting B-cell maturation antigen have shown positive responses in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The phase 2 portion of the CARTITUDE-1 study of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) included a cohort of Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Following a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 ) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2 ), patients received a single cilta-cel infusion at a target dose of 0.75 × 106 (range, 0.5-1.0 × 106 CAR-positive viable T cells/kg). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; defined as partial response or better) by International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A key secondary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response (VGPR) or better (defined as VGPR, complete response, stringent complete response). This first analysis was performed at 6 months after the last patient received cilta-cel. Thirteen patients underwent apheresis, nine of whom received cilta-cel infusion. Eight patients who received cilta-cel at the target dose responded, yielding an ORR of 100%. Seven of eight (87.5%) patients achieved a VGPR or better. One additional patient who received a below-target dose of cilta-cel also achieved a best response of VGPR. MRD negativity (10-5 threshold) was achieved in all six evaluable patients. Eight of nine (88.9%) patients who received cilta-cel infusion experienced a grade 3 or 4 adverse event, and eight (88.9%) patients experienced cytokine release syndrome (all grade 1 or 2). No CAR-T cell neurotoxicity was reported. A positive benefit/risk profile for cilta-cel was established for heavily pretreated Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory MM.

A phase 2, open-label study of ibrutinib plus rituximab in Japanese patients with Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia.

Ibrutinib is a first-in-class Bruton kinase inhibitor against B-cell neoplasms including Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib-rituximab in Japanese patients with WM. Patients received ibrutinib 420 mg orally once daily plus weekly rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV (8 infusions total). The primary end point was major response rate (MRR; PR or better) by Independent Review Committee assessment. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers. Primary analysis was conducted in 16 patients [baseline, treatment naïve: 8 (50.0%); relapsed/refractory WM: 8 (50.0%)] who received ibrutinib-rituximab, after all patients completed Week 57 or end of treatment. At primary analysis, MRR was 87.5% [14/16 patients; 95% CI: 61.7, 98.4%; p < 0.0001 (null hypothesis: 32% response rate)]. At final analysis (median study intervention duration: 34.4 months, median follow-up: 35.0 months), MRR was unchanged at 87.5%, but VGPR [6/16 (37.5%)] and PR [8/16 (50.0%)] improved. Prior treatment status did not affect response. At final analysis, median PFS was not reached [36-month PFS rate: 86% (95% CI: 55, 96%)]. No critical safety signals were reported. This study demonstrated a positive benefit/risk profile of ibrutinib-rituximab in Japanese patients with WM, consistent with the iNNOVATE study.

Long-term Use of Ibrutinib in Japanese Patients with Steroid Dependent/Refractory cGVHD: Final Analysis of Multicenter Study.

Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a serious complication after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Poor prognosis has been shown in patients with cGVHD after the failure of primary steroid-based treatments. A previous report demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in these patients, leading to the approval of ibrutinib for cGVHD in Japan. Here, we report the extended follow-up of patients in this study. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent or refractory cGVHD. Study Design: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent or refractory cGVHD (NCT No.: NCT03474679; Clinical Registry No.: CR108443). Results: At the time of the final data cutoff, 7/19 (36.8%) patients completed the study treatment, and 12/19 (63.2%) patients discontinued ibrutinib. After a median follow-up of 31.11 months (range:1.9 to 38.6 months), the best overall response rate was 84.2% (16/19 patients; 95% CI:60.4%, 96.6%) in all treated populations, with a median time to response of 2.81 (range:1.0 to 27.6) months. Of 15 responders with ≥2 organs involved at baseline, seven (46.7%) had responses in multiple organs. An improvement in the organ response rate was observed for the skin, eye, mouth, and esophagus compared with that in a previous report. The rate of sustained response for ≥20 weeks, ≥32 weeks, and ≥44 weeks were 68.8%, 62.5%, and 50.0%, respectively for 16 responders. The median daily corticosteroid dose requirement tended to decrease over time for all treated analysis sets. Twelve of 19 patients (63.2%) reached a corticosteroid dose of <0.15 mg/kg/day for at least one week, and four (21.1%) discontinued corticosteroid treatment for at least 28 days during the study. The failure-free and overall survival rates at 30 months were 62.7% and 62.0%, respectively. The safety findings of this updated analysis were consistent with the safety profile observed at the time of the primary analysis and the known ibrutinib safety profile. Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were pneumonia (6/19 [31.6%] patients), platelet count decreased, and cellulitis (3/19 [15.8%] patients each). After the primary analysis, no new TEAEs leading to death, treatment discontinuation, or dose reduction were reported, and no new patients reported major hemorrhage. Cardiac arrhythmia (Grade 2 atrial flutter) was reported in 1/19 (5.3%) patients. No new safety signs were observed despite prolonged ibrutinib exposure. Conclusions: The final results support previous conclusions, demonstrating a clinically meaningful response and acceptable safety profile of ibrutinib in Japanese patients with steroid-dependent or refractory cGVHD.