RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The evolving variants of SARS-CoV-2 may escape immunity from prior infections or vaccinations. It's vital to understand how immunity adapts to these changes. Both infection and mRNA vaccination induce T cells that target the Spike protein. These T cells can recognize multiple variants, such as Delta and Omicron, even if neutralizing antibodies are weakened. However, the degree of recognition can vary among people, affecting vaccine efficacy. Previous studies demonstrated the capability of T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire analysis to identify conserved and immunodominant peptides with cross-reactive potential among variant of concerns. However, there is a need to extend the analysis of the TCR repertoire to different clinical scenarios. The aim of this study was to examine the Spike-specific TCR repertoire profiles in natural infections and those with combined natural and vaccine immunity. METHODS: A T-cell enrichment approach and bioinformatic tools were used to investigate the Spike-specific TCRß repertoire in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of previously vaccinated (n = 8) or unvaccinated (n = 6) COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: Diversity and clonality of the TCRß repertoire showed no significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. When comparing the TCRß data to public databases, 692 unique TCRß sequences linked to S epitopes were found in the vaccinated group and 670 in the unvaccinated group. TCRß clonotypes related to spike regions S135-177, S264-276, S319-350, and S448-472 appear notably more prevalent in the vaccinated group. In contrast, the S673-699 epitope, believed to have super antigenic properties, is observed more frequently in the unvaccinated group. In-silico analyses suggest that mutations in epitopes, relative to the main SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, don't hinder their cross-reactive recognition by associated TCRß clonotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal distinct TCRß signatures in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with COVID-19. These differences might be associated with disease severity and could influence clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: FESR/FSE 2014-2020 DDRC n. 585, Action 10.5.12, noCOVID19@UMG.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Leucocitos Mononucleares , Epítopos , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/genéticaRESUMEN
The treatment of calcific coronary lesions is still a major interventional issue in haemodynamics laboratories. The prevalence of the disease is even increasing, considering the general ageing of the population undergoing coronarography, as well as the often associated comorbidities. In recent years, new devices have been developed that allow both better identification and also better treatment of these lesions. The aim of this review is to summarize both imaging modalities and dedicated techniques and materials, thus providing a kind of compendium for the treatment approach.
RESUMEN
Patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and multivessel coronary artery disease are frequently encountered during clinical practice and those patients are at higher risk of subsequent acute cardiovascular events. In patients presenting with both ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, complete revascularization is associated with decreased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of the intervention and treatment modality are still in discussions. Furthermore, non-culprit lesions assessment based on stenosis severity, either on visual or on functional evaluation, may not provide information about vulnerable plaques prone to thrombosis. Therefore, insights from intracoronary imaging could further identify high-risk plaque and patients at higher risk of future adverse events. This article aims to provide an overview of current guideline recommendations, envisioning future perspectives for the treatment of patients with ACS and multivessel disease.
RESUMEN
Background and objectives: Diabetes may affect in-hospital mortality of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We have retrospectively evaluated clinical characteristics, diabetes management, and outcomes in a sample of COVID-19 patients with diabetes admitted to our hospital. Materials and Methods: All patients admitted to the Infectious Diseases Unit from 28 March 2020, to 16 June 2020, were enrolled. Clinical information and biochemical parameters were collected at the time of admission. Patients were ranked according to diabetes and death. Results: Sixty-one patients with COVID-19 were analyzed. Most of them were from a long-term health care facility. Mean age was 77 ± 16 years, and 19 had type 2 diabetes (T2D). Eighteen patients died, including 8 with T2D and 10 without T2D (p = 0.15). Patients with diabetes were significantly older, had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, and a significantly lower lymphocyte count. No significant relationship was found between diabetes and in-hospital mortality (Odds Ratio OR 2.3; Confidence Interval CI 0.73-7.38, p = 0.15). Patients with diabetes were treated with insulin titration algorithm. Severe hypoglycemic events, ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemias did not occur during hospitalization. Mean pre-meal capillary blood glucose was 157 ± 45 mg/dL, and the coefficient of variation of glycaemia was 29%. Conclusions: Our study, albeit limited by the small number of subjects, did not describe any significant association between T2D diabetes and mortality. Clinical characteristics of patients, and acceptable glucose control prior and during hospitalization may have influenced the result. The use of an insulin titration algorithm should be pursued during hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: First-line integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens have become commonly used in clinical practice over the last decade. This study aimed to analyse and compare the efficacy and safety of bictegravir (BIC) and dolutegravir (DTG) when prescribed in association with emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (FTC/TAF) as part of a first-line regimen for the treatment of human immunodeficiency-1 (HIV-1) infection. METHODS: Treatment-naïve people living with HIV (PLWHIV) starting a first-line regimen with either BIC/FTC/TAF (BIC group) or FTC/TAF+DTG (DTG group) were analysed. Snapshot analyses were performed after 24 and 48 weeks to evaluate virological efficacy. In addition, differences in the rate of treatment discontinuation (TD) between the two groups were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test. RESULTS: Data from 327 PLWHIV were analysed: 140 in the DTG group and 187 in the BIC group. At 48 weeks, 90.0% of individuals in the DTG group and 86.7% of those in the BIC group achieved HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL. In total, 88 and 38 cases of TD were observed in the DTG group and BIC group, respectively. The estimated probability of maintaining the study regimen at week 48 was 59.5% in the DTG group and 84.2% in the BIC group. Analysing changes in immunological parameters after 48 weeks, median improvements of +169 cell/mm3 (P<0.001) and +233 cell/mm3 (P<0.001) were observed in the DTG group and the BIC group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both BIC and DTG, in combination with FTC/TAF, show promising efficacy and safety as first-line strategies in clinical practice, with favourable immunological recovery even in the short term.
Asunto(s)
Adenina/análogos & derivados , Alanina , Amidas , Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos , Oxazinas , Piperazinas , Tenofovir/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Emtricitabina/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Fumaratos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The management of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) represents a major challenge in the field of infectious diseases. It is associated with a high rate of nosocomial infections with a mortality rate that reaches approximately 50%, even when using an effective antimicrobial therapy. Therefore, combined actions addressing infection control and antibiotic stewardship are required to delay the emergence of resistance. Since new antimicrobial agents targeting MDR-GNB bacteria have been produced during the last years and are now available for physicians to treat MDR, it is fundamental to choose appropriate antimicrobial therapy for K. pneumoniae infection. AREAS COVERED: The PubMed database was searched to review the most significant recent literature on the topic, including data from articles coming from endemic areas and from the current European and American Guidelines. EXPERT OPINION: We explore the most effective strategies for prevention of MDR-KP spread and the currently available treatment options, focusing on comparing old strategies and new compounds. We reviewed data concerning newly developed drugs that could play an important role in the future; we also propose a treatment algorithm that could be useful for physicians in daily clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiologíaRESUMEN
Background: Dolutegravir (DTG) is recommended by international guidelines as a main component of an optimal initial regimen of cART (combination antiretroviral treatment) in people living with HIV (PLWH) and in case of switching for failure or optimization strategies. However, studies on the performance of DTG-containing regimens and indications for switching therapies in the long term are sparse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the performance of DTG-based regimens, using the metrics of "efficacy", "safety", "convenience" and ''durability'', among a nationally representative cohort of PLWH in Italy. Methods: We selected all PLWH in four centers of the MaSTER cohort who initiated a DTG-based regimen either when naïve or following a regimen switch between 11 July 2018 and 2 July 2021. Participants were followed until the outcomes were recorded or until the end of the study on 4 August 2022, whichever occurred first. Interruption was reported even when a participant switched to another DTG-containing regimen. Survival regression models were fitted to evaluate associations between therapy performance and age, sex, nationality, risk of HIV transmission, HIV RNA suppression status, CD4+ T-cell count, year of HIV diagnosis, cART status (naïve or experienced), cART backbone and viral hepatitis coinfection. Results: There were 371 participants in our cohort who initiated a DTG-based cART regimen in the time frame of the study. The population was predominantly male (75.2%), of Italian nationality (83.3%), with a history of cART use (80.9%), and the majority initiated a DTG-based regimen following a switch strategy in 2019 (80.1%). Median age was 53 years (interquartile range (IQR): 45-58). Prior cART regimen was based mostly on a combination of NRTI drugs plus a PI-boosted drug (34.2%), followed by a combination of NRTIs plus an NNRTI (23.5%). Concerning the NRTI backbone, the majority comprised 3TC plus ABC (34.5%), followed by 3TC alone (28.6%). The most reported transmission risk factor was heterosexual intercourse (44.2%). Total interruptions of the first DTG-based regimen were registered in 58 (15.6%) participants. The most frequent reason for interruption was due to cART simplification strategies, which accounted for 52%. Only 1 death was reported during the study period. The median time of total follow-up was 556 days (IQR: 316.5-722.5). Risk factors for poor performance of DTG-containing-regimens were found to be: a backbone regimen containing tenofovir, being cART naïve, having detectable HIV RNA at baseline, FIB-4 score above 3.25 and having a cancer diagnosis. By contrast, protective factors were found to be: higher CD4+ T-cell counts and higher CD4/CD8 ratio at baseline. Conclusion: DTG-based regimens were used mainly as a switching therapy in our cohort of PLWH who had undetectable HIV RNA and a good immune status. In this type of population, the durability of DTG-based regimens was maintained in 84.4% of participants with a modest incidence of interruptions mostly due to cART simplification strategies. The results of this prospective real-life study confirm the apparent low risk of changing DTG-containing regimens due to virological failure. They may also help physicians to identify people with increased risk of interruption for different reasons, suggesting targeted medical interventions.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , ARN , Lamivudine/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Integrase strand transferase inhibitors (INSTI), including raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (ELV), and dolutegravir (DTG), have demonstrated better efficacy and tolerability than other combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) classes in clinical trials; however, studies of sustainability of INSTI-containing therapy in the long-term are sparse. The purpose of this study was to provide an epidemiological overview comparing the outcome performance of different INSTI-based regimens longitudinally, including the metrics of efficacy, safety, convenience, and durability among a large, nationally representative cohort of persons living with HIV in Italy. METHODS: We selected subjects in the MaSTER cohort (an Italian multicenter, hospital-based cohort established in the mid-1990s that currently has enrolled over 24,000 PLWH) who initiated an INSTI-based regimen either when naïve or following a regimen switch. Cox proportional hazards regression models were fitted to evaluate associations between therapy interruptions and age, sex, nationality, transmission risk group, viral suppression status, CD4 + T-cell count, diagnosis year, cART status (naïve or experienced), and hepatitis coinfection. Results were stratified by cART INSTI type. RESULTS: There were 8173 participants who initiated an INSTI-based cART regimen in the MaSTER cohort between 2009 and 2017. The population was majority male (72.6%), of Italian nationality (88.6%), and cART-experienced (83.0%). Mean age was 49.7 (standard deviation: 13.9) years. In total, interruptions of the 1st INSTI-based treatment were recorded in 34% of cases. The most frequently cited reason for interruption among all three drug types was safety problems. In the survival analysis, past history of cART use was associated with higher hazards of interruption due to poor efficacy for all three drug types when compared to persons who were cART naïve. Non-viral suppression and CD4 + T-cell count < 200/mm3 at baseline were associated with higher hazards of interruption due to efficacy, safety, and durability reasons. Non-Italian nationality was linked to higher hazards of efficacy interruption for RAL and EVG. Age was negatively associated with interruption due to convenience and positively associated with interruption due to safety reasons. People who injects drugs (PWID) were associated with higher hazards of interruption due to convenience problems. Hepatitis coinfection was linked to higher hazards of interruption due to safety concerns for people receiving RAL. CONCLUSION: One-third of the population experienced an interruption of any drugs included in INSTI therapy in this study. The most frequent reason for interruption was safety concerns which accounted for one-fifth of interruptions among the full study population, mainly switched to DTG. The hazard for interruption was higher for low baseline CD4 + T-cell counts, higher baseline HIV-RNA, non-Italian nationality, older age, PWID and possible co-infections with hepatitis viruses. The risk ratio was higher for past history of cART use compared to persons who were cART naive, use of regimens containing 3 drugs compared to regimens containing 2 drugs. Durability worked in favor of DTG which appeared to perform better in this cohort compared to RAL and EVG, though length of follow-up was significantly shorter for DTG. These observational results need to be confirmed in further perspective studies with longer follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Coinfección , Infecciones por VIH , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Italia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Among infectious diseases, zoonoses are increasing in importance worldwide, especially in the Mediterranean region. We report herein some clinical cases from a third-level hospital in Calabria region (Southern Italy) and provide a narrative review of the most relevant features of these diseases from epidemiological and clinical perspectives. Further, the pathogenic mechanisms involved in zoonotic diseases are reviewed, focusing on the mechanisms used by pathogens to elude the immune system of the host. These topics are of particular concern for individuals with primary or acquired immunodeficiency (e.g., people living with HIV, transplant recipients, patients taking immunosuppressive drugs). From the present review, it appears that diagnostic innovations and the availability of more accurate methods, together with better monitoring of the incidence and prevalence of these infections, are urgently needed to improve interventions for better preparedness and response.
RESUMEN
Objectives: The aim of this work was to study characteristics, outcomes and predictors of all-cause death in inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection across the pandemic waves in one large teaching hospital in Italy to optimize disease management. Methods: All patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to our center from March 2020 to June 2022 were included in this retrospective observational cohort study. Both descriptive and regression tree analyses were applied to identify factors influencing all-cause mortality. Results: 527 patients were included in the study (65.3% with moderate and 34.7% with severe COVID-19). Significant evolutions of patient characteristics were found, and mortality increased in the last wave with respect to the third wave notwithstanding vaccination. Regression tree analysis showed that in-patients with severe COVID-19 had the greatest mortality across all waves, especially the older adults, while prognosis depended on the pandemic waves in patients with moderate COVID-19: during the first wave, dyspnea was the main predictor, while chronic kidney disease emerged as determinant factor afterwards. Conclusion: Patients with severe COVID-19, especially the older adults during all waves, as well as those with moderate COVID-19 and concomitant chronic kidney disease during the most recent waves require more attention for monitoring and care. Therefore, our study drives attention towards the importance of co-morbidities and their clinical impact in patients with COVID-19 admitted to hospital, indicating that the healthcare system should adapt to the evolving features of the epidemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Anciano , Pacientes Internos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Atención al Paciente , Hospitales de EnseñanzaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Valacyclovir is the only treatment demonstrated to be effective for the prevention of vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus within a clinical randomized, placebo-controlled trial and has been reimbursed by the Italian National Health System since December 2020. OBJECTIVE: This study reported the results of a real-life Italian multicenter observational study on cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy evaluating the effect of the introduction of valacyclovir in the clinical practice for the prevention of vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus. STUDY DESIGN: The outcomes of women who received valacyclovir treatment and their fetuses or newborns were compared with those of a retrospective cohort observed between 2010 and 2020 who did not receive the antiviral treatment. The inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus primary infection occurring in the periconceptional period or up to 24 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was the transmission by the time of amniocentesis. The secondary outcomes were termination of pregnancy, transmission at birth, symptomatic infection at birth, and a composite outcome (termination of pregnancy or transmission at birth). RESULTS: A total of 447 pregnant women from 10 centers were enrolled, 205 women treated with valacyclovir (called the valacyclovir group, including 1 twin pregnancy) and 242 women not treated with valacyclovir (called the no-valacyclovir group, including 2 twin pregnancies). Valacyclovir treatment was significantly associated with a reduction of the diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection by the time of amniocentesis (weighted odds ratio, 0.39; 90% confidence interval, 0.22-0.68; P=.005; relative reduction of 61%), termination of pregnancy (weighted odds ratio, 0.36; 90% confidence interval, 0.17-0.75; P=.0021; relative reduction of 64%), symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth (weighted odds ratio, 0.17; 90% confidence interval, 0.06-0.49; P=.006; relative reduction of 83%). The treatment had no significant effect on the rate of diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth (weighted odds ratio, 0.85; 90% confidence interval, 0.57-1.26; P=.500), but the composite outcome (termination of pregnancy or diagnosis of congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth) occurred more frequently in the no-valacyclovir group (weighted odds ratio, 0.62; 90% confidence interval, 0.44-0.88; P=.024). Of note, the only symptomatic newborns with congenital cytomegalovirus infection in the valacyclovir group (n=3) were among those with positive amniocentesis. Moreover, 19 women (9.3%) reported an adverse reaction to valacyclovir treatment, classified as mild in 17 cases and moderate in 2 cases. Lastly, 4 women (1.9%) presented renal toxicity with a slight increase in creatinine level, which was reversible after treatment suspension. CONCLUSION: Our real-life data confirm that valacyclovir significantly reduces the rate of congenital cytomegalovirus diagnosis at the time of amniocentesis with a good tolerability profile and show that the treatment is associated with a reduction of termination of pregnancy and symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth.
RESUMEN
The hyperinflammatory phase represents the main cause for the clinical worsening of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to the hypothesis that steroid therapy could be a mainstream treatment in COVID-19 patients. This is an observational study including all consecutive patients admitted to two Italian University Hospitals for COVID-19 from March 2020 to December 2021. The aim of this study was to describe clinical characteristics and outcome parameters of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone 6 mg once daily (standard-dose group) or methylprednisolone 40 mg twice daily (high-dose group). The primary outcome was the impact of these different steroid treatments on 30-day mortality. During the study period, 990 patients were evaluated: 695 (70.2%) receiving standard dosage of dexamethasone and 295 (29.8%) receiving a high dose of methylprednisolone. Cox regression analysis showed that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.98, CI95% 1.34−9.81, p = 0.002), chronic kidney disease (HR 5.21, CI95% 1.48−22.23, p = 0.001), oncologic disease (HR 2.81, CI95% 1.45−19.8, p = 0.005) and high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation oxygen therapy (HR 61.1, CI95% 5.12−511.1, p < 0.001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality; conversely, high-dose steroid therapy was associated with survival (HR 0.42, CI95% 0.38−0.86, p = 0.002) at 30 days. Kaplan−Meier curves for 30-day survival displayed a statistically significant better survival rate in patients treated with high-dose steroid therapy (p = 0.018). The results of this study highlighted that the use of high-dose methylprednisolone, compared to dexamethasone 6 mg once daily, in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 may be associated with a significant reduction in mortality.
RESUMEN
Dolutegravir (DTG) is currently one of the most used Integrase inhibitors (INI) in antiretroviral therapies (ARV) in both naïve and experienced people living with HIV (PLWHIV). We analyzed a multicenter cohort of PLWHIV, both naïve and experienced, starting an ARV including DTG. We enrolled 3775 PLWHIV: 2763 (73.2%) were males, with a median age of 50 years. During 9890.7 PYFU, we observed 930 discontinuations (9.4 per 100 PYFU). Estimated probabilities of maintaining DTG at three and five years were 75.1% and 67.2%, respectively. Treatment-naïve pts showed a lower probability of maintaining DTG at three and five years compared to treatment-experienced PLWHIV (log-rank p < 0.001). At a multivariate analysis, a longer time of virological suppression (aHR 0.994, p < 0.001) and having experienced a previous virological failure (aHR 0.788, p = 0.016) resulted protective against DTG discontinuation. Most discontinuations (84.0%) happened within the first 12 months of DTG initiation, in particular, 92.2% of discontinuations due to neuropsychiatric toxicity were observed in the first year. Our data confirm the overall good tolerability of DTG in clinical practice, with a low rate of discontinuations. CNS toxicity resulted the main reason for DTG discontinuation, with most related interruptions happening in the first year from DTG introduction.
Asunto(s)
Tolerancia a Medicamentos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Integrasa VIH/toxicidad , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/toxicidad , Oxazinas/toxicidad , Piperazinas/toxicidad , Piridonas/toxicidad , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/toxicidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Background. Comorbidities in people living with HIV (PLWH) represent a major clinical challenge today, and metabolic syndrome (MTBS) is one of the most important. Objective. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of MTBS and the role of both clinical/socio-behavioral risk factors for MTBS in a cohort of PLWH. Methods. All PLWH, over 18 years of age, attending all Infectious Disease Units in Calabria Region (Southern Italy) for their routine checks from October 2019-January 2020 were enrolled. MTBS was defined by NCEP-ATP III criteria. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors significantly associated with the main outcome (MTBS). Results. We enrolled 356 PLWH, mostly males (68.5%), with a mean age of 49 years (standard deviation: 12), including 98 subjects with and 258 without MTBS. At logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant association was found between MTBS and alcohol use, osteoporosis, polypharmacy, and a history of AIDS. Conclusions. Identifying and addressing risk factors, including those that are socio-behavioral or lifestyle-related, is crucial to prevent and treat MTBS. Our results suggest the importance of implementing educational/multidimensional interventions to prevent MTBS in PLWH, especially for those with particular risk factors (alcohol abuse, osteoporosis, previous AIDS events, and polypharmacy). Moreover, alcohol consumption or abuse should be routinely investigated in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida , Infecciones por VIH , Síndrome Metabólico , Osteoporosis , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Determinantes Sociales de la SaludRESUMEN
This study evaluated the spread and possible changes in resistance patterns of ESKAPE bacteria to first-choice antibiotics from 2015 to 2019 at a third-level university hospital after persuasive stewardship measures were implemented. Isolates were divided into three groups (group 1, low drug-resistant; group 2, multidrug/extremely drug-resistant; and group 3, pan-resistant bacteria) and a chi-squared test (χ2) was applied to determine differences in their distributions. Among the 2,521 isolates, Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequently detected (31.1%). From 2015 to 2019, the frequency of isolates in groups 2 and 3 decreased from 70.1% to 48.6% (χ2 = 63.439; p < 0.0001). Stratifying isolates by bacterial species, for K. pneumoniae, the frequency of PDR isolates decreased from 20% to 1.3% (χ2 = 15.885; p = 0.003). For Acinetobacter baumannii, a statistically significant decrease was found in groups 2 and 3: from 100% to 83.3% (χ2 = 27.721; p < 0.001). Also, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp., the frequency of groups 2 and 3 decreased from 100% to 28.3% (χ2 = 225.287; p < 0.001) and from 75% to 48.7% (χ2 = 15.408; p = 0.003), respectively. These results indicate that a program consisting of persuasive stewardship measures, which were rolled out during the time frame of our study, may be useful to control drug-resistant bacteria in a hospital setting.
Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Antibacterianos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Prevalencia , Pseudomonas aeruginosaRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the pattern of labor progression among nulliparous women under neuraxial analgesia to obtain a new, specific reference labor curve and to compare the different effects of epidural and combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia on the progression of labor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This perspective cohort study was carried out in the Obstetrics and Gynecology tertiary care unit. Six hundred nulliparous parturients were enrolled. A total of 545 nulliparous women were assigned to receive either epidural (272) or CSE (273) analgesia during labor. RESULTS: The mean duration of the first stage was 4 h and 30 min (SD 1.52 h) and the mean duration of the second stage was 1 h and 10 min (SD 0.43). In the second stage, the CSE analgesia labors showed an overall faster progression compared to the epidural labors but both lasted longer than the duration reported by Zhang (53 min) and Friedman (39 min). Both the first and the second-stage duration were significantly lower if neuraxial analgesia was performed as a CSE procedure with respect to the simple epidural procedure (first stage 4 h and 1 min vs. 4 h and 60 min, P = 0.043; second stage 1 h and 5 min vs 1 h and 15 min, P = 0.0356). CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of labor progression in contemporary obstetrics differs significantly from the Friedman curve. Based on these observations, we can obtain a more comprehensive knowledge of the partogram's modifications due to the analgesia.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Dolor de Parto/tratamiento farmacológico , Trabajo de Parto , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
The worldwide spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. According to clinical studies carried out in China and Italy, most patients experience mild or moderate symptoms; about a fifth of subjects develop a severe and critical disease, and may suffer from interstitial pneumonia, possibly associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death.In patients who develop respiratory failure, timely conventional oxygen therapy through nasal catheter plays a crucial role, but it can be used only in mild forms. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) are uncomfortable, and require significant man-machine cooperation. Herein we describe our experience of five patients with COVID-19, who were treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) after failure of CPAP or NIV, and discuss the role of HFNC in COVID-19 patients. Our findings suggest that HFNC can be used successfully in selected patients with COVID-19-related ARDS.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Cánula , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/instrumentación , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Estudios de Cohortes , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ventilación no Invasiva , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Since December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has spread from China all over the world and many COVID-19 outbreaks have been reported in long-term care facilities (LCTF). However, data on clinical characteristics and prognostic factors in such settings are scarce. We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study to assess clinical characteristics and baseline predictors of mortality of COVID-19 patients hospitalized after an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a LTCF. A total of 50 patients were included. Mean age was 80 years (SD, 12 years), and 24/50 (57.1%) patients were males. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 32%. At Cox regression analysis, significant predictors of in-hospital mortality were: hypernatremia (HR 9.12), lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/µL (HR 7.45), cardiovascular diseases other than hypertension (HR 6.41), and higher levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6, pg/mL) (HR 1.005). Our study shows a high in-hospital mortality rate in a cohort of elderly patients with COVID-19 and hypernatremia, lymphopenia, CVD other than hypertension, and higher IL-6 serum levels were identified as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Given the small population size as major limitation of our study, further investigations are necessary to better understand and confirm our findings in elderly patients.