Comparing outcomes of general anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care during transcatheter aortic valve replacement: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience.

BACKGROUND: Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) has become more widely used during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to avoid the complications of general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: We included consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral-TAVR at our institution between January 2012 and April 2017. We compared outcomes with GA versus MAC. RESULTS: Of 998 patients, MAC was used in 43.9%. MAC was associated with shorter procedural time (96.9 ± 30.9 vs. 135 ± 64.6 mins; p < .001), fluoroscopy time (20.4 ± 8.9 vs. 29 ± 18.7 mins; p < .001), lower contrast volume (45.5 ± 27 vs. 60.4 ± 43 cc; p < .001), and decreased radiation exposure (12,869 ± 8,099 vs. 20,630 ± 16,276 cGy-cm2 ; p < .001). Patients who underwent MAC had a briefer median (IQR) intensive care unit stay [23.3 (21-24) vs. 23.4 (20.8-26) hrs; p < .001], and hospital stay [2 (2, 3) vs. 3 (2-6) days; p < .001], and were more frequently discharged to home (93.4% vs. 82.9%; p < .001). MAC was associated with lower mortality at 30 days (0.5% vs. 2.9%; log-rank p = .012; adjHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.82; p = .024), but not at 1 year (11.7% vs. 14.6%; log-rank p = .157) or 3 years (36.8% vs. 38.4%; log-rank p = 0.433). There were no differences in major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at either 30 days (4.6% vs. 9.3%; log-rank p = .14) or 1 year (21.1% vs. 21.5%; log-rank p = .653). Similar findings were seen among patients who received newer-generation SAPIEN-3 valves. CONCLUSION: Utilizing MAC and omitting intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography during TAVR seems to be more efficient without compromising safety. Better TAVR outcomes can be achieved with newer generation valves without needing GA.

Impact of baseline conduction abnormalities on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN-3.

BACKGROUND: Baseline conduction abnormalities are known risk factors for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to determine the impact of baseline right bundle branch block (RBBB), left bundle branch block (LBBB), left anterior hemiblock (LAHB), first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) on TAVR outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR with SAPIEN-3 (S3) were included. We excluded patients with prior PPM, nontransfemoral access or valve-in-valve. RESULTS: Among 886 patients, baseline RBBB was seen in 15.9%, LBBB in 6.3%, LAHB in 6.2%, first-degree AVB in 26.3% and AF in 37.5%. The rate of 30-day PPM was 10.1%. Baseline RBBB (OR 4.005; 95% CI 2.386-6.723; p < .001) and first-degree AVB (OR 1.847; 95% CI 1.133-3.009; p = .014) were independent predictors of 30 day PPM. LAHB also resulted in higher PPM rates but only in unadjusted analysis (21.8% vs. 9.4%; p = .003). Baseline LBBB and AF were associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at both baseline and 1 year after TAVR. However, Δ LVEF over time were noted to be similar with baseline LBBB (1.8% vs. 1.4%; p = .809) and AF (1.1% vs. 1.7%; p = .458). Moreover, baseline AF was also associated with higher stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) at 1 year (4.4% vs. 1.8%; p = .019), 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (19.5% vs. 13.3%; p = .012) and 2 year mortality (23.5% vs. 15.2%; p = .016). None of the other baseline conduction defects affected long-term mortality or MACCE. CONCLUSION: In our S3 TAVR population, baseline RBBB and first-degree AVB predicted higher PPM risk. Prior LBBB and AF were associated with lower LVEF at both baseline and 1 year. Lastly, preexisting AF was associated with higher rates of mortality, stroke/TIA, and MACCE.

Comparison of acute recoil after valve deployment and after post-dilation in patients undergoing transfemoral-transcatheter aortic valve replacement with SAPIEN-3 valve.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valves are prone to acute recoil similar to the metal-based coronary stents. However, it is not clear if recoil remains a factor only after the initial valve deployment or also after post-dilation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with SAPIEN-3 valve. Acute recoil at the upper, central, and lower levels of the valve was calculated in both anteroposterior right anterior oblique (RAO) and lateral left anterior oblique (LAO) views after initial deployment as well as after post-dilation. The average recoil of the RAO and LAO views was also calculated and described as RAO/LAO. RESULTS: The acute recoil in the RAO/LAO views (mean ± SD) was 3.9 ± 1.1% after valve deployment in the whole study population (n = 257). Among the subset of patients who required post-dilation (n = 133), the mean acute recoil in the RAO/LAO views was found to be greater after initial valve deployment as compared with after post-dilation (3.8 ± 1.1% vs. 3.0 ± 0.9%; p < .001). Further, acute recoil was significantly greater in the RAO view than the LAO view and at the central level of the prosthesis as compared with the upper and lower levels. Those findings were consistent after initial deployment as well as after post-dilation. Clinical outcomes were similar between patients who required post-dilation compared to those who did not. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only smaller valve cover index was found to be an independent predictor of 30-day mild or greater aortic regurgitation (OR 0.007; 95% CI 0.0001-0.707; p = .035). CONCLUSION: Acute elastic recoil of the SAPIEN-3 valve was significantly less after post-dilation as compared with after deployment. It was also greater when measured in the RAO view as compared with the LAO view. Furthermore, acute recoil was not homogenous across the height of the valve stent frame.

Impact of Obesity in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Obesity and cardiovascular disease remain significant burdens on the overall provision of health care in the United States. Obesity has been shown to be a direct risk factor for heart failure (HF). We conducted a nationwide cohort study to assess the short-term impact of obesity in hospitalized patients with HF. METHODS: We identified 1,520,871 encounters with a primary diagnosis of HF in the 2013-2014 Nationwide Readmission Database. We excluded patients younger than 18 years (n = 2755), hospitalized patients discharged in December (n = 126,137), patients with missing mortality information (n = 477), missing length of stay (LOS; n = 91), patients who were transferred to another hospital (n = 38,489), and patients with conflicting body weight information (n = 7757). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between baseline characteristics (including the presence of obesity) and in-hospital mortality, as well as 30-day readmission rates. RESULTS: The overall in-patient mortality rate was 2.8% (n = 37,927). Obese patients had numerically a lower mortality (1.8%) compared with the nonobese patients (3.1%); however, the difference in risk was not significant on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.01). In the overall cohort, 20.6% (n = 269,988) were readmitted within 30 days. The risk of 30-day readmission was significantly lower in obese patients (19.4%) compared with nonobese patients (20.9%) (odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.84-0.86). Obese patients had longer LOSs (median of 5 days [3-7] vs 4 days [2-6], P < 0.001) and higher costs of index admission (median of $27,206 [$16,027-$48,316] vs $23,339 [$13,698-$41,982], P < 0.001) compared with nonobese patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this cross-sectional study of patients hospitalized for HF in the United States, obesity was not associated with a higher risk of inpatient mortality, but it was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate. Obese patients with HF, however, had longer LOSs and higher costs of index admission. Our findings support the obesity paradox seen in patients with HF.

Late stroke: comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel disease and unprotected left main disease: a meta-analysis and review of literature.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies have suggested that the early excess risk of stroke in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be compensated for by a slow but progressive catch-up phenomenon in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore undertook this analysis to compare the temporal stroke risk between PCI and CABG in patients with unprotected left main stenosis and multivessel coronary artery disease. METHODS: Studies of PCI versus CABG for unprotected left main stenosis and multivessel disease published between January 1994 (stent era) and July 2013 were identified using an electronic search and reviewed using meta-analytic techniques. RESULTS: We selected 57 reports for the meta-analysis by applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The analysis was performed on 80,314 patient records. There was a significantly lower risk of cumulative stroke in patients undergoing PCI with stenting at 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.71), 2 years (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.92), 3 years (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.92), 4 years (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97), and 5 years (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.91). There was no significant difference in the incidence of stroke because of the small sample size (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.46-1.08) at >5 years between PCI and CABG. Similar results were observed on subgroup analysis (multi-vessel coronary artery disease, unprotected left main, diabetics, and randomized trials) and for stroke within 30 days. Late stroke (stroke>30 days) was similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significantly lower risk of stroke within 30 days and cumulative stroke with PCI as compared with CABG up to year 5. There is no late catch up of stroke in the PCI arm. The risk of stroke should be weighed in deciding between revascularization strategies.

Pacing-Related Differences After SAPIEN-3 TAVI: Clinical and Echocardiographic Correlates.

Data regarding the impact of pacing on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is evolving especially with regards to pre-existing permanent pacemaker (PPM). We examined the impact of new and previous PPM on the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after SAPIEN-3 TAVI. We included all consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI using SAPIEN-3 valve from 2015 to 2018 at our institution. Among 1,028 patients, 10.2% required a new PPM within 30 days, whereas 14% had a pre-existing PPM. The presence of either previous or new PPM had no impact on the 3-year mortality (log-rank p = 0.6) or 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (log-rank p = 0.65). New PPM was associated with lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) at both 30 days (54.4 ± 11.3% vs 58.4 ± 10.1%, p = 0.001) and 1 year (54.2 ± 12% vs 59.1 ± 9.9%, p = 0.009) than no PPM. Similarly, previous PPM was associated with worse LVEF at 30 days (53.6 ± 12.3%, p <0.001) and 1 year (55.5 ± 12.1%, p = 0.006) than no PPM. Interestingly, new PPM was associated with lower 1-year mean gradient (11.4 ± 3.8 vs 12.6 ± 5.6 mm Hg, p = 0.04) and peak gradient (21.3 ± 6.5 vs 24.1 ± 10.4 mm Hg, p = 0.01), despite no baseline differences. Previous PPM was also associated with lower 1-year mean gradient (10.3 ± 4.4 mm Hg, p = 0.001) and peak gradient (19.4 ± 8 mm Hg, p <0.001) and higher Doppler velocity index (0.51 ± 0.12 vs 0.47 ± 0.13, p = 0.039). Moreover, 1-year LV end-systolic volume index was higher with new (23.2 ± 16.1 vs 20 ± 10.8 ml/m2, p = 0.038) and previous PPM (24.5 ± 19.7, p = 0.038) than no PPM. Previous PPM was associated with higher moderate-to-severe tricuspid regurgitation (35.3% vs 17.7%, p <0.001). There were no differences regarding the rest of the studied echocardiographic outcomes at 1 year. In conclusion, new and previous PPM did not affect 3-year mortality or 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events; however, they were associated with worse LVEF, higher 1-year LV end-systolic volume index, and lower mean and peak gradients on follow-up than no PPM.

Cardiac stress testing for the diagnosis and management of coronary artery disease: a reference for the primary care physician.

Choosing the appropriate stress test is important in the workup of patients with possible myocardial ischemia. This choice often is challenging and sometimes confusing because of the plethora of tests and guidelines available. We present a broad overview of commonly available stress tests and indications to help physicians select the most appropriate stress test for their patients.

Aspiration thrombectomy in ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: Further insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: The initial enthusiasm for thrombectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has given way to restraint. There has been some limited interest whether it is beneficial in a few selected subgroups. Hence, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare conventional PCI (cPCI), Aspiration or manual thrombectomy (AT) and Mechanical thrombectomy (McT) for clarification. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized studies that compared AT, McT, or cPCI. A network meta-analysis was performed and odd's ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals was generated for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis (ST), stroke, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial blush grade (MBG) and ST segment resolution (STR). RESULTS: A total of 43 randomized trials (n = 26,682) were included. The risk of MACE (OR 0.86 95% CI 0.73-1.00), Mortality (OR 0.85 95% CI 0.73-0.99), MI (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.95) and TVR (OR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.74-1.00) were lower with AT compared to cPCI. The risk of ST and stroke was no different with the use of adjunctive AT. MBG, STR, and LVEF improved with the use of AT while the infarct size was no different in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive network meta-analysis suggests conflicting outcomes with AT. While Mortality, MACE, MI seem better, there is a suggestion that, Stroke and ST might be worse. Whether AT can still be pursued in any select cases should be further scrutinized.

Procedures and devices to treat resistant hypertension in chronic kidney disease.

Treatment of resistant hypertension is a challenge, especially in patients who have chronic kidney disease. The choice of medications may be limited in this group, making the possibility of device-based therapies attractive. We explore 4 devices and procedures available to treat this vexing issue.

Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug eluting stent implantation: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There has been much debate regarding the optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cover after drug eluting stent (DES) implantation. We aimed to assess the relative benefits of shorter and longer durations of DAPT coverage. METHODS: We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of all the randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing different time durations of DAPT cover. RESULTS: We included 11 unique trials with a total of 33,458 patients; the longest duration of follow-up was 48 months and the shortest was 3 months. NMA results demonstrated that compared with 12 months, longer DAPT of 30 months reduced the hazard ratio (HR) of stent thrombosis (HR, 0.29; 95% CrI, 0.17-0.49). There was no difference in mortality between shorter and longer durations of DAPT except for 30 vs. 48 months (HR, 0.48; 95% CrI, 0.23-0.98). Compared with 12 months, longer DAPT of 30 months reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (HR, 0.47; 95% CrI, 0.37-0.61). Results also demonstrated that compared with 12 months, a shorter-term DAPT reduced the risk of major bleeding (6 months: HR, 0.53; 95% CrI, 0.29-0.98), whereas longer-term DAPT increased the risk of major bleeding (30 months: HR, 1.61; 95% CrI, 1.21-2.15). CONCLUSION: As expected, bleeding was less in the shorter duration regimens, whereas the ischemic outcomes were better in the longer duration ones.

Prevalence of QT interval prolongation in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There is growing evidence linking various cardiac complications with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Electrolyte abnormalities, chronic inflammation, and medication use (such as Infliximab) that are associated with IBD are all independent risk factors for QT interval prolongation. Given that malignant ventricular arrhythmias are associated with QT interval prolongation, it is important to risk stratify this subset of patients. Our objective was to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal QT interval prolongation (defined by a QT interval of >450 ms in men and >460 ms in women) in an IBD population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with IBD from the Metro Hospital database was performed. Patients' demographic characteristics and laboratory data were abstracted. "RR" and "QT" intervals were measured from the last available electrocardiogram, and corrected QT (QTc) interval was calculated from lead II using Bazett's formula. RESULTS: Of 142 eligible patients, 42.3% (n=22/52) of males and 48.9% (n=44/90) of females had a prolonged QTc interval. Patients with IBD having a prolonged QTc interval had a higher body mass index than those with a normal QTc interval (29.7±6.9 vs. 26.2±5.9, p=0.005). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that patients with IBD are at a higher risk of developing QTc interval prolongation.

Transradial access mitigates bleeding benefit offered by bivalirudin over heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.

OBJECTIVE: Recent randomized control trials (RCTs) showed conflicting efficacy and safety between bivalirudin and heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis, including real-world and trial data to examine the factors affecting their risk-benefit ratio. METHODS: We searched Medline, the Cochrane library, and meeting abstracts for studies comparing bivalirudin versus heparin during PCI. Random-effect meta-analyses for MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events), stent thrombosis (ST) and major bleeding were performed. p-Value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 20 RCTs and 31 observation studies (n=165,835) showed that bivalirudin and heparin were similar in the risk of MACE in RCTs (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.13) and observational studies (OR 0.94, 95% 0.81-1.10). Major bleeding was lower with bivalirudin in both RCTs (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.70) and observational studies (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-0.68). However, in the metaregression analysis, every 10% increase of transradial access decreased the bleeding benefit of bivalirudin by 4.9% (p=0.046, adjusted for GPI and heparin loading dose). ST with bivalirudin was higher with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in RCTs (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.15-1.99) but not in observational studies (p=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: In this large meta-analysis, bivalirudin is associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared to heparin in both RCTs and observational studies, however, transradial PCI mitigated most of this bleeding benefit. Heparin should be the preferred agent in transradial PCI given its lower cost and comparable outcomes.

Abnormal Left Ventricular Filling and Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery.

Objective: Diastolic dysfunction has been associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the community and recently in the postoperative setting. We hypothesized that abnormal left ventricular filling predicts AF after cardiac surgery, a common marker of poor outcomes. Methods: Cohort study of 233 consecutive patients, who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or valve surgery. Early and late mitral inflow velocity (E, A) and deceleration time (DT) and early mitral annular velocity (e?) were obtained from echo within 6 months prior to cardiac surgery. Associations with postoperative AF were studied with multivariable logistic regression. Results: Postoperative AF occurred in 65 (28%) of patients, who were on average older, more likely to have had prior episodes of AF, had larger inferior vena cava diameter and shorter DT (189 ± 62ms vs. 214 ± 63ms, p=0.007). Multivariable adjusted analyses demonstrated only DT (odds ratio [OR] 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.97), older age (OR 2.62 (95% CI 1.68 - 4.10) and prior episodes of atrial fibrillation (OR 7.20, CI 1.41-36.8) to be independent predictors of postoperative AF. Patients with a DT ≤ 200ms (n=117) had a significantly longer length of hospital stay compared with those who had DT > 200ms (n=116) (median 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5-10) vs. 6 days (IQR 5-7, p=0.0002). Conclusion: In patients who undergo cardiac surgery, a shorter DT of early mitral inflow identified greater risk for postoperative AF and a longer hospital stay. These results provide useful information for preoperative risk assessment and mechanistic understanding of postoperative AF.

Effect of early statin therapy on risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting with or without concomitant valve surgery.

Statins decrease postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) if given before cardiac surgery. However, whether early administration of statins after surgery decreases the risk of postoperative AF is unknown. The association of early reinstitution of postoperative statin therapy within 48 hours to the occurrence of postoperative AF was studied in propensity-adjusted analyses of 200 consecutive patients in sinus rhythm who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting with or without valve surgery. Postoperative AF occurred in 36 patients (18%). Of 52 patients who received a statin early after surgery, 4 (7.7%) developed AF compared to 32 (28%) of 148 patients who did not (p = 0.043). In the propensity-adjusted analyses, early postoperative statin treatment was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of AF (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.99), irrespective of concomitant ß-blocker therapy. The length of stay was shorter for the patients who received early postoperative statins (median 6.1 days, interquartile range 4 to 7, vs 7.8 days, interquartile range 5 to 8; p = 0.0031). In conclusion, of preoperative statin users undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with or without valve surgery, early postoperative reinstitution of statins was associated with a lower occurrence of postoperative AF and a shorter length of stay. Early postoperative statin therapy might be a feasible and safe method of reducing postoperative AF.