Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAMA ; 324(10): 961-974, 2020 09 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32897344

RESUMEN

Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death and disability due to trauma. Early administration of tranexamic acid may benefit patients with TBI. Objective: To determine whether tranexamic acid treatment initiated in the out-of-hospital setting within 2 hours of injury improves neurologic outcome in patients with moderate or severe TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 20 trauma centers and 39 emergency medical services agencies in the US and Canada from May 2015 to November 2017. Eligible participants (N = 1280) included out-of-hospital patients with TBI aged 15 years or older with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 12 or less and systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher. Interventions: Three interventions were evaluated, with treatment initiated within 2 hours of TBI: out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) bolus and in-hospital tranexamic acid (1 g) 8-hour infusion (bolus maintenance group; n = 312), out-of-hospital tranexamic acid (2 g) bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (bolus only group; n = 345), and out-of-hospital placebo bolus and in-hospital placebo 8-hour infusion (placebo group; n = 309). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was favorable neurologic function at 6 months (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended score >4 [moderate disability or good recovery]) in the combined tranexamic acid group vs the placebo group. Asymmetric significance thresholds were set at 0.1 for benefit and 0.025 for harm. There were 18 secondary end points, of which 5 are reported in this article: 28-day mortality, 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (range, 0 [no disability] to 30 [death]), progression of intracranial hemorrhage, incidence of seizures, and incidence of thromboembolic events. Results: Among 1063 participants, a study drug was not administered to 96 randomized participants and 1 participant was excluded, resulting in 966 participants in the analysis population (mean age, 42 years; 255 [74%] male participants; mean Glasgow Coma Scale score, 8). Of these participants, 819 (84.8%) were available for primary outcome analysis at 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 65% of patients in the tranexamic acid groups vs 62% in the placebo group (difference, 3.5%; [90% 1-sided confidence limit for benefit, -0.9%]; P = .16; [97.5% 1-sided confidence limit for harm, 10.2%]; P = .84). There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality between the tranexamic acid groups vs the placebo group (14% vs 17%; difference, -2.9% [95% CI, -7.9% to 2.1%]; P = .26), 6-month Disability Rating Scale score (6.8 vs 7.6; difference, -0.9 [95% CI, -2.5 to 0.7]; P = .29), or progression of intracranial hemorrhage (16% vs 20%; difference, -5.4% [95% CI, -12.8% to 2.1%]; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with moderate to severe TBI, out-of-hospital tranexamic acid administration within 2 hours of injury compared with placebo did not significantly improve 6-month neurologic outcome as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01990768.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antifibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Encefalopatías/etiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Método Doble Ciego , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Gravedad del Paciente , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Ácido Tranexámico/efectos adversos
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 28(9): 1248-1254, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28642012

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of a novel device that combines an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter and central venous catheter (CVC) for prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE) in critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, single-arm clinical trial, the device was inserted at the bedside without fluoroscopy and subsequently retrieved before transfer from the intensive care unit (ICU). The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from clinically significant PE or fatal PE 72 hours after device removal or discharge, whichever occurred first. Secondary endpoints were incidence of acute proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT), catheter-related thrombosis, catheter-related bloodstream infections, major bleeding events, and clinically significant thrombus (occupying > 25% of volume of filter) detected by cavography before retrieval. RESULTS: The device was placed in 163 critically ill patients with contraindications to anticoagulation; 151 (93%) were critically ill trauma patients, 129 (85%) had head or spine trauma, and 102 (79%) had intracranial bleeding. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved for all 163 (100%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.8%-100%, P < .01). Diagnosis of new or worsening acute proximal DVT was time dependent with 11 (7%) occurring during the first 7 days. There were no (0%) catheter-related bloodstream infections. There were 5 (3.1%) major bleeding events. Significant thrombus in the IVC filter occurred in 14 (8.6%) patients. Prophylactic anticoagulation was not initiated for a mean of 5.5 days ± 4.3 after ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: This novel device prevented clinically significant and fatal PE among critically ill trauma patients with low risk of complications.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Filtros de Vena Cava , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adulto , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crítica , Remoción de Dispositivos , Seguridad de Equipos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Filtros de Vena Cava/efectos adversos
3.
Burns ; 49(6): 1249-1259, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268542

RESUMEN

Burn injury causes a coagulopathy that is poorly understood. After severe burns, significant fluid losses are managed by aggressive resuscitation that can lead to hemodilution. These injuries are managed by early excision and grafting, which can cause significant bleeding and further decrease blood cell concentration. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an anti-fibrinolytic that has been shown to reduce surgical blood losses; however, its use in burn surgery is not well established. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the influence TXA may have on burn surgery outcomes. Eight papers were included, with outcomes considered in a random-effects model meta-analysis. Overall, when compared to the control group, TXA significantly reduced total volume blood loss (mean difference (MD) = -192.44; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -297.73 to - 87.14; P = 0.0003), the ratio of blood loss to burn injury total body surface area (TBSA) (MD = -7.31; 95% CI = -10.77 to -3.84; P 0.0001), blood loss per unit area treated (MD = -0.59; 95% CI = -0.97 to -0.20; P = 0.003), and the number of patients receiving a transfusion intraoperatively (risk difference (RD) = -0.16; 95% CI = -0.32 to - 0.01; P = 0.04). Additionally, there were no noticeable differences in venous thromboembolism (VTE) events (RD = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.03; P = 0.98) and mortality (RD = 0.00; 95% CI = -0.03 to 0.04; P = 0.86). In conclusion, TXA can potentially be a pharmacologic intervention that reduces blood losses and transfusions in burn surgery without increasing the risk of VTE events or mortality.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos , Quemaduras , Ácido Tranexámico , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Quemaduras/cirugía , Quemaduras/tratamiento farmacológico , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control
4.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 8(1): e001178, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38020867

RESUMEN

Objectives: The risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) after resection and primary anastomosis for traumatic bucket handle injury (BHI) have not been previously defined. This multicenter study was conducted to address this knowledge gap. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study on small intestine and colonic BHIs from blunt trauma between 2010 and 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, risk factors, presence of shock and transfusion, operative details, and clinical outcomes were compared using R. Results: Data on 395 subjects were submitted by 12 trauma centers, of whom 33 (8.1%) patients developed AL. Baseline details were similar, except for a higher proportion of patients in the AL group who had medical comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity (60.6% vs. 37.3%, p=0.015). AL had higher rates of surgical site infections (13.4% vs. 5.3%, p=0.004) and organ space infections (65.2% vs. 11.7%, p<0.001), along with higher readmission and reoperation rates (48.4% vs. 9.1%, p<0.001, and 39.4% vs. 11.6%, p<0.001, respectively). There was no difference in intensive care unit length of stay or mortality (p>0.05). More patients with AL were discharged with an ostomy (69.7% vs. 7.3%, p<0.001), and the mean duration until ostomy reversal was 5.85±3 months (range 2-12.4 months). The risk of AL significantly increased when the initial operation was a damage control procedure, after adjusting for age, sex, injury severity, presence of one or more comorbidities, shock, transfusion of >6 units of packed red blood cells, and site of injury (adjusted RR=2.32 (1.13, 5.17)), none of which were independent risk factors in themselves. Conclusion: Damage control surgery performed as the initial operation appears to double the risk of AL after intestinal BHI, even after controlling for other markers of injury severity. Level of evidence: III.

5.
Am J Surg ; 222(3): 521-528, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33558061

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Handoffs are defined as the transfer of patient information, professional responsibility, and accountability between caregivers. This work aims to clarify the current state of transitions of care related to the management of trauma patients. METHODS: A PubMed database and web search were performed for articles published between 2000 and 2020 related to handoffs and transitions of care. The key search terms used were: handoff(s), handoff(s) AND healthcare, and handoff(s) AND trauma. A total of 55 studies were included in qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: This systematic review explores the current state of healthcare handoffs for trauma patients. Factors found to impact successful handoffs included process standardization, team member accountability, effective communication, and the incorporation of culture. This review was limited by the small number of prospective randomized studies available on the topic. CONCLUSION: Handoffs in trauma care have been studied and should be utilized in the context of published experience and practice. Standardization when applied with accountability has proven benefit to reduce communication errors during these transfers of care.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Pase de Guardia/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Cuidado de Transición/normas , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Pase de Guardia/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Cuidado de Transición/organización & administración , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(5): 900-907, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105308

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: No Food and Drug Administration-approved medication improves outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI). A forthcoming clinical trial that evaluated the effects of two prehospital tranexamic acid (TXA) dosing strategies compared with placebo demonstrated no differences in thromboelastography (TEG) values. We proposed to explore the impact of TXA on markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with moderate to severe TBI. METHODS: Data were extracted from a placebo-controlled clinical trial in which patients 15 years or older with TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale, 3-12) and systolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg were randomized prehospital to receive placebo bolus/placebo infusion (placebo), 1 g of TXA bolus/1 g of TXA infusion (bolus maintenance), or 2 g of TXA bolus/placebo infusion (bolus only). Thromboelastography was performed, and coagulation measures including prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international ratio, fibrinogen, D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin (PAP), thrombin antithrombin, tissue plasminogen activator, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 were quantified at admission and 6 hours later. RESULTS: Of 966 patients receiving study drug, 700 had laboratory tests drawn at admission and 6 hours later. There were no statistically significant differences in TEG values, including LY30, between groups (p > 0.05). No differences between prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international ratio, fibrinogen, thrombin antithrombin, tissue plasminogen activator, and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 were demonstrated across treatment groups. Concentrations of D-dimer in TXA treatment groups were less than placebo at 6 hours (p < 0.001). Concentrations of PAP in TXA treatment groups were less than placebo on admission (p < 0.001) and 6 hours (p = 0.02). No differences in D-dimer and PAP were observed between bolus maintenance and bolus only. CONCLUSION: While D-dimer and PAP levels reflect a lower degree of fibrinolysis following prehospital administration of TXA when compared with placebo in a large prehospital trial of patients with TBI, TEG obtained on admission and 6 hours later did not demonstrate any differences in fibrinolysis between the two TXA dosing regimens and placebo. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic test, level III.


Asunto(s)
Antifibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinólisis/efectos de los fármacos , Ácido Tranexámico/administración & dosificación , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/sangre , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Fibrinolisina/análisis , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tromboelastografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , alfa 2-Antiplasmina/análisis
8.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 86(4): 601-608, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601458

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Over the last 5 years, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma has developed grading scales for emergency general surgery (EGS) diseases. In a previous validation study using diverticulitis, the grading scales were predictive of complications and length of stay. As EGS encompasses diverse diseases, the purpose of this study was to validate the grading scale concept against a different disease process with a higher associated mortality. We hypothesized that the grading scale would be predictive of complications, length of stay, and mortality in skin and soft-tissue infections (STIs). METHODS: This multi-institutional trial encompassed 12 centers. Data collected included demographic variables, disease characteristics, and outcomes such as mortality, overall complications, and hospital and ICU length of stay. The EGS scale for STI was used to grade each infection and two surgeons graded each case to evaluate inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: 1170 patients were included in this study. Inter-rater reliability was moderate (kappa coefficient 0.472-0.642, with 64-76% agreement). Higher grades (IV and V) corresponded to significantly higher Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis scores when compared with lower EGS grades. Patients with grade IV and V STI had significantly increased odds of all complications, as well as ICU and overall length of stay. These associations remained significant in logistic regression controlling for age, gender, comorbidities, mental status, and hospital-level volume. Grade V disease was significantly associated with mortality as well. CONCLUSION: This validation effort demonstrates that grade IV and V STI are significantly predictive of complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality. Though predictive ability does not improve linearly with STI grade, this is consistent with the clinical disease process in which lower grades represent cellulitis and abscess and higher grades are invasive infections. This second validation study confirms the EGS grading scale as predictive, and easily used, in disparate disease processes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiologic retrospective multicenter trial, level III.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento de Urgencia/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/cirugía , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Absceso/clasificación , Absceso/mortalidad , Absceso/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Celulitis (Flemón)/clasificación , Celulitis (Flemón)/mortalidad , Celulitis (Flemón)/cirugía , Fascitis/clasificación , Fascitis/mortalidad , Fascitis/cirugía , Femenino , Cirugía General , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/clasificación , Enfermedades Cutáneas Infecciosas/mortalidad , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/clasificación , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
9.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 82(4): 742-749, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28323788

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed colonic anastomosis after damage control laparotomy (DCL) is an alternative to colostomies during a single laparotomy (SL) in high-risk patients. However, literature suggests increased colonic leak rates up to 27% with DCL, and various reported risk factors. We evaluated our regional experience to determine if delayed colonic anastomosis was associated with worse outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed across three Level I trauma centers encompassing traumatic colon injuries from January 2006 through June 2014. Patients with rectal injuries or mortality within 24 hours were excluded. Patient and injury characteristics, complications, and interventions were compared between SL and DCL groups. Regional readmission data were utilized to capture complications within 6 months of index trauma. RESULTS: Of 267 patients, 69% had penetrating injuries, 21% underwent DCL, and the mortality rate was 4.9%. Overall, 176 received primary repair (26 in DCL), 90 had resection and anastomosis (28 in DCL), and 26 had a stoma created (10 end colostomies and 2 loop ileostomies in DCL). Thirty-five of 56 DCL patients had definitive colonic repair subsequent to their index operation. DCL patients were more likely to be hypotensive; require more resuscitation; and suffer acute kidney injury, pneumonia, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and death. Five enteric leaks (1.9%) and three enterocutaneous fistulas (ECF, 1.1%) were identified, proportionately distributed between DCL and SL (p = 1.00, p = 0.51). No difference was seen in intraperitoneal abscesses (p = 0.13) or surgical site infections (SSI, p = 0.70) between cohorts. Among SL patients, pancreas injuries portended an increased risk of intraperitoneal abscesses (p = 0.0002), as did liver injuries in DCL patients (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: DCL was not associated with increased enteric leaks, ECF, SSI, or intraperitoneal abscesses despite nearly two-thirds having delayed repair. Despite this being a multicenter study, it is underpowered, and a prospective trial would better demonstrate risks of DCL in colon trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colon/lesiones , Colon/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Laparotomía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
10.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 17(6): 720-723, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27500970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Data on antimicrobial prophylaxis for open fractures is limited, with many protocols based on expert recommendations. These protocols include aminoglycosides (AGs) for fractures with significant soft tissue injury, but these drugs are associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in other settings; this risk has not been defined for open fracture prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study from May 2012 to October 2014 at our Level 1 trauma center. Patients with open fractures were evaluated for demographics, location/type of fracture, injury severity, and receipt of an AG. Outcomes included rates of AKI, infection, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 167 patients with open fractures during the study period (119 males, mean age 42 ± 17 [standard deviation] years), with 80 (48%) receiving prophylactic gentamicin (AG+ group). The AG+ and AG- patients had similar fracture sites and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) (12.6 ± 9.9 AG+ vs. 15.9 ± 13.2 AG-) but were more likely to have sustained blunt trauma (96% AG+ vs. 77%; p < 0.001) or received intravenous contrast medium ≤48 h from admission (75% AG+ vs. 56% AG-; p = 0.01). Gentamicin was not associated with AKI (odds ratio [OR] 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.020-2.44; p = 0.22), whereas hypotension on admission (OR 10.7; 95% CI 1.42-80.93; p = 0.02) and ISS (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.01-1.20; p = 0.02) were both associated with AKI. Only four fracture site infections were identified, three in the AG+ group and one in the AG- group (3.8% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.27). The mortality rate was greater in the AG- group (3.8% vs. 12.6%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic gentamicin is not associated with AKI, whereas hypotension on admission and higher ISS were. The use of nephrotoxic agents, including aminoglycosides, should be restricted in open fracture patients presenting with hypotension or a high ISS.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Abiertas/epidemiología , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Am J Surg ; 212(4): 781-785, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27038794

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There has been an increasing emphasis on identifying elderly trauma patients. However, definitions based solely on age vary widely, ranging from age 55 to 80 years, hampering optimal trauma management for older patients. The goal of this study was to develop an objective, data-driven definition for "elderly" in trauma care by evaluating mortality risk as a function of age. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 872,861 adult (≥18 years) patients from the National Trauma Data Bank's National Sample Program from 2003 to 2010. The primary outcome was risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality determined using multivariate logistic regression. Contribution of age to mortality was investigated through step-wise regression and percent of R2 attributable to age. We searched for straight-line trends in mortality rate at each age using the spline function of Statistical Analysis Software. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in mortality rate were noted at ages 37, 60, and 78. Age was found to contribute 10% to mortality compared with greater than 80% for Glasgow coma scale and injury severity score combined. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest using age 60 years as a data-driven definition of "elderly" in trauma.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot ; 22(3): 187-92, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24499372

RESUMEN

While the number of motor vehicle crashes has declined over the years, crashes resulting from distracted driving are increasing in the United States resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. The national public seems to be aware of the dangers associated with using technology while driving, but continues to engage in this dangerous behaviour, and may be unaware of or underestimate the impact of cell phone use on their own driving performance. Problems associated with distracted driving are not limited to novice or teenage drivers; multifaceted universal prevention efforts aimed at impacting large segments of the population may have the greatest impact. Legislation limiting drivers' cell phone use has had little impact, possibly due to low regulation and enforcement. Behaviour change programmes, improved vehicle safety, and public awareness campaigns have been developed as potential preventive efforts to reduce accidents caused by distracted drivers.


Asunto(s)
Prevención de Accidentes/métodos , Accidentes de Tránsito/prevención & control , Atención , Conducción de Automóvil/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Conducción de Automóvil/estadística & datos numéricos , Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Administración de la Seguridad , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
13.
Am J Surg ; 210(5): 827-32, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26321296

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hispanics have similar or lower all-cause mortality rates in the general population than non-Hispanic whites (NHWs), despite higher risks associated with lower socioeconomic status, hence termed the "Hispanic Paradox." It is unknown if this paradox exists in the injured. We hypothesized that Hispanic trauma patients have equivalent or lower risk-adjusted mortality and observed-to-expected mortality ratios than other racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of adult patients from the 2010 National Trauma Data Bank was performed. Hispanic patients were compared with NHWs and African Americans (AAs) to assess in-hospital mortality risk in each group. RESULTS: Compared with NHWs, Hispanic patients had lower unadjusted risk of mortality. After adjusting for potential confounders, the difference was no longer statistically significant. Mortality risk was significantly lower for Hispanic patients compared with AAs in both crude and adjusted models. Hispanic patients had significantly lower observed-to-expected mortality ratios than NHWs and AAs. CONCLUSION: Despite reports of racial/ethnic disparities in trauma outcomes, Hispanic patients are not at greater risk of death than NHW patients in a nationwide representative sample of trauma patients.


Asunto(s)
Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Am J Surg ; 208(3): 476-9, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24881019

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inadequate follow-up of uninsured trauma patients after discharge remains a major challenge for trauma programs. Local access to care programs (LACPs) have been developed to improve access to health care to the uninsured. We hypothesized that enrollment in LACP would improve postdischarge follow-up of uninsured trauma patients. METHODS: Study population consisted of 5,830 uninsured trauma patients from 2006 to 2011, treated at a large urban level-I trauma center. Patients with burn injuries, transfers to another acute-care facility, and those who died or who left against medical advice were excluded. Patients who enrolled in our LACP were compared with those who did not to determine the relationship between enrollment in LACP and postdischarge follow-up, while controlling for injury severity, demographics, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Patients in LACP were significantly more likely to schedule follow-up appointments after discharge (odds ratio = 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.51 to 2.10) and to comply with them (odds ratio = 2.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.98 to 2.99). However, 30-day readmission rates were similar in the 2 groups (1.1% vs 1.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment in the LACP was associated with improved postdischarge follow-up but not readmissions.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Pacientes no Asegurados , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Am J Surg ; 208(5): 806-810, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933668

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current practices suggest that patients with mild traumatic brain injuries (MTBI) receive neurosurgical consultations, while less than 1% require neurosurgical intervention. We implemented a policy of selective neurosurgical consultation with the hypothesis that trauma surgeons alone may manage such patients with no impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: Data from a level I trauma registry were analyzed. Patients with MTBI resulting in an intracranial hemorrhage of 1 cm or less and a Glasgow Coma Score of 13 or greater were included. Patients with additional intracranial injuries were excluded. Multivariate regression was used to determine the relationship between neurosurgical management and good neurologic outcomes, while controlling for injury severity, demographics, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Implementation of the neurosurgical policy significantly reduced the number of such consults (94% before vs 65% after, P < .002). Multivariate analysis revealed that neurosurgical consultation was not associated with neurologic outcomes of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a selective neurosurgical consultation policy for patients with MTBI reduced neurosurgical consultations without any impact on patient outcomes, suggesting that trauma surgeons can effectively manage these patients.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/terapia , Neurocirugia , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Traumatología , Adulto , Anciano , Lesiones Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 77(5): 787-795, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25494434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Femur fractures are common among trauma patients and are typically seen in patients with multiple injuries resulting from high-energy mechanisms. Internal fixation with intramedullary nailing is the ideal method of treatment; however, there is no consensus regarding the optimal timing for internal fixation. We critically evaluated the literature regarding the benefit of early (<24 hours) versus late (>24 hours) open reduction and internal fixation of open or closed femur fractures on mortality, infection, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients. METHODS: A subcommittee of the Practice Management Guideline Committee of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for the earlier question. RevMan software was used to generate forest plots. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence, using GRADEpro software to create evidence tables. RESULTS: No significant reduction in mortality was associated with early stabilization, with a risk ratio (RR) of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.08). The quality of evidence was rated as "low." No significant reduction in infection (RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.10-1.6) or VTE (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.37-1.07) was associated with early stabilization. The quality of evidence was rated "low." CONCLUSION: In trauma patients with open or closed femur fractures, we suggest early (<24 hours) open reduction and internal fracture fixation. This recommendation is conditional because the strength of the evidence is low. Early stabilization of femur fractures shows a trend (statistically insignificant) toward lower risk of infection, mortality, and VTE. Therefore, the panel concludes the desirable effects of early femur fracture stabilization probably outweigh the undesirable effects in most patients.

18.
Crit Care Med ; 32(9): 1949-56, 2004 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15343025

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Addressing an unexpected shortfall of intensivists requires early identification and training of appropriate personnel. The purpose of this study was to determine how U.S. medical students are currently educated and tested on acute care health principles. HYPOTHESIS/METHODS: A survey of critical care education with telephone follow-up was mailed to the deans of all 126 medical schools. Web site review of medical school curricula for critical care education was performed. Upon invited request, four members of the Undergraduate Medical Education Committee (UGMEC) reviewed 1,200 pool questions of step II of the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) given to graduating medical students for critical care content. Descriptive statistics are employed. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 49% and 88% by the second mailing with Web site review. Forty-five percent of U.S. medical schools responding had formal undergraduate critical care didactic curricula averaging 12 +/- 3 hrs: 60% were elective, 60% taught in the 4th year. Eighty percent of clinical ICU rotations offered were elective. Sixty percent of schools taught 11 key critical care procedures in the 3rd or 4th year; 17% required them to graduate. Nineteen percent of Step II USMLE questions had critical care content; 58% dealt with pulmonary or cardiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Graduating medical students are tested (and licensed accordingly) on critical care knowledge, despite an inconsistent exposure to the discipline in medical school. The UGMEC has drafted competency-based recommendations for acute health care delivery that encourage mandatory didactic and procedural critical care training. The UGMEC recommends that critical care rotations with didactic curricula be required for undergraduate education and that acute care procedural skills be an important component of these curricula.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Curriculum , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Educación Médica , Evaluación Educacional , Especialización , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA