Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Wound Care ; 28(Sup8): S4-S14, 2019 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31393783

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of patients, including demographics, medical history and treatment, with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) during their first follow-up visit to a general practitioner (GP). METHODS: A two-part quantitative online questionnaire was distributed among GPs in France, UK, Germany and Spain. Part one entailed a survey of GPs' perceptions of referrals for DFU. Part two collected data on recently managed DFU cases. The percentage of responses was compared for each question and across the four countries for significant differences. RESULTS: In part one of the study, 600 questionnaires were collected (150 per country) and 1188 patients managed for a DFU were included in the second part. About 88% of patients had type 2 diabetes, with a significant proportion of suboptimal control (average HbA1c: 10.64mmol/l). A patient complaint led to diagnosis in 60% of the cases. Wounds were found to be more frequently located in the toes and midfoot, and were superficial (according to the Texas Wound Classification system) in 80% of the cases. More than two-thirds of patients developed small wounds (<5cm2); more than half of them had infected wounds. Approximately 50% of wounds were ischaemic, which triggered the onset of a DFU. Follow-up wound examinations before and after hospitalisation were performed by nurses, except in Germany where GPs undertook this role, including prescribing offloading devices and in the UK where follow-up was managed by podiatrists. Ischaemia, wound necrosis, suspected osteomyelitis and absence of wound healing were the primary reasons for hospital admission during the first month after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Delay in specialised foot care is a recurring topic in the treatment of DFUs, even with different health-care structures across Europe. Knowledge and education on DFUs should be reinforced among GPs and nurses to establish a global DFU care network between primary and specialised care, avoid hospitalisation and adequately manage high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/organización & administración , Pie Diabético/terapia , Médicos Generales , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Podiatría , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Pie Diabético/etiología , Femenino , Francia , Alemania , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis , Osteomielitis , España , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido , Cicatrización de Heridas
2.
Rev Esp Quimioter ; 35 Suppl 3: 20-24, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36285852

RESUMEN

Diabetic foot is a complex disease. One of its most important complications is infection with risk of limb loss. In severe cases it is also a life-threatening condition. Several guidelines are available in order to achieve the implementation of some standard of care strategies. However, these consensus documents do not address all controversial issues arising during diabetic foot infection. The present article aims to review some of these controversial aspects.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles , Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Humanos , Pie Diabético/complicaciones , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Consenso , Amputación Quirúrgica
3.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 219(8): 415-423, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31014566

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence of reported delirium and its associated factors and costs. DESIGN: Retrospective and descriptive analysis of a national clinical-administrative database that includes all patients hospitalised in Spain in internal medicine departments from January 2007 to December 2014. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study included the patients' sociodemographic and clinical data (sex, age, diagnosis and procedures). RESULTS: The prevalence of reported delirium was 2.5% (114,343 of 4,628,397 discharge reports). Delirium was most common in the 81-90-year age group (48%) and in institutionalised patients (4.5% vs. 2.9%; P<.001). The diagnoses most associated with delirium were dementia (14% vs. 7% for patients without delirium), cerebrovascular disease (17% vs. 11%), malnutrition (4% vs. 2%), pressure ulcers (4% vs. 2%), dysphagia (2% vs. 0.2%) and hyponatraemia (5% vs. 2%) (P<.001 in all cases). Patients with delirium also had longer mean stays (11.85±13.15days vs. 9.49±11.17) and higher hospital mortality (OR: 1.41; 95%CI: 1.39-1.43; P=.0001). The costs attributable to delirium in 8years exceeded €100 million (almost €1,000 per hospitalisation/patient). We developed a predictive model for the risk of developing delirium, which has insufficient sensitivity but is useful for identifying low-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who develop delirium during their hospitalisation in internal medicine have a longer stay, greater mortality and an increased risk of being institutionalised at discharge. Delirium is probably poorly reported in the discharge reports prepared by internists.

4.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 216(8): 414-418, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27236835

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the activity of interconsultations conducted by the departments of internal medicine, communicating their importance to managers and offering information to these departments to improve their organisation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an interconsultation activity survey (on-demand consulting activity for other departments) and shared care (consulting activity provided in a regulated manner to other departments). RESULTS: We received 120 surveys that corresponded to 108 public and 12 private hospitals. Forty-five percent of the surveyed hospitals had a specialised interconsultation unit, and 31% had shared care. The department most frequently helped by the presence of a stable consultation unit (65% of the cases) was orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Fifty-five percent of the departments of internal medicine surveyed had an interconsultation activity record since the start of their activity. Ninety-two percent of the departments lacked a protocol that regulated interconsultations, and in 74% of the cases, the interconsultation was on demand. CONCLUSIONS: The interconsultation activity is generalised in the departments of internal medicine, but only 45% of these departments have interconsultation units, and only 33% provide the shared care modality. The survey reflects the shortcomings of training and some confusion in the concept of interconsultations. The considerable majority of departments lack organisational interconsultation protocols.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA