Regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain: from clinical trials to real-world evidence.

Aim: To describe the evolution of regorafenib use, since its approval, in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in routine clinical practice in Spain. Methods: We extracted patient characteristics, dosing, safety and efficacy data for the Spanish cohorts of the CORRECT and CONSIGN trials, and the real-world CORRELATE study. Results: The Spanish cohorts represented 10.7-13.8% of the global cohorts. Efficacy and safety in the Spanish cohorts reflected findings from the global cohorts, with evidence of a flexible dosing approach being adopted in routine clinical practice. Conclusion: Regorafenib use in patients with mCRC has evolved in the real-world setting, emphasizing the need for further research evaluating dosing patterns that can optimize clinical outcomes in these patients.Clinical trial registration: The CORRECT trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01103323; the CONSIGN trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01538680; the CORRELATE study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02042144.

Bowel cancer (also called colorectal cancer) affects the large bowel, including the colon and rectum. Approximately one in ten patients with advanced bowel cancer that has spread to other areas of the body (metastatic bowel cancer) survive 5 years after diagnosis or the start of treatment.Regorafenib is a treatment for patients with advanced bowel cancer that has continued to spread after receiving other treatments. It can slow down cancer growth, as shown in three international studies (CORRECT, CONSIGN and CORRELATE). In Spain, bowel cancer is the most common type of cancer and the cancer that causes the second most deaths. This study describes how the use of regorafenib in Spain has changed since it was approved in 2012, by looking at the patients from Spain who made up 11­14% of the participants in the three international studies.The CORRECT trial that compared regorafenib with a non-therapeutic placebo and the CONSIGN trial of regorafenib alone showed that treatment with regorafenib prolonged life and was well tolerated in patients with metastatic bowel cancer who had previously received or were not suitable to receive other treatments. The CORRELATE study showed that in the real world (i.e., outside of a controlled clinical trial), patients are sometimes prescribed regorafenib at lower starting doses than the recommended dose, without an apparent overall effect on how well regorafenib works or side effects. In the future, it will be important to continue researching how doctors prescribe regorafenib in daily clinical practice in Spain.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (gNENs) display peculiar site-specific features among all NENs. Their incidence and prevalence have been rising in the past few decades. gNENs comprise gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (gNECs) and gastric neuroendocrine tumours (gNETs), the latter further classified into three types. Type I anatype II gNETs are gastrin-dependent and develop in chronic atrophic gastritis and as part of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome within a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1), respectively. Type III or sporadic gNETs develop in the absence of hypergastrinaemia and in the context of a near-normal or inflamed gastric mucosa. gNECs can also develop in the context of variable atrophic, relatively normal or inflamed gastric mucosa. Each gNEN type has different clinical characteristics and requires a different multidisciplinary approach in expert dedicated centres. Type I gNETs are managed mainly by endoscopy or surgery, whereas the treatment of type II gNETs largely depends on the management of the concomitant MEN1. Type III gNETs may require both locoregional approaches and systemic treatments; NECs are often metastatic and therefore require systemic treatment. Specific data regarding the systemic treatment of gNENs are lacking and are derived from the treatment of intestinal NETs and NECs. An enhanced understanding of molecular and clinical pathophysiology is needed to improve the management and outcomes of patients' gNETs.

Nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine and FOLFOX in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sequential nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine followed by modified FOLFOX-6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) (nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX) showed a good safety and clinical profile in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) in the phase I SEQUENCE trial. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX was compared with standard nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/Gem) as first-line treatment in a multi-institutional, randomized, open-label, phase II trial in patients with untreated mPDAC. We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by mFOLFOX on day 29 of a 6-week cycle (experimental group) or nab-P/Gem on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (control group). The primary end point was the 12-month overall survival rate. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were randomly assigned: 78 to nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 79 to nab-P/Gem. Patients receiving nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX had a 12-month overall survival of 55.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2 to 66.5) versus 35.4% (95% CI, 24.9 to 46) in the control group (P=0.02). Similarly, the 24-month survival was 22.4% (95% CI, 13 to 31.8) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX versus 7.6% (95% CI, 1.8 to 13.4) with control treatment. The median overall survival was 13.2 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 16.2) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX and 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 12) with nab-P/Gem (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.95). The safety profile showed a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia (35 of 76 vs. 19 of 79 patients, P=0.004), grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia (18 of 78 vs. 6 of 79 patients, P=0.007), and two treatment-related deaths (2.6%) with nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX compared with none with control treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential nab-P/Gem-mFOLFOX showed a significantly higher 12-month survival when compared with the standard nab-P/Gem treatment; this came with greater treatment toxicity. (Funded by Celgene; EuCT number, 2014-005350-19; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02504333.)

Nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with advanced grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of gastroenteropancreatic or unknown origin: The multicenter phase 2 NICE-NEC trial (GETNE-T1913).

The prognosis of patients with advanced high-grade (G3) digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is rather poor. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibition to platinum-based chemotherapy may improve survival. NICE-NEC (NCT03980925) is a single-arm, phase II trial that recruited chemotherapy-naive, unresectable advanced or metastatic G3 NENs of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) or unknown origin. Patients received nivolumab 360 mg intravenously (iv) on day 1, carboplatin AUC 5 iv on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d iv on days 1-3, every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 24 months, disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate (H0 50%, H1 72%, ß 80%, α 5%). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. From 2019 to 2021, 37 patients were enrolled. The most common primary sites were the pancreas (37.8%), stomach (16.2%) and colon (10.8%). Twenty-five patients (67.6%) were poorly differentiated carcinomas (NECs) and/or had a Ki67 index >55%. The ORR was 56.8%. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95%CI: 5.1-9) and median OS 13.9 months (95%CI: 8.3-Not reached), with a 12-month OS rate of 54.1% (95%CI: 40.2-72.8) that did not meet the primary endpoint. However, 37.6% of patients were long-term survivors (>2 years). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. There was one treatment-related death. Nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival in over one-third of chemonaïve patients with G3 GEP-NENs, with a manageable safety profile.

Sequential RAS mutations evaluation in cell-free DNA of patients with tissue RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the PERSEIDA (Cohort 2) study.

PURPOSE: RAS (KRAS/NRAS) mutational status on a tumor biopsy is mandatory to guide the best treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Determining the RAS mutational status by tumor-tissue biopsy is essential in guiding the optimal treatment decision for mCRC. RAS mutations are negative predictive factors for the use of EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis enables minimally invasive monitoring of tumor evolution. METHODS/PATIENTS: PERSEIDA was an observational, prospective study assessing cfDNA RAS, BRAF and EGFR mutations (using Idylla™) in first-line mCRC, RAS wild-type (baseline tumor-tissue biopsy) patients (cohort 2). Plasma samples were collected before first-line treatment, after 20 ± 2 weeks, and at disease progression. RESULTS: 117 patients were included (103 received panitumumab + chemotherapy as first-line treatment). At baseline, 7 (6.8%) patients had RAS mutations, 4 (3.9%) BRAF mutations and no EGFR mutations were detected (cfDNA, panitumumab + chemotherapy subpopulation [panitumumab + Ch]). The baseline RAS mutational status concordance between tissue and liquid biopsies was 94.0% (93.2%, panitumumab + Ch). At 20 weeks, only one patient in the study (included in the panitumumab + Ch) had an emerging cfDNA RAS mutation. No emerging BRAF or EGFR mutations were reported. At disease progression, 6 patients had emergent mutations not present at baseline (RAS conversion rate: 13.3% [6/45]; 15.0% [6/40], panitumumab + Ch). CONCLUSIONS: The concordance rate between liquid and solid biopsies at baseline was very high, as previously reported, while our results suggest a considerable emergence of RAS mutations during disease progression. Thus, the dynamics of the genomic landscape in ctDNA may provide relevant information for the management of mCRC patients.

Real-world study on microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency testing patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain / Estudio en el mundo real sobre patrones de prueba de inestabilidad de microsatélites y deficiencia de reparación de desajustes en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal metastásico en España

Purpose: Clinical practice guidelines recommend that all patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) should be tested for mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H). We aimed to describe the dMMR/MSI-H testing practice in patients with mCRC in Spanish centers.Methods: Multicenter, observational retrospective study that included patients newly diagnosed with mCRC or who progressed to a metastatic stage from early/localized stages. Results: Three hundred patients were included in the study from May 2020 through May 2021, with a median age of 68 years, and two hundred twenty-five (75%) had stage IV disease at initial diagnosis; two hundred eighty-four patients received first-line treatment, and dMMR/MSI-H testing was performed in two hundred fifty-one (84%) patients. The results of the dMMR/MSI-H tests were available in 61 (24%) of 251 patients before the diagnosis of metastatic disease and in 191 (81%) of 236 evaluable patients for this outcome before the initiation of first-line treatment. Among the 244 patients who were tested for dMMR/MSI-H with IHC or PCR, 14 (6%) were MMR deficient. The most frequent type of first-line treatment was the combination of chemotherapy and biological agent, that was received by 71% and 50% of patients with MMR proficient and deficient tumors, respectively, followed by chemotherapy alone, received in over 20% of patients in each subgroup. Only 29% of dMMR/MSI-H tumors received first-line immunotherapy. Conclusion: Our study suggests that a high proportion of patients with mCRC are currently tested for dMMR/MSI-H in tertiary hospitals across Spain. However, there is still room for improvement until universal testing is achieved.(AU)

SEOM-GETNE clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and bronchial neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) (2022)

'Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous family of tumors of challenging diagnosis and clinical management. Their incidence and prevalence continue to rise mainly due to an improvement on diagnostic techniques and awareness. Earlier detection, along with steadfast improvements in therapy, has led to better prognosis over time for advanced gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of this guideline is to update evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic and lung NENs. Diagnostic procedures, histological classification, and therapeutic options, including surgery, liver-directed therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and systemic hormonal, cytotoxic or targeted therapy, are reviewed and discussed, and treatment algorithms to guide therapeutic decisions are provided (AU)

Actualización de la recomendación para la determinación de biomarcadores en el carcinoma colorrectal. Consenso Nacional de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica y de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica / Update of the recommendations for the determination of biomarkers in colorectal carcinoma. National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology

En esta actualización del consenso de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) y la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica (SEAP) se revisan los avances producidos en el análisis de biomarcadores en cáncer colorrectal (CCR) avanzado, así como en los marcadores de susceptibilidad del CCR hereditario y los biomarcadores moleculares del CCR localizado. También se evalúan la información publicada recientemente sobre la determinación imprescindible de las mutaciones de KRAS, NRAS y BRAF y la conveniencia de determinar la amplificación del receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico 2 (HER2), la expresión de las proteínas de la vía reparadora de ADN y el estudio de las fusiones de NTRK. Desde el punto de vista anatomopatológico, se revisa la importancia de analizar la presencia de células tumorales aisladas o en pequeños grupos de menos de 5 en el frente invasivo tumoral del CCR y su valor pronóstico en el CCR. También se revisa la incorporación de tecnologías pangenómicas, como la secuenciación de nueva generación (next-generation sequencing [NGS]) y la biopsia líquida, en el manejo clínico del paciente con CCR. Todos estos aspectos se desarrollan en la presente guía que, como la anterior, permanecerá abierta a cualquier revisión necesaria en el futuro

This update of the consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica - SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica - SEAP), reviews the advances in the analysis of biomarkers in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as susceptibility markers of hereditary CRC and molecular biomarkers of localized CRC. Recently published information on the essential determination of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF mutations and the possible benefits of determining the amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), the expression of proteins in the DNA repair pathway and the study of NTRK fusions are also evaluated. From a pathological point of view, the importance of analysing the tumour budding and poorly differentiated clusters and its prognostic value in CRC is reviewed, as well as the impact of molecular lymph node analysis on lymph node staging in CRC. The incorporation of pan-genomic technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and liquid biopsy in the clinical management of patients with CRC is also outlined. All these aspects are developed in this guide which, like the previous one, will be revised when necessary in the future

Actualización de la recomendación para la determinación de biomarcadores en el carcinoma colorrectal. Consenso Nacional de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica / Updated guidelines for biomarker testing in colorectal carcinoma. A National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

La publicación de este documento de consenso es una iniciativa conjunta de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica, quienes proponen revisar y actualizar las recomendaciones diagnósticas y terapéuticas publicadas hace 2 años para el manejo del paciente con carcinoma colorrectal y el uso de biomarcadores. Por tanto, supone una oportunidad para mejorar la eficiencia de la actividad asistencial y la utilización de recursos en estos pacientes. Este grupo de expertos recomienda determinar el estado de KRAS y NRAS en todos los pacientes con carcinoma colorrectal metastásico en los que se considere la administración de una terapia antirreceptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico (anti-EGFR), debido a que este tipo de tratamiento solo debe utilizarse en pacientes que no tengan mutaciones en estos genes. En cambio, la determinación del estado mutacional de BRAF, EGFR, PI3K y PTEN no es necesaria para la toma de decisiones terapéuticas y, por tanto, no es necesario realizarlas de forma rutinaria (AU)

The publication of this consensus statement is a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), which aims to revise and update the diagnostic and treatment recommendations published two years ago on biomarker use and the management of patients with colorectal carcinoma, with the intention of improving healthcare efficiency and use of resources. This group of experts recommends testing for KRAS and NRAS status in all patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma being considered for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy, as this type of treatment should only be used in patients not harbouring mutations in these genes. In contrast, testing for BRAF, EGFR, PI3K and PTEN mutation status is not necessary for therapeutic decision-making and therefore does not need to be done routinely (AU)

Recomendaciones para la determinación de biomarcadores en tumores endocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos. Consenso nacional de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica / Guidelines for biomarker testing in gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumours. A national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

La incidencia de los tumores neuroendocrinos en la población caucásica oscila entre 2,5 y 5 casos nuevos anuales por cada 100.000 habitantes. Los tumores neuroendocrinos gastroenteropancreáticos difieren considerablemente entre sí, tanto en su composición hormonal, como en los síndromes que producen, así como en su comportamiento biológico. Esta notable complejidad y heterogeneidad clínica, junto con su conocida dificultad para predecir su comportamiento a partir de características patológicas, han quedado reflejadas en las múltiples clasificaciones que se han realizado a lo largo del tiempo. En este artículo se revisan los principales biomarcadores tisulares y clínicos, y se ofrecen recomendaciones para su uso en la práctica médica. El documento obedece a un consenso fruto de la colaboración entre la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) y la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica (SEAP) (AU)

The annual incidence of neuroendocrine tumours in the Caucasian population ran- ges from 2.5 to 5 new cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours vary considerably in their hormonal composition, the syndromes they cause and their biological behaviour. This high complexity and clinical heterogeneity, together with the well- known difficulty of predicting their behaviour from their pathological features, are reflected in the many classifications that have been formulated over the years. This article reviews the main tissue and clinical biomarkers and makes recommendations for their use in medical prac- tice. This document represents a consensus reached jointly by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) (AU)

Recomendación para la determinación de biomarcadores en el carcinoma colorrectal. Consenso Nacional de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica / Guidelines for biomarker testing in advanced colorectal carcinoma. A National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Este documento de consenso nace como una iniciativa conjunta de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica (SEAP) y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) y propone recomendaciones diagnósticas y terapéuticas para el manejo del paciente con cáncer colorrectal (CCR) hereditario, localizado y avanzado basadas en la evidencia científica que existe en la actualidad sobre el uso de biomarcadores. Por tanto, este documento supone una oportunidad para mejorar la eficiencia de la actividad asistencial y la utilización de recursos, lo que redundará en un beneficio para estos pacientes. Con los datos disponibles en la actualidad, este grupo de expertos recomienda que en los pacientes con CCR localizado se determine la inestabilidad de microsatélites, ya que es un factor predictivo relevante para decidir el tratamiento adyuvante. Sin embargo, aunque las firmas de expresión genética ColoPrint® y Oncotype Dx® han demostrado tener valor pronóstico, no existe todavía consenso sobre su uso en la práctica clínica. En cuanto al CCR avanzado, la determinación del estado mutacional de KRAS es indispensable antes de administrar un tratamiento con anti-receptor del factor de crecimiento epidérmico (EGFR), como cetuximab y panitumumab. Sin embargo, la determinación de otros biomarcadores, como las mutaciones de BRAF, EGFR, PI3K y PTEN, no debe llevarse a cabo de forma rutinaria, ya que hoy por hoy no influye en la planificación del tratamiento. Otros aspectos importantes que incluye son los requisitos organizativos y los controles de calidad que deben existir para la adecuada determinación de estos biomarcadores, así como las implicaciones legales que se deben tener en cuenta(AU)

This consensus is a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). Based on scientific evidence of the use of biomarkers, it recommends diagnostic and treatment guidelines for the management of patients with hereditary, localised and advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The aim of the consensus is to improve healthcare and the use of resources, which will result in increased patient benefit. Taking into consideration data currently available, the group of experts recommends testing for microsatellite instability in patients with localised CRC, as this is a strong predictive factor useful in deciding the choice of adjuvant treatment. However, although the ColoPrint® and Oncotype Dx® gene expression signatures have been shown to have prognostic value, no consensus yet exists as to their clinical use. For advanced CRC, it is essential to test for KRAS mutation status before administering an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) treatment, such as cetuximab or panitumumab. However, at present, testing for other biomarkers, such as BRAF, EGFR, PI3K and PTEN mutations, is not indicated as a routine procedure as it does not influence choice of treatment. Other important issues addressed include organisational requirements, necessary quality controls for the correct testing of these biomarkers as well as the pertinent legal implications(AU)