Cytokines in New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus Predict Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate inflammation using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum cytokines/chemokines in patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) to better understand the pathophysiology of NORSE and its consequences. METHODS: Patients with NORSE (n = 61, including n = 51 cryptogenic), including its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), were compared with patients with other refractory status epilepticus (RSE; n = 37), and control patients without SE (n = 52). We measured 12 cytokines/chemokines in serum or CSF samples using multiplexed fluorescent bead-based immunoassay detection. Cytokine levels were compared between patients with and without SE, and between the 51 patients with cryptogenic NORSE (cNORSE) and the 47 patients with a known-etiology RSE (NORSE n = 10, other RSE n = 37), and correlated with outcomes. RESULTS: A significant increase of IL-6, TNF-α, CXCL8/IL-8, CCL2, MIP-1α, and IL-12p70 pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines was observed in patients with SE compared with patients without SE, in serum and CSF. Serum innate immunity pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines (CXCL8, CCL2, and MIP-1α) were significantly higher in patients with cNORSE compared to non-cryptogenic RSE. Patients with NORSE with elevated innate immunity serum and CSF cytokine/chemokine levels had worse outcomes at discharge and at several months after the SE ended. INTERPRETATION: We identified significant differences in innate immunity serum and CSF cytokine/chemokine profiles between patients with cNORSE and non-cryptogenic RSE. The elevation of innate immunity pro-inflammatory cytokines in patients with NORSE correlated with worse short- and long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the involvement of innate immunity-related inflammation, including peripherally, and possibly of neutrophil-related immunity in cNORSE pathogenesis and suggest the importance of utilizing specific anti-inflammatory interventions. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:75-90.

Clinical outcomes among initial survivors of cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepsy (NORSE).

OBJECTIVE: New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare but severe clinical syndrome. Despite rigorous evaluation, the underlying cause is unknown in 30%-50% of patients and treatment strategies are largely empirical. The aim of this study was to describe clinical outcomes in a cohort of well-phenotyped, thoroughly investigated patients who survived the initial phase of cryptogenic NORSE managed in specialist centers. METHODS: Well-characterized cases of cryptogenic NORSE were identified through the EPIGEN and Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortia (CCEMRC) during the period 2005-2019. Treating epileptologists reported on post-NORSE survival rates and sequelae in patients after discharge from hospital. Among survivors >6 months post-discharge, we report the rates and severity of active epilepsy, global disability, vocational, and global cognitive and mental health outcomes. We attempt to identify determinants of outcome. RESULTS: Among 48 patients who survived the acute phase of NORSE to the point of discharge from hospital, 9 had died at last follow-up, of whom 7 died within 6 months of discharge from the tertiary care center. The remaining 39 patients had high rates of active epilepsy as well as vocational, cognitive, and psychiatric comorbidities. The epilepsy was usually multifocal and typically drug resistant. Only a minority of patients had a good functional outcome. Therapeutic interventions were heterogenous during the acute phase of the illness. There was no clear relationship between the nature of treatment and clinical outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: Among survivors of cryptogenic NORSE, longer-term outcomes in most patients were life altering and often catastrophic. Treatment remains empirical and variable. There is a pressing need to understand the etiology of cryptogenic NORSE and to develop tailored treatment strategies.

Trends in management of patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) from 2016 to 2023: An interim analysis.

In response to the evolving treatment landscape for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second-line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second-line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second-line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.9)-particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3-21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5-20.1)-than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second-line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

Comparative analysis of patients with new onset refractory status epilepticus preceded by fever (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome) versus without prior fever: An interim analysis.

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non-FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non-FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non-infection-related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.

Prognostic value of early electrographic biomarkers of epileptogenesis in high-risk ischaemic stroke patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is frequent. Better prediction of PSE would enable individualized management and improve trial design for epilepsy prevention. The aim was to assess the complementary value of continuous electroencephalography (EEG) data during the acute phase compared with clinical risk factors currently used to predict PSE. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 81 patients with ischaemic stroke who received early continuous EEG monitoring was studied to assess the association of early EEG seizures, other highly epileptogenic rhythmic and periodic patterns, and regional attenuation without delta (RAWOD, an EEG pattern of stroke severity) with PSE. Clinical risk factors were investigated using the SeLECT (stroke severity; large-artery atherosclerosis; early clinical seizures; cortical involvement; territory of middle cerebral artery) scores. RESULTS: Twelve (15%) patients developed PSE. The presence of any of the investigated patterns was associated with a risk of epilepsy of 46%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 78%. The association remained significant after adjusting for the SeLECT score (odds ratio 18.8, interquartile range 3.8-72.7). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that highly epileptogenic rhythmic and periodic patterns and RAWOD were associated with the development of PSE and complemented clinical risk factors. These findings indicate that continuous EEG provides useful information to determine patients at higher risk of developing PSE and could help individualize care.

Combined depth and scalp electroencephalographic monitoring in acute brain injury: Yield and prognostic value.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Depth electroencephalography (dEEG) is an emerging neuromonitoring technology in acute brain injury (ABI). We aimed to explore the concordances between electrophysiological activities on dEEG and on scalp EEG (scEEG) in ABI patients. METHODS: Consecutive ABI patients who received dEEG monitoring between 2018 and 2022 were included. Background, sporadic epileptiform discharges, rhythmic and periodic patterns (RPPs), electrographic seizures, brief potentially ictal rhythmic discharges, ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) patterns, and hourly RPP burden on dEEG and scEEG were compared. RESULTS: Sixty-one ABI patients with a median dEEG monitoring duration of 114 h were included. dEEG significantly showed less continuous background (75% vs. 90%, p = 0.03), higher background amplitude (p < 0.001), more frequent rhythmic spike-and-waves (16% vs. 3%, p = 0.03), more IIC patterns (39% vs. 21%, p = 0.03), and greater hourly RPP burden (2430 vs. 1090 s/h, p = 0.01), when compared to scEEG. Among five patients with seizures on scEEG, one patient had concomitant seizures on dEEG, one had periodic discharges (not concomitant) on dEEG, and three had no RPPs on dEEG. Features and temporal occurrence of electrophysiological activities observed on dEEG and scEEG are not strongly associated. Patients with seizures and IIC patterns on dEEG seemed to have a higher rate of poor outcomes at discharge than patients without these patterns on dEEG (42% vs. 25%, p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: dEEG can detect abnormal electrophysiological activities that may not be seen on scEEG and can be used as a complement in the neuromonitoring of ABI patients.

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European academy of neurology registry on adult refractory status epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE).

BACKGROUND: Status Epilepticus (SE) is a common neurological emergency associated with a high rate of functional decline and mortality. Large randomized trials have addressed the early phases of treatment for convulsive SE. However, evidence regarding third-line anesthetic treatment and the treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is scarce. One trial addressing management of refractory SE with deep general anesthesia was terminated early due to insufficient recruitment. Multicenter prospective registries, including the Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus (SENSE), have shed some light on these questions, but many answers are still lacking, such as the influence exerted by distinct EEG patterns in NCSE on the outcome. We therefore initiated a new prospective multicenter observational registry to collect clinical and EEG data that combined may further help in clinical decision-making and defining SE. METHODS: Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European Academy of Neurology Registry on refractory Status Epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE) is a prospective, multicenter registry for patients treated for SE. The primary objectives are to document patient and SE characteristics, treatment modalities, EEG, neuroimaging data, and outcome of consecutive adults admitted for SE treatment in each of the participating centers and to identify factors associated with outcome and refractoriness. To reach sufficient statistical power for multivariate analysis, a cohort size of 3000 patients is targeted. DISCUSSION: The data collected for the registry will provide both valuable EEG data and information about specific treatment steps in different patient groups with SE. Eventually, the data will support clinical decision-making and may further guide the planning of clinical trials. Finally, it could help to redefine NCSE and its management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT number: NCT05839418.

The impact of perfusion computed tomography on the diagnosis and outcome of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a preventable cause of poor neurological outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Advances in radiological methods, such as cerebral perfusion computed tomography (CTP), could help diagnose DCI earlier and potentially improve outcomes in aSAH. The objective of this study was to assess whether the use of CTP to diagnose DCI early could reduce the risk of infarction related to DCI. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients in the intensive care unit of Erasme Hospital (Brussels, Belgium) between 2004 and 2021 with aSAH who developed DCI. Patients were classified as: "group 1" - DCI diagnosed based on clinical deterioration or "group 2" - DCI diagnosed using CTP. The primary outcome was the development of infarction unrelated to the initial bleeding or surgery. RESULTS: 211 aSAH patients were diagnosed with DCI during the study period: 139 (66%) in group 1 and 72 (34%) in group 2. In group 1, 109 (78%) patients developed a cerebral infarction, compared to 45 (63%) in group 2 (p = 0.02). The adjusted cumulative incidence of DCI over time was lower in group 2 than in group 1 [hazard ratio 0.65 (95% CI 0.48-0.94); p = 0.02]. The use of CTP to diagnose DCI was not independently associated with mortality or neurological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CTP to diagnose DCI might help reduce the risk of developing cerebral infarction after aSAH, although the impact of such an approach on patient outcomes needs to be further demonstrated.

Estimated Cerebral Perfusion Pressure and Intracranial Pressure in Septic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-associated brain dysfunction (SABD) is frequent and is associated with poor outcome. Changes in brain hemodynamics remain poorly described in this setting. The aim of this study was to investigate the alterations of cerebral perfusion pressure and intracranial pressure in a cohort of septic patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in septic adults admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU). We included patients in whom transcranial Doppler recording performed within 48 h from diagnosis of sepsis was available. Exclusion criteria were intracranial disease, known vascular stenosis, cardiac arrhythmias, pacemaker, mechanical cardiac support, severe hypotension, and severe hypocapnia or hypercapnia. SABD was clinically diagnosed by the attending physician, anytime during the ICU stay. Estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (eCPP) and estimated intracranial pressure (eICP) were calculated from the blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery and invasive arterial pressure using a previously validated formula. Normal eCPP was defined as eCPP ≥ 60 mm Hg, low eCPP was defined as eCPP < 60 mm Hg; normal eICP was defined as eICP ≤ 20 mm Hg, and high eICP was defined as eICP > 20 mm Hg. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were included in the final analysis (71% male, median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 64 [52-71] years, median [IQR] Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission was 21 [15-28]). Sixty-nine (49%) patients developed SABD during the ICU stay, and 38 (29%) were dead at hospital discharge. Transcranial Doppler recording lasted 9 (IQR 7-12) min. Median (IQR) eCPP was 63 (58-71) mm Hg in the cohort; 44 of 132 (33%) patients had low eCPP. Median (IQR) eICP was 8 (4-13) mm Hg; five (4%) patients had high eICP. SABD occurrence and in-hospital mortality did not differ between patients with normal eCPP and patients with low eCPP or between patients with normal eICP and patients with high eICP. Eighty-six (65%) patients had normal eCPP and normal eICP, 41 (31%) patients had low eCPP and normal eICP, three (2%) patients had low eCPP and high eICP, and two (2%) patients had normal eCPP and high eICP; however, SABD occurrence and in-hospital mortality were not significantly different among these subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Brain hemodynamics, in particular CPP, were altered in one third of critically ill septic patients at a steady state of monitoring performed early during the course of sepsis. However, these alterations were equally common in patients who developed or did not develop SABD during the ICU stay and in patients with favorable or unfavorable outcome.

Delayed Deterioration of Electroencephalogram in Patients with Cardiac Arrest: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of delayed deterioration of electroencephalogram (EEG) in patients with cardiac arrest (CA) without early highly malignant patterns and to determine their associations with clinical findings. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients with CA admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. We included all patients with CA who had a normal voltage EEG, no more than 10% discontinuity, and absence of sporadic epileptic discharges, periodic discharges, or electrographic seizures. Delayed deterioration was classified as the following: (1) epileptic deterioration, defined as the appearance, at least 24 h after CA, of sporadic epileptic discharges, periodic discharges, and status epilepticus; or (2) background deterioration, defined as increasing discontinuity or progressive attenuation of the background at least 24 h after CA. The end points were the incidence of EEG deteriorations and their association with clinical features and ICU mortality. RESULTS: We enrolled 188 patients in the analysis. The ICU mortality was 46%. Overall, 30 (16%) patients presented with epileptic deterioration and 9 (5%) patients presented with background deterioration; of those, two patients presented both deteriorations. Patients with epileptic deterioration more frequently had an out-of-hospital CA, and higher time to return of spontaneous circulation and less frequently had bystander resuscitation than others. Patients with background deterioration showed a predominantly noncardiac cause, more frequently developed shock, and had multiple organ failure compared with others. Patients with epileptic deterioration presented with a higher ICU mortality (77% vs. 41%; p < 0.01) than others, whereas all patients with background deterioration died in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed EEG deterioration was associated with high mortality rate. Epileptic deterioration was associated with worse characteristics of CA, whereas background deterioration was associated with shock and multiple organ failure.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The concept and understanding of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), and its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) have evolved in the recent past. This review aims to summarize the recent developments in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of these challenging conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: NORSE and FIRES can have many different causes. Although the list of possible causes is still growing, they mostly fall in the categories of autoimmune encephalitis and genetic disorders. However, despite extensive investigations, most cases of NORSE and FIRES remain cryptogenic. Recent studies have pointed towards the key role of autoinflammation as a unifying pathophysiological mechanism in these cases. These findings also support the use of immunomodulatory treatment in this setting. Consensus recommendations on the management of NORSE and FIRES have recently been published. SUMMARY: NORSE and FIRES remain challenging conditions to diagnose and treat. Recent findings from clinical and basic research and new recommendations, reviewed in this article, contribute to an emerging framework for management and future research.

The International Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium Electroencephalography Database.

OBJECTIVES: To develop the International Cardiac Arrest Research (I-CARE), a harmonized multicenter clinical and electroencephalography database for acute hypoxic-ischemic brain injury research involving patients with cardiac arrest. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort, partly prospective and partly retrospective. SETTING: Seven academic or teaching hospitals from the United States and Europe. PATIENTS: Individuals 16 years old or older who were comatose after return of spontaneous circulation following a cardiac arrest who had continuous electroencephalography monitoring were included. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical and electroencephalography data were harmonized and stored in a common Waveform Database-compatible format. Automated spike frequency, background continuity, and artifact detection on electroencephalography were calculated with 10-second resolution and summarized hourly. Neurologic outcome was determined at 3-6 months using the best Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale. This database includes clinical data and 56,676 hours (3.9 terabytes) of continuous electroencephalography data for 1,020 patients. Most patients died ( n = 603, 59%), 48 (5%) had severe neurologic disability (CPC 3 or 4), and 369 (36%) had good functional recovery (CPC 1-2). There is significant variability in mean electroencephalography recording duration depending on the neurologic outcome (range, 53-102 hr for CPC 1 and CPC 4, respectively). Epileptiform activity averaging 1 Hz or more in frequency for at least 1 hour was seen in 258 patients (25%) (19% for CPC 1-2 and 29% for CPC 3-5). Burst suppression was observed for at least 1 hour in 207 (56%) and 635 (97%) patients with CPC 1-2 and CPC 3-5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The I-CARE consortium electroencephalography database provides a comprehensive real-world clinical and electroencephalography dataset for neurophysiology research of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. This dataset covers the spectrum of abnormal electroencephalography patterns after cardiac arrest, including epileptiform patterns and those in the ictal-interictal continuum.

Prognostic scores in status epilepticus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The performance of prognostic scores of status epilepticus (SE) has been reported in very heterogeneous cohorts. We aimed to provide a summary of the available evidence on their respective performance. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for relevant articles. Studies were reviewed for eligibility for meta-analysis of the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and for meta-analysis of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in predicting in-hospital mortality with scores in which at least two external evaluations had been published. This study was registered with PROSPERO (international prospective register of systematic reviews) (CRD42022325766). Study quality was assessed using Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). In the meta-analysis of AUC, 21 studies were pooled for STESS (Status Epilepticus Severity Score), five for EMSE-EAC (Epidemiology-based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus - Etiology, Age, level of Consciousness), five for EMSE-EACE (EMSE - Etiology, Age, level of Consciousness, EEG), and two for ENDIT (Encephalitis, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, Diazepam resistance, Imaging abnormalities, Tracheal intubation). The pooled AUC of STESS, EMSE-EAC, EMSE-EACE, and ENDIT was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.78), 0.68 (95% CI 0.63-0.72), 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.81), and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.87), respectively. The pooled sensitivity of STESS-3, STESS-4, EMSE-EACE-64, and ENDIT-4 was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.80-0.86), 0.60 (95% CI: 0.55-0.65), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.83), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.55-0.82), respectively. Their pooled specificity was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.48-0.52), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.72-0.76), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.59-0.67), and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61-0.70), respectively. Their pooled PPV was 0.27 (95% CI: 0.24-0.30), 0.35 (95% CI: 0.29-0.41), 0.33 (95% CI: 0.24-0.43), and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13-0.27). Their pooled NPV was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.96), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89-0.92), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.98), and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98). Variations in performance were observed in patients' subgroups, such as critically ill patients and refractory cases. Investigated scores only have acceptable AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting in-hospital mortality, with the EMSE-EAC having a lower discriminative power. STESS-3 has the highest sensitivity, and STESS-4 the highest specificity, but neither combines acceptable sensitivity and specificity. All these scores had high NPV but very low PPV. Caution should be exercised in their clinical use. Further studies are required to develop more accurate scores.

Diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Defining electroencephalographic and clinical response to diagnostic intravenous antiseizure medication trials.

OBJECTIVE: The Salzburg criteria for nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology 2021 include a diagnostic trial with intravenous (IV) antiseizure medications (ASMs) to assess electroencephalographic (EEG) and clinical response as a diagnostic criterion for definite NCSE and possible NCSE. However, how to perform this diagnostic test and assessing the EEG and clinical responses have not been operationally defined. METHODS: We performed a Delphi process involving six experts to standardize the diagnostic administration of IV ASM and propose operational criteria for EEG and clinical response. RESULTS: Either benzodiazepines (BZDs) or non-BZD ASMs can be used as first choice for a diagnostic IV ASM trial. However, non-BZDs should be considered in patients who already have impaired alertness or are at risk of respiratory depression. Levetiracetam, valproate, lacosamide, brivaracetam, or (if the only feasible drug) fosphenytoin or phenobarbital were deemed appropriate for a diagnostic IV trial. The starting dose should be approximately two thirds to three quarters of the full loading dose recommended for treatment of status epilepticus, with an additional smaller dose if needed. ASMs should be administered during EEG recording under supervision. A monitoring time of at least 15 min is recommended. If there is no response, a second trial with another non-BDZ or BDZs may be considered. A positive EEG response is defined as the resolution of the ictal-interictal continuum pattern for at least three times the longest previously observed spontaneous interval of resolution (if any), but minimum of one continuous minute. For a clinical response, physicians should use a standardized examination before and after IV ASM administration. We suggest a definite time-locked improvement in a focal deficit or at least one-step improvement on a new dedicated one-domain 10-level NCSE response scale. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed standardized approach of a diagnostic IV ASM trial further refines the ACNS and Salzburg diagnostic criteria for NCSE.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in refractory insular epilepsy.

Due to heterogenous seizure semiology and poor contribution of scalp electroencephalography (EEG) signals, insular epilepsy requires use of the appropriate diagnostic tools for its diagnosis and characterization. The deep location of the insula also presents surgical challenges. The aim of this article is to review the current diagnostic and therapeutic tools and their contribution to the management of insular epilepsy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), isotopic imaging, neurophysiological imaging, and genetic testing should be used and interpretated with caution. Isotopic imaging and scalp EEG have demonstrated a lower value in epilepsy from insular compared to temporal origin, which increases the interest of functional MRI and magnetoencephalography. Intracranial recording with stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is often required. The insular cortex, being highly connected and deeply located under highly functional areas, is difficult to reach, and its ablative surgery raises functional issues. Tailored resection based on SEEG or alternative curative treatments, such as radiofrequency thermocoagulation, laser interstitial thermal therapy, or stereotactic radiosurgery, have produced encouraging results. The management of insular epilepsy has benefited from major advances in the last years. Perspectives for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures will contribute to better management of this complex form of epilepsy.

The seasonality of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE).

The etiology of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as FIRES (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome), remains uncertain. Several arguments suggest that NORSE is a disorder of immunity, likely post-infectious. Consequently, seasonal occurrence might be anticipated. Herein we investigated if seasonality is a notable factor regarding NORSE presentation. We combined four different data sets with a total of 342 cases, all from the northern hemisphere, and 62% adults. The incidence of NORSE cases differed between seasons (p = .0068) and was highest in the summer (32.2%) (p = .0022) and lowest in the spring (19.0%, p = .010). Although both FIRES and non-FIRES cases occurred most commonly during the summer, there was a trend toward FIRES cases being more likely to occur in the winter than non-FIRES cases (OR 1.62, p = .071). The seasonality of NORSE cases differed according to the etiology (p = .024). NORSE cases eventually associated with autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis occurred most frequently in the summer (p = .032) and least frequently in the winter (p = .047), whereas there was no seasonality for cryptogenic cases. This study suggests that NORSE overall and NORSE related to autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis are more common in the summer, but that there is no definite seasonality in cryptogenic cases.

Review and standard operating procedures for collection of biospecimens and analysis of biomarkers in new onset refractory status epilepticus.

New onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with a preceding febrile illness known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), is one of the most severe forms of status epilepticus. The exact causes of NORSE are currently unknown, and there is so far no disease-specific therapy. Identifying the underlying pathophysiology and discovering specific biomarkers, whether immunologic, infectious, genetic, or other, may help physicians in the management of patients with NORSE. A broad spectrum of biomarkers has been proposed for status epilepticus patients, some of which were evaluated for patients with NORSE. Nonetheless, none has been validated, due to significant variabilities in study cohorts, collected biospecimens, applied analytical methods, and defined outcome endpoints, and to small sample sizes. The NORSE Institute established an open NORSE/FIRES biorepository for health-related data and biological samples allowing the collection of biospecimens worldwide, promoting multicenter research and sharing of data and specimens. Here, we suggest standard operating procedures for biospecimen collection and biobanking in this rare condition. We also propose criteria for the appropriate use of previously collected biospecimens. We predict that the widespread use of standardized procedures will reduce heterogeneity, facilitate the future identification of validated biomarkers for NORSE, and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology and best clinical management for these patients.

Severity scores for status epilepticus in the ICU: systemic illness also matters.

BACKGROUND: Current prognostic scores for status epilepticus (SE) may not be adequate for patients in ICU who usually have more severe systemic conditions or more refractory episodes of SE. We aimed to compare the prognostic performance of two SE scores, Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE) score, with four systemic severity scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 (APACHE-2), Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS-2), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Inflammation, Nutrition, Consciousness, Neurologic function and Systemic condition (INCNS) score in critically ill patients with SE. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of a prospectively identified SE cohort was conducted in the ICU at a tertiary-care center. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and associations with outcomes of STESS, EMSE, INCNS, APACHE-2, SAPS-2, and SOFA score for the prediction of in-hospital mortality and no return to baseline condition were assessed. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and December 2020, 166 patients with SE in ICU were included in the study. In predicting in-hospital death, APACHE-2 (0.72), SAPS-2 (0.73), and SOFA score (0.71) had higher AUCs than STESS (0.58) and EMSE (0.69). In predicting no return to baseline condition, the AUC of APACHE-2 (0.75) was the highest, and the AUC of INCNS (0.55) was the lowest. When the specificity approached 90%, the sensitivity values of these scores were not quite acceptable (< 40%). Neither SE scores nor systemic severity scores had desirable prognostic power. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, the best combinations of scores always included at least one or more systemic severity scores. CONCLUSIONS: STESS and EMSE were insufficient in outcome prediction for SE patients in ICU, and EMSE was marginally better than STESS. Systemic illness matters in ICU patients with SE, and SE scores should be modified to achieve better accuracy in this severely ill population. This study mostly refers to severely ill patients in the ICU.

The association between the presence and burden of periodic discharges and outcome in septic patients: an observational prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is frequent in septic patients. Electroencephalography (EEG) is very sensitive to detect early epileptic abnormalities, such as seizures and periodic discharges (PDs), and to quantify their duration (the so-called burden). However, the prevalence of these EEG abnormalities in septic patients, as well as their effect on morbidity and mortality, are still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess whether the presence of electrographic abnormalities (i.e. the absence of reactivity, the presence and burden of seizures and PDs) was associated with functional outcome and mortality in septic patients and whether these abnormalities were associated with sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE). METHODS: We prospectively included septic patients, without known chronic or acute intracranial disease or pre-existing acute encephalopathy, requiring ICU admission in a tertiary academic centre. Continuous EEG monitoring was started within 72 h after inclusion and performed for up to 7 days. A comprehensive assessment of consciousness and delirium was performed twice daily by a trained neuropsychologist. Primary endpoints were unfavourable functional outcome (UO, defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended-GOSE-score < 5), and mortality collected at hospital discharge and secondary endpoint was the association of PDs with SAE. Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact and χ2 tests were used to assess differences in variables between groups, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with in-hospital mortality, functional outcome, SAE or PDs as the dependent variables were performed. RESULTS: We included 92 patients. No seizures were identified. Nearly 25% of patients had PDs. The presence of PDs and PDs burden was associated with UO in univariate (n = 15 [41%], p = 0.005 and p = 0.008, respectively) and, for PDs presence, also in multivariate analysis after correcting for disease severity (OR 3.82, IC 95% [1.27-11.49], p = 0.02). The PDs burden negatively correlated with GOSE (Spearman's coefficient ρ = - 0.2, p = 0.047). The presence of PDs was also independently associated with SAE (OR 8.98 [1.11-72.8], p = 0.04). Reactivity was observed in the majority of patients and was associated with outcomes (p = 0.044 for both functional outcome and mortality). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that PDs and PDs burden are associated with SAE and might affect outcome in septic patients.

Hypertonic sodium lactate infusion reduces vasopressor requirements and biomarkers of brain and cardiac injury after experimental cardiac arrest.

INTRODUCTION: Prognosis after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA) remains poor, with high morbidity and mortality as a result of extensive cardiac and brain injury and lack of effective treatments. Hypertonic sodium lactate (HSL) may be beneficial after CA by buffering severe metabolic acidosis, increasing brain perfusion and cardiac performance, reducing cerebral swelling, and serving as an alternative energetic cellular substrate. The aim of this study was to test the effects of HSL infusion on brain and cardiac injury in an experimental model of CA. METHODS: After a 10-min electrically induced CA followed by 5 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation maneuvers, adult swine (n = 35) were randomly assigned to receive either balanced crystalloid (controls, n = 11) or HSL infusion started during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, Intra-arrest, n = 12) or after return of spontaneous circulation (Post-ROSC, n = 11) for the subsequent 12 h. In all animals, extensive multimodal neurological and cardiovascular monitoring was implemented. All animals were treated with targeted temperature management at 34 °C. RESULTS: Thirty-four of the 35 (97.1%) animals achieved ROSC; one animal in the Intra-arrest group died before completing the observation period. Arterial pH, lactate and sodium concentrations, and plasma osmolarity were higher in HSL-treated animals than in controls (p < 0.001), whereas potassium concentrations were lower (p = 0.004). Intra-arrest and Post-ROSC HSL infusion improved hemodynamic status compared to controls, as shown by reduced vasopressor requirements to maintain a mean arterial pressure target > 65 mmHg (p = 0.005 for interaction; p = 0.01 for groups). Moreover, plasma troponin I and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) concentrations were lower in HSL-treated groups at several time-points than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental CA model, HSL infusion was associated with reduced vasopressor requirements and decreased plasma concentrations of measured biomarkers of cardiac and cerebral injury.