Effect of Replacing Race With Apolipoprotein L1 Genotype in Calculation of Kidney Donor Risk Index.

Renal allografts from deceased African American donors with two apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) renal-risk variants fail sooner than kidneys from donors with fewer variants. The Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) was developed to evaluate organ offers by predicting allograft longevity and includes African American race as a risk factor. Substituting APOL1 genotype for race may refine the KDRI. For 622 deceased African American kidney donors, we applied a 10-fold cross-validation approach to estimate contribution of APOL1 variants to a revised KDRI. Cross-validation was repeated 10 000 times to generate distribution of effect size associated with APOL1 genotype. Average effect size was used to derive the revised KDRI weighting. Mean current-KDRI score for all donors was 1.4930 versus mean revised-KDRI score 1.2518 for 529 donors with no or one variant and 1.8527 for 93 donors with two variants. Original and revised KDRIs had comparable survival prediction errors after transplantation, but the spread in Kidney Donor Profile Index based on presence or absence of two APOL1 variants was 37 percentage points. Replacing donor race with APOL1 genotype in KDRI better defines risk associated with kidneys transplanted from deceased African American donors, substantially improves KDRI score for 85-90% of kidneys offered, and enhances the link between donor quality and recipient need.

AST/ASTS workshop on increasing organ donation in the United States: creating an "arc of change" from removing disincentives to testing incentives.

The American Society of Transplantation (AST) and American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) convened a workshop on June 2-3, 2014, to explore increasing both living and deceased organ donation in the United States. Recent articles in the lay press on illegal organ sales and transplant tourism highlight the impact of the current black market in kidneys that accompanies the growing global organ shortage. We believe it important not to conflate the illegal market for organs, which we reject in the strongest possible terms, with the potential in the United States for concerted action to remove all remaining financial disincentives for donors and critically consider testing the impact and acceptability of incentives to increase organ availability in the United States. However, we do not support any trials of direct payments or valuable considerations to donors or families based on a process of market-assigned values of organs. This White Paper represents a summary by the authors of the deliberations of the Incentives Workshop Group and has been approved by both AST and ASTS Boards.

Apolipoprotein L1 gene variants in deceased organ donors are associated with renal allograft failure.

Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) nephropathy variants in African American deceased kidney donors were associated with shorter renal allograft survival in a prior single-center report. APOL1 G1 and G2 variants were genotyped in newly accrued DNA samples from African American deceased donors of kidneys recovered and/or transplanted in Alabama and North Carolina. APOL1 genotypes and allograft outcomes in subsequent transplants from 55 U.S. centers were linked, adjusting for age, sex and race/ethnicity of recipients, HLA match, cold ischemia time, panel reactive antibody levels, and donor type. For 221 transplantations from kidneys recovered in Alabama, there was a statistical trend toward shorter allograft survival in recipients of two-APOL1-nephropathy-variant kidneys (hazard ratio [HR] 2.71; p = 0.06). For all 675 kidneys transplanted from donors at both centers, APOL1 genotype (HR 2.26; p = 0.001) and African American recipient race/ethnicity (HR 1.60; p = 0.03) were associated with allograft failure. Kidneys from African American deceased donors with two APOL1 nephropathy variants reproducibly associate with higher risk for allograft failure after transplantation. These findings warrant consideration of rapidly genotyping deceased African American kidney donors for APOL1 risk variants at organ recovery and incorporation of results into allocation and informed-consent processes.

Kidneys at higher risk of discard: expanding the role of dual kidney transplantation.

Half of the recovered expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys are discarded in the United States. A new kidney allocation system offers kidneys at higher risk of discard, Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI)>85%, to a wider geographic area to promote broader sharing and expedite utilization. Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) based on the KDPI is a potential option to streamline allocation of kidneys which otherwise would have been discarded. To assess the clinical utility of the KDPI in kidneys at higher risk of discard, we analyzed the OPTN/UNOS Registry that included the deceased donor kidneys recovered between 2002 and 2012. The primary outcomes were allograft survival, patient survival and discard rate based on different KDPI categories (<80%, 80-90% and >90%). Kidneys with KDPI>90% were associated with increased odds of discard (OR=1.99, 95% CI 1.74-2.29) compared to ones with KDPI<80%. DKTs of KDPI>90% were associated with lower overall allograft failure (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.89) and better patient survival (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98) compared to single ECD kidneys with KDPI>90%. Kidneys at higher risk of discard may be offered in the up-front allocation system as a DKT. Further modeling and simulation studies are required to determine a reasonable KDPI cutoff percentile.

Report of a consensus conference on transplant program quality and surveillance.

Public reports of organ transplant program outcomes by the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients have been both groundbreaking and controversial. The reports are used by regulatory agencies, private insurance providers, transplant centers and patients. Failure to adequately adjust outcomes for risk may cause programs to avoid performing transplants involving suitable but high-risk candidates and donors. At a consensus conference of stakeholders held February 13-15, 2012, the participants recommended that program-specific reports be better designed to address the needs of all users. Additional comorbidity variables should be collected, but innovation should also be protected by excluding patients who are in approved protocols from statistical models that identify underperforming centers. The potential benefits of hierarchical and mixed-effects statistical methods should be studied. Transplant centers should be provided with tools to facilitate quality assessment and performance improvement. Additional statistical methods to assess outcomes at small-volume transplant programs should be developed. More data on waiting list risk and outcomes should be provided. Monitoring and reporting of short-term living donor outcomes should be enhanced. Overall, there was broad consensus that substantial improvement in reporting outcomes of transplant programs in the United States could and should be made in a cost-effective manner.

Report of a joint ESOT and AST meeting: highlights in biologic agents and transplantation.

A joint meeting organized by the European (ESOT) and American (AST) Societies of Transplantation occurred in Nice, France, October 1-3, 2010. Focused on emerging use of biologic agents in solid organ transplantation, it served as a venue for state-of-the-art updates in basic immunology and clinical science, with an emphasis on the interrelatedness of the two. This meeting summary is designed to highlight important insights communicated in Nice, offer an overview of novel therapeutics in development, and entice members of all societies to consider attending a second joint symposium, under consideration for 2012.

Inflammation in areas of tubular atrophy in kidney allograft biopsies: a potent predictor of allograft failure.

The Banff scoring schema provides a common ground to analyze kidney transplant biopsies. Interstitial inflammation (i) and tubulitis (t) in areas of viable tissue are features in scoring acute rejection, but are excluded in areas of tubular atrophy (TA). We studied inflammation and tubulitis in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients undergoing allograft biopsy for new-onset late graft dysfunction (N = 337). We found inflammation ('iatr') and tubulitis ('tatr') in regions of fibrosis and atrophy to be strongly correlated with each other (p < 0.0001). Moreover, iatr was strongly associated with death-censored graft failure when compared to recipients whose biopsies had no inflammation, even after adjusting for the presence of interstitial fibrosis (Hazard Ratio = 2.31, [1.10-4.83]; p = 0.0262) or TA (hazard ratio = 2.42, [1.16-5.08]; p = 0.191), serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, time to biopsy and i score. Further, these results did not qualitatively change after additional adjustments for C4d staining or donor specific antibody. Stepwise regression identified the most significant markers of graft failure which include iatr score. We propose that a more global assessment of inflammation in kidney allograft biopsies to include inflammation in atrophic areas may provide better prognostic information. Phenotypic characterization of these inflammatory cells and appropriate treatment may ameliorate late allograft failure.

Fixed- or controlled-dose mycophenolate mofetil with standard- or reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitors: the Opticept trial.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was developed with cyclosporine as a fixed-dose immunosuppressant. More recent data indicate a relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure in individuals and clinical endpoints of rejection and toxicity. This 2-year, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled MMF (MMF(CC)) dosing with a fixed-dose regimen in 720 kidney recipients. Patients received either (A) MMF(CC) and reduced-level calcineurin inhibitor (MMF(CC)/CNI(RL)); (B) MMF(CC) and standard-level CNI (MMF(CC)/CNI(SL)); or (C) fixed-dose MMF and CNI(SL) (MMF(FD)/CNI(SL)). Antibody induction and steroid use were according to center practice. The primary endpoint was noninferiority (alpha= 0.05) of group A versus group C for treatment failure (including biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss and death) at 1 year. Although mean CNI trough levels in group A did not reach the prespecified targets, they were statistically lower than those in groups B and C (p < or = 0.01 for each comparison). BPAR rates (8.5%) were low across groups. Group A had 19% fewer treatment failures (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.18). MMF doses were highest (p < 0.05), with withdrawals for adverse events the fewest (p = 0.02), in group A. Of the 80% of subjects taking tacrolimus (Tac), those with higher MPA exposure had significantly less rejection (p < 0.001) and diarrhea correlated with Tac, but not with MPA levels. Thus, MMF(CC) with low-dose CNI resulted in outcomes not inferior to those with standard CNI exposure and MMF(FD), indicating potential utility of MMF(CC) in CNI-sparing regimens.

Use of cardioprotective medications in kidney transplant recipients.

Death with function causes half of late kidney transplant failures, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common cause of death in these patients. We examined the use of potentially cardioprotective medications in a prospective observational study at seven transplant centers in the United States and Canada. Among 935 patients, 87% received antihypertensive medications at both 1 and 6 months after transplantation. Similar antihypertensive regimens were used for patients with and without diabetes and CVD, but with wide variability among centers. In contrast, while 44% of patients were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) at the time of transplantation, the proportion taking these agents dropped to 12% at month 1, then increased to 24% at 6 months. Fewer than 30% with CVD or diabetes received ACEI/ARB therapy 6 months posttransplant. Aspirin use was uncommon (<40% of patients). Even among those with diabetes and/or CVD, fewer than 60% received aspirin and only half received a statin at 1 and 6 months. This study demonstrates marked variability in the use of cardioprotective medications in kidney transplant recipients, a finding that may reflect, among several possible explanations, clinical uncertainty due the lack of randomized trials for these medications in this population.

Tolerance in renal transplantation after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation-6-year follow-up.

Despite significant advancements in clinical transplantation, very few reports describe the long-term acceptance of transplanted solid organs without indefinite immunosuppression. The immunosuppressive agents used are nonspecific and have serious potential side effects. We present a patient who received a living-donor renal allograft from the same person who had donated bone marrow to her several years earlier. Tolerance was expected based on previous acceptance of full-thickness skin grafts from the donor. Indeed, there has been no evidence of rejection during a 6-year follow-up period, and no induction or maintenance immunosuppression has been given. All noninvasive parameters of graft function remain normal. This and similar reports prove that genetically disparate solid organs can coexist without pharmacological immunosuppression.

Postransplant lymphoproliferative disorder localized near the allograft in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), a complication of immunosuppression, develops in approximately 1% of renal allograft recipients. Typically, PTLD is a proliferation of B-cells associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection; it is said to be most often a systemic disease. Involvement occasionally is localized near the allograft. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all cases of PTLD in recipients of 1474 renal transplants performed at University of Alabama at Birmingham between 1993 and 1997. RESULTS: Of 14 patients developing PTLD, 10 had disease localized near the allograft. The mean interval from transplantation to diagnosis was 221 +/- 70 days. All patients presented with renal dysfunction; an ultrasound examination revealed a hilar mass, with hydronephrosis in five and stenosis of renal vessels in eight. No patient had lymphadenopathy, according to computerized tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging findings. After reduction of immunosuppressive therapy, seven required a nephrectomy because of rejection, progressive dysfunction, or mass enlargement. Tissue recovered in four patients was consistent with PTLD; the tumors in the remaining three patients were unresectable and regressed. One patient died 1 month after a nephrectomy, and another died 4 years after surgery; neither had evidence of PTLD when they died. Three patients retain functional grafts without clinical or radiographical evidence of progression. All patients with disseminated disease died. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of renal allograft recipients, PTLD affected 1%. Disease localized near the allograft was the most common variant. For most patients with localized disease, the outcome was graft loss, and the mortality was low. Localized PTLD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of allograft dysfunction in the 1st posttransplant year.

Pentoxifylline does not prevent the cytokine-induced first dose reaction following OKT3--a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study.

The use of OKT3 as an immunosuppressive agent is accompanied by increased cytokine production and constellation of side effects collectively termed cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Pentoxifylline (PTF) inhibits synthesis of some cytokines, and has been shown to attenuate CRS when administered before OKT3. In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 46 renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive either PTF (800 mg q 8 hr for at least 24 h) p.o. or placebo, along with methylprednisolone (7 mg/kg), diphenhydramine, and acetaminophen, prior to beginning OKT3 as therapy for acute rejection. Patients were observed, and symptoms scored semiquantitatively. Despite the presence of therapeutic PTF levels (721 +/- 726 ng/ml), the frequency and severity of side effects (fever, chills, headache, neurocortical symptoms, dyspnea, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) did not differ between treatment groups. Likewise PTF did not affect renal function or immunologic response to OKT3, with similar graft and patient survival in both groups. Plasma levels of TNF alpha, IFN gamma, IL-6, and IL-8 increased as predicted following OKT3 administration, without significant differences between PTF and placebo groups. In this controlled, multicenter trial, pretreatment with oral PTF was ineffective in attenuating OKT3-related CRS in renal allograft recipients.

Improved survival of primary cadaveric renal allografts in blacks with quadruple immunosuppression.

Black recipients of cadaveric kidneys have been shown to have a lower rate of allograft survival than whites. Data were reviewed from 642 primary cadaveric transplants: results in 276 patients (163 white and 113 black) (group 1) who had received triple therapy (azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1985-87) were compared with those in 366 patients (180 white and 186 black) (group 2) receiving quadruple immunosuppression (MALG-azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1987-90). Blacks in group 2 had better patient (97% vs. 91%, P = 0.03) and graft (77% vs. 55%, P = 0.0002) survival at 1 year than in group 1. There was no difference in these parameters among whites in either group. Racial differences in graft survival noted in group 1 disappeared in group 2. While HLA BDR matching improved in group 2 patients (P = 0.0001), whites received better matched kidneys than blacks in both groups (P = 0.001). HLA matching was associated with improved graft survival only in white recipients of 4 BDR-matched kidneys. In group 1, more blacks than whites had at least one episode of acute rejection (76% vs. 57%, P = 0.001); blacks also lost more grafts to acute and chronic rejection. In group 2, there were no racial differences in the number of rejection episodes or immunologic graft losses. Of 14 potential variables examined by parametric analysis, only quadruple therapy significantly reduced risk of graft loss in blacks. Quadruple immunosuppression improved primary cadaveric renal allograft survival in black recipients, abrogating previously noted racial differences.

The impact of the UNOS mandatory sharing policy on recipients of the black and white races--experience at a single renal transplant center.

The impact of the United Network for Organ Sharing mandatory sharing policy on a large transplant center procuring kidneys primarily from caucasians while serving a pool of prospective recipients composed mainly of blacks is described. This policy requires that all 6-antigen-matched and phenotypically identical donor kidneys be shipped to the appropriately matched recipients. The study consisted of 49 kidneys from 25 cadaveric donors; one kidney was unusable. In general, the 33 recipients of the mandatorily shared kidneys were caucasian (94%), unsensitized (70%), and first-time transplants (73%). Allograft survival for the 24 first-time recipients was 100% (mean graft survival = 11.3 months). Of the 9 regraft kidneys, 2 have failed (mean graft survival = 11.9 months) due to chronic rejection. In comparison, the 16 paired kidneys transplanted into non-6-antigen-matched recipients exhibited a 1-year graft survival of 80% versus 92% for the 33 recipients of mandatorily shared kidneys (P = 0.01). These 16 recipients were composed of more blacks (38%), fewer regrafts (6%), and most were unsensitized (75%). All 25 cadaveric donors were caucasians with very common HLA types. Thus, kidneys provided by the UNOS mandatory sharing policy had excellent allograft survival, and the recipients were largely unsensitized caucasians receiving their first kidney. The low number of blacks receiving allografts under this policy may be due to two factors. First, the histocompatibility differences between black recipients and the primarily caucasian cadaveric donor pool limit the number of kidneys available to blacks. Secondly, blacks do not have access to the best-matched kidneys, in part due to few black donors, their best source for well-matched kidneys. Thus, the mandatory sharing program is of clear benefit to the recipients of these well-matched kidneys; however, for a local program servicing a waiting list composed of 64% blacks the policy has been of limited value. In contrast, over 50% of local cadaveric transplants are into black recipients in a waiting time of 197 days, one third the national average for blacks. In conclusion, this study supports efforts to improve graft survival through matching but emphasizes the need to broaden our efforts in all areas of research and organ procurement to serve the entire recipient population, regardless of race.

Renal retransplantation: the role of race, quadruple immunosuppression, and the flow cytometry cross-match.

To assess the impact of quadruple immunosuppression in black and white recipients of cadaver kidney retransplants, we reviewed data from 178 second or subsequent renal allografts performed at our center between 1985 and 1991. Sixty-six black and 102 white recipients were divided into 3 groups: groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients with a negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) T cell cross-match, receiving triple drug therapy (CsA-AZA-prednisone) and quadruple immunosuppressive therapy (quad therapy; Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin-CsA-AZA-prednisone), respectively. Group 3 patients also received quad therapy, but, in addition to a negative CDC cross-match, had a negative T cell flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM). Black and white patients in groups 1 and 2 experienced similar graft survival at 1 year, ranging from 47% to 63% (P = NS). In group 3, 1-year graft survival in whites, but not blacks, improved to 82%, with fewer grafts lost to immunologic causes in the first 90 days after transplant. A parametric analysis of potential risk factors identified a significant effect of better HLA-DR matching (P = 0.0005) on improved graft survival, with previous mismatched antigens (P = 0.04), female donor (P = 0.002), and short duration of previous graft (P = 0.05) as risk factors for graft loss. Race and immunosuppressive protocol did not affect graft survival. In group 3, blacks received fewer well-matched kidneys than whites (P = 0.05), which may have contributed to poorer outcomes for black recipients. Nine of 10 patients undergoing retransplantation with a negative CDC cross-match and a positive T cell FCXM suffered graft loss at a median of 26 days after transplant. Thus, quad therapy did not enhance graft survival for either black or white patients undergoing cadaveric retransplantation. Immunologic considerations, including HLA-DR matching and the FCXM, continue to exert a strong influence on outcomes in these high-risk recipients.

Evaluation of living renal donors. The current practice of US transplant centers.

To examine practice patterns regarding how living donors are evaluated and selected in the U.S., a survey was sent to all 231 United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS)-approved transplant centers. Respondents from 75% of centers completed the questionnaire, all of whom utilize living donors for renal transplantation. Although the use of living-unrelated donors is also widely accepted (in 92% of centers), only 31% of responding centers performed such transplants in 1992, indicating a discrepancy between acceptance and actual practice. Morbidity (0.23%) and mortality (0.03%) of kidney donation continue to be low. The long-term risk of renal insufficiency in kidney donors appears to be similar to, or lower than, that in the general population. There is substantial variability in how potential donors are evaluated and what they are told regarding the risk involved in renal donation. There is also variability in exclusion criteria such as the acceptance of older donors (> 55 years old); those with borderline-to-mild hypertension, and those with borderline low glomerular filtration rate. Larger centers tended to be less rigid in their exclusion criteria compared with smaller centers. While our results indicate widespread acceptance and use of living donors, they also highlight the need for future studies to examine the efficacy of tests used in the evaluation process and to determine the long-term risks of renal donation.

Impact of donor/recipient size matching on outcomes in renal transplantation.

Interest in nonimmunologic factors affecting longterm graft survival has focused on adequacy of nephron dosing. Body surface are (BSA) is a reliable surrogate for nephron mass. In a retrospective study of 378 primary recipients of paired kidneys from 189 cadaveric donors, we assessed the impact of matching donor and recipient BSA on outcome over 7 years. BSA of donors was 1.82 +/- 0.26 m2. Initially, paired recipients of kidneys from a single donor were divided into two groups. Group 1 included the recipient with the larger BSA of the pair (1.97 +/- 0.17 m2), while group 2 consisted of smaller BSA recipients (1.69 +/- 0.19 m2). Although early function was better in group 2 patients, graft survival at 1 year (77% vs. 79%) and 5 years (54% vs. 55%) was identical between groups, as were most recent serum creatinine levels (2.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.1 mg/dl). A second analysis divided patients with a functioning allograft at discharge from initial transplant hospitalization (n = 345) into three groups based solely on donor to recipient BSA ratio: the ratio of group A (n = 30) was < or = 0.8, that of group B (n = 255) was between 0.81 and 1.19, and that of group C (n = 51) was > or = 1.2. Graft survival and kidney function over 5 years did not differ among groups. In multivariate analysis of 17 variables, donor:recipient BSA, independent of other risk factors, did not affect risk allograft loss. These data indicate that including nephron mass as a criterion for cadaveric organ allocation is unlikely to improve long-term results in renal transplantation.

Results of the double-blind, randomized, multicenter, phase III clinical trial of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam in the treatment of acute graft rejection episodes after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Thymoglobulin, a rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin, was compared with Atgam, a horse anti-human thymocyte globulin for the treatment of acute rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial with enrollment stratification based on standardized histology (Banff grading) was conducted. Subjects received 7-14 days of Thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/ day) or Atgam (15 mg/kg/day). The primary end point was rejection reversal (return of serum creatinine level to or below the day 0 baseline value). RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were enrolled at 25 transplant centers in the United States. No differences in demographics or transplant characteristics were noted. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that Thymoglobulin had a higher rejection reversal rate than Atgam (88% versus 76%, P=0.027, primary end point). Day 30 graft survival rates (Thymoglobulin 94% and Atgam 90%, P=0.17), day 30 serum creatinine levels as a percentage of baseline (Thymoglobulin 72% and Atgam 80%; P=0.43), and improvement in posttreatment biopsy results (Thymoglobulin 65% and Atgam 50%; P=0.15) were not statistically different. T-cell depletion was maintained more effectively with Thymoglobulin than Atgam both at the end of therapy (P=0.001) and at day 30 (P=0.016). Recurrent rejection, at 90 days after therapy, occurred less frequently with Thymoglobulin (17%) versus Atgam (36%) (P=0.011). A similar incidence of adverse events, post-therapy infections, and 1-year patient and graft survival rates were observed with both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Thymoglobulin was found to be superior to Atgam in reversing acute rejection and preventing recurrent rejection after therapy in renal transplant recipients.