COVID-19 vaccination: are more jabs needed or are we now immune?

As the COVID-19 pandemic has progressed, it has become apparent that COVID-19 vaccination has limited impact on SAR-CoV-2 transmission and provides only short-term protection against acquiring infection, but more robust protection against severe disease and death. As a result, vaccinated people remain susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection but are less likely to experience severe outcomes. Studies show that immunity derived from the combination of vaccination and natural infection, so-called hybrid immunity, is superior to that provided by vaccination or natural infection alone. Since most Australian adults have received three or more doses of COVID-19 vaccines and >70% have also been infected with SARS-CoV-2, we now have a population with high levels of hybrid immunity. This was mostly achieved by receiving original Wuhan strain vaccines and then experiencing Omicron strain infections. The original Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 has now disappeared and been replaced with Omicron-lineage variants globally. The predominance of the Omicron strain initially led to the development of bivalent vaccines containing both the Wuhan strain and Omicron variants. Currently, vaccines containing the original Wuhan strain of spike protein are being phased out, and new COVID-19 vaccines based exclusively on the Omicron strain XBB have become available in Australia. This article explores the question of whether further doses will be required from 2024 onwards and, if so, who should receive them?

Strategies to improve postpartum engagement in healthcare after high-risk conditions diagnosed in pregnancy: a narrative review.

Transition from antepartum to postpartum care is important, but often fragmented, and attendance at postpartum visits can be poor. Access to care is especially important for individuals diagnosed antepartum with conditions associated with longer-term implications, including gestational diabetes (GDM) and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP). Strategies to link and strengthen this transition are essential to support people to attend recommended appointments and testing. This narrative review evaluates what is known about postpartum transition of care after higher-risk antepartum conditions, discusses barriers and facilitators to uptake of recommended testing, and outlines strategies trialled to increase both postpartum attendance and testing. Barriers to attendance frequently overlap with general barriers to accessing healthcare. Specific postpartum challenges include difficulties with transport, coordinating breastfeeding and childcare access. Systemic challenges include inadequate communication to women around implications of health conditions diagnosed in pregnancy, and the importance of postpartum follow up. Uptake of recommended testing after a diagnosis of GDM and HDP is variable but generally suboptimal. Strategies which demonstrate promise include the use of patient navigators, focused education and specialised clinics. Reminder systems have had variable impact. Telehealth and technology are under-utilised in this field but offer promising options particularly with the expansion of virtual healthcare into routine maternity care. Strategies to improve both attendance rates and uptake of testing must be designed to address disparities in healthcare access and tailored to the needs of the community. This review provides a starting point to develop such strategies from the community level to the population level.

SOMANZ position statement for the investigation and management of sepsis in pregnancy 2023.

BACKGROUND: The Society of Australia and New Zealand (SOMANZ) published its first sepsis in pregnancy and the postpartum period guideline in 2017 (Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 57, 2017, 540). In the intervening 6 years, maternal mortality from sepsis has remained static. AIMS: To update clinical practice with a review of the subsequent literature. In particular, to review the definition and screening tools for the diagnosis of sepsis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-disciplinary group of clinicians with experience in all aspects of the care of pregnant women analysed the clinical evidence according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system following searches of Cochrane, Medline and EMBASE. Where there were conflicting views, the authors reviewed the topic and came to a consensus. All authors reviewed the final position statement. RESULTS: This position statement has abandoned the use of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) score to diagnose sepsis due to its poor performance in clinical practice. Whilst New Zealand has a national maternity observation chart, in Australia maternity early warning system charts and vital sign cut-offs differ between states. Rapid recognition, early antimicrobials and involvement of senior staff remain essential factors to improving outcomes. CONCLUSION: Ongoing research is required to discover and validate tools to recognize and diagnose sepsis in pregnancy. Australia should follow New Zealand and have a single national maternity early warning system observation chart.

The Reemergence of Syphilis Among Females of Reproductive Age and Congenital Syphilis in Victoria, Australia, 2010 to 2020: A Public Health Priority.

BACKGROUND: Syphilis notifications in Victoria, Australia, have been increasing over the past decade, with an increase in infectious syphilis (syphilis of less than 2 years in duration) cases in females of reproductive age and an associated reemergence of congenital syphilis (CS). Before 2017, there had been 2 CS cases in the preceding 26 years. This study describes the epidemiology of infectious syphilis among females of reproductive age and CS in Victoria. METHODS: Routine surveillance data provided by mandatory Victorian syphilis case notifications were extracted and grouped into a descriptive analysis of infectious syphilis and CS incidence data from 2010 to 2020. RESULTS: In 2020, infectious syphilis notifications in Victoria were approximately 5 times more than 2010 (n = 289 in 2010 to n = 1440 in 2020), with a more than 7-fold rise among females (n = 25 in 2010 to n = 186 in 2020). Females made up 29% (n = 60 of 209) of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander notifications occurring between 2010 and 2020. Between 2017 and 2020, 67% of notifications in females (n = 456 of 678) were diagnosed in low-caseload clinics, at least 13% (n = 87 of 678) of all female notifications were known to be pregnant at diagnosis, and there were 9 CS notifications. CONCLUSIONS: Cases of infectious syphilis in females of reproductive age and CS are on the rise in Victoria, necessitating sustained public health action. Increasing awareness among individuals and clinicians, and health system strengthening, particularly targeting primary care where most females are diagnosed before pregnancy, are required. Treating infections before or promptly during pregnancy and undertaking partner notification and treatment to reduce risk of reinfection are critical to reducing CS cases.

Quality of life in people living with HIV (the fourth 90) - are we there yet in Australia?

In 2014, UNAIDS outlined the 90-90-90 treatment targets. The "fourth 90" reflects the need to focus on optimising quality of life (HRQoL) in people living with HIV. Using a sample of non-heterosexual males in Melbourne, Australia, we aimed to assess HRQoL differences between HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals, and identify factors that predict HRQoL both at baseline and after three years of follow up. Clinical information and patient-reported outcomes incorporating the Assessing Quality of Life-6D scale were collected at baseline and at three years. Sixty-two HIV-positive cases (antiretroviral therapy naïve at baseline) and 48 controls were enrolled. Results were compared between cases and controls at baseline, three-year follow-up, and between timepoints. HRQoL was significantly lower in cases compared to controls (83.5 (IQR 77.2-88.6) vs 87.3 (IQR 82.1-91.8), p = 0.022) at baseline, with increased depression and anxiety associated with reduced HRQoL in multivariate analysis. Mental health in cases improved between timepoints (75.0 (IQR 56.3-81.3) to 81.3 (IQR 62.5-81.3), p = 0.0428). No differences between the HRQoL of cases and controls were observed at three years. Increased mental health support may be required at commencement of antiretroviral therapy to enable similar levels of HRQoL between HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals to be achieved.

Influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage in pregnancy in Australia, 2016-2021.

Vaccination in pregnancy is the best strategy to reduce complications from influenza or pertussis infection in infants who are too young to be protected directly from vaccination. Pregnant women are also at risk of influenza complications preventable through antenatal vaccination. Both vaccines are funded under the National Immunisation Program for pregnant women in Australia, but coverage is not routinely reported nationally. We reviewed all reported Australian maternal influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage data for the period 2016-2021, to identify gaps and information needs. Maternal influenza vaccine coverage was suboptimal at < 58% for 2016-2018, with higher coverage of 62-75% reported in two states (Victoria and Western Australia) for 2019-2021. Maternal pertussis vaccine coverage from 2016 was generally higher than for influenza at > 70%, with the highest jurisdictional coverage of 89% reported in Western Australia in 2020. Vaccination rates were often suboptimal among First Nations pregnant women and up to 20% lower than among non-First Nations Australian women; while data were limited, coverage was low among culturally and linguistically diverse women and among women of lower socio-economic status. Jurisdictional perinatal data collections were the best source of information on antenatal vaccine coverage but were only available for a minority of the population; a nationally consistent systematic approach is lacking. Timely and comprehensive data are needed to provide feedback to improve maternal vaccination coverage, particularly among groups with higher risk and/or low uptake, and as new vaccines are recommended, including COVID-19 vaccination.

The pregnant traveller: An overview of common preventable infections.

Pregnant travellers are often unaware of the various infections that can be acquired during travel and that pregnant people may be at increased risk of severe disease compared to their non-pregnant counterparts. Pregnant people often seek pre-travel counselling from their obstetrician or primary care physicians, who may not be well versed in travel medicine. This paper aims to provide information for maternity care providers regarding important travel-related food, water and mosquito-borne illnesses, including their prevention and treatment methods, equipping maternity care providers to confidently counsel prospective travellers during pregnancy.

Vaccination recommendations for pregnant people travelling overseas.

With international travel on the rise following pandemic restrictions, the number of pregnant travellers is likely to proportionally increase. Recent published data suggest most pregnant travellers seek pre-travel advice from their maternity and primary care providers. With these data, it is important to provide maternity and primary care providers with guidelines and resources to help aid safe, informed, and timely delivery of vaccinations prior to travel. Vaccination for travel during pregnancy is fundamental in mitigating maternal and fetal communicable disease morbidity and mortality. This clinical perspective provides an overview of the indications, safety, and recommendations for pre-travel vaccines in pregnancy.

Azithromycin treatment for short cervix with or without amniotic fluid sludge: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) is one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. A shortened cervix is a recognised risk factor for PTB, and amniotic fluid sludge (AFS) diagnosed on ultrasound may be suggestive of underlying inflammation or infection. AIMS: The aim is to determine if azithromycin, administered in cases of a shortened cervix, results in prolongation of gestation with improvements in neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study at three tertiary maternity services in Melbourne, Australia, between 2015 and 2020. Women with a singleton pregnancy were included if they had a cervical length of 15 mm or less at 13-24 weeks' gestation, with or without AFS. Exclusion criteria comprised multiple pregnancy, major fetal congenital anomaly, placenta praevia, prelabour premature rupture of membranes, vaginal bleeding and/or clinical signs suggestive of chorioamnionitis at the time of diagnosis of the short cervix. The results of antibiotic treatment with azithromycin were compared to those of no antibiotic treatment. The outcomes of interest were PTB, prelabour premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), chorioamnionitis and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 374 women were included in the study, of whom 129 received azithromycin and 245 received no antibiotics. When adjusting for potential confounders, the adjusted risk of PTB overall was higher in the treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.36 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.77) P = 0.023) with no differences found for PPROM, chorioamnionitis or neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: These data do not support the routine use of azithromycin in women with a short cervix, including those with AFS detected on ultrasound.

Widespread implementation of a low-cost telehealth service in the delivery of antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis.

BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available on the use of telehealth for antenatal care. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed and implemented a new antenatal care schedule integrating telehealth across all models of pregnancy care. To inform this clinical initiative, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of telehealth in antenatal care. METHODS: We analysed routinely collected health data on all women giving birth at Monash Health, a large health service in Victoria (Australia), using an interrupted time-series design. We assessed the impact of telehealth integration into antenatal care from March 23, 2020, across low-risk and high-risk care models. Allowing a 1-month implementation period from March 23, 2020, we compared the first 3 months of telehealth integrated care delivered between April 20 and July 26, 2020, with conventional care delivered between Jan 1, 2018, and March 22, 2020. The primary outcomes were detection and outcomes of fetal growth restriction, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes. Secondary outcomes were stillbirth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and preterm birth (birth before 37 weeks' gestation). FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2018, and March 22, 2020, 20 031 women gave birth at Monash Health during the conventional care period and 2292 women gave birth during the telehealth integrated care period. Of 20 154 antenatal consultations provided in the integrated care period, 10 731 (53%) were delivered via telehealth. Overall, compared with the conventional care period, no significant differences were identified in the integrated care period with regard to the number of babies with fetal growth restriction (birthweight below the 3rd percentile; 2% in the integrated care period vs 2% in the conventional care period, p=0·72, for low-risk care models; 5% in the integrated care period vs 5% in the conventional care period, p=0·50 for high-risk care models), number of stillbirths (1% vs 1%, p=0·79; 2% vs 2%, p=0·70), or pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia (3% vs 3%, p=0·70; 9% vs 7%, p=0·15), or gestational diabetes (22% vs 22%, p=0·89; 30% vs 26%, p=0·06). Interrupted time-series analysis showed a significant reduction in preterm birth among women in high-risk models (-0·68% change in incidence per week [95% CI -1·37 to -0·002]; p=0·049), but no significant differences were identified in other outcome measures for low-risk or high-risk care models after telehealth integration compared with conventional care. INTERPRETATION: Telehealth integrated antenatal care enabled the reduction of in-person consultations by 50% without compromising pregnancy outcomes. This care model can help to minimise in-person interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic, but should also be considered in post-pandemic health-care models. FUNDING: None.

The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce: pregnancy and perinatal guidelines.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than non-pregnant women of a similar age. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it was clear that evidenced-based guidance was needed, and that it would need to be updated rapidly. The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce provided a resource to guide care for people with COVID-19, including during pregnancy. Care for pregnant and breastfeeding women and their babies was included as a priority when the Taskforce was set up, with a Pregnancy and Perinatal Care Panel convened to guide clinical practice. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: As of May 2022, the Taskforce has made seven specific recommendations on care for pregnant women and those who have recently given birth. This includes supporting usual practices for the mode of birth, umbilical cord clamping, skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding, rooming-in, and using antenatal corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate as clinically indicated. There are 11 recommendations for COVID-19-specific treatments, including conditional recommendations for using remdesivir, tocilizumab and sotrovimab. Finally, there are recommendations not to use several disease-modifying treatments for the treatment of COVID-19, including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. The recommendations are continually updated to reflect new evidence, and the most up-to-date guidance is available online (https://covid19evidence.net.au). CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT RESULTING FROM THE GUIDELINES: The National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce has been a critical component of the infrastructure to support Australian maternity care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Taskforce has shown that a rapid living guidelines approach is feasible and acceptable.

Travel patterns and advice-seeking behaviour of pregnant women in the Australian context: A multicentre cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Travel poses risks to pregnant women, but little data exist describing the travel habits of women during pregnancy or pre-travel recommendations given. AIMS: To examine travel patterns of pregnant women including frequency of pre-travel consultation, and advice recalled. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of post-partum women admitted to five Victorian maternity hospitals between 21 May 2019 and 22 April 2020 in Australia. RESULTS: Forty-four percent (182/410) of women travelled during pregnancy, 32.9% (135/410) interstate and 19.5% (80/410) internationally. Fifty-five percent travelled for leisure (118/215) and 27% to visit friends/relatives (58/215). Overall, 68.1% (124/182) sought pre-travel advice, primarily from an obstetrician (60.5%, 75/124) or general practitioner (29.8%, 37/124). Only one woman attended a travel clinic. The most common reason for not seeking pre-travel advice was the belief that travel posed no risk (63.4%, 45/71). Pre-travel advice was sought least by those visiting friends/relatives (61.4%, 35/57). Women recalled recommendations regarding travel restrictions by gestational age and venous thromboembolism precautions, but not infectious disease prevention for those to whom it was relevant. Of international travellers, 48.8% (39/80) sought advice from the internet, one-third (13/39) as an alternative to seeing a healthcare provider. CONCLUSIONS: Travel is common during pregnancy and women seek pre-travel advice from the healthcare provider they see most often during pregnancy. All pregnant women should be provided with consistent, evidence-based pre-travel advice regardless of whom they consult. Further work is needed to educate and provide resources to maternity care providers to optimise pre-travel counselling.

Suppression of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) After a Second Wave in Victoria, Australia.

Countries worldwide are experiencing a second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is proving to be difficult to control. We describe the combination of physical distancing, mandatory mask wearing, movement restrictions, and enhanced test, trace, and isolation efforts that can be used to successfully suppress community transmission to zero.

Alignment of national COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for pregnant and lactating women.

The rapid development and roll-out of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is providing hope for a way to control the pandemic. As pregnant and lactating women are generally excluded from clinical trials, the vaccination programme was launched without adequate safety and efficacy data for pregnant women. Yet many professional organizations have recognized the need for administration of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy and have issued their own set of recommendations. The lack of evidence, however, has often led to confused messaging, inconsistent language and differing recommendations across organizations, potentially contributing to delay or refusal to accept vaccination by pregnant women. We summarize those differences and recommend that leaders collaborate at a country level to produce joint recommendations. We use the example of Australia, where two professional authorities along with the government and partners in New Zealand worked towards one message, consistent language and a unified recommendation. The aim was to help health professionals and women who are planning pregnancy or who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding to make an informed decision about COVID-19 vaccination. National advisory groups for immunization, professional obstetric organizations and government bodies should be encouraged to coordinate their statements on COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant and lactating women and to use similar language and phrasing for greater clarity.

La rapidité de développement et de déploiement des vaccins contre la maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) entretient l'espoir d'un jour pouvoir contrôler la pandémie. Étant donné que les femmes enceintes et allaitantes sont généralement exclues des essais cliniques, le programme de vaccination a été lancé en l'absence de données adéquates sur l'efficacité et l'innocuité du vaccin au sein de cette catégorie. Pourtant, de nombreuses associations professionnelles ont reconnu la nécessité de vacciner contre la COVID-19 durant la grossesse, et ont émis leurs propres recommandations. L'absence de preuves a toutefois souvent donné lieu à une communication incohérente, à un discours contradictoire et à des recommandations divergentes d'une organisation à l'autre, ce qui pourrait avoir conduit certaines femmes enceintes à retarder ou refuser la vaccination. Dans le présent document, nous exposons ces différences et exhortons les dirigeants à collaborer au niveau national pour formuler des recommandations communes. Nous utilisons l'exemple de l'Australie, où deux autorités professionnelles ont travaillé avec le gouvernement et des partenaires en Nouvelle-Zélande afin de transmettre un message unique, d'adopter un langage cohérent et de fournir des directives homogènes. L'objectif était d'aider les soignants et les femmes enceintes, allaitantes ou planifiant une grossesse à prendre une décision éclairée en matière de vaccination contre la COVID-19. Les organes consultatifs nationaux sur la vaccination, les associations professionnelles d'obstétrique et les pouvoirs publics devraient être encouragés à aligner leurs déclarations concernant la vaccination contre la COVID-19 chez les femmes enceintes et allaitantes, ainsi qu'à employer des termes et énoncés similaires pour davantage de clarté.

El rápido desarrollo y puesta en marcha de las vacunas contra el coronavirus de la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19) está dando esperanzas sobre una forma de controlar la pandemia. Como las mujeres embarazadas y lactantes suelen estar excluidas de los ensayos clínicos, el programa de vacunación se puso en marcha sin datos adecuados de seguridad y eficacia para las mujeres embarazadas. Sin embargo, muchas organizaciones profesionales han reconocido la necesidad de administrar las vacunas contra la COVID-19 durante el embarazo y han emitido su propio conjunto de recomendaciones. Sin embargo, la falta de pruebas a menudo ha ocasionado mensajes confusos, un lenguaje incoherente y recomendaciones diferentes en las distintas organizaciones, lo que puede contribuir a retrasar o rechazar la vacunación de las mujeres embarazadas. Resumimos esas diferencias y recomendamos que los líderes colaboren a nivel de país para elaborar recomendaciones conjuntas. Utilizamos el ejemplo de Australia, donde dos autoridades profesionales, junto con el gobierno y los socios de Nueva Zelanda, trabajaron para lograr transmitir un único mensaje con un lenguaje coherente y una recomendación unificada. El objetivo era ayudar a los profesionales sanitarios y a las mujeres que planean un embarazo o embarazadas o en periodo de lactancia a tomar una decisión informada sobre la vacunación contra la COVID-19. Hay que animar a los grupos consultivos nacionales de inmunización, a las organizaciones profesionales de obstetricia y a los organismos gubernamentales a que coordinen sus declaraciones sobre la vacunación contra la COVID-19 para las mujeres embarazadas y lactantes y a que utilicen un lenguaje y una redacción similares para mayor claridad.

An evaluation of strategies to achieve greater than 90% coverage of maternal influenza and pertussis vaccines including an economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Maternal immunisation is an essential public health intervention aimed at improving the health outcomes for pregnant women and providing protection to the newborn. Despite international recommendations, safety and efficacy data for the intervention, and often a fully funded program, uptake of vaccines in pregnancy remain suboptimal. One possible explanation for this includes limited access to vaccination services at the point of antenatal care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in vaccine coverage among pregnant women following implementation of a modified model of delivery aimed at improving access at the point of antenatal care, including an economic evaluation. METHODS: This prospective multi-centre study, using action research design, across six maternity services in Victoria, Australia, evaluated the implementation of a co-designed vaccine delivery model (either a pharmacy led model, midwife led model or primary care led model) supported by provider education. The main outcome measure was influenza and pertussis vaccine uptake during pregnancy and the incremental cost of the new model (compared to existing models) and the cost-effectiveness of the new model at each participating health service. RESULTS: Influenza vaccine coverage in 2019 increased between 50 and 196% from baseline. All services reduced their average cost per immunisation under the new platforms due to efficiencies achieved in the delivery of maternal immunisations. This cost saving ranged from $9 to $71. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that there is no 'one size fits all' model of vaccine delivery. Future successful strategies to improve maternal vaccine coverage at other maternity services should be site specific, multifaceted, targeted at the existing barriers to maternal vaccine uptake, and heavily involve local stakeholders in the design and implementation of these strategies. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that an increase in maternal influenza immunisation uptake can be achieved at a relatively modest cost through amendment of maternal immunisation platforms.

Detection of chlamydia infection within human testicular biopsies.

STUDY QUESTION: Can Chlamydia be found in the testes of infertile men? SUMMARY ANSWER: Chlamydia can be found in 16.7% of fresh testicular biopsies and 45.3% of fixed testicular biopsies taken from a selection of infertile men. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Male chlamydial infection has been understudied despite male and female infections occurring at similar rates. This is particularly true of asymptomatic infections, which occur in 50% of cases. Chlamydial infection has also been associated with increased sperm DNA damage and reduced male fertility. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We collected diagnostic (fixed, n = 100) and therapeutic (fresh, n = 18) human testicular biopsies during sperm recovery procedures from moderately to severely infertile men in a cross-sectional approach to sampling. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The diagnostic and therapeutic biopsies were tested for Chlamydia-specific DNA and protein, using real-time PCR and immunohistochemical approaches, respectively. Serum samples matched to the fresh biopsies were also assayed for the presence of Chlamydia-specific antibodies using immunoblotting techniques. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Chlamydial major outer membrane protein was detected in fixed biopsies at a rate of 45.3%. This was confirmed by detection of chlamydial DNA and TC0500 protein (replication marker). C. trachomatis DNA was detected in fresh biopsies at a rate of 16.7%, and the sera from each of these three positive patients contained C. trachomatis-specific antibodies. Overall, C. trachomatis-specific antibodies were detected in 72.2% of the serum samples from the patients providing fresh biopsies, although none of the patients were symptomatic nor had they reported a previous sexually transmitted infection diagnosis including Chlamydia. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: No reproductively healthy male testicular biopsies were tested for the presence of Chlamydia DNA or proteins or Chlamydia-specific antibodies due to the unavailability of these samples. WIDER IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FINDINGS: Application of Chlamydia-specific PCR and immunohistochemistry in this human male infertility context of testicular biopsies reveals evidence of a high prevalence of previously unrecognised infection, which may potentially have a pathogenic role in spermatogenic failure. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding for this project was provided by the Australian NHMRC under project grant number APP1062198. We also acknowledge assistance from the Monash IVF Group and Queensland Fertility Group in the collection of fresh biopsies, and the Monash Health and co-author McLachlan (declared equity interest) in retrieval and sectioning of fixed biopsies. E.M. declares an equity interest in the study due to financing of fixed biopsy sectioning. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

A national study of the clinical management of HIV-positive women in Australia: what are the successes and where are the gaps?

Background Women comprise ~10% of people living with HIV in Australia, so are often underrepresented in research. METHODS: This study invited clinicians providing care to women living with HIV to complete an anonymous survey containing questions related to four key areas: HIV (including diagnosis, treatment and virological outcomes), reproductive health (including sexual activity, contraception, pregnancy and outcomes) and linkage and retention in care. RESULTS: In total, 484 surveys were received, with responses from all states and territories. Most women living with HIV in Australia are on treatment (>90%) and virologically suppressed (>90% have a viral load <50 copies mL-1). Almost 75% of women have had at least one switch in treatment (with toxicity almost as common as simplification as the indication). Treatment interruption is also relatively common, but is more likely the longer a woman has been diagnosed, if she is on benefits (P = 0.007) and is the primary carer of children without a partner (P = 0.001). In Australia, women living with HIV are a diverse heterogeneous group, with over 70 different countries of birth and almost half speaking a language other than English at home. Mental health diagnosis was the most common co-morbid condition identified. A total of 21% of women were post-menopausal, with 42% reporting symptoms to their healthcare provider, but only 17% were receiving treatment for symptoms attributed to menopause. CONCLUSIONS: As well as strategies to support women vulnerable to treatment interruption, important areas for future investment in research and clinical care include co-morbid mental health and menopause symptoms and treatment.

A study comparing the practice of Australian maternity care providers in relation to maternal immunisation.

BACKGROUND: Women's decisions regarding vaccination during pregnancy are heavily influenced by maternity care provider (MCP) recommendations. Understanding why MCPs may not recommend vaccination is central to improving vaccination rates. AIMS: To examine the knowledge, attitudes and practice of Australian MCPs to maternal vaccination. METHODS: We surveyed obstetricians, midwives and general practitioners (GPs) between September and November 2016. Providers were asked about their knowledge and current practice, and about their perceived roles in discussing and administering maternal vaccinations. RESULTS: Eight hundred and seventy surveys were completed. Each MCP group believed they had the primary responsibility for discussing vaccinations but all groups perceived GPs as primarily responsible for administering vaccines. More midwives had concerns about safety (21/129, 16%) than obstetricians (9/359, 3%) and GPs (7/326, 2%) (P < 0.001). Overall, 83% of MCPs recommended diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination (dTpa) and 78% inactivated influenza vaccination (IIV) according to guidelines, with no differences between groups. Overall 77% provided dTpa onsite (GPs 99%, midwives 70%, obstetricians 60%, P < 0.001) and 71% provided IIV (GPs 99%, midwives 48%, obstetricians 54%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with recommending vaccination in accordance with guidelines and providing vaccination onsite were similar across groups: personal history of vaccination, confidence in vaccine knowledge, and awareness of recommendations for and belief in the safety of maternal dTpa. CONCLUSIONS: Among MCPs, the rates of recommending and providing maternal vaccination were higher than previously reported. Further improvements might be expected with increased awareness of guidelines, further education around vaccine safety, and by changing perceptions of the role of obstetricians and midwives in providing maternal vaccinations.

Smoking and HIV: what are the risks and what harm reduction strategies do we have at our disposal?

The World Health Organization estimates that smoking poses one of the greatest global health risks in the general population. Rates of current smoking among people living with HIV (PLHIV) are 2-3 times that of the general population, which contributes to the higher incidence of non-AIDS-related morbidity and mortality in PLHIV. Given the benefit of smoking cessation, strategies to assist individuals who smoke to quit should be a primary focus in modern HIV care. Tobacco harm reduction focuses on reducing health risk without necessarily requiring abstinence. However, there remains uncertainty about the safety, policy and familiarity of specific approaches, particularly the use of vaporised nicotine products. Evidence suggests that vaporised nicotine products may help smokers stop smoking and are not associated with any serious side-effects. However, there is the need for further safety and efficacy data surrounding interventions to assist quitting in the general population, as well as in PLHIV specifically. In addition, official support for vaping as a harm reduction strategy varies by jurisdiction and this determines whether medical practitioners can prescribe vaporised products and whether patients can access vaporised nicotine products. When caring for PLHIV who smoke, healthcare workers should follow general guidelines to assist with smoking cessation. These include: asking the patient about their smoking status; assessing the patient's readiness to quit and their nicotine dependence; advising the patient to stop smoking; assisting the patient in their attempt to stop smoking through referral, counselling, pharmacotherapy, self-help resources and/or health education; and arranging follow-up with the patient to evaluate their progress.

Manipulating the baby biome: What are the issues?

Establishing a baby biome through the controversial practice of 'vaginal seeding' has generated interest among the general public and healthcare providers alike. We discuss the potential risks of this practice and offer a harm minimisation approach to managing women requesting vaginal microbiome transfer after delivery by caesarean section.