RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The effects of SARS-CoV-2 infections on the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques (ART) were studied in a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: The outcome of 1581 treatment cycles with embryo transfer at a university fertility center in Germany was compared in years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. For 335 treatment cycles in 2022 a detailed analysis was carried out depending on infection and immunization status of both partners. RESULTS: ART cycles did not differ in most of the parameters examined between 2018-2022. In spite of comparable clinical pregnancy rates, there was a significantly higher miscarriage rate at 34.6% (27/78) in 2022, compared to 19.7% (29/147) in the pre-pandemic years of 2018-2019 (p = 0.014). In 37.0% of the treatment cycles (124/335) 2022 at least one partner reported a SARS-CoV-2-Infection 6 months before ART, mostly with the virus variant Omicron. Clinical pregnancy rates were lower in cycles without infection. Comparing women with confirmed infection to no infection, a significantly higher risk of miscarriage was seen (62.5% vs. 26.2%, p = 0.009). In treatment cycles of partners with basic immunization against SARS-CoV-2 a statistically significant increase of pregnancy rates was seen comparing to cycles with both unvaccinated partners (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: The results indicate a negative impact of SARS-CoV-2-infections up to 6 months on ART treatment, in particular an increased risk of miscarriage. Vaccination was associated with a better outcome of ART treatment.
Asunto(s)
Aborto Espontáneo , COVID-19 , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Pregnancies and births following assisted reproductive treatment (ART) are related to an increased risk for adverse perinatal outcomes. The aim of this retrospective cohort study at a University Hospital with a tertiary perinatal center was the combined risk analysis of singleton and twin pregnancies after ART in comparison to spontaneously conceived pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Maternal and fetal risks were analyzed in subgroups after spontaneous conception (Nâ¯=â¯14,233) and ART (Nâ¯=â¯785) during the 6-year study period from 2014 to 2019. Odds ratios for perinatal risks between the groups were calculated and adjusted for maternal age and gestational week at birth using a matched control analysis. Subgroups of preterm delivery were compared. RESULTS: The overall maternofetal risks after ART are higher than after spontaneous conception. Maternal risks after ART are mainly related to higher maternal age (pâ¯<â¯0.001). Preterm delivery and neonatal complications are more frequent in twins than in singletons (pâ¯<â¯0.001), but no statistically significant differences were seen in comparison in the subgroup of twins due to conception. Higher maternal age and body mass index did not increase the risk of preterm birth in twin pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal risks in pregnancies after ART are mainly influenced by maternal age. The strongest risk factor in ART pregnancies is a multiple pregnancy. Every 5th pregnancy after ART was a twin pregnancy with higher risks for preterm delivery, maternal hospitalization and adverse neonatal outcome (pâ¯<â¯0.001). Advanced maternal age in ART cannot be altered, but twin pregnancies can be actively avoided using the single embryo transfer strategy.