Continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation in the active phase of labour (CONDISOX): individual management based on artificial intelligence - a secondary analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines regarding oxytocin stimulation are not tailored to individuals as they are based on randomised controlled trials. The objective of the study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for individual prediction of the risk of caesarean delivery (CD) in women with a cervical dilatation of 6 cm after oxytocin stimulation for induced labour. The model included not only variables known when labour induction was initiated but also variables describing the course of the labour induction. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the CONDISOX randomised controlled trial of discontinued vs. continued oxytocin infusion in the active phase of induced labour. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) software was used to build the prediction model. To explain the impact of the predictors, we calculated Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values and present a summary SHAP plot. A force plot was used to explain specifics about an individual's predictors that result in a change of the individual's risk output value from the population-based risk. RESULTS: Among 1060 included women, 160 (15.1%) were delivered by CD. The XGBoost model found women who delivered vaginally were more likely to be parous, taller, to have a lower estimated birth weight, and to be stimulated with a lower amount of oxytocin. In 108 women (10% of 1060) the model favoured either continuation or discontinuation of oxytocin. For the remaining 90% of the women, the model found that continuation or discontinuation of oxytocin stimulation affected the risk difference of CD by less than 5% points. CONCLUSION: In women undergoing labour induction, this AI model based on a secondary analysis of data from the CONDISOX trial may help predict the risk of CD and assist the mother and clinician in individual tailored management of oxytocin stimulation after reaching 6 cm of cervical dilation.

Continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation in the active phase of induced labour: Factors associated with unexpectedly high rates of conversion to open label oxytocin in the CONDISOX trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factors associated with unexpectedly high rates of conversion to open label oxytocin in the CONDISOX trial of continuation versus discontinuation of oxytocin infusion during induced labour. DESIGN: Secondary retrospective analysis of data from a prospective randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Nine hospitals in Denmark and one in the Netherlands between 8 April 2016 and 30 June 2020. POPULATION OR SAMPLE: 1200 women having labour induced. METHODS: Analysis of outcomes by actual management. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mode of delivery and associated variables. RESULTS: Switching to open label oxytocin (42.4% overall) was associated with nulliparity, an unripe cervix, larger babies and higher rates of delivery by caesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: In the CONDISOX trial, slow labour was associated with features suggesting a higher 'resistance to progress', often prompting the use of open-label oxytocin infusion rather than study medication.

Perinatal outcomes after therapeutic rest in the latent phase of labor: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic rest refers to the usage of medication to relieve pain in women in the latent phase of labor. Very few data are available to evaluate the safety and effect of its use. The objectives of this study were to compare perinatal and labor outcomes in women who were seeking hospital care during the latent phase of labor and who were treated either with or without therapeutic rest. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with inclusion of nulliparous singleton pregnant women in the latent phase of labor presenting at the labor ward at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark from May 13, 2018 to June 1, 2021. We identified two groups: women who were treated with therapeutic rest and women who were not. The primary outcomes were neonatal admission and neonatal resuscitation. Secondary outcomes included use of cardiotocography during labor, nonreactive fetal heart rate, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, pediatric delivery room assistance, umbilical cord arterial pH and standard base excess, Apgar score at 5 minutes, interventions during labor and mode of delivery. RESULTS: In our sample of 800 women in the latent phase of labor, 414 women (52%) were treated with therapeutic rest and 386 women (48%) were not. The most frequently used (n = 206) medication for therapeutic rest was a combination of paracetamol, triazolam and codeine. We found no significant difference in neonatal admission (9.2% vs 6.5%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-3.1) or neonatal resuscitation (2.4% vs 3.1%, aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.1-4.0) between women treated with or without therapeutic rest. There were no differences between the two groups in other perinatal adverse outcomes, interventions during labor or mode of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant association between therapeutic rest and neonatal admission or resuscitation. Our findings indicate that therapeutic rest is a safe method for managing the latent phase of labor concerning neonatal health and does not increase the risk of labor complications.

Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Pregnancy: First Clinical Experiences.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment for chronic neuropathic pain. It is based on the delivery of electric impulses to the spinal cord, traditionally in a regular square-wave pattern ("tonic" stimulation) and, more recently, in a rhythmic train-of-five "BurstDR" pattern. The safety of active SCS therapy in pregnancy is not established, and recommendations are based on limited casuistic evidence. We present in this study clinical data on a case series of six women treated with burst SCS during pregnancy. In addition, we present the ultrasonographic flow measurements of fetal and uteroplacental blood flow in a pregnant patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were included if they had been implanted with a full SCS system at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, between 2006 and 2020 and received active burst SCS stimulation during a pregnancy. Telephone interviews were conducted, including details on SCS therapy, medication, pregnancy course and outcome, and health status of the offspring. In one patient, the uteroplacental and fetal blood flow was assessed in gestational week 29 by Doppler flow measurements performed during both ON and OFF phases of the SCS system. RESULTS: Six patients were included with a total of 11 pregnancies. Three pregnancies ended in miscarriages, all in the same patient who had preexisting significant risk factors for miscarriage. Eight resulted in a live-born child with normal birth weight for gestational age; seven were born at term, and one was born late preterm, in gestational week 36. Ultrasonographic Doppler flow, measured in one patient, was normal and did not reveal any immediate changes between burst SCS ON and OFF. Seven children were reported healthy with normal neurodevelopment and one physically healthy but with developmental delays. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented in this study add to the accumulating evidence of the safety of SCS in pregnancy.

EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment, and evidence-informed European recommendations on appendicitis in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice recommendations for the management of acute appendicitis in pregnancy are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-informed, trustworthy guideline on the management of appendicitis in pregnancy. We aimed to address the questions of conservative or surgical management, and laparoscopic or open surgery for acute appendicitis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence appraisal using the GRADE methodology. A European, multidisciplinary panel of surgeons, obstetricians/gynecologists, a midwife, and 3 patient representatives reached consensus through an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to formulate the recommendations. The project was developed in an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp). RESULTS: Research evidence was of very low certainty. We recommend operative treatment over conservative management in pregnant patients with complicated appendicitis or appendicolith on imaging studies (strong recommendation). We suggest operative treatment over conservative management in pregnant patients with uncomplicated appendicitis and no appendicolith on imaging studies (weak recommendation). We suggest laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis until the 20th week of gestation, or when the fundus of the uterus is below the level of the umbilicus; and laparoscopic or open appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis beyond the 20th week of gestation, or when the fundus of the uterus is above the level of the umbilicus, depending on the preference and expertise of the surgeon. CONCLUSION: Through a structured, evidence-informed approach, an interdisciplinary panel provides a strong recommendation to perform appendectomy for complicated appendicitis or appendicolith, and laparoscopic or open appendectomy beyond the 20th week, based on the surgeon's preference and expertise. GUIDELINE REGISTRATION NUMBER: IPGRP-2022CN210.

Early-term elective Caesarean sections did not increase the risk of behavioural problems at six to eight years of age.

AIM: Our aim was to explore the under-researched associations between an elective Caesarean section (C-section) at early-term or full-term gestation and behaviour at 6-8 years of age. METHODS: We identified 1220 eligible children born by elective C-sections at Danish hospital from 2009 to 2011. Their mothers were randomised to elective C-sections at either 38+3 (early-term) or 39+3 (full-term) weeks of gestation. From December 2017 to August 2018, the parents completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. The results were adjusted for maternal education, parity and the child's sex. RESULTS: Of the 574 (45%) children followed up, 288 were delivered early-term and 286 were delivered full-term. The groups had similar baseline characteristics. There were no differences in the total difficulties score, subscale scores or the risk of being classified as having a possible or probable psychiatric disorder. Early-term boys had a lower risk of being classified as having a possible or probable psychiatric disorder and early-term girls had higher risk, but the results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in behaviour at 6-8 years of age between children born by elective C-section at early- versus full-term gestation.

Long-term cognition and behavior in children born at early term gestation: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Recent recommendations characterize deliveries at 37+0  weeks through 38+6  weeks as early term. We aimed to review the literature systematically on long-term cognition, school performance and behavior in children born early term (37+0 to 38+6 weeks) compared with full term (39+0  to 40+6 weeks). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The review was performed according to the PRISMA Statement. The final literature search was performed on 31 January 2019. We located studies in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and case-control studies, with outcome assessment performed at 2-19 years. We collected information using a structured data form and evaluated study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: We included 42 observational studies published between 2006 and 2018. No restriction on year of publication was made. The mean NOS score was 5.8 with a range from 3 to 9. Compared with children born full term, children born early term had a lower intelligence score in early adulthood and up to some 30% increased risk of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Furthermore, we found some 10%-40% increased risk of cognitive problems, some 25% higher risk of language impairments and another 8%-75% with poorer overall school performance. No meta-analysis was conducted due to heterogeneity in the outcome measures. Only 10 studies presented subgroup analyses in spontaneous deliveries or adjusted for type of labor onset/induction. CONCLUSIONS: Children born early term are at increased risk of cognitive deficits, poorer school performance and behavioral problems compared with children born full term.

CONDISOX- continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation of induced labour in a double-blind randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxytocin is an effective drug for induction of labour, but is associated with serious adverse effects of which uterine tachysystole, fetal distress and the need of immediate delivery are the most common. Discontinuation of oxytocin once the active phase of labour is established could reduce the adverse effects. The objective is to investigate how the caesarean section rate is affected when oxytocin stimulation is discontinued in the active phase of labour compared to labours where oxytocin is continued. METHODS: CONDISOX is a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted at Danish and Dutch Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The first participant was recruited on April 8 2016. Based on a clinically relevant relative reduction in caesarean section rate of 7%, an alpha of 0.05, a beta of 80%, we aim for 1200 participating women (600 in each arm). The CONDISOX trial includes women at a gestational age of 37-42 complete weeks of pregnancy, who have uterine activity stimulated with oxytocin infusion for the induction of labour. Women are randomised when the active phase of labour becomes established, to study medication containing either oxytocin (continuous group) or placebo (discontinued group) infusion. Women are stratified by birth site, indication for oxytocin stimulation (induction of labour, prelabour rupture of membranes) and parity (nulliparous, parous +/- previous caesarean section). We will compare the primary outcome, caesarean section rate, in the two groups using a chi-square test with a p-value of 0.05. If superiority is not demonstrated, we have a pre-defined post hoc non-inferiority boundary (margin, delta) at 1.09. Secondary outcomes include duration of the active phase of labour, incidence of uterine tachysystole, postpartum haemorrhage, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, Apgar score, umbilical arterial blood pH, and birth experience. DISCUSSION: The high frequency of oxytocin use and the potential risks of both maternal and fetal adverse effects of oxytocin emphasise the need to determine the optimal oxytocin regime for induction of labour. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02553226 (registered September 17, 2015). Eudra-CT number: 2015-002942-30.

Discontinuation of intravenous oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour.

BACKGROUND: In most Western countries, obstetricians and midwives induce labour in about 25% of pregnant women. Oxytocin is an effective drug for this purpose, but associated with serious adverse effects of which uterine tachysystole, fetal distress and the need for immediate delivery are the most common. Various administration regimens such as reduced or pulsatile dosing have been suggested to minimise these. Discontinuation in the active phase of labour, i.e. when contractions are well-established and the cervix is dilated at least 5 cm is another method which may reduce adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether birth outcomes can be improved by discontinuation of intravenous (IV) oxytocin, initiated in the latent phase of induced labour, once active phase of labour is established. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (31 January 2018), Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (23 January 2018) together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing discontinued IV with continuous IV oxytocin in the active phase of induced labour.No exclusion criteria were applied in terms of parity, maternal age, ethnicity, co-morbidity status, labour setting, gestational age, and prior caesarean delivery.Studies comparing different dosage regimens are outside the scope of this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. MAIN RESULTS: We found 10 completed RCTs involving 1888 women. One additional trial is ongoing. The included trials were conducted in hospital settings between February 1998 and January 2016, two in Europe (Denmark, and Greece), two in Turkey, and one each in Israel, Iran, USA, Bangladesh, India, and Thailand. Most trials included full-term singleton pregnancies with a fetus in vertex presentation. Some excluded women with cervical priming prior to induction and some excluded women with a history of prior caesarean delivery. When reported, the average age of the women ranged from 22 to 31 years, nulliparity from 45% to 68%, and pre-pregnancy body mass index from 22 to 32.Many of the included trials had design limitations and were judged to be at either high or unclear risk of bias across a number of 'Risk of bias' domains.Four trials included a Consort flow diagram. In three, this gave details of participants delivered before the active phase of labour, and treatment compliance for those who reached that stage. One Consort diagram only provided the latter information. The data in many of the trials without such a flow diagram were implausibly compliant with treatment allocation, suggesting that there had been silent post randomisation exclusions of women delivered before the active phase of labour. We therefore conducted a secondary analysis (not in our protocol) of caesarean section among women who reached the active phase of labour and were therefore eligible for the intervention.Our analysis by 'intention-to-treat' found that, compared with continuation of IV oxytocin stimulation, discontinuation of IV oxytocin may reduce the caesarean delivery rate, risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 to 0.86, 9 trials, 1784 women, low-level certainty. However, restricting our analysis to women who reached the active phase of labour (using 'reached active phase' as our denominator) suggests there is probably little or no difference between groups (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.29, 4 trials, 787 women, moderate-certainty evidence).Discontinuation of IV oxytocin probably reduces the risk ofuterine tachysystole combined with abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) compared with continued IV oxytocin (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.46, 3 trials, 486 women, moderate-level certainty). We are uncertain about whether or not discontinuation increases the risk of chorioamnionitis (average RR 2.32, 95% CI 0.99 to 5.45, 1 trial, 252 women, very low-level certainty). Discontinuation of IV oxytocin may have little or no impact on the use of analgesia and epidural during labour compared to the use of continued IV oxytocin (RR 1.04 95% CI 0.95 to 1.14, 3 trials, 556 women, low-level certainty). Intrapartum cardiotocography (CTG) abnormalities (suspicious/pathological CTGs) are probably reduced by discontinuing IV oxytocin (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83, 7 trials, 1390 women, moderate-level certainty). Compared to continuing IV oxytocin, discontinuing IV oxytocin probably has little or no impact on the incidence of Apgar < 7 at five minutes (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.21, 4 trials, 893 women, low-level certainty), or and acidotic cord gasses at birth (arterial umbilical pH < 7.10), (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.13, 4 trials, 873 women, low-level certainty).Many of this review's maternal and infant secondary outcomes (including maternal and neonatal mortality) were not reported in the included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuing IV oxytocin stimulation after the active phase of labour has been established may reduce caesarean delivery but the evidence for this was low certainty. When restricting our analysis to those trials that separately reported participants who reached the active phase of labour, our results showed there is probably little or no difference between groups. Discontinuing IV oxytocin may reduce uterine tachysystole combined with abnormal FHR.Most of the trials had 'Risk of bias' concerns which means that these results should be interpreted with caution. Our GRADE assessments ranged from very low certainty to moderate certainty. Downgrading decisions were based on study limitations, imprecision and indirectness.Future research could account for all women randomised and, in particular, note those who delivered before the point at which they would be eligible for the intervention (i.e. those who had caesareans in the latent phase), or because labour was so rapid that the infusion could not be stopped in time.Future trials could adopt the outcomes listed in this review including maternal and neonatal mortality, maternal satisfaction, and breastfeeding.

Neonatal morbidity after spontaneous labor onset prior to intended cesarean delivery at term: a cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to investigate if labor onset before planned cesarean delivery (CD) affects the risk of neonatal admission, respiratory distress, or neonatal infectious morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our cohort included singleton term pregnant women with intended CD who delivered at Aarhus University Hospital from 1990 to 2012. Two groups of women were identified: women with intended CD performed before labor (nonlabor CD) and women with intended CD performed after spontaneous labor onset (labor-onset CD); in both groups there was no other maternal or fetal medical indication for an immediate CD or for early-term CD scheduling. Data were stratified in early-term (37-38 weeks) and full-term (39-40 weeks) deliveries. The main outcome measures were neonatal admission, respiratory distress and neonatal infectious morbidity. RESULTS: Among 103 919 live births, 5071 deliveries were nonlabor CDs and 731 were labor-onset CDs. Compared to nonlabor CD, labor-onset CD was associated with similar risks of neonatal admission and respiratory distress, both at early and full term, but with a two- to three-fold increased risk of newborn septicemia or antibiotic treatment at early term. Labor onset at early term was associated with a lower risk of maternal blood loss of more than 500 mL, but with a higher risk of postoperative antibiotic treatment and endometritis. CONCLUSIONS: Labor onset before planned CD was not associated with a decrease in neonatal respiratory morbidity, but may be associated with increased risks of neonatal infection.

Repeatability of Junctional Zone Measurements Using 3-Dimensional Transvaginal Sonography in Healthy Fertile Women.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the junctional zone and determine the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of junctional zone measurements using 3-dimensional (3D) transvaginal sonography in healthy fertile women. METHODS: We examined 82 consecutive women with 3D transvaginal sonography. The maximum and minimum junctional zone thickness was measured in all uterine walls. The difference between maximum and minimum thickness and average measurements (maximum thickness + minimum thickness/2) of the anterior, posterior, fundal, and lateral walls were calculated. Among the first 40 consecutive women, intraobserver and interobserver repeatability was evaluated according to the Bland-Altman method and expressed as a coefficient of repeatability. RESULTS: Using 3D transvaginal sonography, we visualized a thin and regular junctional zone in most women. The posterior uterine wall had the largest median maximum junctional zone thickness value of 5.2 (interquartile range, 3.8-6.5) mm. Ten women (12%) had maximum thickness values of 8.0 to 12.0 mm. The maximum thickness in each uterine wall had intraobserver and interobserver coefficients of repeatability of ±2.1 to ±3.4 and ±2.6 to ±3.9 mm, respectively, which were reduced by average measurements: ±1.9 and ±2.0 mm (anterior and posterior walls) and ±1.5 mm (fundal and lateral walls) for intraobserver and interobserver values. Correlations between measurements were poor in the narrow range of junctional zone thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The junctional zone has an indistinct outline on 3D transvaginal sonography, resulting in measurement errors within a broad range of ±2 to ±4 mm, which were only reduced to some extent by average measurements. The thickness of the junctional zone varied within a narrow range in this healthy fertile population, and reliability measurements of junctional zone thickness have to be evaluated in women with a wider range of thickness. The observer repeatability and reliability of junctional zone measurements need to be further evaluated and refined before applying this method in clinical practice.

Elective cesarean delivery at 38 and 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal risks.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to critically review the existing literature with regard to neonatal and maternal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery at 38 completed weeks versus 39 completed weeks of gestation. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent observational studies have consolidated previous findings of an increased risk of neonatal composite morbidity, respiratory morbidity, and neonatal admission with elective cesarean delivery at 38 compared with 39 weeks of gestation. In opposition, results from the first randomized trial were recently reported in which there was no significant difference in the risk of neonatal admission with elective cesarean delivery at the two gestational weeks. In the mothers, the risk of adverse outcomes is similar with elective cesarean delivery at 38 or 39 weeks.Though evidence of long-term adverse effects of early-term delivery (primarily spontaneous and vaginally) is accumulating, no data exist to elucidate whether these findings apply to children electively delivered by cesarean section. SUMMARY: Neonatal but not maternal adverse events are more frequent with elective cesarean delivery performed at 38 than 39 weeks' gestation. The difference, however, may be significantly smaller than previously anticipated. Further prospective studies, including investigations with focus on the impact of labor onset prior to cesarean delivery, are warranted. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COOG/A18.

The cervical mucus plug inhibits, but does not block, the passage of ascending bacteria from the vagina during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microbial load and the inflammatory response in the distal and proximal parts of the cervical mucus plug. DESIGN: Experimental research. POPULATION: Twenty women with a normal, singleton pregnancy. SAMPLE: Vaginal swabs and specimens from the distal and proximal parts of the cervical mucus plug. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, quantitative polymerase chain reaction and histology. RESULTS: The total bacterial load (16S rDNA) was significantly lower in the cervical mucus plug compared with the vagina (p = 0.001). Among women harboring Ureaplasma parvum, the median genome equivalents/g were 1574 (interquartile range 2526) in the proximal part, 657 (interquartile range 1620) in the distal part and 60,240 (interquartile range 96,386) in the vagina. Histological examinations and quantitative polymerase chain reaction revealed considerable amounts of lactobacilli and inflammatory cells in both parts of the cervical mucus plug. The matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration was decreased in the proximal part of the plug compared with the distal part (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The cervical mucus plug inhibits, but does not block, the passage of Ureaplasma parvum during its ascending route from the vagina through the cervical canal.

Healing Architecture in Birthing Rooms: A Scoping Review.

AIM: The purpose of this scoping review is to map the knowledge about the multisensory birthing room regarding the birth experience and birth outcomes. BACKGROUND: The concept of multisensory birthing rooms is relatively novel, making it relevant to explore its impact. METHODS: Five databases were searched. The search was limited to articles in English, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish. There were no time limitations. Fourteen relevant articles were identified providing knowledge about multisensory birthing rooms. RESULTS: Eight articles focused on birth experience, six articles focused on birth outcome, and one on the organization of the maternity care. Seven of the studies identified that sensory birthing rooms have a positive impact on the birth experience and one qualitative study could not demonstrate a better overall birth experience. Five articles described an improvement for selected birth outcomes. On the other hand, a randomized controlled trial study could not demonstrate an effect on either the use of oxytocin or birth outcomes such as pain and cesarean section. The definition and description of the concept weaken the existing studies scientifically. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review revealed that multisensory birthing rooms have many definitions and variations in the content of the sensory exposure; therefore, it is difficult to standardize and evaluate the effect of its use. There is limited knowledge concerning the multisensory birthing room and its impact on the birth experience and the birth outcome. Multisensory birthing rooms may have a positive impact on the birth experience. Whereas there are conflicting results regarding birth outcomes.

Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) or elective repeat cesarean delivery on maternal request (ERCD-MR). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Danish university hospital. POPULATION: Women with TOLAC (n = 1161) and women with ERCD-MR (n = 622) between 2003 and 2010. Exclusion criteria were diabetes, two prior cesarean sections, index cesarean at a different hospital, a delivery after the index cesarean, twin gestation, gestational age <37(+0)  weeks and stillbirth. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Aarhus Birth Cohort database, which comprised prospective registration of the deliveries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse neonatal outcomes, risk factors for emergency cesarean, and uterine rupture in case of TOLAC. RESULTS: TOLAC was associated with an increased risk of neonatal depression [odds ratio (OR) 3.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-19.1] and neonatal intensive care unit admission (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8). Within the TOLAC group 67% delivered vaginally. In the TOLAC group 1.3% (n = 15) of the women had a complete uterine rupture. None of these infants had sequelae after 12 months. Significant risk factors for emergency cesarean were no prior vaginal delivery (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0), index emergency cesarean during labor (adjusted OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.1), maternal age ≥35 years (adjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8), pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥30 (adjusted OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.3), and birthweight 4000-4499 g (adjusted OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1). Uterine rupture was associated with the use of epidural analgesia (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.9) and no prior vaginal delivery (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: TOLAC is an acceptable individualized option for women without major risk factors.

Full-term induction of labor vs expectant management and cesarean delivery in women with obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the literature comparing full-term induction of labor with expectant management in women with obesity on the risk of cesarean delivery and other adverse outcomes. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. This study had no time, language, or geographic restriction. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were eligible if (1) they were cohort or randomized controlled trials, (2) they compared induction of labor at early or late term with expectant management, and (3) they included women with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2. Studies restricted to women with multiple pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes, or noncephalic presentation were excluded. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. The secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidities and were evaluated. METHODS: The risk of bias was assessed by 2 authors using the Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Only studies assessed with low or moderate risk of bias contributed to the meta-analysis. Data were combined to pooled relative risks and 95% confidence intervals using random effects models. The quality of evidence was assessed for selected outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 232 studies identified, 13 were aligned with the inclusion criteria, and 4 cohort studies, including 216,318 women with induction of labor and 1,122,769 women managed expectantly, were included in the meta-analysis for the primary outcome. In women with obesity, full-term induction of labor was associated with a lower risk of cesarean delivery than expectant management (19.7% vs 24.5%; relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.81). Moreover, this study found the same direction of the association for other selected outcomes: severe perineal lacerations (relative risk, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.89), maternal infection (relative risk, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.84), perinatal mortality (relative risk, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.90), low Apgar score (relative risk, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.91), meconium aspiration syndrome (relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.28-0.56), and macrosomia (relative risk, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.75). Conversely, induction of labor was associated with an increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (relative risk, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.22). The quality of evidence ranged from low to very low. CONCLUSION: Full-term induction of labor in women with obesity may reduce the risk of cesarean delivery compared with expectant management, but the quality of the evidence is low.

Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.

INTRODUCTION: Whether there is an association between residual myometrial thickness (RMT) after cesarean section (CS) and the risk of uterine rupture (UR) or uterine scar dehiscence at the subsequent delivery has been sparsely investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our cohort included 149 women with a first CS in whom we measured RMT by transvaginal ultrasonography 6-15 months after their delivery. We did a follow-up study on delivery outcomes in the women's subsequent births. The exposure was scar measurements in the non-pregnant uterus, and the primary outcome was a diagnosis of UR or dehiscence. We calculated likelihood ratios (LRs) with 95% confidence intervals of having UR or dehiscence with a thin RMT (<3 mm). RESULTS: Among the 149 women, 39 had a repeat CS (14 scheduled and 25 unscheduled procedures), and within these, we found one woman with UR and five women with uterine dehiscence. The proportion of women with a thin RMT was significantly higher among cases (4/6) than in controls (4/33); the LR was 5.5 (95% CI 1.9-16.2). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a significant association between a thin RMT as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography in the non-pregnant uterus after a first scheduled CS and the risk of UR or dehiscence at a subsequent delivery.

Induction of labour at 39 weeks versus expectant management in low-risk obese women: study protocol for a randomised controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with many pregnancy complications, including both fetal macrosomia and prolonged labour. As a result, there is often also an increased risk of caesarean section. In other settings, labour induction near to term reduces adverse outcomes such as stillbirth and birth injury, without causing more caesarean deliveries. It has been suggested that induction will reduce adverse events in this setting too, but there have been no trials and the effect on caesarean section is unknown. The objective of this study is to compare induction of labour in gestational week 39 with expectant management on the risk of caesarean section in women with body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An open label randomised controlled multicentre trial are conducted at Danish delivery departments with an in-house neonatal intensive care unit. Recruitment started October 2020. A total of 1900 women with a prepregnancy body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either labour induction at 39 weeks and 0 to 3 days of gestation or to expectant management; that is, waiting for spontaneous labour onset or induction if medically indicated. The primary outcome is caesarean section. Data will be analysed according to intention-to-treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Central Denmark Region Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics approved the study. The study is conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the latest version of the 'Declaration of Helsinki' and the 'Guideline for Good Clinical Practice' related to experiments on humans. The trial findings will be disseminated to participants, clinicians, commissioning groups and via peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04603859.