Management of the thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19: guidance for the hemostasis laboratory.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with extreme inflammatory response, disordered hemostasis and high thrombotic risk. A high incidence of thromboembolic events has been reported despite thromboprophylaxis, raising the question of a more effective anticoagulation. First-line hemostasis tests such as activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen and D-dimers are proposed for assessing thrombotic risk and monitoring hemostasis, but are vulnerable to many drawbacks affecting their reliability and clinical relevance. Specialized hemostasis-related tests (soluble fibrin complexes, tests assessing fibrinolytic capacity, viscoelastic tests, thrombin generation) may have an interest to assess the thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19. Another challenge for the hemostasis laboratory is the monitoring of heparin treatment, especially unfractionated heparin in the setting of an extreme inflammatory response. This review aimed at evaluating the role of hemostasis tests in the management of COVID-19 and discussing their main limitations.

Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Whereas intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is allowed for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on vitamin K antagonists with international normalized ratio ≤1.7, there are no similar recommendations for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), notably due to the lack of coagulation tests to assess the therapeutic effects. Although the literature is scarce, consisting of small case series and retrospective studies, considering the frequency of this situation the French Vascular Neurology Society and the French Study Group on Haemostasis and Thrombosis have worked on a joint position paper to provide a practical position regarding the emergency management of ischaemic stroke in patients on DOACs. METHOD: Based on a review of the literature, the authors wrote a first text that was submitted to a broad panel of members from the two societies. The text was then amended by the authors to address experts' comments and to reach a consensus. RESULTS: In patients with normal renal function and who stopped the DOAC for at least 48 h, the management should not differ from that in patients without oral anticoagulant. In patients who are still on DOACs, mechanical thrombectomy is encouraged preferentially when applicable in first line. Otherwise, when specific tests are available, values <50 ng/ml indicate that IVT is allowed. In the absence of specific tests, standard tests (thrombin time, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time) can be used for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, although interpretation of these tests may be less reliable. In some patients on dabigatran, idarucizumab may be used before IVT. CONCLUSIONS: In this expert opinion paper, it is suggested that IVT can be performed in patients selected according to the time elapsed since the drug was last taken, renal function, type of hospital where the patient is admitted and plasma concentration of DOAC.

Interindividual variability in dabigatran and rivaroxaban exposure: contribution of ABCB1 genetic polymorphisms and interaction with clarithromycin.

Essentials Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are substrates of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) encoded by the ABCB1 gene. We tested the effect of ABCB1 polymorphisms and of a P-gp inhibitor on both drugs' pharmacokinetics. The ABCB1 genotype was not a clinically relevant determinant of both drugs' pharmacokinetics. Administration of P-gp inhibitors with dabigatran or rivaroxaban should be exercised with caution. SUMMARY: Background The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran and rivaroxaban are both substrates of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter, encoded by the ABCB1 gene. Rivaroxaban is metabolized by cytochrome P450 A4 (CYP3A4). Interindividual variability in DOAC exposure and frequent P-gp-associated drug-drug interactions have been described in patients. Objective To assess the influence of ABCB1 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran and rivaroxaban, associated or not with clarithromycin, a P-gp and CYP3A4 inhibitor. Methods Sixty healthy male volunteers, selected according to ABCB1 genotype (20 homozygous mutated, 20 heterozygous mutated, and 20 wild-type for haplotype 2677-3435), were included in this randomized, two-center, crossover study. All received sequentially a single dose of dabigatran etexilate (300 mg) and rivaroxaban (40 mg) associated or not with clarithromycin. Peak plasma concentration and area under the curve (AUC) were compared across the three ABCB1 genotypes. The effect of clarithromycin on dabigatran or rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics was assessed. Results Interindividual coefficients of variation for AUC were 77% for dabigatran and 51% for rivaroxaban. ABCB1 genotype did not significantly affect drug pharmacokinetics: AUC ratios between mutant-allele carriers and wild-type volunteers were 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.92) and 1.20 (95% CI 0.96-1.51) for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively. Clarithromycin coadministration led to a two-fold increase in both drugs' AUC, irrespective of ABCB1 genotype: ratios of geometric means were 2.0 (95% CI 1.15-3.60) and 1.94 (95% CI 1.42-2.63) for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively. Conclusions ABCB1 genotype is not a significant determinant of interindividual variability in dabigatran and rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics. The levels of one drug did not predict the levels of the other. Coadministration of a P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor with dabigatran or rivaroxaban may warrant caution in patients at risk of overexposure.

[Prescribing guidance pocket chart on the initiation of warfarin therapy in a geriatric hospital: a useful but challenging tool]. / Diffusion d'une fiche d'aide à la prescription pour l'initiation d'un traitement par warfarine dans un hôpital gériatrique: intérêt et difficultés de mise en place.

Elderly patients are at high risk of over-anticoagulation and of haemorrhagic risk when on warfarin, especially during treatment induction. In Charles Foix Hospital, a 800-bed geriatric hospital, we specifically developed for in-patients older than 70 years (target INR 2.5) a simple low-dose warfarin induction regimen. The dosing recommendations were summarized on a prescribing guidance pocket chart. Eighteen months after the distribution of the chart, we conducted a one-year observational study in order to evaluate: i/ the time needed to achieve the warfarin maintenance dose; ii/ the prescriber'adherence to the recommendations; iii/ the benefit for elderly patients receiving warfarin therapy. The mean time needed to achieve the warfarin maintenance dose was 12.3 +/- 7.0 days for the 89 patients included in the study: 10.6 +/- 5.9 days for the 30 patients whose prescribers followed the recommendations versus 13.5 +/- 7.6 days for the 59 patients whose prescribers did not follow the recommendations. There is a trend to a more frequent over-anticoagulation in patients whose prescribers did not follow the recommendations. The duration of the heparin-warfarin overlap was significantly shorter when the recommendations were followed. Finally, the reasons for non-adherence to the recommendations were analyzed. This study illustrates an assessment of practice in an health care institution.

[Plasma cell leukaemia]. / La leucémie à plasmocytes.

We report a case of primary plasma cell leukaemia, with an absolute count of plasma cells of 53 Giga/L, diagnosed in a 83-year-old woman. The patient's condition improved, with no circulating plasma cells after 3 weeks of treatment, in response to the combination of thalidomide and dexamethasone administered for 5 days followed by thalidomide alone. The clinical presentation, the morphological, flow cytometric and pathophysiological characteristics of the plasma cell leukaemia and the treatment are summarised in this paper.

[Management of direct oral anticoagulants for invasive procedures]. / Gestion des anticoagulants oraux directs pour un acte invasif.

Three new Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran etexilate are available on the French market. Management of DOAC-induced bleeding risk remains challenging. For elective procedures with high hemorrhagic risk, a last DOAC intake five days before procedure ensures complete elimination in all patients. Heparin bridging therapy should be proposed only to patients at high thrombotic risk. For elective procedures with low hemorrhagic risk, the DOAC intake of the night before procedure should be omitted. For urgent procedures with high bleeding risk, DOAC plasmatic concentration can be helpful: concentration lower than 30 ng/mL should enable performing the procedure; a high concentration is associated with a higher bleeding risk, especially if higher than 400 ng/mL. In case of massive bleeding, no antidote is approved yet; activated prothrombin concentrates or non-activated 4-factors prothrombin concentrates could be considered.

Multimodal assessment of non-specific hemostatic agents for apixaban reversal.

BACKGROUND: Non-specific hemostatic agents, namely activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC), PCC and recombinant activated factor (F) VII (rFVIIa), can be used, off-label, to reverse the effects of FXa inhibitors in the rare cases of severe hemorrhages, as no approved specific antidote is available. We have evaluated the ability of aPCC, PCC and rFVIIa to reverse apixaban. METHODS: Healthy volunteer whole blood was spiked with therapeutic or supra-therapeutic apixaban concentrations and two doses of aPCC, PCC or rFVIIa. Tests performed included a turbidimetry assay for fibrin polymerization kinetics analysis, scanning electron microscopy for fibrin network structure observation, thrombin generation assay (TGA), thromboelastometry, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time. RESULTS: aPCC generated a dense clot constituting thin and branched fibers similar to those of a control without apixaban, increased fibrin polymerization velocity and improved quantitative (endogenous thrombin potential and peak height) as well as latency (clotting and lag times) parameters. Adding PCC also improved the fibrin and increased quantitative parameters, but fibrin polymerization kinetics and latency parameters were not corrected. Finally, rFVIIa improved latency parameters but failed to restore the fibrin network structure, fibrin polymerization velocity and quantitative parameters. CONCLUSION: aPCC was more effective than PCC or rFVIIa in reversing in vitro the effects of apixaban. aPCC rapidly triggered the development of an apparently normal fibrin network and corrected latency and quantitative parameters, whereas PCC or rFVIIa had only a partial effect.

[Relationship between maintenance dosages of fluindione (Préviscan) and warfarin (Coumadin) for patients 70 years and older]. / Nomogramme d'équivalence entre les posologies de fluindione (Préviscan) et de warfarine (Coumadine) pour des patients de 70 ans et plus.

INTRODUCTION: Switching from fluindione, an indanedione vitamin K antagonist derivative, to warfarin, a coumarin one, or vice versa, requires to know the relationships between dosages of these two molecules. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 288 consecutive patients aged 70 years and over, converted from fluindione to warfarin. Patients who were retained for the analysis were those for whom maintenance dosages were obtained for both vitamin K antagonists. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients, mean aged 83 ± 6 years, were analysed. The average daily maintenance dosages were 13.8 ± 6.7 mg (range 5-35) and 3.7 ± 1.7 mg (range 1-8) for fluindione and warfarin, respectively. Using a linear regression model, we built a transition algorithm for the maintenance dosages of warfarin and fluindione. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to propose a conversion algorithm to help prescribers to estimate the maintenance dosage when it is necessary for a patient to switch from fluindione to warfarin or conversely.

New data on the pharmacology of heparin and low molecular weight heparins.

Studies on the pharmacological and pharmacodynamic properties of heparins are complicated by the heterogeneity of heparin preparations. It is important to consider the molecular weight distribution, which may differ from one preparation to another. Molecules with a molecular weight ranging from about 2000 to 5000D are abundant in low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), while they are present at a very low concentration in standard heparin. The clinical relevance of this difference is not fully understood. Recent work from our laboratory demonstrates that factor VII activation to factor VIIa in vitro is significantly inhibited by heparins. This is another aspect of some importance in understanding the mechanism of action of heparins. The bioavailability and plasma clearance of anti-Xa activity are well documented. In contrast, clear results regarding the bioavailability of anti-IIa activity are still missing. Recent data indicate that the anti-Xa activity of different molecules of heparin does not increase in parallel with the molecular weight of the heparin chain. In contrast, the anti-IIa activity of different molecules of heparin increases in parallel with the molecular weight. This could explain why activated partial-thromboplastin time is less prolonged with LMWHs than with standard heparin. There is growing evidence that anti-Xa activity contributes to the antithrombotic effect of heparins, although it is generally accepted that anti-IIa activity plays a major role. There have been 3 important findings from recent work on the pharmacology of heparins: i) heparin at a very low dose has thrombopoietic activity; ii) in hip surgery, the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is significantly lower in patients receiving subcutaneous LMWHs for 2 weeks compared with patients receiving unfractionated heparin; and iii) the risk of osteoporosis with long term treatment with LMWHs seems lower than with standard heparin.

Markers of activated coagulation in patients with factor V Leiden and/or G20210A prothrombin gene mutation.

The activated protein C (APC) resistance phenotype associated with an abnormal factor V Leiden (FVL), and the G20210A prothrombin gene mutation are the most common findings in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). In a group of 210 patients, we compared the levels of markers of coagulation activation in carriers of FVL (71 heterozygous, 30 homozygous), G20210A prothrombin mutation (88 heterozygous) or both mutations combined (21 heterozygous), in order to assess whether these markers allow identification of a group of patients with a higher risk of thrombosis; they were also compared to normal values. A total of 143 patients had a personal history of VTE and 67 were asymptomatic. None of them had other hereditary causes of thrombophilia or an antiphospholipid syndrome. None were currently treated with either anticoagulant or hormonal treatment. Pregnant women were excluded. No significant difference between the four groups of patients could be found in the levels of F1+2, TAT and DDI. Levels were all significantly higher than the control values (p<0.05). The levels of F1+2 and TAT were similar in patients with or without a history of VTE, regardless of the type of mutation. DDI levels were significantly higher in patients with a history of VTE than in asymptomatic subjects (443+/-248 vs. 333+/-222 ng/ml, p=0.02) but with only 57% sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, our study confirms the hypercoagulable state found in mutation carriers and points out the inability of F1+2 and TAT assays to identify a group of subjects at higher risk of thrombosis, within carriers of genetic risk factors. Although the sensitivity and specificity of DDI assay are low, high DDI concentrations tend to be associated with the risk of VTE.

No accumulation of the peak anti-factor Xa activity of tinzaparin in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment: the IRIS substudy.

BACKGROUND: In the elderly, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of accumulation of low molecular weight heparins, owing to their renal elimination. Although data exist for tinzaparin, they are observational. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether: (i) there was an accumulation of anti-factor Xa activity; and (ii) there was any relationship between anti-FXa activity and age, weight, creatinine clearance or clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment receiving tinzaparin (175 IU kg(-1) per 24 h) for acute venous thromboembolism. METHODS: In 38 centers participating in the Innohep in Renal Insufficiency Study (IRIS), peak plasma anti-FXa activity was measured on day 2/day 3 and on day 5 or at visit S (VS) (end of tinzaparin treatment). There was considered to be absence of accumulation if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the (anti-FXa day 5/VS)/(anti-FXa day 2/3) ratio did not exceed the predefined limit of 1.25. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients, with a mean age of 83 ± 5 years (range: 75-99 years) and a mean creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 40.8 mL min(-1) , 24.1% of whom had severe renal impairment, were included. The mean duration of tinzaparin treatment was 8.4 days. No significant accumulation was detected: the mean accumulation ratio was 1.06 (90% CI 1.01-1.11). There was no correlation between the accumulation ratio and age, weight, or CrCl. The mean anti-FXa activity did not differ significantly between the eight patients who experienced clinically relevant bleeding and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: No accumulation of anti-FXa activity was observed in elderly patients with renal impairment receiving therapeutic doses of tinzaparin, suggesting that there is no need for systematic anti-FXa monitoring in these patients. The high proportion of high molecular weight moieties in tinzaparin may account for its reduced dependence on renal elimination.

Predicting the warfarin maintenance dose in elderly inpatients at treatment initiation: accuracy of dosing algorithms incorporating or not VKORC1/CYP2C9 genotypes.

BACKGROUND: Initiating warfarin is challenging in frail elderly patients because of low-dose requirements and interindividual variability. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether incorporating VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotype information in different models helped to predict the warfarin maintenance dose when added to clinical data and INR values at baseline (Day 0), and during warfarin induction. PATIENTS: We prospectively enrolled 187 elderly inpatients (mean age, 85.6 years), all starting on warfarin using the same 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' based on the INR value measured on the day after three 4-mg warfarin doses (INR(3)) and on INR(6 ± 1). RESULTS: On Day 0, the clinical model failed to accurately predict the maintenance dose (R(2) < 0.10). Adding the VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes to the model increased R(2) to 0.31. On Day 3, the INR(3) value was the strongest predictor, completely embedding the VKORC1 genotype, whereas the CYP2C9 genotype remained a significant predictor (model- R(2) 0.55). On Day 6 ± 1, none of the genotypes predicted the maintenance dose. Finally, the simple 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' was the most accurate algorithm on Day 3 (R(2) 0.77) and Day 6 (R(2) 0.81), under-estimating (≥ 1 mg) and over-estimating the dose (≥ 1 mg) in fewer than 10% and 2% of patients, respectively. Clinical models and the 'geriatric dosing-algorithm' were validated on an independent sample. CONCLUSIONS: Before starting warfarin therapy, the VKORC1 genotype is the best predictor of the maintenance dose. Once treatment is started using induction doses tailored for elderly patients, the contribution of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes in dose refinement is negligible compared with two INR values measured during the first week of treatment.

[Surgery and invasive procedures in patients on long-term treatment with oral direct thrombin or factor Xa inhibitors]. / Chirurgies et actes invasifs chez les patients traités au long cours par un anticoagulant oral anti-IIa ou anti-Xa direct Propositions du Groupe d'intérêt en hémostase périopératoire (GIHP) et du Groupe d'études sur l'hémostase et la thrombose (GEHT).

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs), inhibitors of factor IIa or Xa, are expected to replace vitamin K antagonists in most of their indications. It is likely that patients on long-term treatment with DOAs will be exposed to elective or emergency surgery or invasive procedures. Due to the present lack of experience in such conditions, we cannot make recommendations, but only propose perioperative management for optimal safety as regards the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. DOAs may increase surgical bleeding, they have no validated antagonists, they cannot be monitored by simple, standardised laboratory assays, and their pharmacokinetics vary significantly from patient to patient. Although DOAs differ in many respects, the proposals in the perioperative setting need not be specific to each. For procedures with low risk of haemorrhage, a therapeutic window of 48 h (last administration 24h before surgery, restart 24h after) is proposed. For procedures with medium or high haemorrhagic risk, we suggest stopping DOAs 5 days before surgery to ensure complete elimination of the drug in all patients. The treatment should be resumed only when the risk of bleeding has been controlled. In patients with a high risk of thrombosis (e.g. those in atrial fibrillation with an antecedent of stroke), bridging with heparin (low molecular weight, or unfractionated if the former is contraindicated) is proposed. In emergency, the procedure should be postponed for as long as possible (minimum 1-2 half-lives) and non-specific anti-haemorrhagic agents, such as recombinant human activated factor VIIa, or prothrombin concentrates, should not be given for prophylactic reversal, due to their uncertain benefit-risk.

Genetic factors (VKORC1, CYP2C9, EPHX1, and CYP4F2) are predictor variables for warfarin response in very elderly, frail inpatients.

Determining the optimal dose of warfarin for frail elderly patients is a challenging task because of the low dose requirements in such patients, the wide interindividual variability of response, and the associated risk of bleeding. The objective of this study was to address the influence of 13 common variations in eight genes on the maintenance dose of warfarin in a cohort of frail elderly inpatients. For our study, we enrolled 300 Caucasian subjects who were hospital inpatients, with a mean age of 86.7 +/- 6 years. In addition to age, genetic variants of VKORC1, CYP2C9, CYP4F2, and EPHX1 were found to be significant predictor variables for the maintenance dose of warfarin, explaining 26.6% of dose variability. Among 132 patients in whom warfarin therapy was initiated with the same low-dose regimen, we studied the relative influences of genetic and nongenetic factors. The time to first international normalized ratio (INR) > or =2 was influenced by VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.0016, respectively); individuals with multiple variant alleles were at highest risk for overanticoagulation (INR >4) (odds ratio, 12.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.73-60.0). In this special population of frail elderly patients with multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy, we demonstrated the main impact of genetic factors on warfarin response.

Laboratory diagnosis of the thrombophilic state in cancer patients.

Perturbations of coagulation in cancer patients have been described for a long time. In up to 90% of cancer patients "routine" blood tests are abnormal leading to a hypercoagulable state in these patients. Among these tests are an increase in clotting factors, fibrinogen, fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, and thrombocytosis. Markers of the activation of coagulation have been developed, and levels of FPA, F1+2, TAT, and D-Dimer have been found higher in cancer patients. More specific procoagulant activities in cancer (CP and TF) have also been described and can be measured but none of them have any predictive value for the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in these patients. Consistent with this hypercoagulable state in cancer is the finding that most cancer patients have reduced plasma levels of inhibitors of coagulation. These complex abnormalities are clinically expressed as thrombosis, low-grade or fulminant DIC which can be assessed by different laboratory tests, and as hemorrhage when the fibrinolysis system is impaired. However, no studies have shown to date a relationship between these abnormalities of the coagulation tests and the clinical expression in any single individual. Because these patients are at high risk for thrombosis in special conditions such as surgery or during chemotherapy, prophylaxis with various forms of heparin are recommended.

The thrombophilic state in cancer patients.

Thrombosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation are common complications of cancer. Specific conditions associated with cancer such as stasis due to immobilization or blood flow obstruction, surgery, infections, endothelium damage due to chemotherapeutic agents and abnormalities of blood coagulation contribute to the hypercoagulable and thrombophilic state of cancer patients. This procoagulant state in cancer arises mostly from the capacity of tumor cells to express and release procoagulant activities (cancer procoagulant and tissue factor). Decreased levels of inhibitors of coagulation, impaired fibrinolysis, the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies and an acquired activated protein C resistance contribute to the hypercoagulable state. The activation of coagulation is also implicated in tumor proliferation through interactions of coagulation with inflammation and increased tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Laboratory diagnosis of the thrombophilic state include (1) elevation of clotting factors, fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products, hyperfibrinogenemia and thrombocytosis and (2) elevation of specific markers of activation of coagulation: fibrinopeptide A, fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complexes and D-dimers. However, none of the tests has any predictive value for the occurrence of thrombotic events in one individual patient. In patients with venous thromboembolism a noninvasive screening for occult cancer is able to detect a relatively high incidence of hidden cancer and the search for thrombophilia seems important in patients without known cancer.

Measurement of factor Xa-antithrombin III in plasma: relationship to prothrombin activation in vivo.

The M(r) of the complexes formed when factor Xa reacts with antithrombin III (ATIII) in plasma were estimated by gel filtration and SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis. The predominant species of factor Xa-ATIII detected after plasma and plasma to which factor Xa had been added were gel filtered on Sephadex G-200 and Sepharose 4B had apparent M(r) > 200,000, in which factor Xa-ATIII was associated with vitronectin. Addition of factor Xa-ATIII to ATIII-depleted plasma also resulted in the formation of factor Xa-ATIII-vitronectin complexes with M(r) > 200,000. Using polyclonal antibodies to human factor Xa-ATIII and ATIII as the capture and detector antibodies, respectively, a sensitive and specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was developed to quantify factor Xa-ATIII in plasma. The relationship between factor Xa-ATIII production and prothrombinase activity in vivo was investigated by quantifying factor Xa-ATIII and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 endogenous to the plasmas of blood donors and patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Whereas the concentrations of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 in the 84 normal plasmas increased with age, those of factor Xa-ATIII (mean +/- SD of 34.7 +/- 13.8 pM) did not, and no correlation existed between the concentrations of the two parameters in normal plasmas. In contrast, a highly significant correlation between the concentrations of these two parameters was found in the plasmas of the cancer patients which coincidentally also had higher concentrations of both factor Xa-ATIII and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 than the normal plasmas. Thus, ATIII may differentially influence prothrombinase formation and activity in normal individuals and cancer patients.