RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The cosmetically good coverage of skull defects is a challenge in neurosurgical clinics. In addition, the skull treated with implants and the underlying structures must remain radiologically assessable. In this examination, the postoperative courses of patients after implantation of CranioTop is described. Digital x-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance images after implantation of CranioTop were evaluated with regard to their assessability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2018 and 2020, 23 titanium cranioplasties (CranioTop) were implanted to 21 patients. The intraoperative handling, the accuracy of fit, the healing process, the cosmetic result and the physical condition of the patients were examined. In addition, digital x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scans of the cranium supplied with CranioTop were examined. RESULTS: The evaluation showed good to very good results regarding patients' satisfaction. There were no severe complications; thirteen patients found the cosmetic result very good; 8 patients assessed the cosmetic result as good. Because of the low thickness and density of the CranioTop plastic there was only low formation of radial stripe artifacts (streaking) and susceptibility artifacts. The assessment of digital x-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging images is possible after implantation of CranioTop. CONCLUSION: The patients treated with CranioTop showed a high level of satisfaction with regard to the cosmetic result and their physical condition. Furthermore, the cranium supplied with CranioTop remains well assessable in radiologic imaging with only slight limitations in magnetic resonance imaging.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Titanio , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Cráneo/cirugía , Craneotomía/métodos , Prótesis e ImplantesRESUMEN
(1) Background: Infections in deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware, while an undesired complication of DBS surgeries, can be effectively addressed. Minor infections are typically treated with wound revision and IV antibiotics. However, when visible hardware infection occurs, most centers opt for complete removal, leaving the patient in a preoperative state and necessitating post-removal care. To avoid the need for such care, a novel technique was developed. (2) Methods: The electrodes are placed at the exact same spot and then led to the contralateral side. new extensions and a new generator contralateral to the infection as well. Subsequently, the infected system is removed. This case series includes six patients. (3) Results: The average duration of DBS system implantation before the second surgery was 272 days. Only one system had to be removed after 18 months due to reoccurring infection; the others remained unaffected. Laboratory alterations and pathogens were identified in only half of the patients. (4) Conclusions: The described surgical technique proves to be safe, well tolerated, and serves as a viable alternative to complete system removal. Importantly, it effectively prevents the need of post-removal care for patients.