RESUMEN
We assessed tuberculosis (TB) diagnostic delays among patients with TB and COVID-19 in California, USA. Among 58 persons, 43% experienced TB diagnostic delays, and a high proportion (83%) required hospitalization for TB. Even when viral respiratory pathogens circulate widely, timely TB diagnostic workup for at-risk persons remains critical for reducing TB-related illness.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Diagnóstico Tardío , COVID-19/diagnóstico , California/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Prueba de COVID-19RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate implementation of rifamycin-based regimens (RBR) for pediatric tuberculosis infection (TBI) treatment among 3 provider settings in a high-incidence county. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter, retrospective observational study was performed across 3 sites in Los Angeles County: an academic center (AC), a general pediatrics federally qualified health center (FQHC), and department of public health (DPH) tuberculosis clinics. Patients initiated on TBI treatment age 1 months to 17 years between 2018 and 2020 were included. RBRs were defined as regimens: 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid, 4 months of daily rifampin, and 3 months of daily isoniazid and rifampin. RESULTS: We included 424 patients: 51 from AC, 327 from DPH, and 46 from FQHC. RBR use nearly doubled during the study period (from 43% in 2018 to 82% in 2020; P < .001). FQHC had the shortest time to chest radiograph and treatment initiation; however, AC and DPH were 4 times as likely to prescribe an RBR compared to FQHC (95% CI, 2.1-7.8). AC and DPH had similar completion rates (74%) and were 2.6 times as likely to complete treatment compared to FQHC (95% CI, 1.4-4.9). CONCLUSIONS: The use of RBRs for pediatric TBI varies significantly by clinical setting but is improving over time. Strategies are needed to improve RBR uptake, standardize care, and increase treatment completion, particularly among general pediatricians.
Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Latente , Pediatría , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Isoniazida/uso terapéutico , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMEN
Ongoing large-scale land development for renewable energy projects in the Antelope Valley, located in the Western Mojave Desert, has been blamed for increased fugitive dust emissions and coccidioidomycosis incidence among the general public in recent years. Soil samples were collected at six sites that were destined for solar farm construction and were analyzed for the presence of the soil-borne fungal pathogen Coccidioides immitis which is endemic to many areas of central and southern California. We used a modified culture-independent nested PCR approach to identify the pathogen in all soil samples and also compared the sampling sites in regard to soil physical and chemical parameters, degree of disturbance, and vegetation. Our results indicated the presence of C. immitis at four of the six sites, predominantly in non-disturbed soils of the Pond-Oban complex, which are characterized by an elevated pH and salt bush communities, but also in grassland characterized by different soil parameters and covered with native and non-native annuals. Overall, we were able to detect the pathogen in 40% of the soil samples (n = 42). Incidence of coccidioidomycosis in the Antelope Valley was positively correlated with land use and particulate matter in the air (PM10) (Pearson correlation coefficient >0.5). With the predicted population growth and ongoing large-scale disturbance of soil in the Antelope Valley in coming years, incidence of coccidioidomycosis will likely further increase if policy makers and land developers continue to ignore the risk of grading land without implementing long-term dust mitigation plans in Environmental Impact Reports.
Asunto(s)
Coccidioidomicosis/epidemiología , Polvo , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Microbiología del Suelo , California/epidemiología , Coccidioides/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , IncidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Listeriosis is a relatively rare foodborne disease with significant public health implications. The causative pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes, grows well in refrigeration, is associated with a case-fatality rate of 20%, and causes an estimated 28% of all foodborne disease-related deaths. Nevertheless, data on the risk factors for listeriosis mortality are limited. METHODS: Using the passive surveillance listeriosis database of the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health, we conducted a 13-year retrospective cohort study to describe nonperinatal listeriosis mortality in Los Angeles County during the period 1992-2004. A nonperinatal listeriosis case was defined as one occurring in a nonpregnant person >42 days of age who resided in Los Angeles County and had a culture positive for L. monocytogenes. RESULTS: Unconditional multivariable logistic regression analysis of 281 nonperinatal listeriosis cases with 29 main effects variables resulted in finding nonhematological malignancy (odds ratio [OR], 5.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-18.9), alcoholism (OR, 4.63; 95% CI, 1.36-15.8), age 70 years (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.50-7.87), steroid medication (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.38-8.08), and kidney disease (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.18-7.31) to be statistically significant risk factors for mortality. Other listeriosis mortality risk factors with adjusted odds ratios >1.5 included blood transfusion, asthma, black race, Asian race, use of antibiotics, hypertension, receipt of chemotherapy, and Hispanic race. Patients admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis alone had the highest mortality (23.7%), whereas patients with cases of meningitis alone had the lowest mortality (3.13%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study should be used to help researchers and clinicians focus on specific risk factors to prevent nonperinatal listeriosis-related deaths.
Asunto(s)
Listeria monocytogenes/aislamiento & purificación , Listeriosis/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Lactante , Listeriosis/microbiología , Los Angeles , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esteroides/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2010, 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was licensed and recommended in the USA for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease in children. Licensure was based on immunogenicity data comparing PCV13 with the earlier seven-valent formulation. Because clinical endpoints were not assessed for the new antigens, we did a postlicensure matched case-control study to assess vaccine effectiveness. METHODS: Cases in children aged 2-59 months were identified through active surveillance in 13 sites. Controls were identified via birth registries and matched to cases by age and postal (zip) code. The primary objective was the vaccine effectiveness of at least one dose against the 13 serotypes included in PCV13. Secondary objectives included vaccine effectiveness against all-cause invasive pneumococcal disease, against antibiotic non-susceptible invasive pneumococcal disease, and among children with and without underlying conditions. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as (1â-âmatched odds ratio)â×â100%. FINDINGS: We enrolled 722 children with invasive pneumococcal disease and 2991 controls; PCV13 serotype cases (217 [30%]) included most commonly serotypes 19A (128 [18%]), 7F (32 [4%]), and 3 (43 [6%]). Vaccine effectiveness against PCV13 serotypes was 86·0% (95% CI 75·5 to 92·3), driven by serotypes 19A and 7F, for which vaccine effectiveness was 85·6% (95% CI 70·6 to 93·5) and 96·5% (82·7 to 100), respectively. We also identified statistically significant effectiveness against serotype 3 (79·5%, 95% CI 30·3 to 94·8) and against antibiotic non-susceptible invasive pneumococcal disease (65·6%, 44·9 to 78·7). Vaccine effectiveness against all-cause invasive pneumococcal disease was 60·2% (95% CI 46·8 to 70·3). Vaccine effectiveness was similar among children with (81·4%, 95% CI 45·4 to 93·6) and without (85·8%, 74·9 to 91·9) underlying conditions. INTERPRETATION: PCV13 appears highly effective against invasive pneumococcal disease among children in the USA in the context of routine and catch-up schedules, although some new vaccine antigens could not be assessed. PCV13 immunisation provides a robust strategy for combating pneumococcal antimicrobial resistance. FUNDING: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Asunto(s)
Vacunación Masiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Vacunas Neumococicas/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Vacunación Masiva/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Coccidioidomycosis, also known as Valley Fever, is often thought of as an endemic disease of central California exclusive of Los Angeles County. The fungus that causes Valley Fever, Coccidioides spp., grows in previously undisturbed soil of semi-arid and arid environments of certain areas of the Americas. LA County has a few large areas with such environments, particularly the Antelope Valley which has been having substantial land development. Coccidioidomycosis that is both clinically- and laboratory-confirmed is a mandated reportable disease in LA County. Population surveillance data for 1973-2011 reveals an annual rate increase from 0.87 to 3.2 cases per 100,000 population (n = 61 to 306 annual cases). In 2004, case frequency started substantially increasing with notable epidemiologic changes such as a rising 2.1 to 5.7 male-to-female case ratio stabilizing to 1.4-2.2. Additionally, new building construction in Antelope Valley greatly rose in 2003 and displayed a strong correlation (R = 0.92, Pearson p<0.0001) with overall LA County incidence rates for 1996-2007. Of the 24 LA County health districts, 19 had a 100%-1500% increase in cases when comparing 2000-2003 to 2008-2011. Case residents of endemic areas had stronger odds of local exposures, but cases from areas not known to be endemic had greater mortality (14% versus 9%) with notably more deaths during 2008-2011. Compared to the 57 other California counties during 2001-2011, LA County had the third highest average annual number of cases and Antelope Valley had a higher incidence rate than all but six counties. With the large number of reported coccidioidomycosis cases, multi-agency and community partnering is recommended to develop effective education and prevention strategies to protect residents and travelers.
Asunto(s)
Coccidioidomicosis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , California/epidemiología , California/etnología , Niño , Preescolar , Coccidioidomicosis/etnología , Coccidioidomicosis/mortalidad , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Crecimiento Demográfico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce bacterial contamination in platelets (PLTs) have led to implementation of tests for bacterial detection before product release. Although relatively rare as a human pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes often causes serious illness and has a case-fatality rate of 20 percent. CASE REPORT: PLTs from an asymptomatic 58- year-old Hispanic male with a long history of PLT donation were culture-positive for the presence of L. monocytogenes. The pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern of the isolate matched two other L. monocytogenes isolates in the CDC National PulseNet database. Public health investigation found no evidence that the other two isolates were epidemiologically related to the PLT donor, who remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: A cluster of listeriosis cases was detected by PFGE but the significance is unknown. Organisms of public health significance should be reported to health departments. Better surveillance and reporting are needed in the efforts to improve blood product safety.