Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome? A multicenter study and systematic review of the literature.

STUDY QUESTION: Should we perform oocyte accumulation to preserve fertility in women with Turner syndrome (TS)? SUMMARY ANSWER: The oocyte cryopreservation strategy is not well adapted for all TS women as their combination of high basal FSH with low basal AMH and low percentage of 46,XX cells in the karyotype significantly reduces the chances of freezing sufficient mature oocytes for fertility preservation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: An oocyte cryopreservation strategy requiring numerous stimulation cycles is needed to preserve fertility in TS women, to compensate for the low ovarian response, the possible oocyte genetic alterations, the reduced endometrial receptivity, and the increased rate of miscarriage, observed in this specific population. The validation of reliable predictive biomarkers of ovarian response to hormonal stimulation in TS patients is necessary to help practitioners and patients choose the best-personalized fertility preservation strategy. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective bicentric study was performed from 1 January 2011 to 1 January 2023. Clinical and biological data from all TS women who have received from ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation were collected. A systematic review of the current literature on oocyte retrieval outcomes after ovarian stimulation in TS women was also performed (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022362352). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: A total of 14 TS women who had undergone ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation were included, representing the largest cohort of TS patients published to date (n = 14 patients, 24 cycles). The systematic review of the literature identified 34 additional TS patients with 47 oocyte retrieval outcomes after ovarian stimulation in 14 publications (n = 48 patients, n = 71 cycles in total). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The number of cryopreserved mature oocytes on the first cycle for TS patients was low (4.0 ± 3.7). Oocyte accumulation was systematically proposed to increase fertility potential and was accepted by 50% (7/14) of patients (2.4 ± 0.5 cycles), leading to an improved total number of 10.9 ± 7.2 cryopreserved mature oocytes per patient. In the group who refused the oocyte accumulation strategy, only one patient exceeded the threshold of 10 mature cryopreserved oocytes. In contrast, 57.1% (4/7) and 42.9% (3/7) of patients who have underwent the oocyte accumulation strategy reached the threshold of 10 and 15 mature cryopreserved oocytes, respectively (OR = 8 (0.6; 107.0), P = 0.12; OR= 11 (0.5; 282.1), P = 0.13). By analyzing all the data published to date and combining it with our data (n = 48 patients, n = 71 cycles), low basal FSH and high AMH concentrations as well as a higher percentage of 46,XX cells in the karyotype were significantly associated with a higher number of cryopreserved oocytes after the first cycle. Moreover, the combination of low basal FSH concentration (<5.9 IU/l), high AMH concentration (>1.13 ng/ml), and the presence of 46,XX cells (>1%) was significantly predictive of obtaining at least six cryopreserved oocytes in the first cycle, representing objective criteria for identifying patients with real chances of preserving an adequate fertility potential by oocyte cryopreservation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our results should be analyzed with caution, as the optimal oocyte number needed for successful live birth in TS patients is still unknown due to the low number of reports their oocyte use in the literature to date. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: TS patients should benefit from relevant clinical evaluation, genetic counseling and psychological support to make an informed choice regarding their fertility preservation technique, as numerous stimulation cycles would be necessary to preserve a high number of oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research received no external funding. The authors declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

TBL1XR1 mutations in Pierpont syndrome are not restricted to the recurrent p.Tyr446Cys mutation.

Pierpont syndrome is a rare and sporadic syndrome, including developmental delay, facial characteristics, and abnormal extremities. Recently, a recurrent de novo TBL1XR1 variant (c.1337A > G; p.Tyr446Cys) has been identified in eight patients by whole-exome sequencing. A dominant-negative effect of this mutation is strongly suspected, since patients with TBL1XR1 deletion and other variants predicting loss of function do not share the same phenotype. We report two patients with typical Pierpont-like syndrome features. Exome sequencing allowed identifying a de novo heterozygous missense TBL1XR1 variant in both patients, different from those already reported: p.Cys325Tyr and p.Tyr446His. The localization of these mutations and clinical features of Pierpont-like syndrome suggest that their functional consequences are comparable with the recurrent mutation previously described, and provided additional data to understand molecular mechanisms of TBL1XR1 anomalies.

Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of cystic fibrosis: an optimized protocol using MEMO fluorescent PCR to detect the p.Phe508del mutation.

BACKGROUND: Analysis of cell-free foetal DNA (cff-DNA) in maternal plasma is very promising for early diagnosis of monogenic diseases; in particular, cystic fibrosis (CF). However, NIPD of single-gene disorders has been limited by the availability of suitable technical platforms and the need to set up patient or disease-specific custom-made approaches. METHODS: To make research applications more readily accessible to the clinic, we offer a simple assay combining two independent methods to determine the presence or absence of paternally inherited foetal allele p.Phe508del (the most frequent mutation in CF patients worldwide). The first method detects the presence or absence of a p.Phe508del allele by Mutant Enrichment with 3'-Modified Oligonucleotide PCR coupled to Fragment Length Analysis (MEMO-PCR-FLA). The second method detects the p.Phe508del allele with classical Multiplex Fluorescent PCR including five intragenic and extragenic STR markers of the CFTR locus and a specific SRY sequence. RESULTS: We collected 24 plasma samples from 23 women carrying foetuses at risk for CF and tested each sample using both methods. Our new procedures were successfully applied to 10 couples where fathers carried the p.Phe508del mutation and mothers were carrying a different mutation in the CFTR gene. These simple tests provided clear positive or negative results from the maternal plasma of the pregnant women. We confirmed the presence of cff-DNA in the studied samples by the identification of a tri-allelic DNA profile using a miniSTR kit. All results were correlated with chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This NIPD approach, easily set up in any clinical laboratory where prenatal diagnosis is routinely performed, offers many advantages over current methods: it is simple, rapid, and cost-effective. It opens up the possibility for testing a large number of couples with offspring at risk for CF.