RESUMEN
Myocardial infarction (MI) induces an inflammatory response in which neutrophils fulfill a prominent role. Mean neutrophil volume (MNV) represents the average size of the circulating neutrophil population. Our goal was to determine the effect of MI on MNV and investigate the mechanisms behind MNV elevation. MNV of 84 MI patients was compared with the MNV of 209 stable angina patients and correlated to simultaneously measured CK levels. Fourteen pigs were subjected to temporary coronary balloon occlusion and blood was sampled at multiple time points to measure MNV. Echocardiography was performed followed by ex vivo infarct size assessment after 72 h. MNV was higher in MI patients compared to stable angina patients (602 SD26 AU vs. 580 SD20 AU, p < 0.0001) and correlated with simultaneously measured CK levels (R = 0.357, p < 0.0001). In pigs, MNV was elevated post-MI (451 SD11 AU vs. 469 SD12 AU), p < 0.0001). MNV correlated with infarct size (R = 0.705, p = 0.007) and inversely correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (R = -0.718, p = 0.009). Cell sorting revealed an increased presence of banded neutrophils after MI, which have a higher MNV compared to mature neutrophils post-MI (495 SD14 AU vs. 478 SD11 AU, p = 0.012). MNV from coronary sinus blood was higher than MNV of neutrophils from simultaneously sampled arterial blood (463 SD7.6 AU vs. 461 SD8.6 AU, p = 0.013) post-MI. The current study shows MNV is elevated and reflects cardiac damage post-MI. MNV increases due to altered neutrophil composition and systemic neutrophil activation. MNV may be an interesting parameter for prognostic assessment in MI and provide new insights into pathological innate immune responses evoked by ischemia-reperfusion.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/inmunología , Neutrófilos/patología , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/patología , PorcinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic shock (HS) and sepsis are common after trauma. These trauma patients often need ventilatory support. The resulting hyperinflammatory state can cause neutrophil-mediated complications such as adult respiratory distress syndrome. An important underlying mechanism is polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) priming by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs, caused by, e.g., HS and ventilation) and by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs, e.g., lipopolysaccharide [LPS] in sepsis). The aim of this study was to compare the inflammatory response induced by DAMPs (liberated during HS) and PAMPs (LPS challenge) under conditions of high-volume ventilation. METHODS: Twenty-seven male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized for mechanical ventilation (MV) alone (9 rats; positive end-expiratory pressure, 5 cm H2O; pressure control, +20 cm H2O; FIO2, 0.33), MV + HS (9 rats; hemorrhage, 30% volume loss) or MV + LPS (9 rats, LPS, 5mg/kg intravenously administered). Five rats were used as controls. Total PMN count and differentials were determined. In addition, the expression of activation markers (CD62L and CD11b) on blood-derived PMNs was measured by flow cytometry. Pulmonary inflammatory response was measured by PMN counts in bronchoalveolar fluid. The presence of neutrophils in the lung was determined by total myeloperoxidase. Results are expressed as means ± SEM; p ≤ 0.05 is considered statistically significant. RESULTS: All treated rats had more neutrophils in the blood and bronchoalveolar fluid compared with the controls. Myeloperoxidase was significantly higher in all groups compared with controls. MV and MV + HS rats had more blood neutrophils with CD62L(bright)/CD11b(dim) phenotypes, whereas MV + LPS rats showed more CD62L(dim)/CD11b(bright) neutrophils, indicative for activated cells. CONCLUSION: All ventilated rats showed a systemic inflammatory response. The responses to HS and MV were very similar, suggesting a common pathway of DAMP-associated inflammation. In marked contrast, LPS showed a different neutrophil phenotype (CD62L(dim)/CD11b(bright)), suggesting a different inflammatory response. It is concluded that shock induced by DAMPs and PAMPs have different underlying mechanisms.