Effect of Radiation Therapy on Microsurgical Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstructions: A Matched Cohort Analysis of 4577 Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is a state-of-the art procedure. Several patient-related factors have been identified with regard to the safety and efficacy of these reconstructions. The presented study investigates the impact of prereconstruction radiation on outcomes of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free-flap breast reconstructions using largest database available in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2011 and 2019, 3926 female patients underwent 4577 DIEP flap breast reconstructions in 22 different German breast cancer centers. The cases were divided into a no-radiation (NR) and a radiation (R) group, according to radiation status before reconstruction. Groups were compared with regard to surgical complications and free-flap outcome. RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference between the groups regarding the rate of total flap loss [1.9% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.743], partial flap loss [0.9% (NR) vs 1.5 (R), P = 0.069], and revision surgery [vascular revision: 4.4% (NR) vs 4.1% (R), P = 0.686; wound revision: 7.6% (NR) vs 9.4% (R), P = 0.122]. However, the patients had a significantly higher risk of developing wound healing disturbances at the recipient site [1.2% (NR) vs 2.1% (R), P = 0.035] and showed significantly longer hospitalization {8 [SD, 8.4 (NR)] vs 9 [SD, 15.4 {R}] days, P = 0.006} after prereconstruction radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that DIEP flap reconstruction after radiation therapy is feasible. Women with a history of radiation therapy should, however, be informed in detail about the higher risk for wound healing disturbances at the recipient site.

The spreaded gracilis flap revisited: Comparing outcomes in lower limb reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: In lower limb reconstruction, the free gracilis muscle flap is usually chosen for coverage of small- to medium-sized defects. Aim of this study was a re-appraisal regarding the reconstructive indications of the gracilis muscle flap with a focus on postoperative complications in order to evaluate if it can also be routinely used to reconstruct large-size lower limb defects. METHODS: A total of 204 patients underwent free gracilis muscle transfers for lower limb reconstruction at our institution. Cases were divided according to the size of the defect into two groups (<150 cm2 versus ≥150 cm2 ). The small- to medium defect size group included 150 patients and the large defect size group included 54 patients. In the large defect size group, the muscle was enlarged as needed by careful dissection of the epimysium and all connective tissue surrounding the intrinsic vessels under loupe magnification to protect the muscle perfusion. Surgical complications were accounted for and the two groups compared accordingly. RESULTS: Overall, there were no significant differences between the two groups of patients regarding the rate of major (15.72% versus 10.91%; P = .506) and minor surgical complications (6.92% versus 3.64%; P = .522). The total percentage of flap losses in the small to medium defect size group was 5.03%. There were no total flap losses in the large defect size group (P = .117). CONCLUSION: The use of the spreaded gracilis flap provides a valuable option for the microsurgeon, especially also to reconstruct large size lower limb defects.

Postburn Head and Neck Reconstruction: An Algorithmic Approach.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing functional and aesthetic outcomes in postburn head and neck reconstruction remains a surgical challenge. Recurrent contractures, impaired range of motion, and disfigurement because of disruption of the aesthetic subunits of the face, can result in poor patient satisfaction and ultimately, contribute to social isolation of the patient. In an effort to improve the quality of life of these patients, this study evaluates different surgical approaches with an emphasis on tissue expansion of free and regional flaps. METHODS: Regional and free-flap reconstruction was performed in 20 patients (26 flaps) with severe postburn head and neck contractures. To minimize donor site morbidity and obtain large amounts of thin and pliable tissue, pre-expansion was performed in all patients treated with locoregional flap reconstructions (12/12), and 62% (8/14) of patients with free-flap reconstructions. Algorithms regarding pre- and intraoperative decision-making are discussed, and complications between the techniques as well as long-term (mean follow-up 3 years) results are analyzed. RESULTS: Complications, including tissue expander infection with need for removal or exchange, partial or full flap loss, were evaluated and occurred in 25% (3/12) of patients with locoregional and 36% (5/14) of patients receiving free-flap reconstructions. Secondary revision surgery was performed in 33% (4/12) of locoregional flaps and 93% (13/14) of free flaps. CONCLUSIONS: Both locoregional as well as distant tissue transfers have their role in postburn head and neck reconstruction, whereas pre-expansion remains an invaluable tool. Paying attention to the presented principles and keeping the importance of aesthetic facial subunits in mind, range of motion, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction were improved long term in all our patients, while minimizing donor site morbidity.

Evaluation of Scar Quality after Treatment of Superficial Burns with Dressilk® and Suprathel®-In an Intraindividual Clinical Setting.

BACKGROUND: Various synthetic and biological wound dressings are available for the treatment of superficial burns, and standard care differs among hospitals. Nevertheless, the search for an ideal wound dressing offering a safe healing environment as well as optimal scar quality while being economically attractive is a continuing process. In recent years, Dressilk®, which consists of pure silk, has become the standard of care for the treatment of superficial burns in our hospital. However, no long-term scar-evaluation studies have been performed to compare Dressilk® with the often-used and more expensive Suprathel® in the treatment of superficial burns. METHODS: Subjective and objective scar evaluations were performed three, six, and twelve months after treatment in patients who received simultaneous treatment of 20 superficial burn wounds with both Suprathel® and Dressilk®. The evaluations were performed using the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Cutometer®, Mexameter®, Tewameter®, and the O2C®. RESULTS: Both dressings showed mostly equivalent results in subjective scar evaluations. In the objective scar evaluations, the wounds treated with Dressilk® showed a faster return to the qualities of non-injured skin. Wound areas treated with the two dressings showed no significant differences in elasticity and transepidermal water loss after 12 months. Only oxygen saturation was significantly lower in wound areas treated with Suprathel® (p = 0.008). Subjectively, wound areas treated with Dressilk® showed significantly higher pigmentation after six months, which was not apparent after 12 months. CONCLUSION: Both wound dressings led to esthetically satisfying scar recovery without significant differences from normal uninjured skin after 12 months. Therefore, Dressilk® remains an economically and clinically interesting alternative to Suprathel® for the treatment of superficial burns.

Using High-Resolution Ultrasound to Assess Post-Facial Paralysis Synkinesis-Machine Settings and Technical Aspects for Facial Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Synkinesis of the facial musculature is a detrimental sequalae in post-paralytic facial palsy (PPFP) patients. Detailed knowledge on the technical requirements and device properties in a high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) examination is mandatory for a reliable facial muscle assessment in PPFP patients. We therefore aimed to outline the key steps in a HRUS examination and extract an optimized workflow schema. METHODS: From December 2020 to April 2021, 20 patients with unilateral synkinesis underwent HRUS. All HRUS examinations were performed by the first author using US devices with linear multifrequency transducers of 4-18 MHz, including a LOGIQ E9 and a LOGIQ S7 XDclear (GE Healthcare; Milwaukee, WI, USA), as well as Philips Affinity 50G (Philips Health Systems; Eindhoven, the Netherlands). RESULTS: Higher-frequency and multifrequency linear probes ≥15 MHz provided superior imaging qualities. The selection of the preset program Small Parts, Breast or Thyroid was linked with a more detailed contrast of the imaging morphology of facial tissue layers. Frequency (Frq) = 15 MHz, Gain (Gn) = 25-35 db, Depth (D) = 1-1.5 cm, and Focus (F) = 0.5 cm enhanced the image quality and assessability. CONCLUSIONS: An optimized HRUS examination protocol for quantitative and qualitative facial muscle assessments was proposed.