Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Eur Radiol ; 30(7): 3641-3649, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32125513

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT), whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI), and whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI) for the detection of metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to June 2019. Studies were selected if they reported data that could be used to construct contingency tables to compare 18F-FDG PET/CT, WB-MRI, and WB-DWI. Two authors independently extracted data on study characteristics and assessed methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Forest plots were generated for sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT, WB-MRI, and whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (WB-DWI). Summary receiver operating characteristic plots were created. RESULTS: The 4 studies meeting inclusion criteria had a total of 564 patients and 559 lesions, 233 of which were metastases. In studies of 18F-FDG PET/CT, the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.95) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96), respectively. For WB-MRI, pooled sensitivity was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.18-1.00) and pooled specificity was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.95). Pooled sensitivity and specificity for WB-DWI were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.46-0.93) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96), respectively. There was no statistical difference between the diagnostic odds ratio of WB-MRI and WB-DWI compared with that of PET/CT (p = 0.186 for WB-DWI; p = 0.638 for WB-MRI). CONCLUSION: WB-MRI and DWI are radiation-free alternatives with comparable diagnostic performance to 18F-FDG PET/CT for M staging of NSCLC. KEY POINTS: • Whole-body MRI with or without diffusion-weighted imaging has a high accuracy for the diagnostic evaluation of metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. • Whole-body MRI may be used as a non-invasive and radiation-free alternative to positron emission tomography with CT with similar diagnostic performance.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Imagen de Cuerpo Entero/métodos , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radiofármacos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Radiology ; 290(2): 525-534, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30480492

RESUMEN

Purpose To perform a meta-analysis of the literature to compare the diagnostic performance of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI in the differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules and masses. Materials and Methods Published English-language studies on the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and/or DW MRI in the characterization of pulmonary lesions were searched in relevant databases through December 2017. The primary focus was on studies in which joint DW MRI and PET/CT were performed in the entire study population, to reduce interstudy heterogeneity. For DW MRI, lesion-to-spinal cord signal intensity ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient were evaluated; for PET/CT, maximum standard uptake value was evaluated. The pooled sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for PET/CT and DW MRI were determined along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 4224 participants and 4463 lesions (3090 malignant lesions [69.2%]). In the primary analysis of joint DW MRI and PET/CT studies (n = 6), DW MRI had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 83% (95% CI: 75%, 89%) and 91% (95% CI: 80%, 96%), respectively, compared with 78% (95% CI: 70%, 84%) (P = .01 vs DW MRI) and 81% (95% CI: 72%, 88%) (P = .056 vs DW MRI) for PET/CT. DW MRI yielded an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.95), versus 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.89) for PET/CT (P = .001). The diagnostic odds ratio of DW MRI (50 [95% CI: 19, 132]) was superior to that of PET/CT (15 [95% CI: 7, 32]) (P = .006). Conclusion The diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI is comparable or superior to that of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary lesions. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Schiebler in this issue.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Eur Radiol ; 26(9): 2915-20, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26638164

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of signal intensity of the lesion-to-spinal cord ratio (LSR) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary nodules suspicious for lung cancer in granulomatous lung disease-endemic regions. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules detected by chest computed tomography and histopathologically confirmed diagnoses were included in the study. DW images were analysed semiquantitatively by focusing regions of interest on the lesion and spinal cord at the same level (for LSR calculation). ADCs were estimated from ratios of the two image signal intensities. Ratios of T1 and T2 signal intensity between nodules and muscle were calculated for comparison. RESULTS: Mean ADCs ± standard deviations for lung cancer and benign lesions were 0.9 ± 0.2 and 1.3 ± 0.2 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively. Mean LSRs were 1.4 ± 0.3 for lung cancer and 1 ± 0.1 for benign lesions. ADCs and LSRs differed significantly between malignant and benign lesions (P < 0.001). Mean T2 signal intensity ratios also differed significantly between benign and malignant lesions (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DWI can help to differentiate malignant from benign lesions according to ADC and the LSR with good accuracy. KEY POINTS: • DW imaging can help differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary nodules. • ADC and LSR signal intensities had only small overlap between malignant and benign pulmonary nodules. • Mean T2 signal intensity ratios differed significantly between benign and malignant lesions.


Asunto(s)
Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Enfermedades Endémicas , Granuloma , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/patología , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA