Development of a measuring app for systemic sclerosis-related digital ulceration (SALVE: Scleroderma App for Lesion VErification).

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that photographs (in addition to self-reported data) can be collected daily by patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) using a smartphone app designed specifically for digital lesions, and could provide an objective outcome measure for use in clinical trials. METHODS: An app was developed to collect images and patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) including Pain score and the Hand Disability in Systemic Sclerosis-Digital Ulcers (HDISS-DU) questionnaire. Participants photographed their lesion(s) each day for 30 days and uploaded images to a secure repository. Lesions were analysed both manually and automatically, using a machine learning approach. RESULTS: 25 patients with SSc-related digital lesions consented of whom 19 completed the 30-day study, with evaluable data from 27 lesions. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) baseline Pain score was 5.7 (2.4) and HDISS-DU 2.2 (0.9), indicating high lesion and disease-related morbidity. 506 images were used in the analysis (mean number of used images per lesion 18.7, SD 8.3). Mean (SD) manual and automated lesion areas at day 1 were 11.6 (16.0) and 13.9 (16.7) mm2 respectively. Manual area decreased by 0.08mm2 per day (2.4mm2 over 30 days) and automated area by 0.1mm2 (3.0mm2 over 30 days). Average gradients of manual and automated measurements over 30 days correlated strongly (r = 0.81). Manual measurements were on average 40% lower than automated, with wide limits of agreement. CONCLUSION: Even patients with significant hand disability were able to use the app. Automated measurement of finger lesions could be valuable as an outcome measure in clinical trials.

A phase 2 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of the mPGES-1 inhibitor vipoglanstat in systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud's.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to test the hypothesis, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study that vipoglanstat, an inhibitor of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1) which decreases prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and increases prostacyclin biosynthesis, improves RP. METHODS: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and ≥7 RP attacks during the last screening week prior to a baseline visit were randomised to four weeks treatment with vipoglanstat 120 mg or placebo. A daily electronic diary captured RP attacks (duration and pain) and Raynaud's Condition Score, with change in RP attacks/week as primary end point. Cold challenge assessments were performed at baseline and end of treatment. Exploratory endpoints included patients' and physicians' global impression of change, Assessment of Scleroderma-associated Raynaud's Phenomenon questionnaire, mPGES-1 activity, and urinary excretion of arachidonic acid metabolites. RESULTS: Sixty-nine subjects received vipoglanstat (n = 33) or placebo (n = 36). Mean weekly number of RP attacks (baseline; vipoglanstat 14.4[SD 6.7], placebo 18.2[12.6]) decreased by 3.4[95% CI -5.8;-1.0] and 4.2[-6.5;-2.0] attacks per week (p= 0.628) respectively. All patient reported outcomes improved, with no difference between the groups. Mean change in recovery of peripheral blood flow after cold challenge did not differ between the study groups. Vipoglanstat fully inhibited mPGES-1, resulting in 57% reduction of PGE2 and 50% increase of prostacyclin metabolites in urine. Vipoglanstat was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Although vipoglanstat was safe, and well tolerated in a dose achieving full inhibition of mPGES-1, it was ineffective in SSc-related RP. Further development and evaluation of vipoglanstat will therefore be in other diseases where mPGES-1 plays a pathogenetic role.

A rare form of calcinosis in patients with systemic sclerosis-myositis overlap: report of four cases.

Objectives: Calcinosis is a well-described entity that occurs in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and dermatomyositis (DM). Calcinosis in SSc typically occurs over pressure points and is usually nodular. We present a case series of four patients with SSc with a much rarer, diffuse form of calcinosis to illustrate this poorly recognized pattern of extensive and debilitating disease. Methods: Four patients with SSc and extensive calcinosis were identified from patients attending a tertiary rheumatology centre in the preceding 3 years. Their electronic case notes, radiographic images and medical photographs were reviewed. Results: All four patients had the diffuse cutaneous subtype of SSc (dcSSc) and additionally a myositis overlap. This was in the context of 102 of 461 (22%) patients with SSc whose clinical details had been recorded in the preceding 3 years having dcSSc. Their ages at diagnosis ranged from 27 to 65 years. Three were female, two were anti-Scl70 antibody positive, and two were anti-PMScl antibody positive. Development of calcinosis occurred between 1 and 6 years after onset of SSc. Plain radiography showed very extensive calcinosis in various sites, distributed in a pattern akin to sheets of calcium-containing deposits in the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Conclusions: Although calcinosis is common in SSc, extensive sheet-like calcinosis is very rare. Our experience suggests that when this form of calcinosis does occur, this is in the context of the diffuse cutaneous subtype of disease and with myositis overlap. The four cases described should raise awareness of this unusual and extensive pattern of disease.

Development and Initial Validation of the Novel Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Activity Index.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate measurement of disease activity in systemic sclerosis (SSc) remains a significant clinical challenge. The Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium (SCTC) convened an Activity Index Working Group (WG) to develop a novel measure of disease activity (SCTC-AI). METHODS: Using consensus methodology, we developed a conceptual definition of disease activity. Literature review and expert consensus generated provisional SCTC-AI items, which were reduced by Delphi survey. Provisional items were weighted against a combined endpoint of morbidity and mortality, using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study (ASCS) (n=1,254). External validation of the SCTC-AI was performed using data collected from 1,103 Canadian Scleroderma Research Group Study participants. RESULTS: Disease activity in SSc was defined using consensus methodology as 'aspects of disease that are reversible, or can be arrested, with time and, or effective therapy'. One-hundred and forty-one provisional SCTC-AI items were generated and reduced using 3 rounds of Delphi survey and statistical reduction and weighting, against mortality and quality of life measures, yielding a final 24-item index with a maximum possible score of 140. Survival analysis in an external cohort showed a graded relationship between disease activity scores and survival (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: We present a novel instrument to quantify the burden of disease activity in SSc. We have employed a rigorous consensus-based process in combination with data-driven methods, to develop an instrument that has face, content and criterion validity. Further work is required to fully validate and confirm the construct and discriminative validity of the SCTC-AI.

Mobile phone thermography of the toes in patients with systemic sclerosis-a pilot study.

Objectives: To investigate the hypotheses that in patients with SSc, the temperature gradient between the dorsum of the foot and toes (distal-dorsal difference [DDD]) is 'more negative' (toes cooler) than in healthy controls, is greatest along the first (great) toe and that the severities of thermographic abnormalities in the feet and hands are correlated. Methods: Thermographic images of the dorsum of each hand and foot were captured using a thermal camera attached to an iPhone in 40 patients with SSc and 20 healthy controls. DDDs along the fingers (index, middle, ring and little) and toes (great toe and 'others') were measured. Results: There was a non-significant trend for the great toes to be colder in patients with SSc than in controls. The mean great toe DDD was more negative in patients (right: -2.89°C, left: -2.91°C, mean: -2.90°C) than in controls (right: -2.36°C, left: -2.42°C, mean: -2.39°C) (P = 0.37 for mean values). Patients' great toes were colder than 'other' (lesser) toes (right: -2.58°C, left: -2.63°C), although not significantly. In patients with SSc, finger and great toe temperature gradients were correlated (r = 0.406, ρ = 0.01). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the great toe is the coldest in patients with SSc and that patients with the coldest fingers tend to have the coldest toes. Severe RP symptoms in the hands should prompt podiatry assessment and foot care education. Mobile phone thermography is a convenient tool for assessing the digital vasculature but first requires validation in larger studies with a longitudinal component.

Clinical trial eligibility of a real-world connective tissue disease cohort: Results from the LEAP cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Classification criteria aim to identify a homogenous population of patients for research. We aimed to quantify how well phase-III trials in connective tissue diseases (CTDs) represent a real-world cohort. METHODS: A comprehensive review of all major published phase-III trials in CTDs was performed (clinicaltrials.gov). Classification criteria utilised most commonly in clinical trials were applied to a multicentre unselected CTD cohort. RESULTS: There were 42 CTD trials identified, with no trials in mixed (MCTD) or undifferentiated CTD (UCTD). The majority of trials (N = 38, 90 %) required patients to meet classification criteria for their respective disease. Eight (19.0 %) excluded patients with overlapping CTDs and a further two (4.8 %) excluded specific overlapping features, such as pulmonary arterial hypertension. One study explicitly allowed overlap syndromes. Our real-world CTD cohort included 391 patients. Patients with UCTD or MCTD (91/391, 23.3 %) would be excluded from participation in clinical trials for not having an eligible diagnosis. Of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), SLE, systemic sclerosis (SSc) or idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), 211/300 (70.3 %) met the classification criteria for their respective diagnosis and 24/211 (11.4 %) met criteria for >1 CTD. In total, 187/391 (47.8 %) would be eligible for recruitment, based upon their physician diagnosis, and most stringent trial eligibility criteria. CONCLUSION: In an unselected, real-world CTD cohort, up to half of patients are ineligible for clinical trials due to not meeting classification criteria, overlapping features or a lack of trials within their primary disease. To address this inequality in access to novel therapies, clinical trial design should evolve eligibility criteria in CTDs.

Clinical trajectories of hand function impairment in systemic sclerosis: an unmet clinical need across disease subsets.

BACKGROUND: Hand involvement is an early manifestation of systemic sclerosis (SSc), culprit of diagnosis and classification, and recognised major driver of disability. Impairment of hand function burdens both limited and diffuse cutaneous subsets and therefore could be targeted as 'basket' endpoint in SSc. Nevertheless, its natural history in current standard of care is not well characterised, limiting the design of targeted trials. The aim of this study is to describe prevalence, natural history and clinical factors associated with hand function deterioration in a longitudinal, multicentre, observational SSc cohort. METHODS: Hand function was captured through the validated Cochin Hand Function Scale in patients consecutively enrolled in a multicentre observational study and observed over 24 months. Minimal clinically important differences and patient acceptable symptom state were analysed as previously described. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-six consecutive patients were enrolled from 10 centres; 201 with complete follow-up data were included in the analysis. Median (IQR) disease duration was 5 (2-11) years. One hundred and five (52.2%) patients reported clinically significant worsening. Accordingly, the proportion of patients reporting unacceptable hand function increased over 2 years from 27.8% to 35.8% (p<0.001). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis identified male gender, disease subset, Raynaud's Condition Score, tenosynovitis and pain, as some of the key factors associated with worsening hand involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Hand function deteriorates over time in more than 50% of SSc patients despite available therapies. The analysis of factors associated with hand function worsening supports the involvement of both inflammation, vascular and fibrotic processes in hand involvement, making it a hallmark clinical manifestation of SSc. Our data are poised to inform the design of intervention studies to target this major driver of disability in SSc.

Patients' perspectives on systemic sclerosis-related Raynaud's phenomenon in the feet: A qualitative study from the OMERACT Foot and Ankle Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To explore, from patients' perspectives, the symptoms and impact of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) on the feet of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc-RP), and to identify which foot-related domains are important to patients. METHODS: Forty participants (34 women) with SSc-RP took part in one of six focus groups held in the United Kingdom or United States. Participants were purposively sampled to ensure diversity in disease type, duration, and ethnicity. The topic guide included questions on RP impact, self-management, and treatment expectations. Qualitative content analysis was employed to identify key concepts in the data relating to foot-specific symptoms and their impact. Themes were organized by corresponding domains of potential importance. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants (70 %) reported experiencing RP in their feet. Five themes were identified corresponding to domains of potential importance: temperature changes, pain, cramping and stiffness, numbness, and color changes. These issues negatively affected participants' lives, impairing walking, driving, and socializing, and causing issues with footwear and hosiery. CONCLUSIONS: This large qualitative study exploring the experiences of patients with SSc-RP in the feet identified several key domains of high importance to patients. SSc-RP is common in the feet, presents in several patterns, and impacts multiple aspects of patients' lives. These findings indicate where future foot-specific interventions for RP could be targeted. Findings from this study improve understanding of what domains are important to patients with SSc-RP affecting the feet and will contribute to the development of a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.

Circulating collagen neo-epitopes and their role in the prediction of fibrosis in patients with systemic sclerosis: a multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Extracellular matrix remodelling is a hallmark of systemic sclerosis. We evaluated extracellular matrix neo-epitopes as potential serum biomarkers for progression of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis. METHODS: We included patients meeting the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism criteria and healthy controls from a derivation and validation cohort. The primary outcome was progression of fibrosis at follow-up, defined as decline in percentage of predicted forced vital capacity of 10% or more in patients with interstitial lung disease or increase in modified Rodnan skin score of 25% or more and more than 5 points at a 1-year follow-up visit. Longitudinal assessment and biobanking followed European Scleroderma Trials and Research standards. Extracellular matrix-degradation (BGM, C3M, C4M, and C6M) and extracellular matrix-formation neo-epitopes (PRO-C1, PRO-C3, PRO-C4, PRO-C5, and PRO-C6) were measured in serum using validated ELISAs. FINDINGS: Between Aug 18, 2011, and Jan 19, 2015, 149 patients with systemic sclerosis (27 [18%] progressors and 122 [82%] non-progressors) and 29 healthy controls were included in the derivation cohort. Concentrations of type III and IV collagen neo-epitopes were higher in patients with systemic sclerosis compared with healthy controls and were significantly associated with systemic sclerosis in univariable logistic regression. Concentrations of degradation neo-epitopes of type III and IV collagens and their turnover ratios distinguished between progressors and non-progressors (C3M area under the curve 0·77 [95% CI 0·67-0·86], p<0·0001; PRO-C3:C3M 0·70 [0·59-0·80], p=0·0013; C4M 0·73 [0·63-0·82], p<0·0001; PRO-C4:C4M 0·75 [0·64-0·86], p<0·0001). 384 patients with systemic sclerosis (73 [19%] progressors) and 60 healthy controls were included in the multicentre validation cohort between April 17, 2003, and Jan 24, 2017. Analysis of the validation cohort confirmed that neo-epitopes of type III and IV collagens are changed in progressors. In a pooled analysis of both cohorts, the serum concentrations of formation neo-epitopes PRO-C3 and PRO-C4 and the turnover ratio of type IV collagen (PRO-C4:C4M) were higher in skin progressors. The turnover ratio of type IV collagen and PRO-C3 significantly predicted skin progression in a multivariable model adjusted for modified Rodnan skin score, sex, and age. INTERPRETATION: These data suggest that neo-epitopes of type III and IV collagens are promising biomarkers for the assessment and prediction of extracellular matrix remodelling in systemic sclerosis. They could be used in clinical practice to risk stratify patients at risk of progression of fibrosis. FUNDING: None.

Comparative efficacy and safety of treatments for secondary Raynaud's phenomenon: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Several pharmacological treatments are available for secondary Raynaud's phenomenon, but there is uncertainty regarding the best options. We aimed to assess and compare the benefits and harms of treatments available for secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. METHOD: We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacological treatments. We searched for systematic reviews published in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to Jan 31, 2017, and for RCTs published from inception to Sept 24, 2019 in MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We included double-blind RCTs (parallel or crossover) that compared two or more pharmacological treatments or placebo in patients with secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. Individual patient data were obtained for one unpublished RCT. Three researchers independently screened the texts and extracted the data. Efficacy outcomes included severity (on a ten-point scale), daily frequency, and mean duration of Raynaud's phenomenon attacks. We also examined tolerability and acceptability. Pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses were used to synthesise data. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017057518). FINDINGS: We included 58 RCTs in the analysis, comprising 3867 patients (3540 [91·5%] with secondary Raynaud's phenomenon) and 15 classes of drugs. Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors were more effective than placebo for frequency (mean difference -0·36 [95% credibility interval -0·69 to -0·04]), severity (-0·34 [-0·66 to -0·03]), and duration (-3·42 [-6·62 to -0·29]) of attacks (low to moderate level of evidence). Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were superior to placebo for frequency (-0·35 [-0·67 to -0·02]) and severity (-0·84 [-1·25 to -0·45]) of attacks (low level of evidence). For severity of attacks, selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (-1·54 [-2·68 to -0·41]; very low level of evidence) and oral prostacyclin receptor agonists (-0·48 [-0·80 to -0·16]; low level of evidence) were superior to placebo. No other drug classes were significantly superior to placebo with regard to efficacy outcomes. Compared with placebo, tolerability was lower for PDE5 inhibitors (incidence rate ratio for serious adverse events or early study exit due to adverse events 3·30 [95% CrI 1·49 to 7·55]) and CCBs (3·13 [1·33 to 7·04]). For all outcomes, global heterogeneity and between-study variance ranged from low (I2=0% and τ2=0·0 for attack severity and duration) to moderate (I2=41% and τ2=0·2 for tolerability). The overall risk of bias was judged to be low in 22 (38%), high in ten (17%), and unclear in 26 (45%) RCTs. INTERPRETATION: PDE5 inhibitors and CCBs are the most effective pharmacological options, albeit with moderate efficacy and a low level of evidence. Current evidence does not support the use of any other drug in secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. FUNDING: None.