Positive and negative experiences of breast pumping during the first 6 months.

For mothers with breastfeeding difficulties, pumping can be recommended to help establish milk production. However, pumping may present some barriers to successful breastfeeding. Mothers with milk supply concern may be at higher risk of barriers to successful breastfeeding. No previous studies have described experiences of pumping among mothers with milk supply concern. We conducted 10 focus groups of 56 mothers who had milk supply concern in the first month after birth. A paid, trained facilitator led groups in a semi-structured approach. Sessions were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were coded independently by two investigators and analysed using grounded theory. We identified five themes related to the experience of pumping among mothers with milk supply concern: (1) additional control over breastfeeding from pumping: 'I would feed and then give him … whatever I could manage to pump to him'. (2) Painful experience: 'The first time I pumped my boobs hurt so bad'. (3) Pumped volume affected milk supply concern: 'Pump and there was hardly anything coming out that's when I started to worry'. (4) Pumping interfered with other nurturing activities: 'While you're pumping, you can't touch the baby'. (5) Frustration from inconsistent provider advice: 'They told me to pump … and then said, "That's going to cause your milk to increase too much" '. Mothers had positive and negative experiences with pumping. Clinicians should assess a mother's experience shortly after she initiates pumping, as further management and counselling may be necessary to avoid barriers to successful breastfeeding.

Questions From Family Members During the Dying Process And Moral Distress Experienced by ICU Nurses.

BACKGROUND: For a hospitalized patient, transitioning to comfort measures only (CMO) involves discontinuation of life-prolonging interventions with a goal of allowing natural death. Nurses play a pivotal role during the provision of CMO, caring for both the dying patient and their family. OBJECTIVE: To examine the experiences of ICU nurses caring for patients receiving CMO. METHODS: Between October 2020 and June 2021, nurses in the neuro- and medical-cardiac intensive care units at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, WA, completed surveys about their experiences providing CMO. Surveys addressed involvement in discussions about CMO and questions asked by family members of dying patients. We also assessed nurses' moral distress related to CMO and used ordinal logistic regression to examine predictors of moral distress. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 82 nurses (response rate 44%), with 79 (96%) reporting experience providing CMO in the previous year. Most preferred to be present for discussions between physicians or advanced practice providers and family members about transitioning to CMO (89% most of the time or always); however, only 31% were present most of the time or always. Questions from family about time to death, changes in breathing, and medications to relieve symptoms were common. Most nurses reported moral distress at least some of the time when providing CMO (62%). Feeling well-prepared to answer specific questions from family was associated with less moral distress. CONCLUSION: There is discordance between nurses' preferences for inclusion in discussions about the transition to CMO and their actual presence. Moral distress is common for nurses when providing CMO and feeling prepared to answer questions from family members may attenuate distress.

An Embedded Curriculum to Teach Critical Incident Debriefing to Internal Medicine Residents.

Background Internal medicine residents frequently experience distressing clinical events; critical event debriefing is one tool to help mitigate their effects. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a 1-hour workshop teaching residents a novel, efficient approach to leading a team debrief after emotionally charged clinical events. Methods An internal needs assessment identified time and confidence as debriefing barriers. In response, we created the STREAM (Structured, Timely, Reflection, tEAM-based) framework, a 15-minute structured approach to leading a debrief. Senior residents participated in a 1-hour workshop on the first day of an inpatient medicine rotation to learn the STREAM framework. To evaluate learning outcomes, participants completed the same survey immediately before and after the session, and at the end of their 4-week rotation. Senior residents at another site who did not complete the workshop also evaluated their comfort leading debriefs. Results Fifty out of 65 senior residents (77%) participated in the workshop. After the workshop, participants felt more prepared to lead debriefs, learned a structured format for debriefing, and felt they had enough time to lead debriefs. Thirty-four of 50 (68%) workshop participants and 20 of 41 (49%) comparison residents completed the end-of-rotation survey. Senior residents who participated in the workshop were more likely than nonparticipants to report feeling prepared to lead debriefs. Conclusions A brief workshop is an effective method for teaching a framework for leading a team debrief.

Before-After Study of a Checklist to Improve Acute Care to ICU Handoffs.

Transferring care of a patient is a critical process. The objective of this study was to evaluate a checklist to standardize handoffs from acute care to the intensive care unit (ICU). This was a single-center, before-after study of a checklist to standardize transfers of patients from acute care to the medical-cardiac ICU. Clinicians completed surveys about handoffs before and after checklist implementation. The association between study period and survey data was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression with cross-classified multilevel models. Surveys were completed by 179 clinicians. After checklist implementation, handoffs were more likely to occur in the ICU (OR 17.23; 95% CI, 1.81-164.19) and cover patient treatment preferences (OR 2.73; 95% CI, 1.12-6.66). However, checklist uptake was suboptimal (30% of responses indicated checklist use). Implementation of a checklist during acute care to ICU transfers is challenging. Signals suggesting process improvement warrant additional study.

Applying Human-Centered Design to Refinement of the Jumpstart Guide, a Clinician- and Patient-Facing Goals-of-Care Discussion Priming Tool.

CONTEXT: Human-centered design provides a framework to understand the needs of patients and clinicians who are the target of goals-of-care discussion priming tools. Few studies employ human-centered design to develop and refine their tools. OBJECTIVES: To describe how human-centered design can be applied to the development and refinement of clinician- and patient-facing inpatient goals-of-care discussion guides (Jumpstart guides). METHODS: Human-centered design was applied to the development and refinement of the inpatient Jumpstart guides in four phases: (1) discovering problems based on prior pilots, studies, and research team priorities; (2) further defining problems based on stakeholder and expert review of the current guides; (3) designing solutions based on consensus among stakeholders; and (4) validating solutions after research team review of stakeholder comments. RESULTS: Five initial problems were identified by the research team in phase 1. After expert and stakeholder review in phase 2, 30 additional problems were identified related to Jumpstart guide format, structure, and content. In phase 3, stakeholders proposed solutions to these 35 problems and reached consensus on 32 of these. There was disagreement in 3 areas, including how to frame discussions around cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 2 perceived barriers to inpatient goals-of-care discussions. In phase 4, the research team reviewed all stakeholder input and reached final consensus on solutions to all of the identified problems. CONCLUSION: Human-centered design is a useful tool for enhancing communication interventions in serious illness and can easily be integrated in future development and refinement of clinician- and patient-facing interventions to enhance goals-of-care discussions.

Creating a Framework to Integrate Residency Program and Medical Center Approaches to Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Training.

Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) are core components of graduate medical education (GME). Training programs and affiliated medical centers must partner to create an environment in which trainees can learn while meaningfully contributing to QIPS efforts, to further the shared goal of improving patient care. Numerous challenges have been identified in the literature, including lack of resources, lack of faculty expertise, and siloed QIPS programs. In this article, the authors describe a framework for integrated QIPS training for residents in the University of Washington Internal Medicine Residency Program, beginning in 2014 with the creation of a dedicated QIPS chief resident position and assistant program director for health systems position, the building of a formal curriculum, and integration with medical center QIPS efforts. The postgraduate year (PGY) 1 curriculum focused on the culture of patient safety and entering traditional patient safety event (PSE) reports. The PGY-2 curriculum highlighted QIPS methodology and how to conduct mentored PSE reviews of cases that were of educational value to trainees and a clinical priority to the medical center. Additional PGY-2/PGY-3 training focused on the active report, presentation, and evaluation of cases during morbidity and mortality conferences while on clinical services, as well as how to lead longitudinal QIPS work. Select residents led mentored QI projects as part of an additional elective. The hallmark feature of this framework was the depth of integration with medical center priorities, which maximized educational and operational value. Evaluation of the program demonstrated improved attitudes, knowledge, and behavior changes in trainees, and significant contributions to medical center QIPS work. This specialty-agnostic framework allowed for training program and medical center integration, as well as horizontal integration across GME specialties, and can be a model for other institutions.

Maternal experience of interactions with providers among mothers with milk supply concern.

BACKGROUND: Milk supply concern is the most common reason given by mothers for discontinuing breastfeeding. OBJECTIVES. To describe maternal experiences of interactions with health care providers related to milk supply. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten focus groups (N = 56 participants) were conducted among mothers who had had milk supply concern in the first month after birth. Group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed to identify themes. Results. Interactions regarding milk supply concern evoked strong emotions, including gratitude, guilt, disappointment, and fear, and measurement of infant weight was frequently reported as a trigger for these emotions. Some mothers reported that experiencing "pressure" and "guilt" when providers emphasized exclusive breastfeeding led to suboptimal breastfeeding choices. CONCLUSIONS: Interactions with providers about milk supply concern evoke strong emotions among mothers. Providers should be aware that how they communicate routine advice regarding infant weight and formula may have unintended consequences, including discontinuation of breastfeeding.