Characterization of positioning uncertainties in PET-CT-MR trimodality solutions for radiotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positioning uncertainties of two PET/CT-MR imaging setups, C1 and C2. Because the PET/CT data were acquired on the same hybrid device with automatic image registration, experiments were conducted using CT-MRI data. In C1, a transfer table was used, which allowed the patient to move from one imager to another while maintaining the same position. In C2, the patient stood up and was positioned in the same radiotherapy treatment position on each imager. The two setups provided a set of PET/CT and MR images. The accuracy of the registration software was evaluated on the CT-MRI data of one patient using known translations and rotations of MRI data. The uncertainties on the two setups were estimated using a phantom and a cohort of 30 patients. The accuracy of the positioning uncertainties was evaluated using descriptive statistics and a t-test to determine whether the mean shift significantly deviated from zero (p < 0.05) for each setup. The maximum registration errors were less than 0.97 mm and 0.6° for CT-MRI registration. On the phantom, the mean total uncertainties were less than 2.74 mm and 1.68° for C1 and 1.53 mm and 0.33° for C2. For C1, the t-test showed that the displacements along the z-axis did not significantly deviate from zero (p = 0.093). For C2, significant deviations from zero were present for anterior-posterior and superior-inferior displacements. The mean total uncertainties were less than 4 mm and 0.42° for C1 and less than 1.39 mm and 0.27° for C2 in the patients. Furthermore, the t-test showed significant deviations from zero for C1 on the anterior-posterior and roll sides. For C2, there was a significant deviation from zero for the left-right displacements.This study shows that transfer tables require careful evaluation before use in radiotherapy.

Synthetic MRI for Radiotherapy Planning for Brain and Prostate Cancers: Phantom Validation and Patient Evaluation.

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of T 1 and T 2 mappings derived from a multispectral pulse sequence (magnetic resonance image compilation, MAGiC®) on 1.5-T MRI and with conventional sequences [gradient echo with variable flip angle (GRE-VFA) and multi-echo spin echo (ME-SE)] compared to the reference values for the purpose of radiotherapy treatment planning. Methods: The accuracy of T 1 and T 2 measurements was evaluated with 2 coils [head and neck unit (HNU) and BODY coils] on phantoms using descriptive statistics and Bland-Altman analysis. The reproducibility and repeatability of T 1 and T 2 measurements were performed on 15 sessions with the HNU coil. The T 1 and T 2 synthetic sequences obtained by both methods were evaluated according to quality assurance (QA) requirements for radiotherapy. T 1 and T 2 in vivo measurements of the brain or prostate tissues of two groups of five subjects were also compared. Results: The phantom results showed good agreement (mean bias, 8.4%) between the two measurement methods for T 1 values between 490 and 2,385 ms and T 2 values between 25 and 400 ms. MAGiC® gave discordant results for T 1 values below 220 ms (bias with the reference values, from 38% to 1,620%). T 2 measurements were accurately estimated below 400 ms (mean bias, 8.5%) by both methods. The QA assessments are in agreement with the recommendations of imaging for contouring purposes for radiotherapy planning. On patient data of the brain and prostate, the measurements of T 1 and T 2 by the two quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods were comparable (max difference, <7%). Conclusion: This study shows that the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the multispectral pulse sequence (MAGiC®) were compatible with its use for radiotherapy treatment planning in a range of values corresponding to soft tissues. Even validated for brain imaging, MAGiC® could potentially be used for prostate qMRI.

Trimodality PET/CT/MRI and Radiotherapy: A Mini-Review.

Computed tomography (CT) has revolutionized external radiotherapy by making it possible to visualize and segment the tumors and the organs at risk in a three-dimensional way. However, if CT is a now a standard, it presents some limitations, notably concerning tumor characterization and delineation. Its association with functional and anatomical images, that are positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surpasses its limits. This association can be in the form of a trimodality PET/CT/MRI. The objective of this mini-review is to describe the process of performing this PET/CT/MRI trimodality for radiotherapy and its potential clinical applications. Trimodality can be performed in two ways, either a PET/MRI fused to a planning CT (possibly with a pseudo-CT generated from the MRI for the planning), or a PET/CT fused to an MRI and then registered to a planning CT (possibly the CT of PET/CT if calibrated for radiotherapy). These examinations should be performed in the treatment position, and in the second case, a patient transfer system can be used between the PET/CT and MRI to limit movement. If trimodality requires adapted equipment, notably compatible MRI equipment with high-performance dedicated coils, it allows the advantages of the three techniques to be combined with a synergistic effect while limiting their disadvantages when carried out separately. Trimodality is already possible in clinical routine and can have a high clinical impact and good inter-observer agreement, notably for head and neck cancers, brain tumor, prostate cancer, cervical cancer.