Does the shoe really fit? Characterising ill-fitting footwear among community-dwelling older adults attending geriatric services: an observational cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Falls in older people are common and can result in loss of confidence, fear of falling, restriction in activity and loss of independence. Causes of falls are multi-factorial. There is a paucity of research assessing the footwear characteristics among older people who are at high risk of falls, internationally and in the Irish setting. The aim of this study was to examine the proportion of older adults attending a geriatric day hospital in Ireland who were wearing incorrectly sized shoes. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 111 older adults aged 60 years and over attending a geriatric day hospital in a large Irish teaching hospital was recruited. Demographic data including age, mobility, medications, co-habitation status, footwear worn at home and falls history were recorded. Shoe size and foot length were measured in millimetres using an internal shoe gauge and SATRA shoe size stick, respectively. Participants' self-reported shoe size was recorded. Footwear was assessed using the Footwear Assessment Form (FAF). A Timed Up and Go (TUG) score was recorded. Functional independence was assessed using the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) Scale. The primary outcome of interest in this study was selected as having footwear within the suggested range (10 to 15 mm) on at least one foot. Participants who met this definition were compared to those with ill-fitting footwear on both feet using Chi-square tests, T-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The mean difference between shoe length and foot length was 18.6 mm (SD: 9.6 mm). Overall, 72% of participants were wearing footwear that did not fit correctly on both feet, 90% had shoes with smooth, partly worn or fully worn sole treading and 67% reported wearing slippers at home. Participant age, TUG score and NEADL score were not associated with ill-fitting footwear. CONCLUSIONS: Wearing incorrectly fitting shoes and shoes with unsafe features was common among older adults attending geriatric day services in this study. A large number of participants reported wearing slippers at home.

Prevalence and burden of osteoarthritis amongst older people in Ireland: findings from The Irish LongituDinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) in a population aged ≥50 years in Ireland, and to determine its relationship with demographic and health-related variables. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from Wave 1 of The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA), a population-based study of 8175 people aged ≥50 years were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to determine associations between the presence of OA and a range of demographic and health-related variables. RESULTS: A total of 8175 people ≥50 years in Ireland were identified from the TILDA database of whom 45.7% (n = 2941) were male and 54.3% (n = 4431) were female. The overall prevalence of OA was 12.9% (women-17.3%; men-9.4%). Prevalence increased with age, with prevalence in those aged ≥ 80 years twice that [17.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.97, 21.54] of those aged 50-60 years (8.23, 95% CI 7.32, 9.13). On multivariable analysis, OA was significantly associated (P < 0.02) with female gender, older age, pain severity, higher body mass index (BMI), fear of falling, greater number of physical limitations and medication use. In particular, there was a strong association between the use of NSAIDS and the presence of OA [adj odd ratio (OR) = 5.88, 95% CI 4.16, 8.31]. A significant association was also found between OA and increasing number of chronic diseases (adj OR = 2.75 9, 95% CI = 2.44, 3.09). CONCLUSIONS: OA is a common and multifaceted condition, with comparable prevalence of self-reported OA in Ireland with similar populations. Assessment and management should focus on potentially modifiable factors such as BMI, pain, physical limitations, polypharmacy and fear of falling. More research is required to understand the complex inter-relationships between these and other risk-associated variables.

Access to in-patient stroke services and multidisciplinary team (MDT) rehabilitation: current demands and capacity.

The objective of this project was to analyse the current access to in-patient stroke services and MDT rehabilitation in an acute stroke centre and to compare these services to the recommended "National Clinical Guidelines and Recommendations for the Care of People with Stroke and TIA" (IHF 2010). A retrospective chart review was carried out, recording activity statistics of all patients admitted with acute stroke over a three-month period. 73 patients (male = 40, 54.8%) were included. Patients were discharged from the stroke service after a mean stay of 20.2 days (SD = 19.3). 76.7% (N = 56) of patients were admitted to the acute stroke unit (ASU). The mean length of time from admission to first assessment 3.4 days (SD. = 2.68), with an average of 138 minutes of treatment received per day across all disciplines. This is compared to the IHF's recommendation of patients being assessed within 24-48 hours of admission and receiving 180 minutes of treatment across all disciplines. As demands for stroke MDT services increase, it is important to recognise the benefits of increasing staff and resources to maintain and continue to improve standards of care.

The Stroke Activity Scale: results of a validity study.

PURPOSE: To establish the concurrent validity and time to complete of the Stroke Activity Scale (SAS) a recently developed stroke motor disability scale designed for use in a busy clinical setting. METHOD: Forty-one stroke patients with residual hemiplegia were recruited and assessed on a single occasion using both the SAS (five items) and modified Motor Assessment Scale (MMAS) (eight items) by a research physiotherapist. Performance was videotaped and assessed subsequently by a second physiotherapist. RESULTS: Pearson's correlation coefficient between the two measures was 0.91. The SAS was significantly quicker to complete than the MMAS (2.8 vs. 10.4 min, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The SAS had high concurrent validity with the MMAS but was much quicker to complete and therefore more suitable for use in clinical environments where time is at a premium.

Walking in hospital is associated with a shorter length of stay in older medical inpatients.

Evidence suggests that inactivity during a hospital stay is associated with poor health outcomes in older medical inpatients. We aimed to estimate the associations of average daily step-count (walking) in hospital with physical performance and length of stay in this population. Medical in-patients aged ⩾65 years, premorbidly mobile, with an anticipated length of stay ⩾3 d, were recruited. Measurements included average daily step-count, continuously recorded until discharge, or for a maximum of 7 d (Stepwatch Activity Monitor); co-morbidity (CIRS-G); frailty (SHARE F-I); and baseline and end-of-study physical performance (short physical performance battery). Linear regression models were used to estimate associations between step-count and end-of-study physical performance or length of stay. Length of stay was log transformed in the first model, and step-count was log transformed in both models. Similar models were used to adjust for potential confounders. Data from 154 patients (mean 77 years, SD 7.4) were analysed. The unadjusted models estimated for each unit increase in the natural log of step-count, the natural log of length of stay decreased by 0.18 (95% CI -0.27 to -0.09). After adjustment of potential confounders, while the strength of the inverse association was attenuated, it remained significant (ß log(steps) = -0.15, 95%CI -0.26 to -0.03). The back-transformed result suggested that a 50% increase in step-count was associated with a 6% shorter length of stay. There was no apparent association between step-count and end-of-study physical performance once baseline physical performance was adjusted for. The results indicate that step-count is independently associated with hospital length of stay, and merits further investigation.

Validating the Orpington Prognostic Score in an Irish in-patient stroke population.

An accurate assessment of stroke severity and the ability to predict prognosis is important for determining rehabilitation needs and long term management of patients after stroke. The Orpington Prognostic Score (OPS) is a clinically derived stroke severity scale that can be used to stratify patients into different severity groups. The aim of this study was to validate the Orpington Prognostic Score (OPS) in an Irish in-patient stroke population. Fifty 'first stroke' patients (21 male, median age 72.5 [range 31-93] years) were assessed within two weeks following stroke onset. Subjects were stratified into mild, moderate and severe groups using previously established cut-offs for the OPS. Outcomes were determined prospectively and compared to initial severity groups. Patients in the severe group had a significantly increased chance of dying (Odds ratio [95%CI] 2.16 [1.72-2.72] and this persisted after adjustment for age and gender. Length of stay increased significantly with increasing stroke severity group (F ratio 7.0 p=0.0025) and this association remained after adjusting for age and gender. The odds of being discharged home or of being able to walk independently by time of discharge decreased significantly (all p<0.001) as stroke severity increased and adjusting for age and gender did not alter these associations. A higher OPS score within 2 weeks of stroke onset was significantly associated with longer length of stay, increased mortality, reduced mobility at discharge and a reduced likelihood of discharge home. The OPS is a valid measure of stroke severity in Irish stroke in-patients.

Motor recovery following stroke: a basis for evaluation.

Health professionals devote much time to the treatment of stroke patients yet little is known about the extent to which recovery is influenced, and the effectiveness of rehabilitation methods continues to be a much-debated subject. The aim of this study was to identify whether changes in the motor recovery of 42 acute stroke patients could be detected by qualitatively scoring 25 items of functional mobility over a 14-week period. The results of the study identified that this method was sensitive in detecting weekly changes in early motor recovery. Three recovery groups were identified, and within each group it was possible to describe important time periods in which patients demonstrated varied rates of recovery. A qualitative and objective measure of stroke recovery could provide a basis for evaluating patient progress and the outcome of therapeutic interventions.

A new stroke activity scale-results of a reliability study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the internal consistency, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a disability stroke activity scale (SAS) for stroke patients. Its intended use is as a measure of motor function at the level of disability in stroke patients. METHOD: Twelve stroke in-patients were video-recorded performing the five activities from the SAS. Seven senior physiotherapists, experienced in stroke care, independently rated the recordings on two occasions, three weeks apart, using the SAS. Twelve hospital inpatients participated in the study. The subjects were aged between 48 and 86 and were between 6 and 87 days post stroke. RESULTS: Reliability for total scores was found to be excellent (generalizability correlation co-efficient (GCC) values> or =0.95) and reliability for individual item scores was good (kappa> or =0.7). Internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha was also good (0.68 at time 1 and 0.68 at time 2). CONCLUSION: The stroke activity scale is a reliable instrument for hospital stroke patients. It can be administered in less than 10 minutes and requires minimal equipment and training. Further work on the validity and responsiveness of the SAS is in progress.

Health-related quality of life of stroke survivors attending the volunteer stroke scheme.

BACKGROUND: The Volunteer Stroke Scheme (VSS) provides patients with the opportunity to participate in community-based therapeutic activities and physiotherapy sessions. AIMS: To provide the first profile of VSS attendees in terms of their functioning across the range of recommended WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) outcomes. METHODS: A convenience sample of 41 VSS patients completed standardised measures of cognitive functioning (MMSE), activity levels [Frenchay Activity Index (FAI), and Barthel Index (BI)], depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)] and Quality of Life (SF-36). RESULTS: A total of 37% met the criteria for mild cognitive impairment and 44% met the criteria for clinical depression. Scores on the BI (M = 79.5) and FAI (M = 18.4) incidated limitations in activity levels. Quality of life levels was low. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of psychological morbidity, severe disability across a range of domains and poor quality of life were reported.