Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 28(8): E467-71, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23839022

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of 2 different fusion techniques for the treatment of single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of an intervertebral cage improves the clinical outcome and fusion rate of patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) after decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The surgical approach that should be used for degenerative spondylolisthesis is a controversial issue. Decompression and PLIF with an interbody cage is widely used. Theoretical advantages in favor of PLIF include anterior column support, indirect foraminal decompression, restoration of lordosis, and reduction of the slip via ligamentotaxis. Despite numerous publications, the scientific support for the PLIF method is, however, weak. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out including 59 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Average age of patients was 66 years: 34 males and 25 females. Patients were divided into 2 treatment groups: group 1-32 patients with PLIF with interbody graft and group 2-27 patients with PLIF with cage. Minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcomes were assessed by measuring preoperative and postoperative lordotic angles. SF-12 physical and mental health scores were recorded along with visual analogue scores for pain. Complications were also recorded. RESULTS: No significant difference in the postoperative lordotic angles was achieved between the 2 techniques. Nonsignificant difference in the clinical outcomes between both the techniques. CONCLUSIONS: We have found the use of a cage to achieve lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis does not confer any significant advantages in terms of restoration of lumbar lordosis, improvement in clinical symptoms, or relief of pain postoperatively.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Lordosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Lordosis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Espondilolistesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Foot (Edinb) ; 46: 101767, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33453612

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral defects of the talus (OCD) are a well-established pathology within the ankle. They are most commonly associated with ankle trauma and whilst many are asymptomatic, they can have a significant negative impact on the patient, most notably with regards pain and mobility. Treatment of these lesions remains variable across the diverse cohort of these patients. AIMS: Evaluating the incidence of talus OCDs. Evaluating anatomic and morphologic data of the lesions against previous studies. Establishing if there was there any associated ligamentous injury. Determining the cohort of patients who were considered/underwent surgical intervention. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients presenting to a single Scottish Hospital with Talar OCDs between 2012-2016. Data collected included radiological appearance of the lesions (location and size), clinical history, associated ligament injury, treatment given and subsequent outcome. Categorical variables were presented as count and percentage while non-parametric variables were presented as median and interquartile range. RESULTS: 90 new cases that matched our inclusion criteria were identified. Using the Raikin classification, the majority of injuries are in the posteromedial (26%), centrolateral (21%), and centromedial (18%) segments of the talus. Of note, no lesions were identified in the posterocentral segment. 46% of patients had an associated ligamentous injury, either in the form of a sprain or tear. Most commonly the injury involved both ATFL and CFL (82%). 70% of patients that underwent surgery had radiological evidence of ligamentous injury. No statistically significant difference was identified between the management option and the involved segment according to Orr/Raikin classifications. CONCLUSION: Talus osteochondral defects are a pathology which is more common than originally thought and their treatment remain a controversial topic. Little is known about the physical history of the condition as most cases are asymptomatic, thus poorly documented by definition. There is a clear opportunity and need for further research into developing evidence-based guidelines for their management. This study tried to correlate the management of OCDs with epidemiological and radiological data.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo , Esguinces y Distensiones , Astrágalo , Articulación del Tobillo , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Astrágalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Astrágalo/lesiones , Astrágalo/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA