Mechanisms of gelofusine protection in an in vitro model of polymyxin B-associated renal injury.

Polymyxins are a last-resort treatment option for multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections, but they are associated with nephrotoxicity. Gelofusine was previously shown to reduce polymyxin-associated kidney injury in an animal model. However, the mechanism(s) of renal protection has not been fully elucidated. Here, we report the use of a cell culture model to provide insights into the mechanisms of renal protection. Murine epithelial proximal tubular cells were exposed to polymyxin B. Cell viability, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, polymyxin B uptake, mitochondrial superoxide production, nuclear morphology, and apoptosis activation were evaluated with or without concomitant gelofusine. A megalin knockout cell line was used as an uptake inhibition control. Methionine was included in selected experiments as an antioxidant control. A polymyxin B concentration-dependent reduction in cell viability was observed. Increased viability was observed in megalin knockout cells following comparable polymyxin B exposures. Compared with polymyxin B exposure alone, concomitant gelofusine significantly increased cell viability as well as reduced LDH release, polymyxin B uptake, mitochondrial superoxide, and apoptosis. Gelofusine and methionine were more effective at reducing renal cell injury in combination than either agent alone. In conclusion, the mechanisms of renal protection by gelofusine involve decreasing cellular drug uptake, reducing subsequent oxidative stress and apoptosis activation. These findings would be valuable for translational research into clinical strategies to attenuate drug-associated acute kidney injury.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Gelofusine is a gelatinous saline solution with the potential to attenuate polymyxin-associated nephrotoxicity. We demonstrated that the mechanisms of gelofusine renal protection involve reducing polymyxin B uptake by proximal tubule cells, limiting subsequent oxidative stress and apoptosis activation. In addition, gelofusine was more effective at reducing cellular injury than a known antioxidant control, methionine, and a megalin knockout cell line, indicating that gelofusine likely has additional pharmacological properties besides only megalin inhibition.

Zileuton ameliorates aminoglycoside and polymyxin-associated acute kidney injury in an animal model.

OBJECTIVES: Aminoglycosides and polymyxins are antibiotics with in vitro activity against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. However, their clinical use is hindered by dose-limiting nephrotoxicity. The objective of this project was to determine if zileuton can reduce nephrotoxicity associated with amikacin and polymyxin B in a rat model of acute kidney injury. METHODS: Sprague Dawley rats (n = 10, both genders) were administered either amikacin (300 mg/kg) or polymyxin B (20 mg/kg) daily for 10 days. Zileuton (4 and 10 mg/kg) was delivered intraperitoneally 15 min before antibiotic administration. Blood samples were collected at baseline and daily to determine serum creatinine concentration. Nephrotoxicity was defined as a ≥2× elevation of baseline serum creatinine. Time-to-event analysis and log rank test were used to compare the onset of nephrotoxicity in different cohorts. Histopathological analysis was also conducted to characterize the extent of kidney injury. RESULTS: Animals receiving amikacin or polymyxin B alone had nephrotoxicity rates of 90% and 100%, respectively. The overall rate was reduced to 30% in animals receiving adjuvant zileuton. The onset of nephrotoxicity associated with amikacin and polymyxin B was also significantly delayed by zileuton at 4 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Histopathology confirmed reduced kidney injury in animals receiving amikacin concomitant with zileuton. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot data suggest that zileuton has the potential to attenuate nephrotoxicity associated with last-line antibiotics. This would allow these antibiotics to treat MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections optimally without dose-limiting constraints. Further studies are warranted to optimize drug delivery and dosing in humans.

Optimal ceftazidime/avibactam dosing exposure against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales are considered urgent public health threats and often treated with a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination. However, clinical treatment failure and resistance emergence have been attributed to inadequate dosing. We used a novel framework to provide insights of optimal dosing exposure of ceftazidime/avibactam. METHODS: Seven clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing different KPC variants were examined. Ceftazidime susceptibility (MIC) was determined by broth dilution using escalating concentrations of avibactam. The observed MICs were characterized as response to avibactam concentrations using an inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. Using the best-fit parameter values, %fT>MICi was estimated for various dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam. A hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) was subsequently used to ascertain the effectiveness of selected regimens over 120 h. The drug exposure threshold associated with bacterial suppression was identified by recursive partitioning. RESULTS: In all scenarios, ceftazidime MIC reductions were well characterized with increasing avibactam concentrations. In HFIM, bacterial regrowth over time correlated with emergence of resistance. Overall, suppression of bacterial regrowth was associated with %fT>MICi ≥ 76.1% (100% versus 18.2%; P < 0.001). Using our framework, the optimal drug exposure could be achieved with ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g every 12 h in 5 out of 7 isolates. Furthermore, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g every 8 h can suppress an isolate deemed resistant based on conventional susceptibility testing method. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal drug exposure to suppress KPC-producing bacteria was identified. The novel framework is informative and may be used to guide optimal dosing of other ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Further in vivo investigations are warranted.

In vitro evaluation of using ceftazidime/avibactam against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is a global concern as effective treatments are very limited. We previously used a modified susceptibility testing approach to predict growth suppression in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, but there are uncertainties about the generalizability of the model. The objective of this study is to verify if a similar approach can be extended to CRAB. METHOD: A clinical isolate of CRAB resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI, MIC=32/4 mg/L) was examined. CAZ susceptibility was determined using increasing concentrations of AVI (0-64 mg/L), and MIC reduction was characterized with a sigmoid inhibitory maximum effect (Emax) model. The effectiveness of CAZ/AVI was validated in a hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) over 72 hours, using simulated unbound serum / epithelial lining fluid (ELF) exposures of 2.5 g over 2 hours every 8 hours. Baseline inocula of approximately 5.5 log CFU/mL were examined. RESULTS: An AVI concentration-dependent reduction in CAZ MIC was observed (r2=0.99). Ceftazidime MIC was dramatically reduced from 512 mg/L (no AVI) to 32 mg/L (AVI=4 mg/L), and further to 8 mg/L (AVI=16 mg/L). Pharmacokinetic simulations were satisfactory in the HFIM (r2>0.96). Bacterial suppression was observed > 24 hours with the serum exposure, but not that from the ELF. CONCLUSION: Using multiple AVI concentrations within the clinically relevant range, our susceptibility testing approach could have better insights of treatment outcome for infections caused by CRAB. This could potentially lead to effective intervention(s) overlooked by conventional susceptibility testing method. This case highlights the importance of site-specific drug exposures on determining treatment outcome.

In vitro model to simulate multiple drugs with distinct elimination half-lives.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of drug resistance in pathogens such as HIV and selected bacteria has been steadily rising, resulting in an increased need for using multiple agents concurrently. Agents used in these combination therapies may have different elimination half-lives in humans. There is an unmet need for in vitro models to evaluate the efficacy of these combinations to guide early drug development. In order to realistically reflect in vivo conditions, useful in vitro model systems must be capable of simulating multiple pharmacokinetic profiles with distinct elimination half-lives. The goal of this study was to experimentally simulate four pharmacokinetic profiles with distinct elimination half-lives in an in vitro hollow-fibre system. METHODS: For illustrative purposes, fluctuating exposures of ceftriaxone were simulated with distinct half-lives of 1, 2.5, 8, and 12 hours. A parallel experimental setup was used to independently connect four supplemental reservoirs to a central reservoir. Target maximum concentration was achieved by direct drug dosing into the central reservoir; supplemental reservoirs were also dosed to offset the rapid drug elimination rate from the central reservoir. Serial pharmacokinetic samples were obtained from the central reservoir, assayed by a spectrophotometric method, and characterized by a one-compartment model. RESULTS: The observed maximum concentrations and elimination half-lives were in agreement with the expected values obtained from the mathematical predictions. CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro experimental system can be used to evaluate the efficacy of up to four-drug combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria or HIV-infected mammalian cells. The established framework represents an adaptable tool to advance the field of combination therapy.

Experimental Validation of a Mathematical Framework to Simulate Antibiotics with Distinct Half-Lives Concurrently in an In Vitro Model.

Antimicrobial resistance has been steadily increasing in prevalence, and combination therapy is commonly used to treat infections due to multidrug resistant bacteria. Under certain circumstances, combination therapy of three or more drugs may be necessary, which makes it necessary to simulate the pharmacokinetic profiles of more than two drugs concurrently in vitro. Recently, a general theoretical framework was developed to simulate three drugs with distinctly different half-lives. The objective of the study was to experimentally validate the theoretical model. Clinically relevant exposures of meropenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone were simulated concurrently in a hollow-fiber infection model, with the corresponding half-lives of 1, 2.5, and 8 h, respectively. Serial samples were obtained over 24 h and drug concentrations were assayed using validated LC-MS/MS methods. A one-compartment model with zero-order input was used to characterize the observed concentration-time profiles. The experimentally observed half-lives corresponding to exponential decline of all three drugs were in good agreement with the respective values anticipated at the experiment design stage. These results were reproducible when the experiment was repeated on a different day. The validated benchtop setup can be used as a more flexible preclinical tool to explore the effectiveness of various drug combinations against multidrug resistant bacteria.