Seizure Assessment and Forecasting With Efficient Rapid-EEG: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparative Effectiveness Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Approximately 30% of critically ill patients have seizures, and more than half of these seizures do not have an overt clinical correlate. EEG is needed to avoid missing seizures and prevent overtreatment with antiseizure medications. Conventional-EEG (cEEG) resources are logistically constrained and unable to meet their growing demand for seizure detection even in highly developed centers. Brief EEG screening with the validated 2HELPS2B algorithm was proposed as a method to triage cEEG resources, but it is hampered by cEEG requirements, primarily EEG technologists. Seizure risk-stratification using reduced time-to-application rapid response-EEG (rrEEG) systems (∼5 minutes) could be a solution. We assessed the noninferiority of the 2HELPS2B score on a 1-hour rrEEG compared to cEEG. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective EEG diagnostic accuracy study was conducted from October 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. Chart and EEG review performed with consecutive sampling at 4 tertiary care centers, included records of patients ≥18 years old, from January 1, 2018, to June 20, 2022. Monte Carlo simulation power analysis yielded n = 500 rrEEG; for secondary outcomes n = 500 cEEG and propensity-score covariate matching was planned. Primary outcome, noninferiority of rrEEG for seizure risk prediction, was assessed per area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Noninferiority margin (0.05) was based on the 2HELPS2B validation study. RESULTS: A total of 240 rrEEG with follow-on cEEG were obtained. Median age was 64 (interquartile range 22); 42% were female. 2HELPS2B on a 1-hour rrEEG met noninferiority to cEEG (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.90, p = 0.001). Secondary endpoints of comparison with a matched contemporaneous cEEG showed no significant difference in AUC (0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.94, p = 0.31); in false negative rate for the 2HELPS2B = 0 group (p = 1.0) rrEEG (0.021, 95% CI 0-0.062), cEEG (0.016, 95% CI 0-0.048); nor in survival analyses. DISCUSSION: 2HELPS2B on 1-hour rrEEG is noninferior to cEEG for seizure prediction. Patients with low-risk (2HELPS2B = 0) may be able to forgo prolonged cEEG, allowing for increased monitoring of at-risk patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that rrEEG is noninferior to cEEG in calculating the 2HELPS2B score to predict seizure risk.

The Significance of LRDA With Bilateral Involvement Compared With GRDA on EEG in Critically Ill Patients.

PURPOSE: Lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA) is highly associated with seizures but generalized rhythmic delta activity (GRDA; symmetric by definition) has no known seizure association. A subset of LRDA includes patterns that are "bilateral asymmetric LRDA" (LRDA-ba), falling between purely unilateral LRDA and GRDA. The significance of this finding has not been previously addressed. METHODS: Clinical, EEG, and imaging findings were reviewed in all patients with >6 hours of continuous EEG and LRDA-ba between 2014 and 2019. They were compared with a control group of patients with GRDA, matched 1:1 for prevalence, duration, and frequency of the predominant rhythmic pattern. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients with LRDA-ba and 258 matched controls with GRDA were identified. Statistically significant findings included that patients with LRDA-ba were more likely to have presented with an ischemic stroke (LRDA-ba 12.4% vs. GRDA 3.9%) or subdural hemorrhage (8.9% vs. 4.3%); those with GRDA were more likely to have a metabolic encephalopathy (GRDA 10.5% vs. LRDA-ba 3.5%) or "altered mental state" without clear etiology (12.5% vs. 4.3%). Patients with LRDA-ba were significantly more likely to have a background EEG asymmetry (LRDA-ba 62.0% vs. GRDA 25.6%) or focal (arrhythmic) slowing (40.3% vs. 15.5%), and acute (65.5% vs. 46.1%) or focal (49.6% vs. 28.3%) abnormalities on computed tomography scan. Patients with LRDA-ba were more likely to have focal sporadic epileptiform discharges (95.4% vs. 37.9%), lateralized periodic discharges (32.2% vs. 5.0%), and focal electrographic seizures (33.3% vs. 11.2%); however, patients with LRDA-ba alone (i.e., without sporadic epileptiform discharges or PDs) showed only a trend toward increased seizures (17.3%) compared with a matched group of patients with GRDA alone (9.9%, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LRDA-ba had a higher proportion of acute focal abnormalities compared with a matched group of patients with GRDA. The LRDA-ba was associated with additional evidence of focal cortical excitability on EEG (sporadic epileptiform discharges and lateralized periodic discharges) and seizures but with only a trend toward increased seizures when other signs of focal excitability were absent.

Favorable outcome of repeat mechanical thrombectomy in a geriatric patient: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: The authors presented their experience with a case of repeat thrombectomy in a 93-year-old patient who showed a favorable outcome after recurrent large vessel occlusion treated with emergency mechanical thrombectomy. OBSERVATIONS: Mechanical thrombectomy has been proven to be effective in treating large vessel occlusion types of ischemic stroke. Most of the patient populations involved in the thrombectomy-related studies were younger than 80 years. In addition, recurrent mechanical thrombectomy is not a common procedure in clinical practice. This unusual case demonstrated the potential to achieve a favorable outcome with thrombectomy even in a patient older than 85 years with recurrent large vessel occlusion. LESSONS: There can be a favorable neurological outcome after one or repeat thrombectomies for geriatric patients older than 90 years, and age should not be a deterrent to treatment.