Unraveling noncoding DNA variants and epimutations: a paradigm shift in hereditary cancer research.

Exhaustive efforts have been dedicated to uncovering genomic aberrations linked to cancer susceptibility. Noncoding sequence variants and epigenetic alterations significantly influence gene regulation and could contribute to cancer development. However, exploring noncoding regions in hereditary cancer susceptibility demands cutting-edge methodologies for functionally characterizing genomic discoveries. Additionally, comprehending the impact on cancer development of variants in noncoding DNA and the epigenome necessitates integrating diverse data through bioinformatic analyses. As novel technologies and analytical methods continue to advance, this realm of research is rapidly gaining traction. Within this mini-review, we delve into future research domains concerning aberrations in noncoding DNA regions, such as pseudoexons, promoter variants and cis-epimutations.

[Box: see text].

Assessing actionability and incidental findings of germline variants in two precision oncology trials.

INTRODUCTION: High-throughput sequencing techniques have revolutionized oncology. Paired germline-tumor DNA analysis has emerged as a comprehensive strategy to uncover actionable alterations in advanced cancer patients (ACP) enrolled in precision oncology trials. However, challenges persist in variant interpretation and managing incidental germline findings. METHODS: We conducted a study involving 288 ACP from MOSCATO (NCT01566019) and MATCHR (NCT02517892) trials to assess germline variants impacting cancer-related genes. Germline DNA sequencing was performed using a panel of 250 cancer-related genes, and the results were discussed during tumor molecular board sessions. RESULTS: Germline pathogenic variants (PV) were classified according to the ESCAT classification. Lung cancer (36.8 %), followed by prostate (18.4 %) and breast cancer (17.7 %), comprised the most prevalent tumor types. PVs were found in 12.5 % of patients. Most PVs were classified as ESCAT X (63.9 %), highlighting limited therapeutic actionability. Notably,2 % of patients had actionable variants (ESCAT I-A/II-A). Incidental findings included 7.3 % of patients with PVs in cancer-predisposition genes, with 2.4 % having very high-risk potential, necessitating mandatory oncogenetic counseling. Nearly one in five patients (21.9 %) had at least one VUS. DISCUSSION: Our study underscores the significance of germline sequencing in identifying actionable alterations and the need for improved variant interpretation as well as pretest counseling plans in precision oncology trials.