Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 55
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 160, 2020 Mar 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32126998

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transplant recipients are chronically ill patients, who require lifelong follow-up to manage co-morbidities and prevent graft loss. This necessitates a system of care that is congruent with the Chronic Care Model. The eleven-item self-report Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scale assesses whether chronic care is congruent with the Chronic Care Model, yet its validity for heart transplant patients has not been tested. METHODS: We tested the validity of the English version of the PACIC, and compared the similarity of the internal structure of the PACIC across English-speaking countries (USA, Canada, Australia and United Kingdom) and across six languages (French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Italian and Portuguese). This was done using data from the cross-sectional international BRIGHT study that included 1378 heart transplant patients from eleven countries across 4 continents. To test the validity of the instrument, confirmatory factor analyses to check the expected unidimensional internal structure, and relations to other variables, were performed. RESULTS: Main analyses confirmed the validity of the English PACIC version for heart transplant patients. Exploratory analyses across English-speaking countries and languages also confirmed the single factorial dimension, except in Italian and Spanish. CONCLUSION: This scale could help healthcare providers monitor level of chronic illness management and improve transplantation care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT01608477, first patient enrolled in March 2012, registered retrospectively: May 30, 2012.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Reino Unido , Estados Unidos
2.
Qual Life Res ; 27(2): 503-513, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29188481

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Frequent Emergency Department users are likely to experience poor quality of life (QOL). Case management interventions are efficient in responding to the complex needs of this population, but their effects on QOL have not been tested yet. Therefore, the aim of our study was to examine to what extent a case management intervention improved frequent Emergency Department users' QOL in a universal health coverage system. METHODS: Data were part of a randomized controlled trial designed to improve frequent Emergency Department users' QOL at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. A total of 250 frequent Emergency Department users (≥ 5 attendances during the previous 12 months) were randomly assigned to the control (n = 125) or the intervention group (n = 125). The latter benefited from case management intervention. QOL was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF at baseline, two, five and a half, nine, and twelve months later. It included four dimensions: physical health, psychological health, social relationship, and environment. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze the change in the patients' QOL over time. RESULTS: Patients' QOL improved significantly (p < 0.001) in both groups for all dimensions after two months. However, environment QOL dimension improved significantly more in the intervention group after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Environment QOL dimension was the most responsive dimension for short-term interventions. This may have been due to case management's assistance in obtaining income entitlements, health insurance coverage, stable housing, or finding general health care practitioners. Case management in general should be developed to enhance frequent users' QOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov , Unique identifier: NCT01934322.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de Caso/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Seguro de Salud/normas , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 30(10): 743-750, 2018 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29733366

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) was created to assess whether provided care is congruent with the Chronic Care Model, according to patients. We aimed to identify all studies using the PACIC in diabetic patients to explore (i) how overall PACIC scores varied across studies and (ii) whether scores varied according to healthcare delivery, patient and instrument characteristics. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and PubMed Central (PMC), from 2005 to 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Studies of any design using the PACIC in diabetic patients. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We extracted data on healthcare delivery, patient, and instrument characteristics, and overall PACIC score and standard deviation. We performed random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions. RESULTS: We identified 34 studies including 25 942 patients from 13 countries, mostly in North America and Europe, using different versions of the PACIC in 11 languages. The overall PACIC score fluctuated between 1.7 and 4.2, with a pooled score of 3.0 (95% confidence interval 2.8-3.2, 95% predictive interval 1.9-4.2), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 99%). The PACIC variance was not explained by healthcare delivery or patient characteristics, but by the number of points on the response scale (5 vs. 11) and the continent (Asia vs. others). CONCLUSION: The PACIC is a widely used instrument, but the direct comparison of PACIC scores between studies should be performed with caution as studies may employ different versions and the influence of cultural norms and language on the PACIC score remains unknown.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Humanos , Lenguaje , Satisfacción del Paciente
4.
J Gen Intern Med ; 32(5): 508-515, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27400922

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frequent emergency department (ED) users account for a disproportionately high number of ED visits. Studies on case management (CM) interventions to reduce frequent ED use have shown mixed results, and few studies have been conducted within a universal health coverage system. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a CM intervention-compared to standard emergency care-reduces ED attendance. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty frequent ED users (5 or more visits in the prior 12 months) who visited a public urban ED at the Lausanne University Hospital between May 2012 and July 2013 were allocated to either an intervention (n = 125) or control (n = 125) group, and monitored for 12 months. INTERVENTIONS: An individualized CM intervention consisting of concrete assistance in obtaining income entitlements, referral to primary or specialty medical care, access to mental health care or substance abuse treatment, and counseling on at-risk behaviors and health care utilization (in addition to standard care) at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 months. MAIN MEASURES: We used a generalized linear model for count data (negative binomial distribution) to compare the number of ED visits during the 12-month follow-up between CM and usual care, from an intention-to-treat perspective. KEY RESULTS: At 12 months, there were 2.71 (±0.23) ED visits in the intervention group versus 3.35 (±0.32) visits among controls (ratio = 0.81, 95 % CI = 0.63; 1.02). In the multivariate model, the effect of the CM intervention on the number of ED visits approached statistical significance (b = -0.219, p = 0.075). The presence of poor social determinants of health was a significant predictor of ED use in the multivariate model (b = 0.280, p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: CM may reduce ED use by frequent users through an improved orientation to the health care system. Poor social determinants of health significantly increase use of the ED by frequent users.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de Caso/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Programas Nacionales de Salud/tendencias , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales Universitarios/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Simple Ciego , Suiza/epidemiología
5.
Prev Med ; 99: 37-42, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28189805

RESUMEN

Healthcare renunciation has been a recent focus of the public health debate, but large-scale investigations of healthcare renunciation are scarce. The goal of this study was to examine healthcare renunciation among young adults at French universities. It investigated prevalence of and reasons for healthcare renunciation and identified subgroups of vulnerable youths. Data were collected in the 2013 triennial study conducted by the French National Observatory of Student Life. That study had a sample of 35,810 18- to 25-year-old participants. Measures included healthcare renunciation, reasons for healthcare renunciation, demographics, cultural and socioeconomic background, health and social outcomes, healthcare system-related variables, and markers of adulthood. The results showed that the prevalence of healthcare renunciation was 27.2%. The most common reasons for healthcare renunciation were refusal renunciation (self-care, 12.7%; wait for improvement, 15.5%) and barrier renunciation (financial reasons, 12.1%; lack of time, 10.2%). Therefore, healthcare renunciation is linked not only to financial constraints but also to individuals' subjective needs and ways of facing illness. Overall, disadvantaged youths and youths transitioning to adulthood were likelier to renounce care, especially for financial reasons. To conclude, there are social inequalities in the use of healthcare by emerging adults in higher education in France. Emerging adulthood appears to be a risky period in which people are likely to renounce healthcare for multiple reasons. Support should be provided for vulnerable youths to prevent them from becoming increasingly vulnerable.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Universidades , Adolescente , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Autocuidado/métodos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
6.
Vasa ; 45(5): 417-22, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27594393

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multilevel peripheral arterial disease is frequently observed in patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia. This report evaluates the efficacy of one-stage hybrid revascularization in patients with multilevel arterial peripheral disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database included all consecutive patients treated by a hybrid approach for a multilevel arterial peripheral disease. The primary outcome was the patency rate at 6 months and 1 year. Secondary outcomes were early and midterm complication rate, limb salvage and mortality rate. Statistical analysis, including a Kaplan-Meier estimate and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were carried out with the primary, primary assisted and secondary patency, comparing the impact of various risk factors in pre- and post-operative treatments. RESULTS: 64 patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up time of 428 days (range: 4 - 1140). The technical success rate was 100 %. The primary, primary assisted and secondary patency rates at 1 year were 39 %, 66 % and 81 %, respectively. The limb-salvage rate was 94 %. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. Early and midterm complication rates were 15.4 % and 6.4 %, respectively. The early mortality rate was 3.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid approach is a major alternative in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease in multilevel disease and comorbid patients, with low complication and mortality rates and a high limb-salvage rate.


Asunto(s)
Endarterectomía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Injerto Vascular , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad Crítica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Endarterectomía/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/mortalidad , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Claudicación Intermitente/cirugía , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/cirugía , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Suiza , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
7.
Int J Equity Health ; 14: 146, 2015 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26645272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Frequent emergency department (ED) users meet several of the criteria of vulnerability, but this needs to be further examined taking into consideration all vulnerability's different dimensions. This study aimed to characterize frequent ED users and to define risk factors of frequent ED use within a universal health care coverage system, applying a conceptual framework of vulnerability. METHODS: A controlled, cross-sectional study comparing frequent ED users to a control group of non-frequent users was conducted at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. Frequent users were defined as patients with five or more visits to the ED in the previous 12 months. The two groups were compared using validated scales for each one of the five dimensions of an innovative conceptual framework: socio-demographic characteristics; somatic, mental, and risk-behavior indicators; and use of health care services. Independent t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for the comparison. To examine the -related to vulnerability- risk factors for being a frequent ED user, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used. RESULTS: We compared 226 frequent users and 173 controls. Frequent users had more vulnerabilities in all five dimensions of the conceptual framework. They were younger, and more often immigrants from low/middle-income countries or unemployed, had more somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, were more often tobacco users, and had more primary care physician (PCP) visits. The most significant frequent ED use risk factors were a history of more than three hospital admissions in the previous 12 months (adj OR:23.2, 95%CI = 9.1-59.2), the absence of a PCP (adj OR:8.4, 95%CI = 2.1-32.7), living less than 5 km from an ED (adj OR:4.4, 95%CI = 2.1-9.0), and household income lower than USD 2,800/month (adj OR:4.3, 95%CI = 2.0-9.2). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent ED users within a universal health coverage system form a highly vulnerable population, when taking into account all five dimensions of a conceptual framework of vulnerability. The predictive factors identified could be useful in the early detection of future frequent users, in order to address their specific needs and decrease vulnerability, a key priority for health care policy makers. Application of the conceptual framework in future research is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suiza
8.
Alcohol Alcohol ; 50(2): 195-9, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25548143

RESUMEN

AIMS: Many studies have suggested a close relationship between alcohol use disorder (AUD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to test whether the relationship between self-reported AUD and MDD was artificially strengthened by the diagnosis of MDD. This association was tested comparing relationships between alcohol use and AUD for depressive people and non-depressive people. METHODS: As part of the Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors, 4352 male Swiss alcohol users in their early twenties answered questions concerning their alcohol use, AUD and MDD at two time points. Generalized linear models for cross-sectional and longitudinal associations were calculated. RESULTS: For cross-sectional associations, depressive participants reported a higher number of AUD symptoms (ß = 0.743, P < 0.001) than non-depressive participants. Moreover, there was an interaction (ß = -0.204, P = 0.001): the relationship between alcohol use and AUD was weaker for depressive participants rather than non-depressive participants. For longitudinal associations, there were almost no significant relationships between MDD at baseline and AUD at follow-up, but the interaction was still significant (ß = -0.249, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MDD thus appeared to be a confounding variable in the relationship between alcohol use and AUD, and self-reported measures of AUD seemed to be overestimated by depressive people. This result brings into question the accuracy of self-reported measures of substance use disorders. Furthermore, it adds to the emerging debate about the usefulness of substance use disorder as a concept, when heavy substance use itself appears to be a sensitive and reliable indicator.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Autoinforme , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Suiza/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
9.
J Clin Densitom ; 18(2): 233-8, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25439454

RESUMEN

Vertebral fracture assessments (VFAs) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry increase vertebral fracture detection in clinical practice and are highly reproducible. Measures of reproducibility are dependent on the frequency and distribution of the event. The aim of this study was to compare 2 reproducibility measures, reliability and agreement, in VFA readings in both a population-based and a clinical cohort. We measured agreement and reliability by uniform kappa and Cohen's kappa for vertebral reading and fracture identification: 360 VFAs from a population-based cohort and 85 from a clinical cohort. In the population-based cohort, 12% of vertebrae were unreadable. Vertebral fracture prevalence ranged from 3% to 4%. Inter-reader and intrareader reliability with Cohen's kappa was fair to good (0.35-0.71 and 0.36-0.74, respectively), with good inter-reader and intrareader agreement by uniform kappa (0.74-0.98 and 0.76-0.99, respectively). In the clinical cohort, 15% of vertebrae were unreadable, and vertebral fracture prevalence ranged from 7.6% to 8.1%. Inter-reader reliability was moderate to good (0.43-0.71), and the agreement was good (0.68-0.91). In clinical situations, the levels of reproducibility measured by the 2 kappa statistics are concordant, so that either could be used to measure agreement and reliability. However, if events are rare, as in a population-based cohort, we recommend evaluating reproducibility using the uniform kappa, as Cohen's kappa may be less accurate.


Asunto(s)
Absorciometría de Fotón , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Torácicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/lesiones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/epidemiología , Suiza/epidemiología , Vértebras Torácicas/lesiones
10.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 272(5): 1277-85, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25411074

RESUMEN

Patients with cleft palate are prone to velopharyngeal insufficiency. In minor cases or when hypernasal speech does not resolve after velopharyngoplasty, an augmentation pharyngoplasty with autologous fat can be proposed. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the short-term (within 2 months) and long-term efficiency (during the 24 months following the procedure) of our procedure in the setting of velopharyngeal insufficiency related to a cleft palate. Twenty-two patients with cleft palate related velopharyngeal insufficiency were included in this retrospective study. All patients were operated following the same technique, in the same institution. The pre- and postoperative evaluations included a nasometry, a subjective evaluation using the Borel-Maisonny score, and a nasofibroscopy to assess the degree of velopharyngeal closure. Scores of Borel-Maisonny and nasometry were compared before, shortly after the procedure (within 2 months) and long term after the procedure (within 24 months). Forty-one procedures in 22 patients with a cleft palate performed in our institution between October 2004 and January 2012 were included in the study. Nine patients had a previous velopharyngoplasty with persistent rhinolalia despite intensive speech therapy. In 14 patients the procedure was repeated because of recurrent hypernasal speech after the first injection. The average number of procedures per patient was 1.8. Postoperative nasometry and Borel-Maisonny scores were statistically significantly improved and remained stable until the end of the follow-up (median 42 months postoperative) in most patients. Complications were rare and minor. Autologous fat injection is a simple procedure for treatment of minor velopharyngeal insufficiencies in patients with cleft palate, with good long-term results and few complications.


Asunto(s)
Fisura del Paladar , Faringe/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Grasa Subcutánea Abdominal/trasplante , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Fisura del Paladar/complicaciones , Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones/métodos , Masculino , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos del Habla/etiología , Trastornos del Habla/terapia , Logopedia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/etiología , Insuficiencia Velofaríngea/cirugía
11.
Int J Lang Commun Disord ; 50(2): 260-7, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25244532

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The few studies that have evaluated syntax in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have yielded conflicting findings: some suggest that once matched on mental age, ASD and typically developing controls do not differ for grammar, while others report that morphosyntactic deficits are independent of cognitive skills in ASD. There is a need for a better understanding of syntax in ASD and its relation to, or dissociation from, nonverbal abilities. AIMS: Syntax in ASD was assessed by evaluating subject and object relative clause comprehension in adolescents and adults diagnosed with ASD with a performance IQ within the normal range, and with or without a history of language delay. METHODS & PROCEDURES: Twenty-eight participants with ASD (mean age 21.8) and 28 age-matched controls (mean age 22.07) were required to point to a character designated by relative clauses that varied in syntactic complexity. OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Scores indicate that participants with ASD regardless of the language development history perform significantly worse than age-matched controls with object relative clauses. In addition, participants with ASD with a history of language delay (diagnosed with high-functioning autism in the DSM-IV-TR) perform worse on subject relatives than ASD participants without language delay (diagnosed with Asperger syndrome in the DSM-IV-TR), suggesting that these two groups do not have equivalent linguistic abilities. Performance IQ has a positive impact on the success of the task for the population with ASD. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: This study reveals subtle grammatical difficulties remaining in adult individuals with ASD within normal IQ range as compared with age-matched peers. Even in the absence of a history of language delay in childhood, the results suggest that a slight deficit may nevertheless be present and go undetected by standardized language assessments. Both groups with and without language delay have a similar global performance on relative clause comprehension; however, the study also indicates that the participants with reported language delay show more difficulty with subject relatives than the participants without language delay, suggesting the presence of differences in linguistic abilities between these subgroups of ASD.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Asperger/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Percepción Auditiva/diagnóstico , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Desarrollo del Lenguaje/diagnóstico , Psicolingüística , Semántica , Medición de la Producción del Habla , Adolescente , Adulto , Síndrome de Asperger/psicología , Trastornos de la Percepción Auditiva/psicología , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Inteligencia , Trastornos del Desarrollo del Lenguaje/psicología , Pruebas del Lenguaje , Masculino , Valores de Referencia , Adulto Joven
12.
BMC Emerg Med ; 15: 27, 2015 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26452550

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to determine the proportions of psychiatric and substance use disorders suffered by emergency departments' (EDs') frequent users compared to the mainstream ED population, to evaluate how effectively these disorders were diagnosed in both groups of patients by ED physicians, and to determine if these disorders were predictive of a frequent use of ED services. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study with concurrent and retrospective data collection. Between November 2009 and June 2010, patients' mental health and substance use disorders were identified prospectively in face-to-face research interviews using a screening questionnaire (i.e. researcher screening). These data were compared to the data obtained from a retrospective medical chart review performed in August 2011, searching for mental health and substance use disorders diagnosed by ED physicians and recorded in the patients' ED medical files (i.e. ED physician diagnosis). The sample consisted of 399 eligible adult patients (≥18 years old) admitted to the urban, general ED of a University Hospital. Among them, 389 patients completed the researcher screening. Two hundred and twenty frequent users defined by >4 ED visits in the previous twelve months were included and compared to 169 patients with ≤4 ED visits in the same period (control group). RESULTS: Researcher screening showed that ED frequent users were more likely than members of the control group to have an anxiety, depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or suffer from alcohol, illicit drug abuse/addiction. Reviewing the ED physician diagnosis, we found that the proportions of mental health and substance use disorders diagnosed by ED physicians were low both among ED frequent users and in the control group. Using multiple logistic regression analyses to predict frequent ED use, we found that ED patients who screened positive for psychiatric disorders only and those who screened positive for both psychiatric and substance use disorders were more likely to be ED frequent users compared to ED patients with no disorder. CONCLUSIONS: This study found high proportions of screened mental health and/or substance use disorders in ED frequent users, but it showed low rates of detection of such disorders in day-to-day ED activities which can be a cause for concern. Active screening for these disorders in this population, followed by an intervention and/or a referral for treatment by a case-management team may constitute a relevant intervention for integration into a general ED setting.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suiza , Adulto Joven
13.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 14: 264, 2014 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24938769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We devised a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of an intervention based on case management care for frequent emergency department users. The aim of the intervention is to reduce such patients' emergency department use, to improve their quality of life, and to reduce costs consequent on frequent use. The intervention consists of a combination of comprehensive case management care and standard emergency care. It uses a clinical case management model that is patient-identified, patient-directed, and developed to provide high intensity services. It provides a continuum of hospital- and community-based patient services, which include clinical assessment, outreach referral, and coordination and communication with other service providers. METHODS/DESIGN: We aim to recruit, during the first year of the study, 250 patients who visit the emergency department of the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland. Eligible patients will have visited the emergency department 5 or more times during the previous 12 months. Randomisation of the participants to the intervention or control groups will be computer generated and concealed. The statistician and each patient will be blinded to the patient's allocation. Participants in the intervention group (N = 125), additionally to standard emergency care, will receive case management from a team, 1 (ambulatory care) to 3 (hospitalization) times during their stay and after 1, 3, and 5 months, at their residence, in the hospital or in the ambulatory care setting. In between the consultations provided, the patients will have the opportunity to contact, at any moment, the case management team. Participants in the control group (N = 125) will receive standard emergency care only. Data will be collected at baseline and 2, 5.5, 9, and 12 months later, including: number of emergency department visits, quality of life (EuroQOL and WHOQOL), health services use, and relevant costs. Data on feelings of discrimination and patient's satisfaction will also be collected at the baseline and 12 months later. DISCUSSION: Our study will help to clarify knowledge gaps regarding the positive outcomes (emergency department visits, quality of life, efficiency, and cost-utility) of an intervention based on case management care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01934322.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de Caso/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Proyectos de Investigación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suiza
14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36602178

RESUMEN

The present study focuses on referential choices made by healthy aged adults during narrative discourse, and their relationship with cognitive and socio-cognitive abilities. Previously, some studies have shown that, compared to young adults, older adults produce more pronouns when referring to various entities during discourse, regardless of the accessibility level of the referent for the addressee. This referential behavior has been interpreted in relation to the decrease of cognitive abilities, such as working memory abilities. There is, as of yet, little empirical evidence highlighting which cognitive competences preferentially support referential choices during discourse production. Here, we focus on three categories of referential markers (indefinite, definite markers and pronouns) produced by 78 participants from 60 to 91 years old. We used a storytelling task enabling us to examine the referential choices made at three discourse stages (introduction, maintaining or shift of the referent in focus) and in increasing levels of referential complexity (one vs two characters, and different vs same gender). In addition to specifically assessing how increasing age influences referential choices, we also examine the contribution of various cognitive and socio-cognitive skills that are presumed to play a specific role in referential choices. We found that both age and specific cognitive abilities (planification, inhibition, and verbal episodic memory) had an effect on referential choices, but that these effects depended on when (at which discourse stage) the referential markers were produced. Overall, our study highlights the complex interplay between discursive and cognitive factors in referential choices made by healthy older speakers.


Asunto(s)
Lenguaje , Memoria Episódica , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Memoria a Corto Plazo , Narración , Cognición/fisiología
15.
J Affect Disord ; 352: 306-311, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387669

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robust empirical data on suicide awareness are needed, to better plan and evaluate suicide prevention interventions. However, there is a lack of validated measures of suicide awareness. This is especially true for perceived suicide awareness, which focuses on perceived knowledge about suicide, willingness, and confidence to talk about suicide and get help. Using the theoretical framework of Social Cognitive Theory, this study aimed to validate a measure of perceived suicide awareness. METHODS: We re-used data from a suicide prevention trial conducted in Swiss secondary schools (n = 366). Baseline and one-month follow-up data were used to validate the scale. The main measure was an initial 14-item Perceived Suicide Awareness Scale (PSAS). Perceived knowledge of help-seeking resources, suicide-related knowledge, and support networks were used to assess convergent validity. RESULTS: A nine-item version, the PSAS-9, showed satisfactory psychometric properties, including high internal consistency (α = 0.78), acceptable test-retest (r = 0.68), and a one-factor structure explaining 95 % of the variance. The convergent validity was acceptable (0.19 ≤ r ≤ 0.40). The PSAS-9 was not correlated with suicide-related knowledge (r = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: The study missed a similar construct to properly assess convergent validity and had a modest sample size. In addition, it only included secondary school adolescents, so further research in other samples of youths is needed to robustly validate the PSAS-9. CONCLUSIONS: This study was an important step towards validating a perceived suicide awareness scale, which appears as a new dimension of suicidality, distinct from suicide-related knowledge. The PSAS-9 could be used to develop, evaluate, and improve suicide prevention efforts.


Asunto(s)
Prevención del Suicidio , Suicidio , Humanos , Adolescente , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Suicidio/psicología , Ideación Suicida , Psicometría/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Trials ; 25(1): 23, 2024 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178233

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is characterized by difficulty paying attention, poor impulse control, and hyperactive behavior. It is associated with several adverse health and social outcomes and leads to an increased risk of criminality and recidivism. Worldwide, ADHD is thus highly prevalent in prisons. However, ADHD treatment has been neglected in such environments. Stimulant medications such as osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) are first-line treatments in the general population, but they are under-prescribed in prisons due to concerns about abuse, even though such claims are not empirically supported. This project aims to compare the efficacy of a 3-month in-prison OROS-MPH vs. placebo treatment on the severity of core ADHD symptoms and relevant in- and post-prison outcomes. METHODS: This study is a phase III, double-blinded, randomized, superiority, controlled trial of OROS-MPH vs. placebo. After randomization, the participants will receive 3 months of treatment with OROS-MPH or placebo (1:1 ratio) while incarcerated. Upon release, all participants will be offered the treatment (OROS-MPH) for 1 year but will remain blinded to their initial study group. The study will be conducted at the Division of Prison Health, Geneva, Switzerland, among incarcerated men (n = 150). Measures will include (1) investigator-rated ADHD symptoms, (2) acute events collected by the medical and prison teams, (3) assessment of the risk of recidivism, (4) medication side effects, (5) medication adherence, (6) study retention, (7) health care/prison costs, and (8) 1-year recidivism. Analyses will include bivariable and multivariable modeling (e.g., regression models, mixed-effects models, survival analyses) and an economic evaluation (cost-benefit analysis). DISCUSSION: We expect that early identification and treatment of ADHD in prison will be an important public health opportunity and a cost-effective approach that is likely to reduce the vulnerability of incarcerated individuals and promote pathways out of criminal involvement. The study will also promote standards of care for people with ADHD in prison and provide recommendations for continuity of care after release. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05842330 . Registered on June 5, 2023. Kofam.ch SNCTP000005388. Registered on July 17, 2023.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Metilfenidato , Masculino , Humanos , Metilfenidato/efectos adversos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Prisiones , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble Ciego , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto
17.
J Urol ; 190(6): 2126-32, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23820054

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The nutritional risk score is a recommended screening tool for malnutrition. While a nutritional risk score of 3 or greater predicts adverse outcomes after digestive surgery, to our knowledge its predictive value for morbidity after urological interventions is unknown. We determined whether urological patients at nutritional risk are at higher risk for complications after major surgery than patients not at nutritional risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study in consecutive patients undergoing major surgery. A priori sample calculation resulted in a study cohort of 220 patients. Interim analysis was planned after 110 patients. The nutritional risk score was assessed preoperatively by a specialized study nurse. Nutritional care was standardized in all patients. Postoperative complications were defined previously using the standardized Dindo-Clavien classification. The primary end point was 30-day morbidity. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of complications. RESULTS: The study was discontinued due to significant results after interim analysis. A total of 125 patients were included in analysis from June 2011 to June 2012 and 15 were excluded because of incomplete data. Of 51 patients at nutritional risk 38 (74%) presented with at least 1 complication compared to 28 of 59 controls (47%). Patients at nutritional risk were at threefold risk for complications on univariate and multivariate analysis (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.0). Cystectomy was the only other predictor of morbidity (OR 10, 95% CI 2-48). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at nutritional risk are more prone to complications after major urological procedures. Whether this increased morbidity can be reversed by perioperative nutritional support should be studied.


Asunto(s)
Desnutrición/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Int J Legal Med ; 127(2): 427-35, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23064651

RESUMEN

The aims of this study were twofold. The first was to investigate the diagnostic performance of two biochemical markers, procalcitonin (PCT) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), considering each individually and then combined, for the postmortem diagnosis of sepsis. We also tested the usefulness of pericardial fluid for postmortem LBP determination. Two study groups were formed, a sepsis-related fatalities group of 12 cases and a control group of 30 cases. Postmortem native CT scans, autopsy, histology, neuropathology, and toxicology as well as other postmortem biochemical investigations were performed in all cases. Microbiological investigations were also carried out in the septic group. Postmortem serum PCT and LBP levels differed between the two groups. Both biomarkers, individually considered, allowed septic states to be diagnosed, whereas increases in both postmortem serum PCT and LBP levels were only observed in cases of sepsis. Similarly, normal PCT and LBP values in postmortem serum were identified only in non-septic cases. Pericardial fluid LBP levels do not correlate with the presence of underlying septic states. No relationship was observed between postmortem serum and pericardial fluid LBP levels in either septic or non-septic groups, or between pericardial fluid PCT and LBP levels.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Fase Aguda/metabolismo , Calcitonina/metabolismo , Proteínas Portadoras/metabolismo , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Precursores de Proteínas/metabolismo , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Péptido Relacionado con Gen de Calcitonina , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Patologia Forense , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pericardio/metabolismo , Cambios Post Mortem , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sepsis/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
19.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 28(1): 105-14, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22968331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is an important diagnostic instrument in clinical practice. The National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) guidelines do not recommend using formulas developed for adults to estimate GFR in children; however, studies confirming these recommendations are scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of the new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, and the Cockcroft-Gault formula in children with various stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: A total of 550 inulin clearance (iGFR) measurements for 391 children were analyzed. The cohort was divided into three groups: group 1, with iGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m(2); group 2, with iGFR between 60 and 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2); group 3, with iGFR of <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). RESULTS: All formulas overestimate iGFR with a significant bias (p < 0.001), present poor accuracies, and have poor Spearman correlations. For an accuracy of 10 %, only 11, 6, and 27 % of the eGFRs are accurate when using the MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault formulas, respectively. For an accuracy of 30 %, these formulas do not reach the NKF-KDOQI guidelines for validation, with only 25, 20, and 70 % of the eGFRs, respectively, being accurate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, the performances of all of these formulas are unreliable for eGFR in children across all CKD stages and cannot therefore be applied in the pediatric population group.


Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/fisiología , Nefrología/normas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
20.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 251(3): 697-704, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22733165

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the rhythm and predictability of the need for retreatment with intravitreal injections of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 39 patients with treatment-naïve nAMD. After three loading doses of intravitreal ranibizumab, patients underwent an intensified follow-up for 12 months (initially weekly, then with stepwise increases to every 2 weeks and to monthly after each injection). Patients were retreated on an as-needed basis if any fluid or increased central retinal thickness (CRT) (>50 µm) was found on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Statistical analysis included patients who received at least two retreatments (five injections). RESULTS: A mean of 7.5 injections (range 0-12) were given between months 3 and 15. The mean visual acuity increased by 13.1 and 12.6 ETDRS letters at months 12 and 15 respectively. Two or more injection-retreatment intervals were found in 31 patients. The variability of their intra-individual intervals up to 14 weeks was small (SD 0-2.13 weeks), revealing a high regularity of the retreatment rhythm. The SD was correlated with the mean interval duration (r = 0.89, p < 0.001). The first interval was a good predictor of the following intervals (regression coefficient =0.81). One retreatment criterion was stable in 97 % of patients (cysts or subretinal fluid). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate a high intra-individual predictability of retreatment need with ranibizumab injections for nAMD. These findings may be helpful for developing individualized treatment plans for maintained suppression of disease activity with a minimum of injections and visits.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular Húmeda/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Ranibizumab , Retratamiento , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/antagonistas & inhibidores , Agudeza Visual
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA