Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 720, 2024 Aug 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39210258

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Geriatric rehabilitation aims at increasing physical and social activity and maintaining the functional reserve of older people. However, the continuity of geriatric rehabilitation in the outpatient setting is limited due to a lack of structured aftercare programs. In order to overcome this, a three-month multimodal home-based intervention program (GeRas) was implemented. The aim of this early qualitative process evaluation was to assess GeRas in terms of perceived reach, effectiveness/efficacy, adoption/uptake, implementation, and maintenance/sustainability (Domains within the RE-AIM Framework) from the perspective of patients who received the intervention and healthcare providers who were involved in the delivery of the intervention. METHODS: In a qualitative process evaluation, 13 healthcare providers and 10 patients were interviewed throughout the beginning of the implementation period of GeRas to capture early experiences using a semi-structured interview guide. The interview guide and qualitative content analysis was guided by the RE-AIM Framework. RESULTS: The GeRas program was perceived to be largely well implemented and beneficial by healthcare providers and patients. According to healthcare providers, GeRas showed more advantages compared to usual care. Additionally, outcome expectations were mainly met (Domain 1: Effectiveness). However, the implementation of the intervention delivered via the eHealth system was perceived as challenging (Domain 2: Adoption). Nevertheless, the outpatient physical exercise, the outpatient counselling, and the continuous care after discharge improved perceived well-being regardless of the intervention type (Domain 3: Implementation). To facilitate the continued use of GeRas, technical requirements should be created to increase user-friendliness and to motivate patients to continue the training in the long term (Domain 4: Maintenance). CONCLUSION: Although initial experiences with the implementation and effectiveness of GeRas were positive in general, organisational and technical issues need to be resolved to enhance sustainable and successful implementation of the GeRas program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029559). Registered 5/10/2022.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Investigación Cualitativa , Pacientes Internos
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 69, 2024 Jan 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38233746

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Geriatric rehabilitation aims to maintain the functional reserves of older adults in order to optimize social participation and prevent disability. After discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation, patients are at high risk for decreased physical capacity, increased vulnerability, and limitations in mobility. As a result, ageing in place becomes uncertain for a plethora of patients after discharge from geriatric rehabilitation and effective strategies to prevent physical decline are required. Collaboration between different health-care providers is essential to improve continuity of care after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-professional home-based intervention program (GeRas) to improve functional capacity and social participation in older persons after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: The study is a multicenter, three-arm, randomized controlled trial with a three-month intervention period. Two hundred and seventy community-dwelling older people receiving inpatient geriatric rehabilitation will be randomized with a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the parallel intervention groups (conventional IG or tablet IG) or the control group (CG). The participants of both IGs will receive a home-based physical exercise program supervised by physical therapists, a nutritional recommendation by a physician, and social counseling by social workers of the health insurance company. The collaboration between the health-care providers and management of participants will be realized within a cloud environment based on a telemedicine platform and supported by multi-professional case conferences. The CG will receive usual care, two short handouts on general health-related topics, and facultative lifestyle counseling with general recommendations for a healthy diet and active ageing. The primary outcomes will be the physical capacity measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery and social participation assessed by the modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index, three months after discharge. DISCUSSION: The GeRas program is designed to improve the collaboration between health-care providers in the transition from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation to outpatient settings. Compared to usual care, it is expected to improve physical capacity and participation in geriatric patients after discharge from inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00029559). Registered on October 05, 2022.


Asunto(s)
Pacientes Internos , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vida Independiente/psicología , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
3.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 59(1): 10-16, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31096290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early retirements make up a large portion of indirect costs of illness caused by chronic back pain. METHODS: Claims data from statutory health insurance and German Pension Fund provide the basis for analysis. Cox-Regression was performed for duration to early retirement, whereby beside sociodemographic and treatment characteristics, the effect of rehabilitation was considered. RESULTS: Early retirement started on average 7.1 month later through rehabilitation. Therefore, rehabilitants made € 8,432.60 higher payments to statutory health insurance and German Pension Fund per rehabilitant. Based on the total number of 21,262 early retirees with orthopedic indications, this can save € 180.7 million. The timing of the early retirement was also affected by age and sickness benefits in the previous month. Savings by avoiding entry into early retirement have not yet been taken into account in this model. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitants receive later pensions due to reduced ability, which allow for more contributions to statutory health insurance and German Pension Fund. This indicates that medical rehabilitation is an economic and effective treatment.


Asunto(s)
Administración Financiera , Rehabilitación , Jubilación , Alemania , Humanos , Renta , Pensiones , Rehabilitación/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA