Diagnostic accuracy of anti-3-[18F]-FACBC PET/MRI in gliomas.

PURPOSE: The primary aim was to evaluate whether anti-3-[18F]FACBC PET combined with conventional MRI correlated better with histomolecular diagnosis (reference standard) than MRI alone in glioma diagnostics. The ability of anti-3-[18F]FACBC to differentiate between molecular and histopathological entities in gliomas was also evaluated. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients with suspected primary or recurrent gliomas were recruited from two sites in Norway and examined with PET/MRI prior to surgery. Anti-3-[18F]FACBC uptake (TBRpeak) was compared to histomolecular features in 36 patients. PET results were then added to clinical MRI readings (performed by two neuroradiologists, blinded for histomolecular results and PET data) to assess the predicted tumor characteristics with and without PET. RESULTS: Histomolecular analyses revealed two CNS WHO grade 1, nine grade 2, eight grade 3, and 17 grade 4 gliomas. All tumors were visible on MRI FLAIR. The sensitivity of contrast-enhanced MRI and anti-3-[18F]FACBC PET was 61% (95%CI [45, 77]) and 72% (95%CI [58, 87]), respectively, in the detection of gliomas. Median TBRpeak was 7.1 (range: 1.4-19.2) for PET positive tumors. All CNS WHO grade 1 pilocytic astrocytomas/gangliogliomas, grade 3 oligodendrogliomas, and grade 4 glioblastomas/astrocytomas were PET positive, while 25% of grade 2-3 astrocytomas and 56% of grade 2-3 oligodendrogliomas were PET positive. Generally, TBRpeak increased with malignancy grade for diffuse gliomas. A significant difference in PET uptake between CNS WHO grade 2 and 4 gliomas (p < 0.001) and between grade 3 and 4 gliomas (p = 0.002) was observed. Diffuse IDH wildtype gliomas had significantly higher TBRpeak compared to IDH1/2 mutated gliomas (p < 0.001). Adding anti-3-[18F]FACBC PET to MRI improved the accuracy of predicted glioma grades, types, and IDH status, and yielded 13.9 and 16.7 percentage point improvement in the overall diagnoses for both readers, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anti-3-[18F]FACBC PET demonstrated high uptake in the majority of gliomas, especially in IDH wildtype gliomas, and improved the accuracy of preoperatively predicted glioma diagnoses. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04111588, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04111588.

Stable glioma incidence and increased patient survival over the past two decades in Norway: a nationwide registry-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of incidence and survival of central nervous system tumors is essential to monitor disease burden and epidemiological changes, and to allocate health care resources. Here, we describe glioma incidence and survival trends by histopathology group, age, and sex in the Norwegian population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with a histologically verified glioma reported to the Cancer Registry of Norway from 2002 to 2021 (N = 7,048). Population size and expected mortality were obtained from Statistics Norway. Cases were followed from diagnosis until death, emigration, or 31 December 2022, whichever came first. We calculated age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) per 100,000 person-years and age-standardized relative survival (RS).  Results: The ASIR for histologically verified gliomas was 7.4 (95% CI: 7.3-7.6) and was higher for males (8.8; 95% CI: 8.5-9.1) than females (6.1; 95% CI: 5.9-6.4). Overall incidence was stable over time. Glioblastoma was the most frequent tumor entity (ASIR = 4.2; 95% CI: 4.1-4.4). Overall, glioma patients had a 1-year RS of 63.6% (95% CI: 62.5-64.8%), and a 5-year RS of 32.8% (95% CI: 31.6-33.9%). Females had slightly better survival than males. For most entities, 1- and 5-year RS improved over time (5-year RS for all gliomas 29.0% (2006) and 33.1% (2021), p < 0.001). Across all tumor types, the RS declined with increasing age at diagnosis. INTERPRETATION: The incidence of gliomas has been stable while patient survival has increased over the past 20 years in Norway. As gliomas represent a heterogeneous group of primary CNS tumors, regular reporting from cancer registries at the histopathology group level is important to monitor disease burden and allocate health care resources in a population.

Prospects of returning to work after lumbar spine surgery for patients considering disability pension: a nationwide study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the odds for not returning to work (non-RTW) 1 year after treatment among patients who had applied for or were planning to apply for disability pension (DP-applicant) prior to an operation for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. METHODS: This population-based cohort study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine surgery included 26 688 cases operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine from 2009 to 2020. The primary outcome was RTW (yes/no). Secondary patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were the Oswestry Disability Index, Numeric Rating Scales for back and leg pain, EuroQoL five-dimension and the Global Perceived Effect Scale. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate associations between being a DP-applicant prior to surgery (exposure), possible confounders (modifiers) at baseline and RTW 12 months after surgery (outcome). RESULTS: The RTW ratio for DP-applicants was 23.1% (having applied: 26.5%, planning to apply 21.1%), compared with 78.6% among non-applicants. All secondary PROMs were more favourable among non-applicants. After adjusting for all significant confounders (low expectations and pessimism related to working capability, not feeling wanted by the employer and physically demanding work), DP-applicants with under 12 months preoperative sick leave had 3.8 (95% CI 1.8 to 8.0) higher odds than non-applicants for non-RTW 12 months after surgery. The subgroup having applied for disability pension had the strongest impact on this association. CONCLUSION: Less than a quarter of the DP-applicants returned to work 12 months after surgery. This association remained strong, also when adjusted for the confounders as well as other covariates related RTW.

The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine): cohort profile.

PURPOSE: To review and describe the development, methods and cohort of the lumbosacral part of the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine). METHODS: NORspine was established in 2007. It is government funded, covers all providers and captures consecutive cases undergoing operations for degenerative disorders. Patients' participation is voluntary and requires informed consent. A set of baseline-, process- and outcome-variables (3 and 12 months) recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement is reported by surgeons and patients. The main outcome is the Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 12 months. RESULTS: We show satisfactory data quality assessed by completeness, timeliness, accuracy, relevance and comparability. The coverage rate has been 100% since 2016 and the capture rate has increased to 74% in 2021. The cohort consists of 60,647 (47.6% women) cases with mean age 55.7 years, registered during the years 2007 through 2021. The proportions > 70 years and with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists' Physical Classification System (ASA) score > II has increased gradually to 26.1% and 19.3%, respectively. Mean ODI at baseline was 43.0 (standard deviation 17.3). Most cases were operated with decompression for disc herniation (n = 26,557, 43.8%) or spinal stenosis (n = 26,545, 43.8%), and 7417 (12.2%) with additional or primary fusion. The response rate at 12 months follow-up was 71.6%. CONCLUSION: NORspine is a well-designed population-based comprehensive national clinical quality registry. The register's methods ensure appropriate data for quality surveillance and improvement, and research.

Non-respondents do not bias outcome assessment after cervical spine surgery: a multicenter observational study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine).

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine) is a national clinical quality registry which has recorded more than 10,000 operations for degenerative conditions of the cervical spine since 2012. Registries are large observational cohorts, at risk for attrition bias. We therefore aimed to examine whether clinical outcomes differed between respondents and non-respondents to standardized questionnaire-based 12-month follow-up. METHODS: All eight public and private providers of cervical spine surgery in Norway report to NORspine. We included 334 consecutive patients who were registered with surgical treatment of degenerative conditions in the cervical spine in 2018 and did a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected register data and data on non-respondents' outcomes collected by telephone interviews. The primary outcome measure was patient-reported change in arm pain assessed with the numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcome measures were change in neck pain assessed with the NRS, change in health-related quality of life assessed with EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and patients' perceived benefit of the operation assessed by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. RESULTS: At baseline, there were few and small differences between the 238 (71.3%) respondents and the 96 (28.7%) non-respondents. We reached 76 (79.2%) non-respondents by telephone, and 63 (65.6%) consented to an interview. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in change in NRS score for arm pain (3.26 (95% CI 2.84 to 3.69) points for respondents and 2.77 (1.92 to 3.63) points for telephone interviewees) or any of the secondary outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that patients lost to follow-up were missing at random. Analyses of outcomes based on data from respondents can be considered representative for the complete register cohort, if patient characteristics associated with attrition are controlled for.

[Glioblastoma in adults]. / Glioblastom hos voksne.

Glioblastoma is the most common form of primary brain cancer in adults, and the disease has a serious prognosis. Although great progress has been made in molecular characteristics, no major breakthroughs in treatment have been achieved for many years. In this article we present a clinical review of current diagnostics and treatment, as well as the challenges and opportunities inherent in developing improved and more personalised treatment.

Obesity Does Not Protect From Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Pooled Analyses of 3 Large Prospective Nordic Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Several population-based cohort studies have related higher body mass index (BMI) to a decreased risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The main objective of our study was to investigate whether the previously reported inverse association can be explained by modifying effects of the most important risk factors of SAH-smoking and hypertension. METHODS: We conducted a collaborative study of three prospective population-based Nordic cohorts by combining comprehensive baseline data from 211 972 adult participants collected between 1972 and 2012, with follow-up until the end of 2018. Primarily, we compared the risk of SAH between three BMI categories: (1) low (BMI<22.5), (2) moderate (BMI: 22.5-29.9), and (3) high (BMI≥30) BMI and evaluated the modifying effects of smoking and hypertension on the associations. RESULTS: We identified 831 SAH events (mean age 62 years, 55% women) during the total follow-up of 4.7 million person-years. Compared with the moderate BMI category, persons with low BMI had an elevated risk for SAH (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.30 [1.09-1.55]), whereas no significant risk difference was found in high BMI category (HR, 0.91 [0.73-1.13]). However, we only found the increased risk of low BMI in smokers (HR, 1.49 [1.19-1.88]) and in hypertensive men (HR, 1.72 [1.18-2.50]), but not in nonsmokers (HR, 1.02 [0.76-1.37]) or in men with normal blood pressure values (HR, 0.98 [0.63-1.54]; interaction HRs, 1.68 [1.18-2.41], P=0.004 between low BMI and smoking and 1.76 [0.98-3.13], P=0.06 between low BMI and hypertension in men). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking and hypertension appear to explain, at least partly, the previously reported inverse association between BMI and the risk of SAH. Therefore, the independent role of BMI in the risk of SAH is likely modest.

Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: impact of different definitions - the Tromsø Study.

BACKGROUND: Management of incidental unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) remains challenging and depends on their risk of rupture, estimated from the assumed prevalence of aneurysms and the incidence of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Reported prevalence varies, and consistent criteria for definition of UIAs are lacking. We aimed to study the prevalence of UIAs in a general population according to different definitions of aneurysm. METHODS: Cross-sectional population-based study using 3-dimensional time-of-flight 3 Tesla MR angiography to identify size, type and location of UIAs in 1862 adults aged 40-84 years. Size was measured as the maximal distance between any two points in the aneurysm sac. Prevalence was estimated for different diameter cutoffs (≥1, 2 and 3 mm) with and without inclusion of extradural aneurysms. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of intradural saccular aneurysms ≥2 mm was 6.6% (95% CI 5.4% to 7.6%), 7.5% (95% CI 5.9% to 9.2%) in women and 5.5% (95% CI 4.1% to 7.2%) in men. Depending on the definition of an aneurysm, the overall prevalence ranged from 3.8% (95% CI 3.0% to 4.8%) for intradural aneurysms ≥3 mm to 8.3% (95% CI 7.1% to 9.7%) when both intradural and extradural aneurysms ≥1 mm were included. CONCLUSION: Prevalence in this study was higher than previously observed in other Western populations and was substantially influenced by definitions according to size and extradural or intradural location. The high prevalence of UIAs sized <5 mm may suggest lower rupture risk than previously estimated. Consensus on more robust and consistent radiological definitions of UIAs is warranted.

Decompressive hemicraniectomy for space-occupying brain infarction: Nationwide population-based registry study.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed data from the Norwegian Stroke Registry (NSR) to study access to and outcomes of decompressive hemicraniectomy for brain infarction in a nationwide routine clinical setting. We also discretionary assessed whether the outcomes were comparable with those achieved in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and whether the use was in accordance with guidelines. METHODS: The NSR is a nationwide (population 5.3 million) clinical quality registry. We included all stroke-cases operated in 2017 through 2019, and retrieved data on baseline characteristics, treatment and functional outcome after three months (dichotomized modified Rankin Scale score; favorable (0-3) or unfavorable (4-6)). Crude treatment rates and the expected proportion of patients transferred from a local hospital to a stroke-center for the operation were estimated, based on the total population's distribution of residency. RESULTS: The 68 cases were 17 (25%) women and 51 (75%) men with a median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission of 14.0 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 11.0) and a median time from onset to hemicraniectomy of 34.3 (IQR 40.9) hours. The crude treatment rate varied between regions from 0.29 to 1.40 operations per 100,000 population per year, and the proportion transferred from a local hospital (50%) was lower than expected (68%). A favorable outcome was achieved in 20/52 (38.5%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate gender- and geographic-inequalities in access. Among operated cases, outcomes were comparable with those reported from RCTs, and the use in accordance with recommendations in the current guidelines from the American Stroke Association.

Cervical spine surgery in the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area in 2014-18. / Nakkekirurgi i Helse Nord 2014­18.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge about the variation in treatment rates is needed to assess whether the access to health services is equitable. The objective of this study was to investigate the rates of surgical treatment of degenerative cervical spine disease in Norway and the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area and the local coverage in the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area, and to assess the activity in the region. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We included cervical spine procedures recorded in the Norwegian Patient Registry from the years 2014-18 and estimated age-standardised treatment rates for Norway, the health regions and health trusts in Northern Norway Regional Health Authority. We estimated the local coverage as the proportion of patients resident in the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area who had undergone surgery at the University Hospital of North Norway in Tromsø. RESULTS: The treatment rate remained stable at an average of 29.6 surgical procedures per 100 000 inhabitants (aged 18-105) per year. The rate for residents in the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area was 23.0 procedures per 100 000 inhabitants per year (78 % of the national average). The rates in Finnmark and the areas of residence served by the University Hospital of North Norway were close to the national average. Residents in the Nordland and Helgeland areas had lower rates in each year of the study period, with an average of 16.6 and 18.1 procedures per 100 000 inhabitants per year respectively. This corresponds to 56 % and 61 % of the national average. Local coverage in the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area increased from 69 % in 2014 to 91 % in 2018. INTERPRETATION: The treatment rate for degenerative cervical spine disease was lower in the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area than in the rest of Norway. For this to be compensated and the local coverage to be increased to 100 %, we have estimated that the activity needs to be increased by approximately 35 surgical procedures per year.

A prognostic model for failure and worsening after lumbar microdiscectomy: a multicenter study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model for failure and worsening 1 year after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included 11,081 patients operated with lumbar microdiscectomy, registered at the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Follow-up was 1 year. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess potential prognostic factors for previously defined cut-offs for failure and worsening on the Oswestry Disability Index scores 12 months after surgery. Since the cut-offs for failure and worsening are different for patients with low, moderate, and high baseline ODI scores, the multivariate analyses were run separately for these subgroups. Data were split into a training (70%) and a validation set (30%). The model was developed in the training set and tested in the validation set. A prediction (%) of an outcome was calculated for each patient in a risk matrix. RESULTS: The prognostic model produced six risk matrices based on three baseline ODI ranges (low, medium, and high) and two outcomes (failure and worsening), each containing 7 to 11 prognostic factors. Model discrimination and calibration were acceptable. The estimated preoperative probabilities ranged from 3 to 94% for failure and from 1 to 72% for worsening in our validation cohort. CONCLUSION: We developed a prognostic model for failure and worsening 12 months after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. The model showed acceptable calibration and discrimination, and could be useful in assisting physicians and patients in clinical decision-making process prior to surgery.

Adherence to the Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults. / Blir retningslinjer for behandling av mindre alvorlige hodeskader fulgt?

BACKGROUND: The Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults aim to identify patients at risk of developing intracranial haematoma, while also avoiding unnecessary computed tomography (CT) scans and hospital admissions. We examined compliance with the guidelines at the University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A search in the patient administration system identified 448 patients with a diagnosis code for head injury. We excluded 298 who met one or more exclusion criteria, and included 150 with minimal, mild or moderate injuries in a retrospective study. Management was categorised as being either compliant or non-compliant with the guidelines. We defined non-compliance as overtesting (unnecessary CT scan and/or hospital admission) or undertesting (omission of necessary CT scan and/or hospital admission). RESULTS: Management was in accordance with the guidelines for 96/150 (64 %) patients. This proportion increased with the severity of the injury (minimal 4/12 (33 %), mild 76/119 (64 %) and moderate 16/19 (84 %)). A total of 54/150 (36 %) patients were not managed in accordance with the guidelines. This was due to unnecessary CT scans and/or hospitalisation in 39/54 (72 %) patients and undertesting in 15/54 (28 %). Among patients with low-risk mild head injuries, 35/57 (61 %) underwent analysis of the brain injury marker S100B, as per the recommendations. INTERPRETATION: Compliance with the Scandinavian guidelines could be improved.

Associations between utilization rates and patients' health: a study of spine surgery and patient-reported outcomes (EQ-5D and ODI).

BACKGROUND: A vast body of literature has documented regional variations in healthcare utilization rates. The extent to which such variations are "unwarranted" critically depends on whether there are corresponding variations in patients' needs. Using a unique medical registry, the current paper investigated any associations between utilization rates and patients' needs, as measured by two patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: This observational panel study merged patient-level data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), Statistics Norway, and the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) for individuals who received surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disorders in 2010-2015. NPR consists of hospital administration data. NORspine includes two PROMs: the generic health-related quality of life instrument EQ-5D and the disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Measurements were assessed at baseline and at 3 and 12 months post-surgery and included a wide range of patient characteristics. Our case sample included 15,810 individuals. We analyzed all data using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Our results show that as treatment rates increase, patients have better health at baseline. Furthermore, increased treatment rates are associated with smaller health gain. CONCLUSION: The correlation between treatment rates and patients health indicate the presence of unwarranted variation in treatment rates for lumbar spine disorders.

Treatment rates for lumbar spine surgery in Norway and Northern Norway Regional Health Authority 2014-18. / Behandlingsrater for ryggkirurgi i Norge og Helse Nord 2014­18.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the service provision for lumbar spine surgery within the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area complies with the distribution of functions that has been decided for the hospitals in the region, and whether there are any geographical variations in service provision. We therefore studied the treatment rates in Norway as a whole and in the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area, and assessed the activity in the region. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We included lumbar spine procedures in the Norwegian Patient Registry from the years 2014-2018 in a retrospective analysis and estimated treatment rates standardised by sex and age for Norway as a whole, the health regions and the health enterprises in Northern Norway Regional Health Authority. We estimated the local coverage as the proportion of patients who had undergone surgery in a hospital within their own area of residence. RESULTS: The treatment rate for lumbar spine surgery in Norway amounted to approximately 120 procedures per 100 000 inhabitants per year for the entire period. The number of spine procedures nationwide increased from 5 995 in 2014 to 6 494 in 2018 because of a general population growth. The treatment rates for fractures and simple spine procedures were approximately identical throughout Norway, but the rate for complex spine procedures among residents within the area of Northern Norway Regional Health Authority amounted to 57 % of the national average. Local coverage within the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area increased from 60 % to 84 % during the period. The local hospital functions for simple spine procedures at Nordland and Helgeland hospitals (approximately 30 %) and the regional function for complex spine surgery at the University Hospital of North Norway (55 %) had a low degree of local coverage. INTERPRETATION: The treatment rate for complex spine procedures and the local coverage for all surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spine disease were lower within the Northern Norway Regional Health Authority area than in the country as a whole. For this to be compensated in this region, we have estimated that the activity needs to be increased by approximately 170 procedures per year.

Injury coding in a national trauma registry: a one-year validation audit in a level 1 trauma centre.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals must improve patient safety and quality continuously. Clinical quality registries can drive such improvement. Trauma registries code injuries according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and benchmark outcomes based on the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New ISS (NISS). The primary aim of this study was to validate the injury codes and severities registered in a national trauma registry. Secondarily, we aimed to examine causes for missing and discordant codes, to guide improvement of registry data quality. METHODS: We conducted an audit and established an expert coder group injury reference standard for patients met with trauma team activation in 2015 in a Level 1 trauma centre. Injuries were coded according to the AIS. The audit included review of all data in the electronic health records (EHR), and new interpretation of all images in the picture archiving system. Validated injury codes were compared with the codes registered in the registry. The expert coder group's interpretations of reasons for discrepancies were categorised and registered. Inter-rater agreement between registry data and the reference standard was tested with Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: We validated injury data from 144 patients (male sex 79.2%) with median age 31 (inter quartile range 19-49) years. The total number of registered AIS codes was 582 in the registry and 766 in the reference standard. All injuries were concordantly coded in 62 (43.1%) patients. Most non-registered codes (n = 166 in 71 (49.3%) patients) were AIS 1, and information in the EHR overlooked by registrars was the dominating cause. Discordant coding of head injuries and extremity fractures were the most common causes for 157 discordant AIS codes in 74 (51.4%) patients. Median ISS (9) and NISS (12) for the total population did not differ between the registry and the reference standard. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between the codes registered in the trauma registry and the reference standard was moderate, influencing individual patients' injury codes validity and ISS/NISS reliability. Nevertheless, aggregated median group ISS/NISS reliability was acceptable.

Outcome prediction in chronic unilateral lumbar radiculopathy: prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Identification of prognostic factors for persistent pain and disability are important for better understanding of the clinical course of chronic unilateral lumbar radiculopathy and to assist clinical decision-making. There is a lack of scientific evidence concerning prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to identify clinically relevant predictors for outcome at 52 weeks. METHODS: 116 patients were included in a sham controlled clinical trial on epidural injection of glucocorticoids in patients with chronic unilateral lumbar radiculopathy. Success at follow-up was ≤ 17.5 for visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain, ≤ 22.5 for VAS back pain and ≤ 20 for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Fifteen clinically relevant variables included demographic, psychosocial, clinical and radiological data and were analysed using a logistic multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: At follow-up, 75 (64.7%) patients had reached a successful outcome with an ODI score ≤ 20, 54 (46.6%) with a VAS leg pain score ≤ 17.5, and 47 (40.5%) with a VAS back pain score ≤ 22.5. Lower age (OR 0.94 (CI 0.89-0.99) for each year decrease in age) and FABQ Work ≥ 34 (OR 0.16 (CI 0.04-0.61)) were independent variables predicting a successful outcome on the ODI. Higher education (OR 5.77 (CI 1.46-22.87)) and working full-time (OR 2.70 (CI 1.02-7.18)) were statistically significant (P <0.05) independent predictors for successful outcome (VAS score ≤ 17.5) on the measure of leg pain. Lower age predicted success on ODI (OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.99) for each year) and less back pain (OR 0.94 (0.90 to 0.99)), while higher education (OR 5.77 (1.46 to 22.87)), working full-time (OR 2.70 (1.02 to 7.18)) and muscle weakness at baseline (OR 4.11 (1.24 to 13.61) predicted less leg pain, and reflex impairment at baseline predicted the contrary (OR 0.39 (0.15 to 0.97)). CONCLUSIONS: Lower age, higher education, working full-time and low fear avoidance beliefs each predict a better outcome of chronic unilateral lumbar radiculopathy. Specifically, lower age and low fear avoidance predict a better functional outcome and less back pain, while higher education and working full-time predict less leg pain. These results should be validated in further studies before being used to inform patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12574253 . Registered 18 May 2005.

Patient Characteristics Associated With Worsening of Neck Pain-Related Disability After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Nationwide Study of 1508 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Functional status, pain, and quality of life usually improve after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), but a subset of patients report worsening. The objective was to define cutoff values for worsening on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and identify prognostic factors associated with worsening of pain-related disability 12 months after DCM surgery. METHODS: In this prognostic study based on prospectively collected data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery, the NDI was the primary outcome. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were used to obtain cutoff values, using the global perceived effect scale as an external anchor. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using mixed logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between potential prognostic factors and the NDI. RESULTS: Among the 1508 patients undergoing surgery for myelopathy, 1248 (82.7%) were followed for either 3 or 12 months. Of these, 317 (25.4%) were classified to belong to the worsening group according to the mean NDI percentage change cutoff of 3.3. Multivariable analyses showed that smoking (odds ratio [OR] 3.4: 95% CI 1.2-9.5: P < .001), low educational level (OR 2.5: 95% CI 1.0-6.5: P < .001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade >II (OR 2.2: 95% CI 0.7-5.6: P = .004) were associated with worsening. Patients with more severe neck pain (OR 0.8: 95% CI 0.7-1.0: P = .003) and arm pain (OR 0.8: 95% CI 0.7-1.0; P = .007) at baseline were less likely to report worsening. CONCLUSION: We defined a cutoff value of 3.3 for worsening after DCM surgery using the mean NDI percentage change. The independent prognostic factors associated with worsening of pain-related disability were smoking, low educational level, and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade >II. Patients with more severe neck and arm pain at baseline were less likely to report worsening at 12 months.

Are diagnoses of unruptured intracranial aneurysms associated with quality of life, psychological distress, health anxiety, or use of healthcare services in untreated individuals? A longitudinal, nested case-control study.

Introduction: Increasing imaging examination rates leads to a corresponding rise in the detection rates of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). There is limited knowledge on how the detection of UIA affects health-related outcomes in untreated patients. Research question: Is the diagnosis of UIA associated with psychosocial outcomes, healthcare services utilisation, or sick leave in untreated individuals? Material and methods: Nested case-control study with 96 participants diagnosed with UIAs through magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) screening, not receiving preventive aneurysm obliteration. Comparisons were made with Control1 (192 participants with negative MRAs) and Control2 (192 individuals not MRA screened). Quality of life, psychological distress, and health anxiety were assessed using EQ-5D-5L including EQ VAS, Hopkins Symptom Checklist-10, and Whiteley Index-6, respectively. Healthcare service utilisation and sick leave was measured using registry data. Median follow-up was 32-55 months for the different outcomes. Results: UIA were in general not associated with psychosocial outcomes, neither compared to pre-screening values nor to controls. The exemption was a lower mean EQ VAS score at follow-up for cases (76.7) versus Control1 (80.0), regression coefficient -3.87 (95% CI (-7.60, -0.14). Cases had significantly higher rates of radiology exams compared to controls, with 1.47 (95% CI 1.25, 1.74) exams per person-year versus 0.91 (C95% CI 0.75, 1.09) for Control1 and 0.95 (95% CI CI 0.79, 1.14) for Control2. No significant differences were observed in other psychosocial outcomes, healthcare services utilisation, or sick-leave. Discussion and conclusions: The overall impact of untreated UIAs appears to be limited when assessed years after diagnosis.

Reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after posterior fossa craniotomy: Retrospective case-series.

Introduction: Studies report rates of treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after craniotomy around 1-2%, but do not distinguish between supratentorial and posterior fossa operations. Reports about intracranial haemorrhages' temporal occurrence show conflicting results. Recommendations for duration of postoperative monitoring vary. Research question: To determine the rate, temporal pattern and clinical presentation of reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial posterior fossa haemorrhage. Material and methods: This retrospective case-series identified cases operated with posterior fossa craniotomy or craniectomy between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021 by an electronic search in the patient administrative database, and collected data about patient- and treatment-characteristics, postoperative monitoring, and the occurrence of haemorrhagic and other serious postoperative complications. Results: We included 62 (n = 34, 55% women) cases with mean age 48 (interquartile range 50) years operated for tumours (n = 34, 55%), Chiari malformations (n = 18, 29%), ischemic stroke (n = 6, 10%) and other lesions (n = 3, 5%). One (2%) 66-year-old woman who was a daily smoker operated with decompressive craniectomy and infarct resection, developed a reoperation-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage after 25.5 h. In four (6%) cases, other serious complications requiring reoperation or transfer from the post anaesthesia care unit or regular bed wards to the intensive care unit occurred after 0.5, 6, 9 and 54 h, respectively. Discussion and conclusion: Treatment-requiring postoperative intracranial haemorrhage and other serious complications after posterior fossa craniotomies occur over a wide timespan and are difficult to capture with a standardized postoperative monitoring time. This indicates that the duration of monitoring should be individualized based on assessment of risk factors.