Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr ; 249: 59-66.e1, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35772508

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the severity of cases of spina bifida changed after the institution of mandatory folic acid fortification in the US. STUDY DESIGN: Six active population-based birth defects programs provided data on cases of spina bifida for 1992-1996 (prefortification period) and 1999-2016 (postfortification period). The programs contributed varying years of data. Case information included both a medical record verbatim text description of the spina bifida diagnosis and spina bifida codes (International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, or a modified birth defects surveillance coding system). Comparing the prefortification and postfortification periods, aORs for case severity (upper-level lesions [cervical, thoracic] vs lower-level lesions [lumbar, sacral]) and prevalence ratios (PRs) were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 2593 cases of spina bifida (out of 7 816 062 live births) met the inclusion criteria, including 573 cases from the prefortification period and 2020 cases from the postfortification period. Case severity decreased by 70% (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.26-0.35) between the fortification periods. The decrease was most pronounced for non-Hispanic White mothers. Overall spina bifida prevalence declined by 23% (PR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85), with similar reductions seen across the early, mid, and recent postfortification periods. A statistically significant decrease in upper-level lesions occurred in the postfortification period compared with the prefortification period (PR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22-0.34), whereas the prevalence of lower-level lesions remained relatively similar (PR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of spina bifida cases decreased after mandatory folic acid fortification in the US. Further examination is warranted to better understand the potential effect of folic acid on spina bifida severity.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Fólico , Disrafia Espinal , Femenino , Ácido Fólico/uso terapéutico , Alimentos Fortificados , Humanos , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Disrafia Espinal/epidemiología , Disrafia Espinal/prevención & control
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(2): 25-29, 2020 Jan 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945037

RESUMEN

Birth defects are a leading cause of infant mortality in the United States, accounting for 20.6% of infant deaths in 2017 (1). Rates of infant mortality attributable to birth defects (IMBD) have generally declined since the 1970s (1-3). U.S. linked birth/infant death data from 2003-2017 were used to assess trends in IMBD. Overall, rates declined 10% during 2003-2017, but decreases varied by maternal and infant characteristics. During 2003-2017, IMBD rates decreased 4% for infants of Hispanic mothers, 11% for infants of non-Hispanic black (black) mothers, and 12% for infants of non-Hispanic white (white) mothers. In 2017, these rates were highest among infants of black mothers (13.3 per 10,000 live births) and were lowest among infants of white mothers (9.9). During 2003-2017, IMBD rates for infants who were born extremely preterm (20-27 completed gestational weeks), full term (39-40 weeks), and late term/postterm (41-44 weeks) declined 20%-29%; rates for moderate (32-33 weeks) and late preterm (34-36 weeks) infants increased 17%. Continued tracking of IMBD rates can help identify areas where efforts to reduce IMBD are needed, such as among infants born to black and Hispanic mothers and those born moderate and late preterm (32-36 weeks).


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/mortalidad , Mortalidad Infantil/tendencias , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anomalías Congénitas/etnología , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil/etnología , Recien Nacido Extremadamente Prematuro , Recién Nacido , Posmaduro , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(1): 1-5, 2020 Jan 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31917782

RESUMEN

In May 2018, a study of birth defects in infants born to women with diagnosed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in Botswana reported an eightfold increased risk for neural tube defects (NTDs) among births with periconceptional exposure to antiretroviral therapy (ART) that included the integrase inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) compared with other ART regimens (1). The World Health Organization* (WHO) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services† (HHS) promptly issued interim guidance limiting the initiation of DTG during early pregnancy and in women of childbearing age with HIV who desire pregnancy or are sexually active and not using effective contraception. On the basis of additional data, WHO now recommends DTG as a preferred treatment option for all populations, including women of childbearing age and pregnant women. Similarly, the U.S. recommendations currently state that DTG is a preferred antiretroviral drug throughout pregnancy (with provider-patient counseling) and as an alternative antiretroviral drug in women who are trying to conceive.§ Since 1981 and 1994, CDC has supported separate surveillance programs for HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (2) and birth defects (3) in state health departments. These two surveillance programs can inform public health programs and policy, linkage to care, and research activities. Because birth defects surveillance programs do not collect HIV status, and HIV surveillance programs do not routinely collect data on occurrence of birth defects, the related data have not been used by CDC to characterize birth defects in births to women with HIV. Data from these two programs were linked to estimate overall prevalence of NTDs and prevalence of NTDs in HIV-exposed pregnancies during 2013-2017 for 15 participating jurisdictions. Prevalence of NTDs in pregnancies among women with diagnosed HIV infection was 7.0 per 10,000 live births, similar to that among the general population in these 15 jurisdictions, and the U.S. estimate based on data from 24 states. Successful linking of data from birth defects and HIV/AIDS surveillance programs for pregnancies among women with diagnosed HIV infection suggests that similar data linkages might be used to characterize possible associations between maternal diseases or maternal use of medications, such as integrase strand transfer inhibitors used to manage HIV, and pregnancy outcomes. Although no difference in NTD prevalence in HIV-exposed pregnancies was found, data on the use of integrase strand transfer inhibitors in pregnancy are needed to understand the safety and risks of these drugs during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Defectos del Tubo Neural/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antirretrovirales/efectos adversos , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(2): 31-36, 2019 Jan 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30653484

RESUMEN

Prevalence of gastroschisis, a serious birth defect of the abdominal wall resulting in some of the abdominal contents extending outside the body at birth, has been increasing worldwide (1,2). Gastroschisis requires surgical repair after birth and is associated with digestive and feeding complications during infancy, which can affect development. Recent data from 14 U.S. states indicated an increasing prevalence of gastroschisis from 1995 to 2012 (1). Young maternal age has been strongly associated with gastroschisis, but research suggests that risk factors such as smoking, genitourinary infections, and prescription opioid use also might be associated (3-5). Data from 20 population-based state surveillance programs were pooled and analyzed to assess age-specific gastroschisis prevalence during two 5-year periods, 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, and an ecologic approach was used to compare annual gastroschisis prevalence by annual opioid prescription rate categories. Gastroschisis prevalence increased only slightly (10%) from 2006-2010 to 2011-2015 (prevalence ratio = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.1), with the highest prevalence among mothers aged <20 years. During 2006-2015, the prevalence of gastroschisis was 1.6 times higher in counties with high opioid prescription rates (5.1 per 10,000 live births; CI = 4.9-5.3) and 1.4 times higher where opioid prescription rates were medium (4.6 per 10,000 live births; CI = 4.4-4.8) compared with areas with low prescription rates (3.2 per 10,000 live births; CI = 3.1-3.4). Public health research is needed to understand factors contributing to the association between young maternal age and gastroschisis and assess the effect of prescription opioid use during pregnancy on this pregnancy outcome.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fenómenos Ecológicos y Ambientales , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/etnología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(3): 91-96, 2018 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29370151

RESUMEN

Zika virus infection during pregnancy can cause serious birth defects, including microcephaly and brain abnormalities (1). Population-based birth defects surveillance systems are critical to monitor all infants and fetuses with birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection, regardless of known exposure or laboratory evidence of Zika virus infection during pregnancy. CDC analyzed data from 15 U.S. jurisdictions conducting population-based surveillance for birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection.* Jurisdictions were stratified into the following three groups: those with 1) documented local transmission of Zika virus during 2016; 2) one or more cases of confirmed, symptomatic, travel-associated Zika virus disease reported to CDC per 100,000 residents; and 3) less than one case of confirmed, symptomatic, travel-associated Zika virus disease reported to CDC per 100,000 residents. A total of 2,962 infants and fetuses (3.0 per 1,000 live births; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9-3.2) (2) met the case definition.† In areas with local transmission there was a non-statistically significant increase in total birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection from 2.8 cases per 1,000 live births in the first half of 2016 to 3.0 cases in the second half (p = 0.10). However, when neural tube defects and other early brain malformations (NTDs)§ were excluded, the prevalence of birth defects strongly linked to congenital Zika virus infection increased significantly, from 2.0 cases per 1,000 live births in the first half of 2016 to 2.4 cases in the second half, an increase of 29 more cases than expected (p = 0.009). These findings underscore the importance of surveillance for birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection and the need for continued monitoring in areas at risk for Zika.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Anomalías Congénitas/virología , Vigilancia de la Población , Infección por el Virus Zika/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Prevalencia , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(8): 219-222, 2017 Mar 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253231

RESUMEN

Zika virus infection during pregnancy can cause serious brain abnormalities, but the full range of adverse outcomes is unknown (1). To better understand the impact of birth defects resulting from Zika virus infection, the CDC surveillance case definition established in 2016 for birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection* (2) was retrospectively applied to population-based birth defects surveillance data collected during 2013-2014 in three areas before the introduction of Zika virus (the pre-Zika years) into the World Health Organization's Region of the Americas (Americas) (3). These data, from Massachusetts (2013), North Carolina (2013), and Atlanta, Georgia (2013-2014), included 747 infants and fetuses with one or more of the birth defects meeting the case definition (pre-Zika prevalence = 2.86 per 1,000 live births). Brain abnormalities or microcephaly were the most frequently recorded (1.50 per 1,000), followed by neural tube defects and other early brain malformations† (0.88), eye abnormalities without mention of a brain abnormality (0.31), and other consequences of central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction without mention of brain or eye abnormalities (0.17). During January 15-September 22, 2016, the U.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry (USZPR) reported 26 infants and fetuses with these same defects among 442 completed pregnancies (58.8 per 1,000) born to mothers with laboratory evidence of possible Zika virus infection during pregnancy (2). Although the ascertainment methods differed, this finding was approximately 20 times higher than the proportion of one or more of the same birth defects among pregnancies during the pre-Zika years. These data demonstrate the importance of population-based surveillance for interpreting data about birth defects potentially related to Zika virus infection.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Infección por el Virus Zika/congénito , Adulto , Anomalías Congénitas/virología , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Massachusetts/epidemiología , North Carolina/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(2): 23-6, 2016 Jan 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26796490

RESUMEN

Gastroschisis is a serious congenital defect in which the intestines protrude through an opening in the abdominal wall. Gastroschisis requires surgical repair soon after birth and is associated with an increased risk for medical complications and mortality during infancy. Reports from multiple surveillance systems worldwide have documented increasing prevalence of gastroschisis since the 1980s, particularly among younger mothers; however, since publication of a multistate U.S. report that included data through 2005, it is not known whether prevalence has continued to increase. Data on gastroschisis from 14 population-based state surveillance programs were pooled and analyzed to assess the average annual percent change (AAPC) in prevalence and to compare the prevalence during 2006-2012 with that during 1995-2005, stratified by maternal age and race/ethnicity. The pooled data included approximately 29% of U.S. births for the period 1995-2012. During 1995-2012, gastroschisis prevalence increased in every category of maternal age and race/ethnicity, and the AAPC ranged from 3.1% in non-Hispanic white (white) mothers aged <20 years to 7.9% in non-Hispanic black (black) mothers aged <20 years. These corresponded to overall percentage increases during 1995-2012 that ranged from 68% in white mothers aged <20 years to 263% in black mothers aged <20 years. Gastroschisis prevalence increased 30% between the two periods, from 3.6 per 10,000 births during 1995-2005 to 4.9 per 10,000 births during 2006-2012 (prevalence ratio = 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-1.4), with the largest increase among black mothers aged <20 years (prevalence ratio = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.6-2.5). Public health research is urgently needed to identify factors contributing to this increase.


Asunto(s)
Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Edad , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
8.
Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol ; 106(11): 972-982, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27891783

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Congenital microcephaly has been linked to maternal Zika virus infection. However, ascertaining infants diagnosed with microcephaly can be challenging. METHODS: Thirty birth defects surveillance programs provided data on infants diagnosed with microcephaly born 2009 to 2013. The pooled prevalence of microcephaly per 10,000 live births was estimated overall and by maternal/infant characteristics. Variation in prevalence was examined across case finding methods. Nine programs provided data on head circumference and conditions potentially contributing to microcephaly. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of microcephaly was 8.7 per 10,000 live births. Median prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was similar among programs using active (6.7) and passive (6.6) methods; the interdecile range of prevalence estimates was wider among programs using passive methods for all race/ethnicity categories except Hispanic. Prevalence (per 10,000 live births) was lowest among non-Hispanic Whites (6.5) and highest among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics (11.2 and 11.9, respectively); estimates followed a U-shaped distribution by maternal age with the highest prevalence among mothers <20 years (11.5) and ≥40 years (13.2). For gestational age and birth weight, the highest prevalence was among infants <32 weeks gestation and infants <1500 gm. Case definitions varied; 41.8% of cases had an HC ≥ the 10th percentile for sex and gestational age. CONCLUSION: Differences in methods, population distribution of maternal/infant characteristics, and case definitions for microcephaly can contribute to the wide range of observed prevalence estimates across individual birth defects surveillance programs. Addressing these factors in the setting of Zika virus infection can improve the quality of prevalence estimates. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:972-982, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Microcefalia/epidemiología , Infección por el Virus Zika/epidemiología , Virus Zika , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(1): 1-5, 2015 Jan 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25590678

RESUMEN

In 1992, the U.S. Public Health Service recommended that all women capable of becoming pregnant consume 400 µg of folic acid daily to prevent neural tube defects (NTDs). NTDs are major birth defects of the brain and spine that occur early in pregnancy as a result of improper closure of the embryonic neural tube, which can lead to death or varying degrees of disability. The two most common NTDs are anencephaly and spina bifida. Beginning in 1998, the United States mandated fortification of enriched cereal grain products with 140 µg of folic acid per 100 g. Immediately after mandatory fortification, the birth prevalence of NTD cases declined. Fortification was estimated to avert approximately 1,000 NTD-affected pregnancies annually. To provide updated estimates of the birth prevalence of NTDs in the period after introduction of mandatory folic acid fortification (i.e., the post-fortification period), data from 19 population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States, covering the years 1999-2011, were examined. After the initial decrease, NTD birth prevalence during the post-fortification period has remained relatively stable. The number of births occurring annually without NTDs that would otherwise have been affected is approximately 1,326 (95% confidence interval = 1,122-1,531). Mandatory folic acid fortification remains an effective public health intervention. There remain opportunities for prevention among women with lower folic acid intakes, especially among Hispanic women, to further reduce the prevalence of NTDs in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Anencefalia/prevención & control , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Alimentos Fortificados , Política de Salud , Vigilancia de la Población , Disrafia Espinal/prevención & control , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Anencefalia/epidemiología , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Disrafia Espinal/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
BMC Public Health ; 15: 925, 2015 Sep 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26386816

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Population-based birth defects surveillance is a core public health activity in the United States (U.S.); however, the lack of national data quality standards has limited the use of birth defects surveillance data across state programs. Development of national standards will facilitate data aggregation and utilization across birth defects surveillance programs in the U.S. METHODS: Based on national standards for other U.S. public health surveillance programs, existing National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) guidelines for conducting birth defects surveillance, and information from birth defects surveillance programs regarding their current data quality practices, we developed 11 data quality measures that focused on data completeness (n = 5 measures), timeliness (n = 2), and accuracy (n = 4). For each measure, we established tri-level performance criteria (1 = rudimentary, 2 = essential, 3 = optimal). In January 2014, we sent birth defects surveillance programs in each state, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the U.S. Department of Defense Birth and Infant Health Registry an invitation to complete a self-administered NBDPN Standards Data Quality Assessment Tool. The completed forms were electronically submitted to the CDC for analyses. RESULTS: Of 47 eligible population-based surveillance programs, 45 submitted a completed assessment tool. Two of the 45 programs did not meet minimum inclusion criteria and were excluded; thus, the final analysis included information from 43 programs. Average scores for four of the five completeness performance measures were above level 2. Conversely, the average scores for both timeliness measures and three of the four accuracy measures were below level 2. Surveillance programs using an active case-finding approach scored higher than programs using passive case-finding approaches for the completeness and accuracy measures, whereas their average scores were lower for timeliness measures. CONCLUSIONS: This initial, nation-wide assessment of data quality across U.S. population-based birth defects surveillance programs highlights areas for improvement. Using this information to identify strengths and weaknesses, the birth defects surveillance community, working through the NBDPN, can enhance and implement a consistent set of standards that can promote uniformity and enable surveillance programs to work towards improving the potential of these programs.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Exactitud de los Datos , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Sistema de Registros/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Recolección de Datos , Humanos , Lactante , Características de la Residencia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Birth Defects Res ; 116(1): e2301, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We provide updated crude and adjusted prevalence estimates of major birth defects in the United States for the period 2016-2020. METHODS: Data were collected from 13 US population-based surveillance programs that used active or a combination of active and passive case ascertainment methods to collect all birth outcomes. These data were used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates and national prevalence estimates adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity for all conditions, and maternal age for trisomies and gastroschisis. Prevalence was compared to previously published national estimates from 1999 to 2014. RESULTS: Adjusted national prevalence estimates per 10,000 live births ranged from 0.63 for common truncus to 18.65 for clubfoot. Temporal changes were observed for several birth defects, including increases in the prevalence of atrioventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, omphalocele, trisomy 18, and trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) and decreases in the prevalence of anencephaly, common truncus, transposition of the great arteries, and cleft lip with and without cleft palate. CONCLUSION: This study provides updated national estimates of selected major birth defects in the United States. These data can be used for continued temporal monitoring of birth defects prevalence. Increases and decreases in prevalence since 1999 observed in this study warrant further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Gastrosquisis , Cardiopatías Congénitas , Transposición de los Grandes Vasos , Humanos , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Edad Materna , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino
13.
Birth Defects Res ; 114(2): 57-61, 2022 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34951159

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have a higher prevalence of additional congenital anomalies, especially cardiovascular defects, compared to the general population. Several reports have indicated that the prevalence of DS among live births varies by race and ethnicity within the United States. We aim to examine variations in co-occurring congenital anomalies by maternal race/ethnicity among infants and fetuses diagnosed with DS born during 2013-2017. METHODS: State birth defect surveillance systems (N = 12) submitted data on infants and fetuses diagnosed with DS born during 2013-2017. We calculated the prevalence of co-occurring major and minor congenital anomalies, by organ system, and four selected cardiovascular birth defects, all stratified by maternal race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 5,836 cases of DS, 79.7% had one or more co-occurring congenital anomalies. There was a higher percentage of co-occurring congenital anomalies among infants and fetuses born to Hispanic mothers. The lowest percentage of co-occurring congenital anomalies, including three out of the four individual cardiovascular conditions examined, was among infants/fetuses born to non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native mothers. CONCLUSIONS: We describe differences in DS co-occurrence with additional congenital anomalies among maternal racial/ethnic groups. These data may help focus future research on differences among racial/ethnic groups in the diagnosis and reporting of co-occurring congenital anomalies in infants/fetuses diagnosed with DS.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Etnicidad , Síndrome de Down/complicaciones , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Femenino , Feto , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Lactante , Grupos Raciales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Birth Defects Res ; 114(2): 45-56, 2022 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35048540

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Critical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) are one of the most common types of birth defects and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality along with surgical or catheter interventions within the first year of life. This report updates previously published estimates of CCHD prevalence with the latest population-based surveillance data from 19 birth defect surveillance programs. METHODS: The U.S. population-based surveillance programs submitted data on identified cases of 12 CCHDs and co-occurring cardiovascular and chromosomal birth defects from 2014 to 2018. We estimated prevalence by program type and maternal and infant characteristics. Among nine programs with active case ascertainment that collect more than live births, we estimated the percentage of co-occurring cardiovascular and chromosomal birth defects for the 12 CCHDs. RESULTS: We identified 18,587 cases of CCHD among all participating programs. Overall CCHD prevalence was 19.6 per 10,000 live births among all 19 programs and 20.2 per 10,000 live births among active programs. Among maternal racial/ethnic groups, infants/fetuses born to American Indian/Alaska Native mothers showed the highest overall prevalence for all CCHDs (28.3 per 10,000) along with eight of the 12 individual CCHDs. Among 7,726 infants/fetuses with CCHD from active case ascertainment programs, 15.8% had at least one co-occurring chromosomal birth defect. CONCLUSION: Our study provides prevalence estimates for CCHDs by maternal and infant characteristics along with co-occurrence with cardiovascular and chromosomal birth defects among infants/fetuses with CCHD using one of the largest and most recent cohorts since the implementation of widespread CCHD screening. These data can provide a basis for future research to better understand risk factors for these defects.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Femenino , Feto , Cardiopatías Congénitas/complicaciones , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Nacimiento Vivo , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo
15.
Birth Defects Res ; 113(2): 189-202, 2021 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33348463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal disorder at birth and is often accompanied by structural birth defects. Current data on major structural defects in this population are limited. METHODS: States and territorial population-based surveillance programs submitted data on identified cases of Down syndrome and identified structural birth defects during 2013-2017. We estimated prevalence by program type and maternal and infant characteristics. Among programs with active case ascertainment, we estimated the prevalence of birth defects by organ system and for specific defects by maternal age (<35, ≥35) and infant sex. RESULTS: We identified 13,376 cases of Down syndrome. Prevalence among all programs was 12.7 per 10,000 live births. Among these children, 75% had at least one reported co-occurring birth defect diagnosis code. Among 6,210 cases identified by active programs, 66% had a cardiovascular defect with septal defects being the most common: atrial (32.5%), ventricular (20.6%), and atrioventricular (17.4%). Defect prevalence differed by infant sex more frequently than by maternal age. For example, atrioventricular septal defects were more common in female children (20.1% vs. 15.1%) while limb deficiencies were more prevalent in male children (0.4% vs. 0.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides updated prevalence estimates for structural defects, including rare defects, among children with Down syndrome using one of the largest and most recent cohorts to date. These data may aid clinical care and surveillance.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Down , Niño , Síndrome de Down/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Masculino , Edad Materna , Vigilancia de la Población , Embarazo , Prevalencia
17.
Birth Defects Res ; 111(18): 1420-1435, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580536

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) annual data report, U.S. national prevalence estimates for major birth defects are developed based on birth cohort 2010-2014. METHODS: Data from 39 U.S. population-based birth defects surveillance programs (16 active case-finding, 10 passive case-finding with case confirmation, and 13 passive without case confirmation) were used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for major defects by case-finding approach. Fourteen active case-finding programs including at least live birth and stillbirth pregnancy outcomes monitoring approximately one million births annually were used to develop national prevalence estimates, adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity (for all conditions examined) and maternal age (trisomies and gastroschisis). These calculations used a similar methodology to the previous estimates to examine changes over time. RESULTS: The adjusted national birth prevalence estimates per 10,000 live births ranged from 0.62 for interrupted aortic arch to 16.87 for clubfoot, and 19.93 for the 12 critical congenital heart defects combined. While the birth prevalence of most birth defects studied remained relatively stable over 15 years, an increasing prevalence was observed for gastroschisis and Down syndrome. Additionally, the prevalence for atrioventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, omphalocele, and trisomy 18 increased in this period compared to the previous periods. Active case-finding programs generally had higher prevalence rates for most defects examined, most notably for anencephaly, anophthalmia/microphthalmia, trisomy 13, and trisomy 18. CONCLUSION: National estimates of birth defects prevalence provide data for monitoring trends and understanding the impact of these conditions. Increasing prevalence rates observed for selected conditions warrant further examination.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/etnología , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Adulto , Anomalías Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/epidemiología , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Femenino , Enfermedades Genéticas Congénitas/epidemiología , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/etnología , Adulto Joven
18.
Birth Defects Res ; 111(11): 630-639, 2019 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920179

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We investigated differences in prevalence of major birth defects by maternal nativity within racial/ethnic groups for 27 major birth defects. METHODS: Data from 11 population-based birth defects surveillance systems in the United States including almost 13 million live births (approximately a third of U.S. births) during 1999-2007 were pooled. We calculated prevalence estimates for each birth defect for five racial/ethnic groups. Using Poisson regression, crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were also calculated using births to US-born mothers as the referent group in each racial/ethnic group. RESULTS: Approximately 20% of case mothers and 26% of all mothers were foreign-born. Elevated aPRs for infants with foreign-born mothers were found for spina bifida and trisomy 13, 18, and 21, while lower prevalence patterns were found for pyloric stenosis, gastroschisis, and hypospadias. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that birth defects prevalence varies by nativity within race/ethnic groups, with elevated prevalence ratios for some specific conditions and lower prevalence for others. More detailed analyses focusing on a broader range of maternal behaviors and characteristics are required to fully understand the implications of our findings.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/etnología , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Madres , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/etnología
19.
Birth Defects Res ; 111(18): 1436-1447, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31642616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In this report, the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) examines and compares gastroschisis and omphalocele for a recent 5-year birth cohort using data from 30 population-based birth defect surveillance programs in the United States. METHODS: As a special call for data for the 2019 NBDPN Annual Report, state programs reported expanded data on gastroschisis and omphalocele for birth years 2012-2016. We estimated the overall prevalence (per 10,000 live births) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each defect as well as by maternal race/ethnicity, maternal age, infant sex, and case ascertainment methodology utilized by the program (active vs. passive). We also compared distribution of cases by maternal and infant factors and presence/absence of other birth defects. RESULTS: The overall prevalence estimates (per 10,000 live births) were 4.3 (95% CI: 4.1-4.4) for gastroschisis and 2.1 (95% CI: 2.0-2.2) for omphalocele. Gastroschisis was more frequent among young mothers (<25 years) and omphalocele more common among older mothers (>40 years). Mothers of infants with gastroschisis were more likely to be underweight/normal weight prior to pregnancy and mothers of infants with omphalocele more likely to be overweight/obese. Omphalocele was twice as likely as gastroschisis to co-occur with other birth defects. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights important differences between gastroschisis and omphalocele. These differences indicate the importance of distinguishing between these defects in epidemiologic assessments. The report also provides additional data on co-occurrence of gastroschisis and omphalocele with other birth defects. This information can provide a basis for future research to better understand these defects.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Congénitas/etnología , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Anomalías del Sistema Digestivo/epidemiología , Pared Abdominal/fisiopatología , Anomalías Múltiples/epidemiología , Adulto , Anomalías del Sistema Digestivo/etnología , Femenino , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Hernia Umbilical/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Edad Materna , Persona de Mediana Edad , Madres , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Grupos Raciales , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/etnología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA