Combination of exhaled breath condensate samples with lipoarabinomannan point of care assay for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis: protocol for a diagnostic accuracy study.

INTRODUCTION: The WHO estimates a gap of about 30% between the incident (10.6 million) and notified (7.5 million) cases of tuberculosis (TB). Combined with the growing recognition in prevalence surveys of the high proportion of cases identified who are asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, these data underscore how current symptom screening approaches and use of diagnostic tests with suboptimal performance on sputum miss large numbers of cases. Thus, the development of sputum-free biomarker-based tests for diagnosis is becoming necessary, which the WHO has already identified as a priority for new TB diagnostics.The objective of this study is to evaluate a combination of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples and mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan (LAM) as point-of-care (POC) assays to identify TB patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study is conducted at the TB Screening and Treatment Centre of International Center for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, on a cohort of adults and adolescents >11 years of age. A total of 614 individuals with presumptive pulmonary TB based on TB signs, symptoms and radiography are being recruited from 28 August 2023. Spot sputum is collected for standard reference testing (L-J culture, GeneXpert MTB/Rif, acid-fast Bacilli microscopy) to fine-tune categorisation of TB disease status for each participant, defined as (1) definite TB (at least one positive standard reference test); (2) probable TB (not microbiologically confirmed but under TB treatment); (3) possible TB (no TB treatment but signs, symptoms and radiography suggestive of TB); (4) other respiratory disease (microbiologically not confirmed and no radiography presenting abnormalities compatible with TB); and (5) unknown (no microbiological evidence with normal/no TB abnormalities with radiography). Urine and EBC specimens will be subjected to LAM POC testing and biobanked for further investigation. Statistical analyses will include an assessment of diagnostic accuracy by constructing receiver operating curves and calculating sensitivity and specificity, as well as post-test probabilities. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Research Review Committee as well as the Ethical Review Committee of icddr,b and recorded under a protocol reference number, PR-2301. Results will be submitted to open-access peer-reviewed journals, presented at academic meetings, and shared with national and international policymaking bodies.

SalivaDirect: an alternative to a conventional RNA extraction protocol for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in a clinical setting.

IMPORTANCE: Affordable and accessible tests for COVID-19 allow for timely disease treatment and pandemic management. SalivaDirect is a faster and easier method to implement than NPS sampling. Patients can self-collect saliva samples at home or in other non-clinical settings without the help of a healthcare professional. Sample processing in SalivaDirect is less complex and more adaptable than in conventional nucleic acid extraction methods. We found that SalivaDirect has good diagnostic performance and is ideal for large-scale testing in settings where supplies may be limited or trained healthcare professionals are unavailable.

Comparative Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance: Standard E TB Feron ELISA vs QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus for Latent Tuberculosis Infection Detection in Diverse Risk Groups in Bangladesh.

Background: Around one-quarter of the global population has latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). If left untreated, LTBI has 5-10% lifetime risk of developing into TB. Interferon-gamma release Assays (IGRAs) are more sensitive than the tuberculin skin test for LTBI detection. However, the high cost and complexity of IGRAs are barriers to adoption in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a more affordable IGRA, Standard E TB-Feron (TBE), among different risk groups in Bangladesh. Methods: 532 participants of all age groups were enrolled from the TB Screening and Treatment Centers and Dhaka Hospital of icddr,b between June and September 2023. The participants were categorized into four risk groups: healthy people, healthcare workers/ attendants of TB patients, patients with microbiologically confirmed TB, and people with a history of TB. The diagnostic performance of TBE was compared to QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) for all groups. GeneXpert, culture, and microscopy were used to confirm TB microbiologically. Results: TBE had an overall agreement of 85.9% (95% CI, 82.5% to 88.7%), positive percent agreement of 86.1% (95% CI, 80.6% to 90.5%), and negative percent agreement of 85.7% (95% CI, 81.3% -89.4%) with QFT-Plus. Among 81 culture-positive patients, TBE and QFT-Plus were positive for 60 (74.1%) and 62 (76.5%) respectively. Among healthy people, TBE and QFT results were positive for 49 (24.5%) and 59 (29.5%) respectively. Among health workers and contacts, TBE and QFT-Plus were positive for 79 (39.5%) and 73 (35.5%) respectively. Conclusion: We found a substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa of 0.71) between TBE and QFT-Plus in detecting LTBI across different groups, suggesting its potential as a cost-effective diagnostic tool. Implementation of TBE in routine clinical practice could increase accessibility to LTBI diagnosis, facilitating the timely initiation of preventative therapy, and leading to a reduction of active TB incidence.